Overview 9 matches · 6 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9matches
6in Waratek scope66.7%
1protected11.1%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
2public PoC22.2%
1EPSS ≥ 0.511.1%
Protected by Waratek
1
11.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
5
55.6%
Outside Waratek scope
2
22.2%
Not applicable
1
11.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
11.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
88.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
2
22.2%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
7
77.8%
split by
peak 2 / year
20041
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20051
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20060
20070
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20130
20140
20152
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20162
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
No public exploit2
20170
20181
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20190
20201
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20210
20220
20230
20240
20250
20261
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-35568 | High | 2026-04-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | MCP Java SDK is the official Java SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clients. Prior to 1.0.0, the java-sdk contains a DNS rebinding vulnerability. This vulnerability allows an attacker to access a locally or network-private java-sdk MCP server via a victims browser that is either local, or network adjacent. This allows an attacker to make any tool call to the server as if they were a locally running MCP connected AI agent. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.0. |
| CVE-2020-9040 | High | 2020-06-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Couchbase Server Java SDK before 2.7.1.1 allows a potential attacker to forge an SSL certificate and pose as the intended peer. An attacker can leverage this flaw by crafting a cryptographically valid certificate that will be accepted by Java SDK's Netty component due to missing hostname verification. |
| CVE-2018-1417 | High | 2018-02-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Under certain circumstances, a flaw in the J9 JVM (IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 7.1 and 8.0) allows untrusted code running under a security manager to elevate its privileges. IBM X-Force ID: 138823. |
| CVE-2016-0376 | High | 2016-06-03 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The com.ibm.rmi.io.SunSerializableFactory class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) does not properly deserialize classes in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism and execute arbitrary code as demonstrated by the readValue method of the com.ibm.rmi.io.ValueHandlerPool.ValueHandlerSingleton class, which implements the javax.rmi.CORBA.ValueHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-5456. |
| CVE-2016-0363 | High | 2016-06-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) uses the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to a Proxy object instance implementing the java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-3009. |
| CVE-2014-8892 | High | 2015-03-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 5.0 before SR16-FP9, 6 before SR16-FP3, 6R1 before SR8-FP3, 7 before SR8-FP10, and 7R1 before SR2-FP10 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access permissions and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors related to the security manager. |
| CVE-2014-8891 | High | 2015-03-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 5.0 before SR16-FP9, 6 before SR16-FP3, 6R1 before SR8-FP3, 7 before SR8-FP10, and 7R1 before SR2-FP10 allows remote attackers to escape the Java sandbox and execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to the security manager. |
| CVE-2004-1029 | High | 2005-03-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The Sun Java Plugin capability in Java 2 Runtime Environment (JRE) 1.4.2_01, 1.4.2_04, and possibly earlier versions, does not properly restrict access between Javascript and Java applets during data transfer, which allows remote attackers to load unsafe classes and execute arbitrary code by using the reflection API to access private Java packages. |
| CVE-2004-0204 | High | 2004-08-06 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Directory traversal vulnerability in the web viewers for Business Objects Crystal Reports 9 and 10, and Crystal Enterprise 9 or 10, as used in Visual Studio .NET 2003 and Outlook 2003 with Business Contact Manager, Microsoft Business Solutions CRM 1.2, and other products, allows remote attackers to read and delete arbitrary files via ".." sequences in the dynamicimag argument to crystalimagehandler.aspx. |