WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (3)
Columns
Published from 2024-12-01✕Published to 2024-12-31✕Product java✕
Overview 2 matches · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
2matches 1protected50.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 1 50.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 1 50.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 1 50.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 1 50.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 1 50.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 1 50.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 1 50.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 1 50.0%
split by peak 2 / month
No exploit published: 1Protected by Waratek: 1 Low: 1High: 1 not blocked: 1blocked by ARMR today: 1 No public exploit: 1Proof of concept only: 1
Dec 242 Protected by Waratek1 No exploit published1 High1 Low1 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit1
Dec 24
2 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2024-12744 High 2024-12-24 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A SQL injection in the Amazon Redshift JDBC Driver in v2.1.0.31 allows a user to gain escalated privileges via the getSchemas, getTables, or getColumns Metadata APIs. Users should upgrade to the driver version 2.1.0.32 or revert to driver version 2.1.0.30.
CVE-2024-54140 Low 2024-12-05 No exploit published Proof of concept only sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. sigstore-java has insufficient verification for a situation where a bundle provides a invalid signature for a checkpoint. This bug impacts clients using any variation of KeylessVerifier.verify(). Currently checkpoints are only used to ensure the root hash of an inclusion proof was provided by the log in question. Failing to validate that means a bundle may provide an inclusion proof that doesn't actually correspond to the log in question. This may eventually lead a monitor/witness being unable to detect when a compromised logs are providing different views of themselves to different clients. There are other mechanisms right now that mitigate this, such as the signed entry timestamp. Sigstore-java currently requires a valid signed entry timestamp. By correctly verifying the signed entry timestamp we can make certain assertions about the log signing the log entry (like the log was aware of the artifact signing event and signed it). Therefore the impact on clients that are not monitors/witnesses is very low. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.0.