WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Vendor netapp✕Product host agent✕
Overview 2 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
2matches 0in Waratek scope0.0% 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 1public PoC50.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 2 100.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 2 100.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 2 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 1 50.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 1 50.0%
split by peak 1 / month
Outside Waratek scope: 2 High: 2 not blocked: 2 No public exploit: 1Proof of concept only: 1
Sep 161 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Oct 160 Nov 160 Dec 160 Jan 170 Feb 170 Mar 170 Apr 170 May 170 Jun 170 Jul 170 Aug 170 Sep 170 Oct 170 Nov 171 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1
Sep 16Nov 16Jan 17Mar 17May 17Jul 17Sep 17Nov 17
2 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2016-8610 High 2017-11-13 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.
CVE-2015-8960 High 2016-09-21 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue.