WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Product groovy✕
Overview 3 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
3matches 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 3 100.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 3 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 3 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 3 100.0%
split by peak 2 / year
No exploit published: 3 Medium: 3 not blocked: 3 No public exploit: 3
20191 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20200 20210 20220 20230 20240 20250 20262 No exploit published2 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2
20192020202120222023202420252026
3 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2026-57284 Medium 2026-06-24 No exploit published No public exploit Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 4331.v9d06ed4658ff and earlier does not restrict the types that can be instantiated through the Pipeline Snippet Generator, allowing attackers to instantiate types related to job or system configuration other than Pipeline steps.
CVE-2026-57283 Medium 2026-06-24 No exploit published No public exploit A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 4331.v9d06ed4658ff and earlier allows attackers to instantiate types related to job or system configuration other than Pipeline steps through the Pipeline Snippet Generator.
CVE-2019-10753 Medium 2019-09-05 No exploit published No public exploit In all versions prior to version 3.9.6 for eclipse-wtp, all versions prior to version 9.4.4 for eclipse-cdt, and all versions prior to version 3.0.1 for eclipse-groovy, Spotless was resolving dependencies over an insecure channel (http). If the build occurred over an insecure connection, a malicious user could have perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack during the build and alter the build artifacts that were produced. In case that any of these artifacts were compromised, any developers using these could be altered. **Note:** In order to validate that this artifact was not compromised, the maintainer would need to confirm that none of the artifacts published to the registry were not altered with. Until this happens, we can not guarantee that this artifact was not compromised even though the probability that this happened is low.