Overview 51 matches · 28 in Waratek scope · 9 protected · 3 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 9 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
51matches
28in Waratek scope54.9%
9protected17.6%
3exploited5.9%
2CISA KEV3.9%
9public PoC17.6%
3EPSS ≥ 0.55.9%
Protected by Waratek
10
19.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
2.0%
No exploit published
17
33.3%
Outside Waratek scope
1
2.0%
Not applicable
22
43.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
9
17.6%
partly blocked
1
2.0%
not blocked
41
80.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 8 / year
19991
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20000
20010
20021
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20030
20040
20050
20060
20073
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20081
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20090
20100
20111
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20120
20130
20140
20150
20163
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20173
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
High3
partly blocked1
not blocked2
Exploited1
No public exploit2
20186
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable4
High6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit5
20193
Protected by Waratek2
Not applicable1
High3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
No public exploit3
20207
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope1
High7
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
No public exploit7
20213
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
High3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
Exploited1
No public exploit2
20223
No exploit published2
Not applicable1
High3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20233
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
High3
not blocked3
Exploited1
No public exploit2
20242
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20253
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
High3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
20268
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Not applicable5
High8
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked6
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit6
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-61372 | High | 2026-08-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Jena Fuseki. This issue affects Apache Jena Fuseki: through 6.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-45804 | High | 2026-07-15 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Diffusers is the a library for pretrained diffusion models. Prior to 0.38.0, Diffusers' DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained flow can bypass the trust_remote_code guard because download() validates model_index.json and custom pipeline code before later loading from a cached folder that can change, allowing a Hub repository with custom .py pipeline code to execute through the custom pipeline flow without passing custom_pipeline or trust_remote_code=True. This issue is fixed in version 0.38.0. |
| CVE-2026-50633 | High | 2026-06-12 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A JNDI Injection vulnerability has been discovered in Apache CXF's JCA integration module, which can allow for code execution, if an attacker is able to manipulate the JCA deployment descriptor (ra.xml) or runtime activation parameters. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-50632 | High | 2026-06-12 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A further incomplete fix for a previous advisory CVE-2026-44417 (Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE) for Apache CXF has been identified, which can allow code execution capabilities, if untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-41731 | High | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JsonKafkaHeaderMapper and the deprecated DefaultKafkaHeaderMapper matched type headers against trusted packages using a prefix check, meaning that trusting any package implicitly trusted all of its subpackages. Combined with Jackson's default bean deserialization, a producer could supply crafted header values that caused the consumer to deserialize arbitrary JDK types. Affected versions: Spring for Apache Kafka 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.3.0 through 3.3.15; 3.2.0 through 3.2.13; 2.9.0 through 2.9.13; 2.8.0 through 2.8.11. |
| CVE-2026-44827 | High | 2026-05-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Diffusers is the a library for pretrained diffusion models. Prior to 0.38.0, diffusers 0.37.0 allows remote code execution without the trust_remote_code=True safeguard when loading pipelines from Hugging Face Hub repositories. The _resolve_custom_pipeline_and_cls function in pipeline_loading_utils.py performs string interpolation on the custom_pipeline parameter using f"{custom_pipeline}.py". When custom_pipeline is not supplied by the user, it defaults to None, which Python interpolates as the literal string "None.py". If an attacker publishes a Hub repository containing a file named None.py with a class that subclasses DiffusionPipeline, the file is automatically downloaded and executed during a standard DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained() call with no additional keyword arguments. The trust_remote_code check in DiffusionPipeline.download() is bypassed because it evaluates custom_pipeline is not None as False (since the kwarg was never supplied), while the downstream code path that actually loads the module resolves the None value into a valid filename. An attacker can achieve silent arbitrary code execution by publishing a malicious model repository with a None.py file and a standard-looking model_index.json that references a legitimate pipeline class name, requiring only that a victim calls from_pretrained on the repository. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.38.0. |
| CVE-2026-44513 | High | 2026-05-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Diffusers is the a library for pretrained diffusion models. Prior to 0.38.0, a trust_remote_code bypass in DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained allows arbitrary remote code execution despite the user passing trust_remote_code=False (or omitting it, which is the default). The vulnerability has three variants, all sharing the same root cause — the trust_remote_code gate was implemented inside DiffusionPipeline.download() rather than at the actual dynamic-module load site, so any code path that bypassed or short-circuited download() also bypassed the security check. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('repoA', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the gate evaluated against repoA's file list rather than repoB's, so repoB's pipeline.py was loaded and executed. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the local-path branch never invoked download(), so the gate was never reached and remote code from repoB executed. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', trust_remote_code=False) where the snapshot contains custom component files (e.g. unet/my_unet_model.py) referenced from model_index.json — same root cause; the local path skipped download() and custom component code executed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.38.0. |
| CVE-2026-33150 | High | 2026-03-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | libfuse is the reference implementation of the Linux FUSE. From version 3.18.0 to before version 3.18.2, a use-after-free vulnerability in the io_uring subsystem of libfuse allows a local attacker to crash FUSE filesystem processes and potentially execute arbitrary code. When io_uring thread creation fails due to resource exhaustion (e.g., cgroup pids.max), fuse_uring_start() frees the ring pool structure but stores the dangling pointer in the session state, leading to a use-after-free when the session shuts down. The trigger is reliable in containerized environments where cgroup pids.max limits naturally constrain thread creation. This issue has been patched in version 3.18.2. |
| CVE-2025-59305 | High | 2025-09-24 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Improper authorization in the background migration endpoints of Langfuse 3.1 before d67b317 allows any authenticated user to invoke migration control functions. This can lead to data corruption or denial of service through unauthorized access to TRPC endpoints such as backgroundMigrations.all, backgroundMigrations.status, and backgroundMigrations.retry. |
| CVE-2025-9784 | High | 2025-09-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow where malformed client requests can trigger server-side stream resets without triggering abuse counters. This issue, referred to as the "MadeYouReset" attack, allows malicious clients to induce excessive server workload by repeatedly causing server-side stream aborts. While not a protocol bug, this highlights a common implementation weakness that can be exploited to cause a denial of service (DoS). |
| CVE-2025-49656 | High | 2025-07-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Users with administrator access can create databases files outside the files area of the Fuseki server. This issue affects Apache Jena version up to 5.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.5.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-7885 | High | 2024-08-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Undertow where the ProxyProtocolReadListener reuses the same StringBuilder instance across multiple requests. This issue occurs when the parseProxyProtocolV1 method processes multiple requests on the same HTTP connection. As a result, different requests may share the same StringBuilder instance, potentially leading to information leakage between requests or responses. In some cases, a value from a previous request or response may be erroneously reused, which could lead to unintended data exposure. This issue primarily results in errors and connection termination but creates a risk of data leakage in multi-request environments. |
| CVE-2024-1635 | High | 2024-02-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Undertow. This vulnerability impacts a server that supports the wildfly-http-client protocol. Whenever a malicious user opens and closes a connection with the HTTP port of the server and then closes the connection immediately, the server will end with both memory and open file limits exhausted at some point, depending on the amount of memory available. At HTTP upgrade to remoting, the WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit leaks connections if RemotingConnection is closed by Remoting ServerConnectionOpenListener. Because the remoting connection originates in Undertow as part of the HTTP upgrade, there is an external layer to the remoting connection. This connection is unaware of the outermost layer when closing the connection during the connection opening procedure. Hence, the Undertow WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit is not notified of the closed connection in this scenario. Because WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit creates a timeout task, the whole dependency tree leaks via that task, which is added to XNIO WorkerThread. So, the workerThread points to the Undertow conduit, which contains the connections and causes the leak. |
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2023-1108 | High | 2023-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in undertow. This issue makes achieving a denial of service possible due to an unexpected handshake status updated in SslConduit, where the loop never terminates. |
| CVE-2022-4492 | High | 2023-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol. |
| CVE-2022-40320 | High | 2022-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | cfg_tilde_expand in confuse.c in libConfuse 3.3 has a heap-based buffer over-read. |
| CVE-2021-3690 | High | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A buffer leak on the incoming WebSocket PONG message may lead to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability. |
| CVE-2022-2053 | High | 2022-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2. |
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2021-20218 | High | 2021-03-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the fabric8 kubernetes-client in version 4.2.0 and after. This flaw allows a malicious pod/container to cause applications using the fabric8 kubernetes-client `copy` command to extract files outside the working path. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to integrity and system availability. This has been fixed in kubernetes-client-4.13.2 kubernetes-client-5.0.2 kubernetes-client-4.11.2 kubernetes-client-4.7.2 |
| CVE-2020-27782 | High | 2021-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the Undertow AJP connector. Malicious requests and abrupt connection closes could be triggered by an attacker using query strings with non-RFC compliant characters resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. This affects Undertow 2.1.5.SP1, 2.0.33.SP2, and 2.2.3.SP1. |
| CVE-2020-25644 | High | 2020-10-06 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A memory leak flaw was found in WildFly OpenSSL in versions prior to 1.1.3.Final, where it removes an HTTP session. It may allow the attacker to cause OOM leading to a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. |
| CVE-2020-10714 | High | 2020-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in WildFly Elytron version 1.11.3.Final and before. When using WildFly Elytron FORM authentication with a session ID in the URL, an attacker could perform a session fixation attack. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. |
| CVE-2020-10718 | High | 2020-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Wildfly before wildfly-embedded-13.0.0.Final, where the embedded managed process API has an exposed setting of the Thread Context Classloader (TCCL). This setting is exposed as a public method, which can bypass the security manager. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. |
| CVE-2020-1714 | High | 2020-05-13 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak before version 11.0.0, where the code base contains usages of ObjectInputStream without type checks. This flaw allows an attacker to inject arbitrarily serialized Java Objects, which would then get deserialized in a privileged context and potentially lead to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2020-1718 | High | 2020-05-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the reset credential flow in all Keycloak versions before 8.0.0. This flaw allows an attacker to gain unauthorized access to the application. |
| CVE-2020-1757 | High | 2020-04-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in all undertow-2.x.x SP1 versions prior to undertow-2.0.30.SP1, all undertow-1.x.x and undertow-2.x.x versions prior to undertow-2.1.0.Final, where the Servlet container causes servletPath to normalize incorrectly by truncating the path after semicolon which may lead to an application mapping resulting in the security bypass. |
| CVE-2019-14888 | High | 2020-01-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in the Undertow HTTP server in versions before 2.0.28.SP1 when listening on HTTPS. An attacker can target the HTTPS port to carry out a Denial Of Service (DOS) to make the service unavailable on SSL. |
| CVE-2019-10174 | High | 2019-11-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Infinispan such that the invokeAccessibly method from the public class ReflectionUtil allows any application class to invoke private methods in any class with Infinispan's privileges. The attacker can use reflection to introduce new, malicious behavior into the application. |
| CVE-2019-10172 | High | 2019-11-18 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl:1.9.x libraries. XML external entity vulnerabilities similar CVE-2016-3720 also affects codehaus jackson-mapper-asl libraries but in different classes. |
| CVE-2019-0204 | High | 2019-03-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A specifically crafted Docker image running under the root user can overwrite the init helper binary of the container runtime and/or the command executor in Apache Mesos versions pre-1.4.x, 1.4.0 to 1.4.2, 1.5.0 to 1.5.2, 1.6.0 to 1.6.1, and 1.7.0 to 1.7.1. A malicious actor can therefore gain root-level code execution on the host. |
| CVE-2018-19760 | High | 2018-11-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | cfg_init in confuse.c in libConfuse 3.2.2 has a memory leak. |
| CVE-2016-8648 | High | 2018-08-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | It was found that the Karaf container used by Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6.x, and Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x, deserializes objects passed to MBeans via JMX operations. An attacker could use this flaw to execute remote code on the server as the user running the Java Virtual Machine if the target MBean contain deserialization gadgets in its classpath. |
| CVE-2018-10906 | High | 2018-07-24 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | In fuse before versions 2.9.8 and 3.x before 3.2.5, fusermount is vulnerable to a restriction bypass when SELinux is active. This allows non-root users to mount a FUSE file system with the 'allow_other' mount option regardless of whether 'user_allow_other' is set in the fuse configuration. An attacker may use this flaw to mount a FUSE file system, accessible by other users, and trick them into accessing files on that file system, possibly causing Denial of Service or other unspecified effects. |
| CVE-2018-14447 | High | 2018-07-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | trim_whitespace in lexer.l in libConfuse v3.2.1 has an out-of-bounds read. |
| CVE-2016-10576 | High | 2018-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Fuseki server wrapper and management API in fuseki before 1.0.1 downloads binary resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server. |
| CVE-2018-1258 | High | 2018-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework version 5.0.5 when used in combination with any versions of Spring Security contains an authorization bypass when using method security. An unauthorized malicious user can gain unauthorized access to methods that should be restricted. |
| CVE-2014-0120 | High | 2017-12-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin terminal in Hawt.io allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that run commands on the Karaf server, as demonstrated by running "shutdown -f." |
| CVE-2017-12617 | High | 2017-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. |
| CVE-2017-7957 | High | 2017-04-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream through 1.4.9, when a certain denyTypes workaround is not used, mishandles attempts to create an instance of the primitive type 'void' during unmarshalling, leading to a remote application crash, as demonstrated by an xstream.fromXML("<void/>") call. |
| CVE-2015-8837 | High | 2016-03-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based buffer overflow in the isofs_real_readdir function in isofs.c in FuseISO 20070708 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long pathname in an ISO file. |
| CVE-2015-8836 | High | 2016-03-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Integer overflow in the isofs_real_read_zf function in isofs.c in FuseISO 20070708 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a large ZF block size in an ISO file, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2016-1233 | High | 2016-01-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unspecified udev rule in the Debian fuse package in jessie before 2.9.3-15+deb8u2, in stretch before 2.9.5-1, and in sid before 2.9.5-1 sets world-writable permissions for the /dev/cuse character device, which allows local users to gain privileges via a character device in /dev, related to an ioctl. |
| CVE-2010-5033 | High | 2011-11-02 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SQL injection vulnerability in ProductList.cfm in Fusebox 5.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the CatDisplay parameter. |
| CVE-2008-2284 | High | 2008-05-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in fusebox5.php in Fusebox 5.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the FUSEBOX_APPLICATION_PATH parameter. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| CVE-2007-3705 | High | 2007-07-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in FuseTalk 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the FTVAR_SUBCAT (txForumID) parameter to forum/index.cfm and possibly other unspecified components, related to forum/include/error/forumerror.cfm. |
| CVE-2007-3301 | High | 2007-06-20 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SQL injection vulnerability in forum/include/error/autherror.cfm in FuseTalk allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the errorcode parameter. NOTE: a patch may have been released privately between April and June 2007. NOTE: this issue may overlap CVE-2007-3273. |
| CVE-2007-3273 | High | 2007-06-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in index.cfm in FuseTalk 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| CVE-2002-0504 | High | 2002-08-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Citrix NFuse 1.6 and earlier does not quote results from the getLastError method, which allows remote attackers to execute script in other clients via the NFuse_Application parameter to (1) launch.jsp or (2) launch.asp. |
| CVE-1999-0759 | High | 1999-09-13 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in FuseMAIL POP service via long USER and PASS commands. |