WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Product enterprise manager base platform✕
Overview 19 matches · 3 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 7 EPSS ≥ 0.5
19matches 3exploited15.8% 1CISA KEV5.3% 5public PoC26.3% 7EPSS ≥ 0.536.8%
Protected by Waratek 19 100.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0%
Critical 6 31.6% High 8 42.1% Medium 5 26.3% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 19 100.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 0 0.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 3 15.8% Working exploit published 1 5.3% Proof of concept only 1 5.3% Forecast only 2 10.5% No public exploit 12 63.2%
split by peak 4 / quarter
Protected by Waratek: 19 Medium: 5High: 8Critical: 6 blocked by ARMR today: 19 No public exploit: 12Forecast only: 2Proof of concept only: 1Working exploit published: 1Exploited: 3
Q2 171 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 170 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 180 Q3 184 Protected by Waratek4 Critical1 High3 blocked by ARMR today4 Exploited1 No public exploit3 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 192 Protected by Waratek2 High2 blocked by ARMR today2 No public exploit2 Q3 190 Q4 192 Protected by Waratek2 Medium2 blocked by ARMR today2 No public exploit2 Q1 201 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 No public exploit1 Q2 203 Protected by Waratek3 Critical3 blocked by ARMR today3 No public exploit3 Q3 200 Q4 200 Q1 210 Q2 210 Q3 210 Q4 212 Protected by Waratek2 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2 Q1 223 Protected by Waratek3 Critical1 High2 blocked by ARMR today3 Proof of concept only1 Forecast only2 Q2 221 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 No public exploit1
Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22
19 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2022-29577 Medium 2022-04-21 Protected by Waratek No public exploit OWASP AntiSamy before 1.6.7 allows XSS via HTML tag smuggling on STYLE content with crafted input. The output serializer does not properly encode the supposed Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) content. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-28367.
CVE-2022-23307 High 2022-01-18 Protected by Waratek Forecast only CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists.
CVE-2022-23305 Critical 2022-01-18 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2022-23302 High 2022-01-18 Protected by Waratek Forecast only JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-4104 High 2021-12-14 Protected by Waratek Exploited JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2020-11973 Critical 2020-05-14 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Apache Camel Netty enables Java deserialization by default. Apache Camel 2.22.x, 2.23.x, 2.24.x, 2.25.0, 3.0.0 up to 3.1.0 are affected. 2.x users should upgrade to 2.25.1, 3.x users should upgrade to 3.2.0.
CVE-2020-11972 Critical 2020-05-14 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Apache Camel RabbitMQ enables Java deserialization by default. Apache Camel 2.22.x, 2.23.x, 2.24.x, 2.25.0, 3.0.0 up to 3.1.0 are affected. 2.x users should upgrade to 2.25.1, 3.x users should upgrade to 3.2.0.
CVE-2020-10683 Critical 2020-05-01 Protected by Waratek No public exploit dom4j before 2.0.3 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allows external DTDs and External Entities by default, which might enable XXE attacks. However, there is popular external documentation from OWASP showing how to enable the safe, non-default behavior in any application that uses dom4j.
CVE-2020-5397 Medium 2020-01-17 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack.
CVE-2019-10219 Medium 2019-11-08 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.
CVE-2019-12415 Medium 2019-10-23 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In Apache POI up to 4.1.0, when using the tool XSSFExportToXml to convert user-provided Microsoft Excel documents, a specially crafted document can allow an attacker to read files from the local filesystem or from internal network resources via XML External Entity (XXE) Processing.
CVE-2019-0188 High 2019-05-28 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Apache Camel prior to 2.24.0 contains an XML external entity injection (XXE) vulnerability (CWE-611) due to using an outdated vulnerable JSON-lib library. This affects only the camel-xmljson component, which was removed.
CVE-2019-5427 High 2019-04-22 Protected by Waratek No public exploit c3p0 version < 0.9.5.4 may be exploited by a billion laughs attack when loading XML configuration due to missing protections against recursive entity expansion when loading configuration.
CVE-2018-11776 High 2018-08-22 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace.
CVE-2018-1656 High 2018-08-20 Protected by Waratek No public exploit The IBM Java Runtime Environment's Diagnostic Tooling Framework for Java (DTFJ) (IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6.0 , 7.0, and 8.0) does not protect against path traversal attacks when extracting compressed dump files. IBM X-Force ID: 144882.
CVE-2018-12539 High 2018-08-14 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.8, users other than the process owner may be able to use Java Attach API to connect to an Eclipse OpenJ9 or IBM JVM on the same machine and use Attach API operations, which includes the ability to execute untrusted native code. Attach API is enabled by default on Windows, Linux and AIX JVMs and can be disabled using the command line option -Dcom.ibm.tools.attach.enable=no.
CVE-2018-1000613 Critical 2018-07-09 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including 1.60 contains a CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in XMSS/XMSS^MT private key deserialization that can result in Deserializing an XMSS/XMSS^MT private key can result in the execution of unexpected code. This attack appear to be exploitable via A handcrafted private key can include references to unexpected classes which will be picked up from the class path for the executing application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.60 and later.
CVE-2017-5645 Critical 2017-04-17 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.