Overview 8 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
8matches
1in Waratek scope12.5%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
12.5%
Outside Waratek scope
7
87.5%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
8
100.0%
split by
peak 6 / quarter
Q1 14Q2 14Q3 14Q4 14Q1 15Q2 15Q3 15Q4 15Q1 16Q2 16
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-0363 | High | 2016-06-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) uses the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to a Proxy object instance implementing the java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-3009. |
| CVE-2016-0264 | Medium | 2016-05-24 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2014-0418 | Medium | 2014-01-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u65 and 7u45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Deployment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5889, CVE-2013-5902, CVE-2014-0410, CVE-2014-0415, and CVE-2014-0424. |
| CVE-2014-0382 | Medium | 2014-01-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u45 and JavaFX 2.2.45 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to JavaFX. |
| CVE-2013-5906 | Medium | 2014-01-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u55, 6u65, and 7u45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Install, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5905. |
| CVE-2013-5904 | Medium | 2014-01-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Deployment. |
| CVE-2013-5895 | Medium | 2014-01-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u45 and JavaFX 2.2.45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to JavaFX. |
| CVE-2013-5870 | Medium | 2014-01-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u45 and JavaFX 2.2.45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to JavaFX. |