Overview 10 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
10matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
1exploited10.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
3public PoC30.0%
1EPSS ≥ 0.510.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
10.0%
Not applicable
9
90.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
10
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
10.0%
Working exploit published
2
20.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
7
70.0%
split by
peak 2 / year
20051
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20061
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20070
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20132
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20140
20150
20161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20172
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20181
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20190
20201
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20210
20220
20231
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
2005200720092011201320152017201920212023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-48795 | Medium | 2023-12-18 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. |
| CVE-2019-12953 | Medium | 2020-12-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dropbear 2011.54 through 2018.76 has an inconsistent failure delay that may lead to revealing valid usernames, a different issue than CVE-2018-15599. |
| CVE-2018-15599 | Medium | 2018-08-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The recv_msg_userauth_request function in svr-auth.c in Dropbear through 2018.76 is prone to a user enumeration vulnerability because username validity affects how fields in SSH_MSG_USERAUTH messages are handled, a similar issue to CVE-2018-15473 in an unrelated codebase. |
| CVE-2017-9079 | Medium | 2017-05-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dropbear before 2017.75 might allow local users to read certain files as root, if the file has the authorized_keys file format with a command= option. This occurs because ~/.ssh/authorized_keys is read with root privileges and symlinks are followed. |
| CVE-2016-7409 | Medium | 2017-03-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The dbclient and server in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74, when compiled with DEBUG_TRACE, allows local users to read process memory via the -v argument, related to a failed remote ident. |
| CVE-2016-3116 | Medium | 2016-03-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | CRLF injection vulnerability in Dropbear SSH before 2016.72 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended shell-command restrictions via crafted X11 forwarding data. |
| CVE-2013-4434 | Medium | 2013-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dropbear SSH Server before 2013.59 generates error messages for a failed logon attempt with different time delays depending on whether the user account exists, which allows remote attackers to discover valid usernames. |
| CVE-2013-4421 | Medium | 2013-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The buf_decompress function in packet.c in Dropbear SSH Server before 2013.59 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a compressed packet that has a large size when it is decompressed. |
| CVE-2006-1206 | Medium | 2006-03-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Matt Johnston Dropbear SSH server 0.47 and earlier, as used in embedded Linux devices and on general-purpose operating systems, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection slot exhaustion) via a large number of connection attempts that exceeds the MAX_UNAUTH_CLIENTS defined value of 30. |
| CVE-2005-4178 | Medium | 2005-12-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in Dropbear server before 0.47 allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified inputs that cause insufficient memory to be allocated due to an incorrect expression that does not enforce the proper order of operations. |