Overview 266 matches · 43 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 3 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 9 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
266matches
43in Waratek scope16.2%
3protected1.1%
3exploited1.1%
0CISA KEV0.0%
9public PoC3.4%
3EPSS ≥ 0.51.1%
Protected by Waratek
3
1.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
40
15.0%
Outside Waratek scope
28
10.5%
Not applicable
195
73.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
1.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
263
98.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 51 / year
20051
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20060
20071
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20082
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20092
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20100
20114
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20123
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20136
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20145
Not applicable5
Medium5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20154
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20167
No exploit published1
Not applicable6
Medium7
not blocked7
No public exploit7
201710
No exploit published1
Not applicable9
Medium10
not blocked10
No public exploit10
201816
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable12
Medium16
not blocked16
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit14
201926
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable12
Medium26
not blocked26
Exploited3
No public exploit23
202027
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable18
Medium27
not blocked27
No public exploit27
202134
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope12
Not applicable19
Medium34
not blocked34
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit33
202251
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published14
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable32
Medium51
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked48
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit50
202318
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable16
Medium18
not blocked18
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit14
202421
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable17
Medium21
not blocked21
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit20
202518
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable17
Medium18
not blocked18
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit15
202610
No exploit published1
Not applicable9
Medium10
not blocked10
No public exploit10
20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-10569 | Medium | 2026-07-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UCD - IBM UrbanCode Deploy 7.2 through 7.2.3.23, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.18 and IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.13, 8.1 through 8.1.2.6, and 8.2 through 8.2.1.0 is susceptible to an Exposure of Sensitive Information Vulnerability in plugin output logs. This exposure could allow an attacker with access to the logs to potentially obtain senstive values related to that step. |
| CVE-2026-56460 | Medium | 2026-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch could disclose sensitive configurations and secrets to authenticated users in API responses that could be used in further attacks against the system. |
| CVE-2026-56459 | Medium | 2026-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch is susceptible to sensitive information disclosure. The application stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. |
| CVE-2026-12086 | Medium | 2026-06-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UCD - IBM UrbanCode Deploy 7.2 through 7.2.3.23, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.18 and IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.13, 8.1 through 8.1.2.6, and 8.2 through 8.2.1.0 IBM DevOps Deploy stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. |
| CVE-2026-12085 | Medium | 2026-06-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UCD - IBM UrbanCode Deploy 7.3 through 7.3.2.18 and IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.13, 8.1 through 8.1.2.6, and 8.2 through 8.2.1.0 IBM DevOps Deploy could disclose sensitive configurations and secrets to authenticated users in API responses that could be used in further attacks against the system. |
| CVE-2026-56457 | Medium | 2026-06-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch is susceptible to an exposure of sensitive information vulnerability in output logs. This exposure could allow an attacker with access to the logs to potentially obtain sensitive values related to that step. |
| CVE-2026-22726 | Medium | 2026-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Route Services can be leveraged to send app traffic to network destinations outside of an app's configured egress rules. As a result, a malicious developer with access to Cloudfoundry could configure a route-service that would allow it to send requests to HTTP services on internal networks reachable by the Gorouter, which may not have previously had direct access from outside networks, or from the application. Routing release: affected from v0.118.0 through v0.371.0 (inclusive); upgrade to v0.372.0 or greater. CF Deployment: affected from v0.0.2 through v54.14.0 (inclusive); upgrade to v55.0.0 or greater (includes routing_release v0.372.0). |
| CVE-2026-22723 | Medium | 2026-03-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Inappropriate user token revocation due to a logic error in the token revocation endpoint implementation in Cloudfoundry UAA v77.30.0 to v78.7.0 and in Cloudfoundry Deployment v48.7.0 to v54.10.0. |
| CVE-2025-15327 | Medium | 2026-02-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Deploy. |
| CVE-2025-62327 | Medium | 2026-01-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In HCL DevOps Deploy 8.1.2.0 through 8.1.2.3, a user with LLM configuration privileges may be able to recover a credential previously saved for performing authenticated LLM Queries. |
| CVE-2025-59849 | Medium | 2025-12-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper management of Content Security Policy in HCL BigFix Remote Control Lite Web Portal (versions 10.1.0.0326 and lower) may allow the execution of malicious code in web pages. |
| CVE-2025-55254 | Medium | 2025-12-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper management of Path-relative stylesheet import in HCL BigFix Remote Control Lite Web Portal (versions 10.1.0.0326 and lower) may allow to execute malicious code in certain web pages. |
| CVE-2025-62330 | Medium | 2025-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy is susceptible to a cleartext transmission of sensitive information because the HTTP port remains accessible and does not redirect to HTTPS as intended. As a result, an attacker with network access could intercept or modify user credentials and session-related data via passive monitoring or man-in-the-middle attacks. |
| CVE-2025-62329 | Medium | 2025-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch is susceptible to a race condition in http-session client-IP binding enforcement which may allow a session to be briefly reused from a new IP address before it is invalidated. This could lead to unauthorized access under certain network conditions. |
| CVE-2025-36360 | Medium | 2025-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UCD - IBM UrbanCode Deploy 7.1 through 7.1.2.27, 7.2 through 7.2.3.20, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.15 and IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.10, and 8.1 through 8.1.2.3 is susceptible to a race condition in http-session client-IP binding enforcement which may allow a session to be briefly reused from a new IP address before it is invalidated, potentially enabling unauthorized access under certain network conditions. |
| CVE-2025-14148 | Medium | 2025-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.1 through 8.1.2.3 could allow an authenticated user with LLM integration configuration privileges to recover a previously saved LLM API Token. |
| CVE-2025-13489 | Medium | 2025-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.1 through 8.1.2.3 IBM DevOps Deploy transmits data in clear text that could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. |
| CVE-2025-36162 | Medium | 2025-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DevOps Deploy / IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 8.1 before 8.1.2.2 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information about configuration on the system. |
| CVE-2025-3163 | Medium | 2025-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in InternLM LMDeploy up to 0.7.1. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Open of the file lmdeploy/docs/en/conf.py. The manipulation leads to code injection. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-3162 | Medium | 2025-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in InternLM LMDeploy up to 0.7.1. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function load_weight_ckpt of the file lmdeploy/lmdeploy/vl/model/utils.py of the component PT File Handler. The manipulation leads to deserialization. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-1998 | Medium | 2025-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) through 7.1.2.21, 7.2 through 7.2.3.14, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.0 / IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.4 and 8.1 through 8.1 stores potentially sensitive authentication token information in log files that could be read by a local user. |
| CVE-2025-1997 | Medium | 2025-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.25, 7.1 through 7.1.2.21, 7.2 through 7.2.3.14, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.0 / IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.4 and 8.1 through 8.1 is vulnerable to HTML injection. This vulnerability may allow a user to embed arbitrary HTML tags in the Web UI potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure. |
| CVE-2025-0273 | Medium | 2025-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch stores potentially sensitive authentication token information in log files that could be read by a local user. |
| CVE-2024-56469 | Medium | 2025-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.1 through 7.1.2.22, 7.2 through 7.2.3.15, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.10 / IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.5 and 8.1 through 8.1.0.1 could allow unauthorized access to other services or potential exposure of sensitive data due to missing authentication in its Agent Relay service. |
| CVE-2025-0256 | Medium | 2025-03-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information about other users on the system due to missing authorization for a function. |
| CVE-2025-1178 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function bfd_putl64 of the file libbfd.c of the component ld. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. The attack can be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 75086e9de1707281172cc77f178e7949a4414ed0. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. |
| CVE-2024-54176 | Medium | 2025-02-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.4, 8.1 through 8.1.0.0 and IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.25, 7.1 through 7.1.2.21, 7.2 through 7.2.3.14 and 7.3 through 7.3.2 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information about other users on the system due to missing authorization for a function. |
| CVE-2024-45091 | Medium | 2025-01-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.24, 7.1 through 7.1.2.10, and 7.2 through 7.2.3.13 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user with access to HTTP request logs. |
| CVE-2024-42195 | Medium | 2024-12-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch is vulnerable to HTML injection. This vulnerability may allow a user to embed arbitrary HTML tags in the Web UI potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure. |
| CVE-2023-20060 | Medium | 2024-11-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. Cisco plans to release software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-8096 | Medium | 2024-09-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When curl is told to use the Certificate Status Request TLS extension, often referred to as OCSP stapling, to verify that the server certificate is valid, it might fail to detect some OCSP problems and instead wrongly consider the response as fine. If the returned status reports another error than 'revoked' (like for example 'unauthorized') it is not treated as a bad certficate. |
| CVE-2024-34018 | Medium | 2024-08-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information disclosure due to insecure folder permissions. The following products are affected: Acronis Snap Deploy (Windows) before build 4569. |
| CVE-2024-4603 | Medium | 2024-05-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform various checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time if the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using public keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature verification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit the modulus size when performing the checks. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. These functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so only applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable. Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications when using the `-check` option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. |
| CVE-2024-28781 | Medium | 2024-05-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.20, 7.1 through 7.1.2.16, 7.2 through 7.2.3.9, 7.3 through 7.3.2.4, and 8.0 through 8.0.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 285654. |
| CVE-2023-6237 | Medium | 2024-04-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. |
| CVE-2023-5675 | Medium | 2024-04-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Quarkus. When a Quarkus RestEasy Classic or Reactive JAX-RS endpoint has its methods declared in the abstract Java class or customized by Quarkus extensions using the annotation processor, the authorization of these methods will not be enforced if it is enabled by either 'quarkus.security.jaxrs.deny-unannotated-endpoints' or 'quarkus.security.jaxrs.default-roles-allowed' properties. |
| CVE-2024-23561 | Medium | 2024-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch is vulnerable to sensitive information disclosure vulnerability due to insufficient obfuscation of sensitive values. |
| CVE-2024-23560 | Medium | 2024-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch could be vulnerable to incomplete revocation of permissions when deleting a custom security resource type. |
| CVE-2024-23559 | Medium | 2024-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / Launch is generating an obsolete HTTP header. |
| CVE-2024-23558 | Medium | 2024-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. |
| CVE-2024-22359 | Medium | 2024-04-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.20, 7.1 through 7.1.2.16, 7.2 through 7.2.3.9, 7.3 through 7.3.2.4 and IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.0.1 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 280897. |
| CVE-2024-22339 | Medium | 2024-04-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.20, 7.1 through 7.1.2.16, 7.2 through 7.2.3.9, 7.3 through 7.3.2.4 and IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.0.1 is vulnerable to a sensitive information due to insufficient obfuscation of sensitive values from some log files. IBM X-Force ID: 279979. |
| CVE-2024-22334 | Medium | 2024-04-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.20, 7.1 through 7.1.2.16, 7.2 through 7.2.3.9, 7.3 through 7.3.2.4 and IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.0.1 could be vulnerable to incomplete revocation of permissions when deleting a custom security resource type. When deleting a custom security type, associated permissions of objects using that type may not be fully revoked. This could lead to incorrect reporting of permission configuration and unexpected privileges being retained. IBM X-Force ID: 279974. |
| CVE-2024-2379 | Medium | 2024-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | libcurl skips the certificate verification for a QUIC connection under certain conditions, when built to use wolfSSL. If told to use an unknown/bad cipher or curve, the error path accidentally skips the verification and returns OK, thus ignoring any certificate problems. |
| CVE-2024-26633 | Medium | 2024-03-18 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ip6_tunnel: fix NEXTHDR_FRAGMENT handling in ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim() syzbot pointed out [1] that NEXTHDR_FRAGMENT handling is broken. Reading frag_off can only be done if we pulled enough bytes to skb->head. Currently we might access garbage. [1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim+0x94f/0xbb0 ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim+0x94f/0xbb0 ipxip6_tnl_xmit net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c:1326 [inline] ip6_tnl_start_xmit+0xab2/0x1a70 net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c:1432 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4940 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4954 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3548 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa10 net/core/dev.c:3564 __dev_queue_xmit+0x33b8/0x5130 net/core/dev.c:4349 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3134 [inline] neigh_connected_output+0x569/0x660 net/core/neighbour.c:1592 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0x23a9/0x2b30 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:137 ip6_finish_output+0x855/0x12b0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:222 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline] ip6_output+0x323/0x610 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:243 dst_output include/net/dst.h:451 [inline] ip6_local_out+0xe9/0x140 net/ipv6/output_core.c:155 ip6_send_skb net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1952 [inline] ip6_push_pending_frames+0x1f9/0x560 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1972 rawv6_push_pending_frames+0xbe8/0xdf0 net/ipv6/raw.c:582 rawv6_sendmsg+0x2b66/0x2e70 net/ipv6/raw.c:920 inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x190 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:847 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2584 ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2674 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook+0x129/0xa70 mm/slab.h:768 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5c9/0x970 mm/slub.c:3517 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:1006 [inline] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x118/0x3c0 mm/slab_common.c:1027 kmalloc_reserve+0x249/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:582 pskb_expand_head+0x226/0x1a00 net/core/skbuff.c:2098 __pskb_pull_tail+0x13b/0x2310 net/core/skbuff.c:2655 pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2673 [inline] pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2681 [inline] ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim+0x901/0xbb0 net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c:408 ipxip6_tnl_xmit net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c:1326 [inline] ip6_tnl_start_xmit+0xab2/0x1a70 net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c:1432 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4940 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4954 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3548 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa10 net/core/dev.c:3564 __dev_queue_xmit+0x33b8/0x5130 net/core/dev.c:4349 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3134 [inline] neigh_connected_output+0x569/0x660 net/core/neighbour.c:1592 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0x23a9/0x2b30 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:137 ip6_finish_output+0x855/0x12b0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:222 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline] ip6_output+0x323/0x610 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:243 dst_output include/net/dst.h:451 [inline] ip6_local_out+0xe9/0x140 net/ipv6/output_core.c:155 ip6_send_skb net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1952 [inline] ip6_push_pending_frames+0x1f9/0x560 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1972 rawv6_push_pending_frames+0xbe8/0xdf0 net/ipv6/raw.c:582 rawv6_sendmsg+0x2b66/0x2e70 net/ipv6/raw.c:920 inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x190 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:847 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2584 ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendms ---truncated--- |
| CVE-2024-26462 | Medium | 2024-02-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.21.2 contains a memory leak vulnerability in /krb5/src/kdc/ndr.c. |
| CVE-2024-26458 | Medium | 2024-02-29 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.21.2 contains a memory leak in /krb5/src/lib/rpc/pmap_rmt.c. |
| CVE-2024-22331 | Medium | 2024-02-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.19, 7.1 through 7.1.2.15, 7.2 through 7.2.3.8, 7.3 through 7.3.2.3, and IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0.0.0 could disclose sensitive user information when installing the Windows agent. IBM X-Force ID: 279971. |
| CVE-2024-23550 | Medium | 2024-02-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch (UCD) could disclose sensitive user information when installing the Windows agent. |
| CVE-2023-47161 | Medium | 2023-12-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.1 through 7.1.2.14, 7.2 through 7.2.3.7, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.2 may mishandle input validation of an uploaded archive file leading to a denial of service due to resource exhaustion. IBM X-Force ID: 270799. |
| CVE-2023-42013 | Medium | 2023-12-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.1 through 7.1.2.14, 7.2 through 7.2.3.7, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 265510. |
| CVE-2023-42012 | Medium | 2023-12-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An IBM UrbanCode Deploy Agent 7.2 through 7.2.3.7, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.2 installed as a Windows service in a non-standard location could be subject to a denial of service attack by local accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 265509. |
| CVE-2023-42015 | Medium | 2023-12-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.1 through 7.1.2.14, 7.2 through 7.2.3.7, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.2 is vulnerable to HTML injection. This vulnerability may allow a user to embed arbitrary HTML tags in the Web UI potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure. IBM X-Force ID: 265512. |
| CVE-2023-50775 | Medium | 2023-12-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Deployment Dashboard Plugin 1.0.10 and earlier allows attackers to copy jobs. |
| CVE-2023-6105 | Medium | 2023-11-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An information disclosure vulnerability exists in multiple ManageEngine products that can result in encryption keys being exposed. A low-privileged OS user with access to the host where an affected ManageEngine product is installed can view and use the exposed key to decrypt product database passwords. This allows the user to access the ManageEngine product database. |
| CVE-2023-40376 | Medium | 2023-10-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.1 - 7.1.2.12, 7.2 through 7.2.3.5, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.0 under certain configurations could allow an authenticated user to make changes to environment variables due to improper authentication controls. IBM X-Force ID: 263581. |
| CVE-2023-34041 | Medium | 2023-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cloud foundry routing release versions prior to 0.278.0 are vulnerable to abuse of HTTP Hop-by-Hop Headers. An unauthenticated attacker can use this vulnerability for headers like B3 or X-B3-SpanID to affect the identification value recorded in the logs in foundations. |
| CVE-2022-48065 | Medium | 2023-08-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | GNU Binutils before 2.40 was discovered to contain a memory leak vulnerability var the function find_abstract_instance in dwarf2.c. |
| CVE-2022-48064 | Medium | 2023-08-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | GNU Binutils before 2.40 was discovered to contain an excessive memory consumption vulnerability via the function bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line_with_alt at dwarf2.c. The attacker could supply a crafted ELF file and cause a DNS attack. |
| CVE-2023-2975 | Medium | 2023-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Issue summary: The AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data entries which are unauthenticated as a consequence. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-SIV algorithm and want to authenticate empty data entries as associated data can be misled by removing, adding or reordering such empty entries as these are ignored by the OpenSSL implementation. We are currently unaware of any such applications. The AES-SIV algorithm allows for authentication of multiple associated data entries along with the encryption. To authenticate empty data the application has to call EVP_EncryptUpdate() (or EVP_CipherUpdate()) with NULL pointer as the output buffer and 0 as the input buffer length. The AES-SIV implementation in OpenSSL just returns success for such a call instead of performing the associated data authentication operation. The empty data thus will not be authenticated. As this issue does not affect non-empty associated data authentication and we expect it to be rare for an application to use empty associated data entries this is qualified as Low severity issue. |
| CVE-2023-20882 | Medium | 2023-05-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cloud foundry routing release versions from 0.262.0 and prior to 0.266.0,a bug in the gorouter process can lead to a denial of service of applications hosted on Cloud Foundry. Under the right circumstances, when client connections are closed prematurely, gorouter marks the currently selected backend as failed and removes it from the routing pool. |
| CVE-2023-33254 | Medium | 2023-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | There is an LDAP bind credentials exposure on KACE Systems Deployment and Remote Site appliances 9.0.146. The captured credentials may provide a higher privilege level on the Active Directory domain. To exploit this, an authenticated attacker edits the user-authentication settings to specify an attacker-controlled LDAP server, clicks the Test Settings button, and captures the cleartext credentials. |
| CVE-2022-43877 | Medium | 2023-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) versions up to 7.3.0.1 could disclose sensitive password information during a manual edit of the agentrelay.properties file. IBM X-Force ID: 240148. |
| CVE-2023-2247 | Medium | 2023-05-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask variable secrets using the variable preview function |
| CVE-2023-27043 | Medium | 2023-04-19 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The email module of Python through 3.11.3 incorrectly parses e-mail addresses that contain a special character. The wrong portion of an RFC2822 header is identified as the value of the addr-spec. In some applications, an attacker can bypass a protection mechanism in which application access is granted only after verifying receipt of e-mail to a specific domain (e.g., only @company.example.com addresses may be used for signup). This occurs in email/_parseaddr.py in recent versions of Python. |
| CVE-2023-24527 | Medium | 2023-04-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SAP NetWeaver AS Java for Deploy Service - version 7.5, does not perform any access control checks for functionalities that require user identity enabling an unauthenticated attacker to attach to an open interface and make use of an open naming and directory API to access a service which will enable them to access but not modify server settings and data with no effect on availability and integrity. |
| CVE-2023-25136 | Medium | 2023-02-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenSSH server (sshd) 9.1 introduced a double-free vulnerability during options.kex_algorithms handling. This is fixed in OpenSSH 9.2. The double free can be leveraged, by an unauthenticated remote attacker in the default configuration, to jump to any location in the sshd address space. One third-party report states "remote code execution is theoretically possible." |
| CVE-2022-46771 | Medium | 2022-12-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.7.18, 7.0.5.0 through 7.0.5.13, 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.2.9, 7.2.0.0 through 7.2.3.2 and 7.3.0.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 242273. |
| CVE-2022-40751 | Medium | 2022-11-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.2.7.0 through 6.2.7.17, 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.5.12, 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.2.8, and 7.2.0.0 through 7.2.3.1 could allow a user with administrative privileges including "Manage Security" permissions may be able to recover a credential previously saved for performing authenticated LDAP searches. IBM X-Force ID: 236601. |
| CVE-2022-41235 | Medium | 2022-09-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins WildFly Deployer Plugin 1.0.2 and earlier implements functionality that allows agent processes to read arbitrary files on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-1355 | Medium | 2022-08-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in Libtiffs' tiffcp.c in main() function. This flaw allows an attacker to pass a crafted TIFF file to the tiffcp tool, triggering a stack buffer overflow issue, possibly corrupting the memory, and causing a crash that leads to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2022-1354 | Medium | 2022-08-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in Libtiffs' tiffinfo.c in TIFFReadRawDataStriped() function. This flaw allows an attacker to pass a crafted TIFF file to the tiffinfo tool, triggering a heap buffer overflow issue and causing a crash that leads to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2022-2953 | Medium | 2022-08-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | LibTIFF 4.4.0 has an out-of-bounds read in extractImageSection in tools/tiffcrop.c:6905, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit 48d6ece8. |
| CVE-2021-4214 | Medium | 2022-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A heap overflow flaw was found in libpngs' pngimage.c program. This flaw allows an attacker with local network access to pass a specially crafted PNG file to the pngimage utility, causing an application to crash, leading to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2021-4189 | Medium | 2022-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Python, specifically in the FTP (File Transfer Protocol) client library in PASV (passive) mode. The issue is how the FTP client trusts the host from the PASV response by default. This flaw allows an attacker to set up a malicious FTP server that can trick FTP clients into connecting back to a given IP address and port. This vulnerability could lead to FTP client scanning ports, which otherwise would not have been possible. |
| CVE-2021-3975 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A use-after-free flaw was found in libvirt. The qemuMonitorUnregister() function in qemuProcessHandleMonitorEOF is called using multiple threads without being adequately protected by a monitor lock. This flaw could be triggered by the virConnectGetAllDomainStats API when the guest is shutting down. An unprivileged client with a read-only connection could use this flaw to perform a denial of service attack by causing the libvirt daemon to crash. |
| CVE-2022-35716 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.7.16, 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.5.11, 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.2.7, and 7.2.0.0 through 7.2.3.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information in some instances due to improper security checking. IBM X-Force ID: 231360. |
| CVE-2022-34526 | Medium | 2022-07-29 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A stack overflow was discovered in the _TIFFVGetField function of Tiffsplit v4.4.0. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted TIFF file parsed by the "tiffsplit" or "tiffcrop" utilities. |
| CVE-2022-36909 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36908 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36907 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password. |
| CVE-2022-36906 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password. |
| CVE-2022-36891 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Deployer Framework Plugin 85.v1d1888e8c021 and earlier allows attackers with Item/Read permission but without Deploy Now/Deploy permission to read deployment logs. |
| CVE-2022-36890 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Deployer Framework Plugin 85.v1d1888e8c021 and earlier does not restrict the name of files in methods implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2021-3696 | Medium | 2022-07-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A heap out-of-bounds write may heppen during the handling of Huffman tables in the PNG reader. This may lead to data corruption in the heap space. Confidentiality, Integrity and Availablity impact may be considered Low as it's very complex to an attacker control the encoding and positioning of corrupted Huffman entries to achieve results such as arbitrary code execution and/or secure boot circumvention. This flaw affects grub2 versions prior grub-2.12. |
| CVE-2021-3695 | Medium | 2022-07-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A crafted 16-bit grayscale PNG image may lead to a out-of-bounds write in the heap area. An attacker may take advantage of that to cause heap data corruption or eventually arbitrary code execution and circumvent secure boot protections. This issue has a high complexity to be exploited as an attacker needs to perform some triage over the heap layout to achieve signifcant results, also the values written into the memory are repeated three times in a row making difficult to produce valid payloads. This flaw affects grub2 versions prior grub-2.12. |
| CVE-2022-34903 | Medium | 2022-07-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line. |
| CVE-2022-22367 | Medium | 2022-07-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.2.7.15, 7.0.5.10, 7.1.2.6, and 7.2.2.1 could disclose sensitive database information to a local user in plain text. IBM X-Force ID: 221008. |
| CVE-2022-22366 | Medium | 2022-07-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.2.7.15, 7.0.5.10, 7.1.2.6, and 7.2.2.1 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 22106. |
| CVE-2022-34799 | Medium | 2022-06-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Deployment Dashboard Plugin 1.0.10 and earlier stores a password unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where it can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-34798 | Medium | 2022-06-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Deployment Dashboard Plugin 1.0.10 and earlier does not perform a permission check in several HTTP endpoints, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP URL using attacker-specified credentials. |
| CVE-2022-34797 | Medium | 2022-06-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Deployment Dashboard Plugin 1.0.10 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP URL using attacker-specified credentials. |
| CVE-2022-34796 | Medium | 2022-06-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Deployment Dashboard Plugin 1.0.10 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-34795 | Medium | 2022-06-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Deployment Dashboard Plugin 1.0.10 and earlier does not escape environment names on its Deployment Dashboard view, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with View/Configure permission. |
| CVE-2022-34184 | Medium | 2022-06-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins CRX Content Package Deployer Plugin 1.9 and earlier does not escape the name and description of CRX Content Package Choice parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission. |
| CVE-2022-1623 | Medium | 2022-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | LibTIFF master branch has an out-of-bounds read in LZWDecode in libtiff/tif_lzw.c:624, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit b4e79bfa. |
| CVE-2022-1622 | Medium | 2022-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | LibTIFF master branch has an out-of-bounds read in LZWDecode in libtiff/tif_lzw.c:619, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit b4e79bfa. |
| CVE-2022-29824 | Medium | 2022-05-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In libxml2 before 2.9.14, several buffer handling functions in buf.c (xmlBuf*) and tree.c (xmlBuffer*) don't check for integer overflows. This can result in out-of-bounds memory writes. Exploitation requires a victim to open a crafted, multi-gigabyte XML file. Other software using libxml2's buffer functions, for example libxslt through 1.1.35, is affected as well. |
| CVE-2022-1210 | Medium | 2022-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in LibTIFF 4.3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the TIFF File Handler of tiff2ps. Opening a malicious file leads to a denial of service. The attack can be launched remotely but requires user interaction. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2022-0897 | Medium | 2022-03-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the libvirt nwfilter driver. The virNWFilterObjListNumOfNWFilters method failed to acquire the driver->nwfilters mutex before iterating over virNWFilterObj instances. There was no protection to stop another thread from concurrently modifying the driver->nwfilters object. This flaw allows a malicious, unprivileged user to exploit this issue via libvirt's API virConnectNumOfNWFilters to crash the network filter management daemon (libvirtd/virtnwfilterd). |