Overview 54 matches · 7 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 4 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 5 EPSS ≥ 0.5
54matches
7in Waratek scope13.0%
2protected3.7%
4exploited7.4%
4CISA KEV7.4%
3public PoC5.6%
5EPSS ≥ 0.59.3%
Protected by Waratek
2
3.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
5
9.3%
Outside Waratek scope
11
20.4%
Not applicable
36
66.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
3.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
52
96.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
7.4%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
3
5.6%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
47
87.0%
split by
peak 19 / year
20142
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited2
20150
20160
20173
Not applicable3
Critical3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20183
Not applicable3
Critical3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
201919
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable12
Critical19
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked17
No public exploit19
20203
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Critical3
not blocked3
Exploited1
No public exploit2
20217
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable6
Critical7
not blocked7
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit6
20227
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable2
Critical7
not blocked7
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit5
20233
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
Critical3
not blocked3
Exploited1
No public exploit2
20244
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable2
Critical4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20252
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20261
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
2014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-27208 | Critical | 2026-02-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | bleon-ethical/api-gateway-deploy provides API gateway deployment. Version 1.0.0 is vulnerable to an attack chain involving OS Command Injection and Privilege Escalation. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges within the container, potentially leading to a container escape and unauthorized infrastructure modifications. This is fixed in version 1.0.1 by implementing strict input sanitization and secure delimiters in entrypoint.sh, enforcing a non-root user (appuser) in the Dockerfile, and establishing mandatory security quality gates. |
| CVE-2025-52095 | Critical | 2025-08-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue in PDQ Smart Deploy V.3.0.2040 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the Credential encryption routines in SDCommon.dll |
| CVE-2025-3115 | Critical | 2025-04-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Injection Vulnerabilities: Attackers can inject malicious code, potentially gaining control over the system executing these functions. Additionally, insufficient validation of filenames during file uploads can enable attackers to upload and execute malicious files, leading to arbitrary code execution |
| CVE-2024-4741 | Critical | 2024-11-13 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications. The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use. The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived. In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only been partially processed and the buffer is still in use. The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer is still in use. While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs. We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. |
| CVE-2024-5535 | Critical | 2024-06-27 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. |
| CVE-2024-21990 | Critical | 2024-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 9.12.1.x, 9.13.1.x and 9.14.1.x contain hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to view Deploy configuration information and modify the account credentials. |
| CVE-2024-23613 | Critical | 2024-01-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Symantec Deployment Solution version 7.9 when parsing UpdateComputer tokens. A remote, anonymous attacker can exploit this vulnerability to achieve remote code execution as SYSTEM. |
| CVE-2023-37920 | Critical | 2023-07-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Certifi is a curated collection of Root Certificates for validating the trustworthiness of SSL certificates while verifying the identity of TLS hosts. Certifi prior to version 2023.07.22 recognizes "e-Tugra" root certificates. e-Tugra's root certificates were subject to an investigation prompted by reporting of security issues in their systems. Certifi 2023.07.22 removes root certificates from "e-Tugra" from the root store. |
| CVE-2022-31733 | Critical | 2023-02-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Starting with diego-release 2.55.0 and up to 2.69.0, and starting with CF Deployment 17.1 and up to 23.2.0, apps are accessible via another port on diego cells, allowing application ingress without a client certificate. If mTLS route integrity is enabled AND unproxied ports are turned off, then an attacker could connect to an application that should be only reachable via mTLS, without presenting a client certificate. |
| CVE-2022-47966 | Critical | 2023-01-18 | Not applicable | Exploited | Multiple Zoho ManageEngine on-premise products, such as ServiceDesk Plus through 14003, allow remote code execution due to use of Apache Santuario xmlsec (aka XML Security for Java) 1.4.1, because the xmlsec XSLT features, by design in that version, make the application responsible for certain security protections, and the ManageEngine applications did not provide those protections. This affects Access Manager Plus before 4308, Active Directory 360 before 4310, ADAudit Plus before 7081, ADManager Plus before 7162, ADSelfService Plus before 6211, Analytics Plus before 5150, Application Control Plus before 10.1.2220.18, Asset Explorer before 6983, Browser Security Plus before 11.1.2238.6, Device Control Plus before 10.1.2220.18, Endpoint Central before 10.1.2228.11, Endpoint Central MSP before 10.1.2228.11, Endpoint DLP before 10.1.2137.6, Key Manager Plus before 6401, OS Deployer before 1.1.2243.1, PAM 360 before 5713, Password Manager Pro before 12124, Patch Manager Plus before 10.1.2220.18, Remote Access Plus before 10.1.2228.11, Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) before 10.1.41. ServiceDesk Plus before 14004, ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 13001, SupportCenter Plus before 11026, and Vulnerability Manager Plus before 10.1.2220.18. Exploitation is only possible if SAML SSO has ever been configured for a product (for some products, exploitation requires that SAML SSO is currently active). |
| CVE-2022-4116 | Critical | 2022-11-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in quarkus. This security flaw happens in Dev UI Config Editor which is vulnerable to drive-by localhost attacks leading to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2020-35527 | Critical | 2022-09-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In SQLite 3.31.1, there is an out of bounds access problem through ALTER TABLE for views that have a nested FROM clause. |
| CVE-2022-37434 | Critical | 2022-08-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field. NOTE: only applications that call inflateGetHeader are affected. Some common applications bundle the affected zlib source code but may be unable to call inflateGetHeader (e.g., see the nodejs/node reference). |
| CVE-2022-2068 | Critical | 2022-06-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). |
| CVE-2022-1664 | Critical | 2022-05-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dpkg::Source::Archive in dpkg, the Debian package management system, before version 1.21.8, 1.20.10, 1.19.8, 1.18.26 is prone to a directory traversal vulnerability. When extracting untrusted source packages in v2 and v3 source package formats that include a debian.tar, the in-place extraction can lead to directory traversal situations on specially crafted orig.tar and debian.tar tarballs. |
| CVE-2022-1587 | Critical | 2022-05-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the get_recurse_data_length() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This issue affects recursions in JIT-compiled regular expressions caused by duplicate data transfers. |
| CVE-2022-1586 | Critical | 2022-05-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the compile_xclass_matchingpath() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This involves a unicode property matching issue in JIT-compiled regular expressions. The issue occurs because the character was not fully read in case-less matching within JIT. |
| CVE-2021-35942 | Critical | 2021-07-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The wordexp function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.33 may crash or read arbitrary memory in parse_param (in posix/wordexp.c) when called with an untrusted, crafted pattern, potentially resulting in a denial of service or disclosure of information. This occurs because atoi was used but strtoul should have been used to ensure correct calculations. |
| CVE-2021-3520 | Critical | 2021-06-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | There's a flaw in lz4. An attacker who submits a crafted file to an application linked with lz4 may be able to trigger an integer overflow, leading to calling of memmove() on a negative size argument, causing an out-of-bounds write and/or a crash. The greatest impact of this flaw is to availability, with some potential impact to confidentiality and integrity as well. |
| CVE-2020-36331 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. An out-of-bounds read was found in function ChunkAssignData. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and to the service availability. |
| CVE-2020-36330 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. An out-of-bounds read was found in function ChunkVerifyAndAssign. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and to the service availability. |
| CVE-2020-36329 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. A use-after-free was found due to a thread being killed too early. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. |
| CVE-2020-36328 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. A heap-based buffer overflow in function WebPDecodeRGBInto is possible due to an invalid check for buffer size. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. |
| CVE-2021-3177 | Critical | 2021-01-19 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. |
| CVE-2020-15999 | Critical | 2020-11-03 | Not applicable | Exploited | Heap buffer overflow in Freetype in Google Chrome prior to 86.0.4240.111 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. |
| CVE-2020-11656 | Critical | 2020-04-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In SQLite through 3.31.1, the ALTER TABLE implementation has a use-after-free, as demonstrated by an ORDER BY clause that belongs to a compound SELECT statement. |
| CVE-2019-20330 | Critical | 2020-01-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.2 lacks certain net.sf.ehcache blocking. |
| CVE-2014-3699 | Critical | 2019-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | eDeploy has RCE via cPickle deserialization of untrusted data |
| CVE-2019-19646 | Critical | 2019-12-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | pragma.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 mishandles NOT NULL in an integrity_check PRAGMA command in certain cases of generated columns. |
| CVE-2019-19317 | Critical | 2019-12-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | lookupName in resolve.c in SQLite 3.30.1 omits bits from the colUsed bitmask in the case of a generated column, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact. |
| CVE-2019-5509 | Critical | 2019-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.11.2 through 2.12.2 are susceptible to a code injection vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enable and use a privileged user account. |
| CVE-2014-3700 | Critical | 2019-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | eDeploy through at least 2014-10-14 has remote code execution due to eval() of untrusted data |
| CVE-2019-17531 | Critical | 2019-10-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the apache-log4j-extra (version 1.2.x) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can provide a JNDI service to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. |
| CVE-2019-16943 | Critical | 2019-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the p6spy (3.8.6) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of com.p6spy.engine.spy.P6DataSource mishandling. |
| CVE-2019-16942 | Critical | 2019-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the commons-dbcp (1.4) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource and org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource mishandling. |
| CVE-2019-5505 | Critical | 2019-09-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.2 through 2.12.1 transmit credentials in plaintext. |
| CVE-2019-5504 | Critical | 2019-09-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.12 & 2.12.1 ship with an HTTP service bound to the network allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to perform administrative actions. |
| CVE-2019-14379 | Critical | 2019-07-29 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | SubTypeValidator.java in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.9.2 mishandles default typing when ehcache is used (because of net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.DefaultTransactionManagerLookup), leading to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2019-3801 | Critical | 2019-04-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cloud Foundry cf-deployment, versions prior to 7.9.0, contain java components that are using an insecure protocol to fetch dependencies when building. A remote unauthenticated malicious attacker could hijack the DNS entry for the dependency, and inject malicious code into the component. |
| CVE-2019-3861 | Critical | 2019-03-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SSH packets with a padding length value greater than the packet length are parsed. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3860 | Critical | 2019-03-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SFTP packets with empty payloads are parsed. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3862 | Critical | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST packets with an exit status message and no payload are parsed. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3859 | Critical | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the _libssh2_packet_require and _libssh2_packet_requirev functions. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3858 | Critical | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 when a specially crafted SFTP packet is received from the server. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-9169 | Critical | 2019-02-26 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, proceed_next_node in posix/regexec.c has a heap-based buffer over-read via an attempted case-insensitive regular-expression match. |
| CVE-2018-14718 | Critical | 2019-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging failure to block the slf4j-ext class from polymorphic deserialization. |
| CVE-2017-3181 | Critical | 2018-07-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple TIBCO Products are prone to multiple unspecified SQL-injection vulnerabilities because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before using it in an SQL query. Exploiting these issues could allow an attacker to compromise the application, access or modify data, or exploit latent vulnerabilities in the underlying database. The following products and versions are affected: TIBCO Spotfire Analyst 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Connectors 7.6.0 TIBCO Spotfire Deployment Kit 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop 7.6.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Developer Edition 7.7.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Language Packs 7.6.0 TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Language Packs 7.7.0 The following components are affected: TIBCO Spotfire Client TIBCO Spotfire Web Player Client |
| CVE-2018-5435 | Critical | 2018-06-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The TIBCO Spotfire Client and TIBCO Spotfire Web Player Client components of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Spotfire Analyst, TIBCO Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS Marketplace, TIBCO Spotfire Deployment Kit, TIBCO Spotfire Desktop, and TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Language Packs contain multiple vulnerabilities that may allow for remote code execution. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Spotfire Analyst: versions up to and including 7.8.0; 7.9.0; 7.9.1; 7.10.0; 7.10.1; 7.11.0; 7.12.0, TIBCO Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS Marketplace: versions up to and including 7.12.0, TIBCO Spotfire Deployment Kit: versions up to and including 7.8.0; 7.9.0;7.9.1;7.10.0;7.10.1;7.11.0; 7.12.0, TIBCO Spotfire Desktop: versions up to and including 7.8.0; 7.9.0; 7.9.1; 7.10.0; 7.10.1; 7.11.0;7.12.0, TIBCO Spotfire Desktop Language Packs: versions up to and including 7.8.0; 7.9.0; 7.9.1; 7.10.0; 7.10.1; 7.11.0. |
| CVE-2014-2652 | Critical | 2018-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in OpenScape Deployment Service (DLS) before 6.x and 7.x before R1.11.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2014-3702 | Critical | 2017-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in eNovance eDeploy allows remote attackers to create arbitrary directories and files and consequently cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a .. (dot dot) the session parameter. |
| CVE-2014-8174 | Critical | 2017-09-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | eDeploy makes it easier for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging use of HTTP to download files. |
| CVE-2016-8938 | Critical | 2017-02-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM UrbanCode Deploy could allow a user to execute code using a specially crafted file upload that would replace code on the server. This code could be executed on the UCD agent machines that host customer's production applications. |
| CVE-2014-7169 | Critical | 2014-09-25 | Not applicable | Exploited | GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. |
| CVE-2014-6271 | Critical | 2014-09-24 | Not applicable | Exploited | GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. |