Overview 13 matches · 12 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
13
100.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
12
92.3%
partly blocked
1
7.7%
not blocked
0
0.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
7.7%
Working exploit published
2
15.4%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
10
76.9%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q2 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Q3 170
Q4 171
Protected by Waratek1
High1
partly blocked1
Exploited1
Q1 181
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q2 181
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q3 180
Q4 181
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q1 192
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
No public exploit2
Q2 190
Q3 190
Q4 191
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q1 200
Q2 201
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Q3 201
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q4 200
Q1 213
Protected by Waratek3
High2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today3
No public exploit3
Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20Q1 21
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-25329 | High | 2021-03-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue. |
| CVE-2021-25122 | High | 2021-03-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. |
| CVE-2021-21290 | Medium | 2021-02-08 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. In Netty before version 4.1.59.Final there is a vulnerability on Unix-like systems involving an insecure temp file. When netty's multipart decoders are used local information disclosure can occur via the local system temporary directory if temporary storing uploads on the disk is enabled. On unix-like systems, the temporary directory is shared between all user. As such, writing to this directory using APIs that do not explicitly set the file/directory permissions can lead to information disclosure. Of note, this does not impact modern MacOS Operating Systems. The method "File.createTempFile" on unix-like systems creates a random file, but, by default will create this file with the permissions "-rw-r--r--". Thus, if sensitive information is written to this file, other local users can read this information. This is the case in netty's "AbstractDiskHttpData" is vulnerable. This has been fixed in version 4.1.59.Final. As a workaround, one may specify your own "java.io.tmpdir" when you start the JVM or use "DefaultHttpDataFactory.setBaseDir(...)" to set the directory to something that is only readable by the current user. |
| CVE-2020-7712 | High | 2020-08-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | This affects the package json before 10.0.0. It is possible to inject arbritary commands using the parseLookup function. |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2019-10219 | Medium | 2019-11-08 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. |
| CVE-2018-14719 | Critical | 2019-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging failure to block the blaze-ds-opt and blaze-ds-core classes from polymorphic deserialization. |
| CVE-2018-14718 | Critical | 2019-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging failure to block the slf4j-ext class from polymorphic deserialization. |
| CVE-2018-1000873 | Medium | 2018-12-20 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Fasterxml Jackson version Before 2.9.8 contains a CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Jackson-Modules-Java8 that can result in Causes a denial-of-service (DoS). This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim deserializes malicious input, specifically very large values in the nanoseconds field of a time value. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.9.8. |
| CVE-2018-10237 | Medium | 2018-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Unbounded memory allocation in Google Guava 11.0 through 24.x before 24.1.1 allows remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks against servers that depend on this library and deserialize attacker-provided data, because the AtomicDoubleArray class (when serialized with Java serialization) and the CompoundOrdering class (when serialized with GWT serialization) perform eager allocation without appropriate checks on what a client has sent and whether the data size is reasonable. |
| CVE-2017-15095 | Critical | 2018-02-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind in versions before 2.8.10 and 2.9.1, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. This issue extends the previous flaw CVE-2017-7525 by blacklisting more classes that could be used maliciously. |
| CVE-2017-12617 | High | 2017-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |