Overview 38 matches · 7 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
38matches
7in Waratek scope18.4%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
2public PoC5.3%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
7
18.4%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
31
81.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
38
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
2
5.3%
Proof of concept only
1
2.6%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
35
92.1%
split by
peak 7 / year
20041
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20050
20060
20070
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20130
20142
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20163
No exploit published2
Not applicable1
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20172
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20180
20195
No exploit published1
Not applicable4
Medium5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20202
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20212
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20225
Not applicable5
Medium5
not blocked5
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit4
20237
Not applicable7
Medium7
not blocked7
No public exploit7
20242
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20252
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20264
No exploit published3
Not applicable1
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-62483 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Project Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Project Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60940 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-34300 | Medium | 2026-04-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Contracts product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Contracts). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-28410 | Medium | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Graph is an indexing protocol for querying networks like Ethereum, IPFS, Polygon, and other blockchains. Prior to version 3.0.0, a flaw in the token vesting contracts allows users to access tokens that should still be locked according to their vesting schedule. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0. |
| CVE-2025-64067 | Medium | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 API endpoints responsible for retrieving object-specific or filtered data (e.g., user profiles, project records) fail to implement sufficient server-side validation to confirm that the requesting user is authorized to access the requested object or dataset. This vulnerability can be exploited in two ways: Direct ID manipulation and IDOR, by changing an ID parameter (e.g., user_id, project_id) in the request, an attacker can access the object and data belonging to another user; and filter Omission, by omitting the filtering parameter entirely, an attacker can cause the endpoint to return an entire unfiltered dataset of all stored records for all users. This flaw leads to the unauthorized exposure of sensitive personal and organizational information. |
| CVE-2025-64061 | Medium | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 /api/v2/users endpoint is vulnerable to unauthorized data exposure due to deficient access control mechanisms. Any authenticated user, regardless of their privilege level (including standard or low-privileged users), can make a GET request to this endpoint and retrieve a complete, unfiltered list of all registered application users. Crucially, the API response body for this endpoint includes password hashes. |
| CVE-2024-45304 | Medium | 2024-08-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cairo-Contracts are OpenZeppelin Contracts written in Cairo for Starknet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized ownership transfer, contrary to the original owner's intention of leaving the contract without an owner. It introduces a security risk where an unintended party (pending owner) can gain control of the contract after the original owner has renounced ownership. This could also be used by a malicious owner to simulate leaving a contract without an owner, to later regain ownership by previously having proposed himself as a pending owner. This issue has been addressed in release version 0.16.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-22236 | Medium | 2024-01-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Spring Cloud Contract, versions 4.1.x prior to 4.1.1, versions 4.0.x prior to 4.0.5, and versions 3.1.x prior to 3.1.10, test execution is vulnerable to local information disclosure via temporary directory created with unsafe permissions through the shaded com.google.guava:guava dependency in the org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-contract-shade dependency. |
| CVE-2019-25157 | Medium | 2023-12-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Ethex Contracts. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file EthexJackpot.sol of the component Monthly Jackpot Handler. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is named 6b8664b698d3d953e16c284fadc6caeb9e58e3db. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248271. |
| CVE-2023-40014 | Medium | 2023-08-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Starting in version 4.0.0 and prior to version 4.9.3, contracts using `ERC2771Context` along with a custom trusted forwarder may see `_msgSender` return `address(0)` in calls that originate from the forwarder with calldata shorter than 20 bytes. This combination of circumstances does not appear to be common, in particular it is not the case for `MinimalForwarder` from OpenZeppelin Contracts, or any deployed forwarder the team is aware of, given that the signer address is appended to all calls that originate from these forwarders. The problem has been patched in v4.9.3. |
| CVE-2023-34459 | Medium | 2023-06-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Starting in version 4.7.0 and prior to version 4.9.2, when the `verifyMultiProof`, `verifyMultiProofCalldata`, `procesprocessMultiProof`, or `processMultiProofCalldat` functions are in use, it is possible to construct merkle trees that allow forging a valid multiproof for an arbitrary set of leaves. A contract may be vulnerable if it uses multiproofs for verification and the merkle tree that is processed includes a node with value 0 at depth 1 (just under the root). This could happen inadvertedly for balanced trees with 3 leaves or less, if the leaves are not hashed. This could happen deliberately if a malicious tree builder includes such a node in the tree. A contract is not vulnerable if it uses single-leaf proving (`verify`, `verifyCalldata`, `processProof`, or `processProofCalldata`), or if it uses multiproofs with a known tree that has hashed leaves. Standard merkle trees produced or validated with the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree library are safe. The problem has been patched in version 4.9.2. Some workarounds are available. For those using multiproofs: When constructing merkle trees hash the leaves and do not insert empty nodes in your trees. Using the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree package eliminates this issue. Do not accept user-provided merkle roots without reconstructing at least the first level of the tree. Verify the merkle tree structure by reconstructing it from the leaves. |
| CVE-2023-34234 | Medium | 2023-06-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the `Governor` contract in v4.9.0 only, and the `GovernorCompatibilityBravo` contract since v4.3.0. This problem has been patched in 4.9.1 by introducing opt-in frontrunning protection. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may submit the proposal creation transaction to an endpoint with frontrunning protection as a workaround. |
| CVE-2023-30541 | Medium | 2023-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. A function in the implementation contract may be inaccessible if its selector clashes with one of the proxy's own selectors. Specifically, if the clashing function has a different signature with incompatible ABI encoding, the proxy could revert while attempting to decode the arguments from calldata. The probability of an accidental clash is negligible, but one could be caused deliberately and could cause a reduction in availability. The issue has been fixed in version 4.8.3. As a workaround if a function appears to be inaccessible for this reason, it may be possible to craft the calldata such that ABI decoding does not fail at the proxy and the function is properly proxied through. |
| CVE-2023-26488 | Medium | 2023-03-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The ERC721Consecutive contract designed for minting NFTs in batches does not update balances when a batch has size 1 and consists of a single token. Subsequent transfers from the receiver of that token may overflow the balance as reported by `balanceOf`. The issue exclusively presents with batches of size 1. The issue has been patched in 4.8.2. |
| CVE-2023-23940 | Medium | 2023-02-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for secure smart contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. `is_valid_eth_signature` is missing a call to `finalize_keccak` after calling `verify_eth_signature`. As a result, any contract using `is_valid_eth_signature` from the account library (such as the `EthAccount` preset) is vulnerable to a malicious sequencer. Specifically, the malicious sequencer would be able to bypass signature validation to impersonate an instance of these accounts. The issue has been patched in 0.6.1. |
| CVE-2022-41273 | Medium | 2022-12-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Due to improper input sanitization in SAP Sourcing and SAP Contract Lifecycle Management - version 1100, an attacker can redirect a user to a malicious website. In order to perform this attack, the attacker sends an email to the victim with a manipulated link that appears to be a legitimate SAP Sourcing URL, since the victim doesn’t suspect the threat, they click on the link, log in to SAP Sourcing and CLM and at this point, they get redirected to a malicious website. |
| CVE-2022-39384 | Medium | 2022-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Before version 4.4.1 but after 3.2.0, initializer functions that are invoked separate from contract creation (the most prominent example being minimal proxies) may be reentered if they make an untrusted non-view external call. Once an initializer has finished running it can never be re-executed. However, an exception put in place to support multiple inheritance made reentrancy possible in the scenario described above, breaking the expectation that there is a single execution. Note that upgradeable proxies are commonly initialized together with contract creation, where reentrancy is not feasible, so the impact of this issue is believed to be minor. This issue has been patched, please upgrade to version 4.4.1. As a workaround, avoid untrusted external calls during initialization. |
| CVE-2022-35916 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Contracts using the cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, `CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2` or `LibArbitrumL2`, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts (EOAs) as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This issue has been patched in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-35915 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The target contract of an EIP-165 `supportsInterface` query can cause unbounded gas consumption by returning a lot of data, while it is generally assumed that this operation has a bounded cost. The issue has been fixed in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-31153 | Medium | 2022-07-15 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. Version 0.2.0 is vulnerable to an error that renders account contracts unusable on live networks. This issue affects all accounts (vanilla and ethereum flavors) in the v0.2.0 release of OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo, which are not whitelisted on StarkNet mainnet. Only goerli deployments of v0.2.0 accounts are affected. This faulty behavior is not observed in StarkNet's testing framework. This bug has been patched in v0.2.1. |
| CVE-2020-4897 | Medium | 2021-01-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0, 10.1.1, and 10.1.3 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 190988. |
| CVE-2020-4892 | Medium | 2021-01-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management 10.1.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 190979. |
| CVE-2019-20154 | Medium | 2020-01-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Determine (formerly Selectica) Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) v5.4. A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in multiple getchart.jsp parameters allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML. |
| CVE-2019-20153 | Medium | 2020-01-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Determine (formerly Selectica) Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) in v5.4. An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the upload definition feature in definition_upload_attach.jsp allows authenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files (including configuration files containing administrative credentials). |
| CVE-2019-4485 | Medium | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Sourcing 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 generates an error message that includes sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 164069. |
| CVE-2019-4484 | Medium | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Sourcing 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 generates an error message that includes sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 164068. |
| CVE-2019-4308 | Medium | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Sourcing 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information from error messages IBM X-Force ID: 161034. |
| CVE-2018-1961 | Medium | 2019-04-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management 10.0.0 and 10.1.3.0 could disclose sensitive information from detailed information from error messages. IBM X-Force ID: 153657. |
| CVE-2019-2622 | Medium | 2019-04-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts component of Oracle E-Business Suite (subcomponent: Renewals). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5, 12.2.6, 12.2.7 and 12.2.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Service Contracts, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.7 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2017-14841 | Medium | 2017-09-28 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Mojoomla Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) Management System allows Arbitrary File Upload in profilesetting image handling. |
| CVE-2016-6018 | Medium | 2017-07-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management 10.0 and 10.1 reveals detailed error messages in certain features that could cause an attacker to gain additional information to conduct further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 116738. |
| CVE-2015-7398 | Medium | 2016-02-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.0.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix15, 10.0.0.x and 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.5 iFix5, 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.7 iFix4, and 10.0.4.x before 10.0.4.0 iFix3 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2016-0558 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Renewals. |
| CVE-2016-0534 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Project Contracts component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Printing. |
| CVE-2014-6212 | Medium | 2015-01-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Echo API in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix11, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix12, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.5 iFix2, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.2 iFix5; Emptoris Sourcing 9.5 before 9.5.1.3 iFix2, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix1, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.3 iFix1, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.5; and Emptoris Program Management (aka PGM) and Strategic Supply Management (aka SSMP) 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.3 iFix6, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.4 iFix1, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.5 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via an XML external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2014-3041 | Medium | 2014-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix 10, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix 10, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.4, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.2 iFix 2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2014-3040 | Medium | 2014-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix 10, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix 10, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.4, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.2 iFix 2; Emptoris Sourcing Portfolio 9.5.x before 9.5.1.3, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.3, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.4; and Emptoris Spend Analysis 9.5.x before 9.5.0.4, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.3, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.4 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| CVE-2004-1395 | Medium | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The Lithtech engine, as used in (1) Contract Jack 1.1 and earlier, (2) No one lives forever 2 1.3 and earlier, (3) Tron 2.0 1.042 and earlier, (4) F.E.A.R. (First Encounter Assault and Recon), and possibly other games, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection refused) via a UDP packet that causes recvfrom to generate a return code that causes the listening loop to exit, as demonstrated using zero byte packets or packets between 8193 and 12280 bytes, which result in conditions that are not "Operation would block." |