Overview 1,117 matches · 45 in Waratek scope · 6 protected · 10 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 37 public PoC · 9 EPSS ≥ 0.5
1,117matches
45in Waratek scope4.0%
6protected0.5%
10exploited0.9%
4CISA KEV0.4%
37public PoC3.3%
9EPSS ≥ 0.50.8%
Protected by Waratek
6
0.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
0.1%
No exploit published
38
3.4%
Outside Waratek scope
84
7.5%
Not applicable
988
88.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
6
0.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
1,111
99.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 236 / year
20022
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20032
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20044
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable3
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20053
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
20068
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
Working exploit published3
No public exploit5
20077
Not applicable7
Medium7
not blocked7
Working exploit published2
No public exploit5
20086
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
Working exploit published1
No public exploit5
20096
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
Working exploit published3
No public exploit3
201018
Not applicable18
Medium18
not blocked18
Working exploit published1
No public exploit17
20117
Not applicable7
Medium7
not blocked7
No public exploit7
201213
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable12
Medium13
not blocked13
Working exploit published1
No public exploit12
201323
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable21
Medium23
not blocked23
No public exploit23
201418
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable13
Medium18
not blocked18
Working exploit published1
No public exploit17
201529
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable24
Medium29
not blocked29
No public exploit29
201639
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable36
Medium39
not blocked39
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit37
201741
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable37
Medium41
not blocked41
Working exploit published1
No public exploit40
201851
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope10
Not applicable39
Medium51
not blocked51
Exploited1
No public exploit50
201955
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable44
Medium55
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked54
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
No public exploit49
202067
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope9
Not applicable53
Medium67
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked65
Exploited2
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit63
202192
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable78
Medium92
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked90
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only1
No public exploit84
202286
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable77
Medium86
not blocked86
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit79
202392
No exploit published3
Not applicable89
Medium92
not blocked92
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only8
No public exploit82
2024101
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable97
Medium101
not blocked101
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit100
2025111
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable106
Medium111
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked110
Proof of concept only9
No public exploit102
2026236
No exploit published12
Outside Waratek scope22
Not applicable202
Medium236
not blocked236
Exploited1
No public exploit235
2002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18196 | Medium | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.30 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTML due to improper output neutralization. |
| CVE-2026-18195 | Medium | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.30 could allow a remote attacker to perform content spoofing due to improper output encoding of error messages. |
| CVE-2026-17437 | Medium | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.29 could allow a local attacker to perform an arbitrary file write due to improper validation of pathnames during archive extraction. |
| CVE-2026-17305 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17304 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper input validation. Locations supplied when service definitions are imported are not sufficiently validated, which could allow the server to retrieve content it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17303 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal network resources due to improper validation of a user-supplied URL. The address is not sufficiently restricted, which could allow the server to contact internal systems. |
| CVE-2026-17302 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to probe internal network services due to improper validation of a user-supplied URL. |
| CVE-2026-17241 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17240 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. Authentication checks are not applied consistently, which could allow protected resources to be reached without valid credentials. |
| CVE-2026-17238 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from other tenants due to path parameter injection. Values in the request path are not sufficiently validated, which could allow access to data belonging to other tenants. |
| CVE-2026-17237 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17236 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization. Authorization checks are not applied when certain organization URLs are resolved, which could allow access to information belonging to others. |
| CVE-2026-17233 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain information about internal network services due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. Addresses supplied by users are not sufficiently restricted, so the server could be made to contact internal systems. |
| CVE-2026-17232 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper neutralization of special elements in a request. Specially formed request parameters are not handled safely, which could allow protections to be circumvented. |
| CVE-2026-17231 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an observable response discrepancy. |
| CVE-2026-17230 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-17225 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions and access unauthorized analytics queries due to improper input validation. Request parameters are not validated sufficiently, which could allow restrictions on analytics data to be circumvented. |
| CVE-2026-17215 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to verbose error messages. Error responses contain more information about the system than necessary, which could help an attacker learn about the environment. |
| CVE-2026-17202 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to enumerate usernames due to observable differences in response behavior. |
| CVE-2026-17139 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to cross-site scripting. Certain URL fields are not sufficiently validated, so malicious script content could run in another user's browser session. |
| CVE-2026-17137 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper use of cryptography. The encryption applied to stored data is not implemented with sufficient strength, which weakens its protection. |
| CVE-2026-17128 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the insertion of sensitive information into log files. |
| CVE-2026-17098 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to verbose error messages. |
| CVE-2026-17085 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper handling of case sensitivity. An access restriction is not applied consistently to all variations of the input, which could allow it to be circumvented and unauthorized emails to be sent. |
| CVE-2026-17067 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17064 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an insecure direct object reference. |
| CVE-2026-16719 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to view arbitrary files on the system due to a path traversal vulnerability. A specially crafted URL request could allow directories outside the intended location to be accessed. |
| CVE-2026-16711 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to inject platform credentials into outbound requests due to improper input validation. A validation check is not sufficiently strict, which could cause platform credentials to be included in outbound requests. |
| CVE-2026-16710 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-16679 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to view arbitrary files on the system due to a path traversal vulnerability. A specially crafted URL request could allow directories outside the intended location to be accessed. |
| CVE-2026-108178 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a token to be accepted that should be rejected due to an improperly implemented security check. Under certain conditions, token validation is incomplete, so a token may be accepted for a purpose it was not intended for. |
| CVE-2026-105459 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to an organization due to improper verification of a cryptographic signature. A token is accepted without its signature being fully verified, which could allow an attacker to join an organization without a valid invitation. |
| CVE-2026-118527 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | Exploited | Use of predictable filenames in Ivanti Connect Secure before versions 25.1.1.3 and 22.8R2.6 allows a remote authenticated attacker to upload files with attacker-controlled content to a known location on disk. |
| CVE-2026-78340 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution and Filesystem access for attacker. |
| CVE-2026-78027 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-78021 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-78016 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure and Information tampering. |
| CVE-2026-78015 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Use of Less Trusted Source vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. |
| CVE-2026-78013 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service, Information disclosure, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-87426 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unauthenticated network-based attacker can query specific internal management endpoints on Brocade ASCG versions before 3.5.0 to enumerate the configuration details and state of managed Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) switches. This results in the unauthorized disclosure of the customer's SAN fabric management topology and switch connectivity attributes. |
| CVE-2023-5649 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Input Validation vulnerability for the registered case credentials in Brocade ASCG before v3.0 could allow a local authenticated user to provide invalid inputs like special characters leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) when collecting “supportsave” from a Brocade Switch. |
| CVE-2023-5648 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Brocade ASCG before Brocade ASCG v3.0, several security-related HTTP Headers were missing in various Brocade ASCG URL paths, aiding unauthenticated attackers to perform attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting, Clickjacking, Information disclosure, and more. |
| CVE-2026-25274 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing concurrent DMA buffer allocation and deallocation commands without proper synchronization. |
| CVE-2026-25273 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing camera operations due to out-of-bounds write during driver updates. |
| CVE-2026-25272 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing camera CRE driver operations with improper handling of buffer limits during hardware update preparation. |
| CVE-2026-25270 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when processing command buffer requests with invalid length parameters in the Android Camera driver. |
| CVE-2026-25269 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when processing camera requests with excessive batch and IO buffer configurations exceeds allocated memory size. |
| CVE-2026-25263 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing IOCTL command called from user space to the kernel with invalid parameters. |
| CVE-2026-76114 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-73599 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-73596 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73593 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Active Debug Code vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73589 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains a Weak Encoding for Password vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73587 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73586 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-71177 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Session theft. |
| CVE-2026-61413 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-48361 | Medium | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-76451 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76450 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76449 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76448 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76447 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responder of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an administrative reload of the OCSP responder certificate and key material. This vulnerability is due to missing authentication on a function of the OCSP responder. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the OCSP responder to reload certificate and key material on demand. |
| CVE-2026-76446 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in an API of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read specific files on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper restriction of XML external entity references. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read specific files on the affected system that the underlying process has permission to access. |
| CVE-2026-76444 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in an internal service of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive configuration information from an affected device. This vulnerability is due to missing authentication on the Policy Runtime Repository Table (PRRT) service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive configuration information from the affected device. |
| CVE-2026-76439 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the endpoint posture status reporting functionality of the guest portal web application of Cisco ISE could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to submit forged posture status events into the endpoint posture pipeline. This vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication on an internal interface that is exposed through the guest portal. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to manipulate the posture status on the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-76434 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the certificate import functionality of the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the affected feature. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read arbitrary files from the affected device, which could contain sensitive information. |
| CVE-2026-76433 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the client provisioning download feature of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access protected files on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of directory traversal character sequences in a user-supplied path when the software processes provisioning resource requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the provisioning download service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access protected files without authentication, potentially exposing sensitive information. |
| CVE-2026-76432 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative-level privileges to write arbitrary files on an affected device. This vulnerability exists because the affected software does not properly validate directory traversal character sequences in a user-supplied file path during the upload process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted file to the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write files to an arbitrary location on the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-76431 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the file management function of the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to delete arbitrary files and directories on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of directory traversal character sequences in a user-supplied file path before the request is validated. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files and directories on the underlying operating system of the affected device. |
| CVE-2026-76428 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the REST APIs of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against the session database. This vulnerability is due to certain parameters being concatenated directly into SQL clauses without parameterization. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request that contains SQL statements in one of the affected parameters. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read information from the session database. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76426 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against the monitoring database. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of specific parameters that are then concatenated into an SQL statement. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request that contains SQL statements in one of the affected parameters. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read information from the monitoring database. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76707 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to view some system memory contents. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain insight into internal services and workflows, increasing the risk of unauthorized access and elevated privileges when combined with other vulnerabilities. |
| CVE-2026-76706 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information. Successful exploitation could result in the disclosure of security-relevant configuration details and security feature status, which could be used to facilitate further attacks. |
| CVE-2026-76705 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated remote attacker with Admin privilege to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. |
| CVE-2026-76704 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim's browser in the context of the affected interface. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to access sensitive information, potentially affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the data processed by the application. |
| CVE-2026-76703 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways that could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative access to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt system operations, potentially resulting in an unstable system state. |
| CVE-2026-76702 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the operating system of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an authenticated local attacker to cause a denial-of-service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt system operations, potentially resulting in an unstable system state. |
| CVE-2026-76701 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. |
| CVE-2026-76700 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerabilities in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service. |
| CVE-2026-76699 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in a system service within the underlying operating system of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways that could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause a denial-of-service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to crash the impacted service and temporarily disrupting network operations. |
| CVE-2026-76698 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A command injection vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. An authenticated remote attacker with limited access privileges could exploit this vulnerability through specially crafted input. Successful exploitation, under certain conditions, could result in the execution of arbitrary commands with elevated privileges or a denial-of-service condition on the affected appliance. |
| CVE-2026-76697 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow a remote attacker authenticated with low privileges to access sensitive information. A successful exploit allows an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. |
| CVE-2026-76696 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to conduct a denial of service attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to crash the system, preventing it from rebooting without manual intervention and disrupting network operations. |
| CVE-2026-76695 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to send specially crafted packets to the affected service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to affect the integrity and availability of the affected service. |
| CVE-2026-76694 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the command line interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to escalate privileges beyond their authorized level, and execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable system. |
| CVE-2026-80177 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to script injection. |
| CVE-2026-80174 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to session theft. |
| CVE-2026-80171 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Insufficient Entropy in PRNG vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-80124 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-80055 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to script injection. |
| CVE-2026-79974 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Authentication vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-79973 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Unsynchronized Access to Shared Data in a Multithreaded Context vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-79971 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Sanitization of Custom Special Characters vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to script injection. |
| CVE-2026-79970 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-79969 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains a Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-79968 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-79967 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-79965 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an External Control of Critical State Data vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-79964 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to launch of phishing attacks. |