Overview 11 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 3 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
11matches
3in Waratek scope27.3%
2protected18.2%
3exploited27.3%
3CISA KEV27.3%
3public PoC27.3%
3EPSS ≥ 0.527.3%
Protected by Waratek
2
18.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
9.1%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
7
63.6%
Not applicable
1
9.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
18.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
81.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
3
27.3%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
2
18.2%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
6
54.5%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q3 191
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 190
Q1 202
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q2 200
Q3 200
Q4 201
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 213
Outside Waratek scope3
Critical3
not blocked3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 210
Q1 222
Mitigation candidate1
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 222
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
Q3 19Q4 19Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4 20Q1 21Q2 21Q3 21Q4 21Q1 22Q2 22
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2022-23219 | Critical | 2022-01-14 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The deprecated compatibility function clnt_create in the sunrpc module of the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.34 copies its hostname argument on the stack without validating its length, which may result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in a denial of service or (if an application is not built with a stack protector enabled) arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2020-14343 | Critical | 2021-02-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability was discovered in the PyYAML library in versions before 5.4, where it is susceptible to arbitrary code execution when it processes untrusted YAML files through the full_load method or with the FullLoader loader. Applications that use the library to process untrusted input may be vulnerable to this flaw. This flaw allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system by abusing the python/object/new constructor. This flaw is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-1747. |
| CVE-2020-36242 | Critical | 2021-02-07 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In the cryptography package before 3.3.2 for Python, certain sequences of update calls to symmetrically encrypt multi-GB values could result in an integer overflow and buffer overflow, as demonstrated by the Fernet class. |
| CVE-2021-3177 | Critical | 2021-01-19 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. |
| CVE-2020-27619 | Critical | 2020-10-22 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In Python 3 through 3.9.0, the Lib/test/multibytecodec_support.py CJK codec tests call eval() on content retrieved via HTTP. |
| CVE-2020-1747 | Critical | 2020-03-24 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability was discovered in the PyYAML library in versions before 5.3.1, where it is susceptible to arbitrary code execution when it processes untrusted YAML files through the full_load method or with the FullLoader loader. Applications that use the library to process untrusted input may be vulnerable to this flaw. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the system by abusing the python/object/new constructor. |
| CVE-2019-15606 | Critical | 2020-02-07 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Including trailing white space in HTTP header values in Nodejs 10, 12, and 13 causes bypass of authorization based on header value comparisons |
| CVE-2019-10746 | Critical | 2019-08-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | mixin-deep is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution in versions before 1.3.2 and version 2.0.0. The function mixin-deep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. |