WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Protection: Full✕Product communications cloud native core network function cloud native environment✕
Overview 4 matches · 3 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4matches 3exploited75.0% 2CISA KEV50.0% 3public PoC75.0% 3EPSS ≥ 0.575.0%
Protected by Waratek 4 100.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 2 50.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 2 50.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 4 100.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 0 0.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 3 75.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 1 25.0%
split by peak 2 / quarter
Protected by Waratek: 4 Medium: 2Critical: 2 blocked by ARMR today: 4 No public exploit: 1Exploited: 3
Q4 191 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 No public exploit1 Q1 200 Q2 200 Q3 200 Q4 200 Q1 210 Q2 210 Q3 210 Q4 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 Q1 220 Q2 222 Protected by Waratek2 Critical2 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2
Q4 19Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4 20Q1 21Q2 21Q3 21Q4 21Q1 22Q2 22
4 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2022-22965 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
CVE-2022-22963 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2019-10219 Medium 2019-11-08 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.