Overview 4 matches · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
4
100.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
4
100.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
0
0.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
25.0%
Working exploit published
1
25.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
2
50.0%
split by
peak 1 / month
May 201
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Jun 200
Jul 200
Aug 200
Sep 200
Oct 200
Nov 200
Dec 200
Jan 210
Feb 210
Mar 210
Apr 210
May 211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Jun 210
Jul 210
Aug 211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Sep 210
Oct 211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Jun 20Aug 20Oct 20Dec 20Feb 21Apr 21Jun 21Aug 21Oct 21
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-37136 | High | 2021-10-19 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The Bzip2 decompression decoder function doesn't allow setting size restrictions on the decompressed output data (which affects the allocation size used during decompression). All users of Bzip2Decoder are affected. The malicious input can trigger an OOME and so a DoS attack |
| CVE-2021-39144 | High | 2021-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-22118 | High | 2021-05-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data. |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |