WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Protection: None✕Product communications application session controller✕
Overview 14 matches · 5 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 7 EPSS ≥ 0.5
14matches 5in Waratek scope35.7% 0protected0.0% 2exploited14.3% 0CISA KEV0.0% 5public PoC35.7% 7EPSS ≥ 0.550.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 5 35.7% Outside Waratek scope 9 64.3% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 8 57.1% Medium 4 28.6% Low 2 14.3% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 14 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 2 14.3% Working exploit published 3 21.4% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 2 14.3% No public exploit 7 50.0%
split by peak 5 / year
Outside Waratek scope: 9No exploit published: 5 Low: 2Medium: 4High: 8 not blocked: 14 No public exploit: 7Forecast only: 2Working exploit published: 3Exploited: 2
20131 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 Forecast only1 20140 20152 Outside Waratek scope2 High1 Low1 not blocked2 Working exploit published1 Forecast only1 20160 20171 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20182 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Working exploit published1 No public exploit1 20191 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 Exploited1 20205 No exploit published2 Outside Waratek scope3 High3 Medium1 Low1 not blocked5 Exploited1 No public exploit4 20212 No exploit published2 High2 not blocked2 No public exploit2
201320142015201620172018201920202021
14 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-2351 High 2021-07-21 No exploit published No public exploit Vulnerability in the Advanced Networking Option component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.0.2, 12.2.0.1 and 19c. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Advanced Networking Option. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Advanced Networking Option, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Advanced Networking Option. Note: The July 2021 Critical Patch Update introduces a number of Native Network Encryption changes to deal with vulnerability CVE-2021-2351 and prevent the use of weaker ciphers. Customers should review: "Changes in Native Network Encryption with the July 2021 Critical Patch Update" (Doc ID 2791571.1). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
CVE-2020-11987 High 2021-02-24 No exploit published No public exploit Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests.
CVE-2020-28052 High 2020-12-18 No exploit published No public exploit An issue was discovered in Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC Java 1.65 and 1.66. The OpenBSDBCrypt.checkPassword utility method compared incorrect data when checking the password, allowing incorrect passwords to indicate they were matching with previously hashed ones that were different.
CVE-2020-27216 High 2020-10-23 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty versions 1.0 thru 9.4.32.v20200930, 10.0.0.alpha1 thru 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha1 thru 11.0.0.beta2O, on Unix like systems, the system's temporary directory is shared between all users on that system. A collocated user can observe the process of creating a temporary sub directory in the shared temporary directory and race to complete the creation of the temporary subdirectory. If the attacker wins the race then they will have read and write permission to the subdirectory used to unpack web applications, including their WEB-INF/lib jar files and JSP files. If any code is ever executed out of this temporary directory, this can lead to a local privilege escalation vulnerability.
CVE-2020-11022 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2020-9488 Low 2020-04-27 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in Apache Log4j SMTP appender. This could allow an SMTPS connection to be intercepted by a man-in-the-middle attack which could leak any log messages sent through that appender. Fixed in Apache Log4j 2.12.3 and 2.13.1
CVE-2020-5258 High 2020-03-10 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit In affected versions of dojo (NPM package), the deepCopy method is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. Prototype Pollution refers to the ability to inject properties into existing JavaScript language construct prototypes, such as objects. An attacker manipulates these attributes to overwrite, or pollute, a JavaScript application object prototype of the base object by injecting other values. This has been patched in versions 1.12.8, 1.13.7, 1.14.6, 1.15.3 and 1.16.2
CVE-2019-11358 Medium 2019-04-20 Outside Waratek scope Exploited jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype.
CVE-2018-11784 Medium 2018-10-04 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published When the default servlet in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.11, 8.5.0 to 8.5.33 and 7.0.23 to 7.0.90 returned a redirect to a directory (e.g. redirecting to '/foo/' when the user requested '/foo') a specially crafted URL could be used to cause the redirect to be generated to any URI of the attackers choice.
CVE-2018-1000180 High 2018-06-05 No exploit published No public exploit Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later.
CVE-2017-3730 High 2017-05-04 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published In OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d, if a malicious server supplies bad parameters for a DHE or ECDHE key exchange then this can result in the client attempting to dereference a NULL pointer leading to a client crash. This could be exploited in a Denial of Service attack.
CVE-2015-2808 Low 2015-04-01 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue.
CVE-2015-0235 High 2015-01-28 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) gethostbyname or (2) gethostbyname2 function, aka "GHOST."
CVE-2013-2566 Medium 2013-03-15 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext.