WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product common✕
Overview 4 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4matches 0in Waratek scope0.0% 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 1public PoC25.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 4 100.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 4 100.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 4 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 1 25.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 3 75.0%
split by peak 4 / month
Withdrawn CVE: 4 Unknown: 4 not blocked: 4 No public exploit: 3Proof of concept only: 1
Oct 22
4 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2022-41852 Unknown 2022-10-06 Withdrawn CVE Proof of concept only Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2022-40161 Unknown 2022-10-06 Withdrawn CVE No public exploit Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2022-40158 Unknown 2022-10-06 Withdrawn CVE No public exploit Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2022-40157 Unknown 2022-10-06 Withdrawn CVE No public exploit Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.