Overview 21 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
21matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
2
9.5%
Not applicable
19
90.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
21
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
21
100.0%
split by
peak 7 / quarter
Q2 161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 171
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 180
Q2 180
Q3 187
Not applicable7
Medium7
not blocked7
No public exploit7
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 192
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 190
Q4 194
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable2
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
Q1 205
Not applicable5
Medium5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
Q2 200
Q3 201
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 16Q1 17Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-10780 | Medium | 2020-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by CSV Injection flaw, a crafted payload stays dormant till a victim export as CSV and opens the file with Excel. Once the victim opens the file, the formula executes, triggering any number of possible events. While this is strictly not an flaw that affects the application directly, attackers could use the loosely validated parameters to trigger several attack possibilities. |
| CVE-2019-14905 | Medium | 2020-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Ansible Engine versions 2.9.x before 2.9.3, 2.8.x before 2.8.8, 2.7.x before 2.7.16 and earlier, where in Ansible's nxos_file_copy module can be used to copy files to a flash or bootflash on NXOS devices. Malicious code could craft the filename parameter to perform OS command injections. This could result in a loss of confidentiality of the system among other issues. |
| CVE-2020-1740 | Medium | 2020-03-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Ansible Engine when using Ansible Vault for editing encrypted files. When a user executes "ansible-vault edit", another user on the same computer can read the old and new secret, as it is created in a temporary file with mkstemp and the returned file descriptor is closed and the method write_data is called to write the existing secret in the file. This method will delete the file before recreating it insecurely. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable. |
| CVE-2020-1735 | Medium | 2020-03-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the Ansible Engine when the fetch module is used. An attacker could intercept the module, inject a new path, and then choose a new destination path on the controller node. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable. |
| CVE-2020-1733 | Medium | 2020-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A race condition flaw was found in Ansible Engine 2.7.17 and prior, 2.8.9 and prior, 2.9.6 and prior when running a playbook with an unprivileged become user. When Ansible needs to run a module with become user, the temporary directory is created in /var/tmp. This directory is created with "umask 77 && mkdir -p <dir>"; this operation does not fail if the directory already exists and is owned by another user. An attacker could take advantage to gain control of the become user as the target directory can be retrieved by iterating '/proc/<pid>/cmdline'. |
| CVE-2019-14864 | Medium | 2020-01-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Ansible, versions 2.9.x before 2.9.1, 2.8.x before 2.8.7 and Ansible versions 2.7.x before 2.7.15, is not respecting the flag no_log set it to True when Sumologic and Splunk callback plugins are used send tasks results events to collectors. This would discloses and collects any sensitive data. |
| CVE-2014-3536 | Medium | 2019-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CFME (CloudForms Management Engine) 5: RHN account information is logged to top_output.log during registration |
| CVE-2018-10854 | Medium | 2019-11-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | cloudforms version, cloudforms 5.8 and cloudforms 5.9, is vulnerable to a cross-site-scripting. A flaw was found in CloudForms's v2v infrastructure mapping delete feature. A stored cross-site scripting due to improper sanitization of user input in Name field. |
| CVE-2013-6461 | Medium | 2019-11-05 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Nokogiri gem 1.5.x and 1.6.x has DoS while parsing XML entities by failing to apply limits |
| CVE-2013-6460 | Medium | 2019-11-05 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Nokogiri gem 1.5.x has Denial of Service via infinite loop when parsing XML documents |
| CVE-2019-10177 | Medium | 2019-06-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability was found in the PDF export component of CloudForms, versions 5.9 and 5.10, due to user input is not properly sanitized. An attacker with least privilege to edit compute is able to execute a XSS attack against other users, which could lead to malicious code execution and extraction of the anti-CSRF token of higher privileged users. |
| CVE-2017-15123 | Medium | 2019-06-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the CloudForms web interface, versions 5.8 - 5.10, where the RSS feed URLs are not properly restricted to authenticated users only. An attacker could use this flaw to view potentially sensitive information from CloudForms including data such as newly created virtual machines. |
| CVE-2016-7047 | Medium | 2018-09-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the CloudForms API before 5.6.3.0, 5.7.3.1 and 5.8.1.2. A user with permissions to use the MiqReportResults capability within the API could potentially view data from other tenants or groups to which they should not have access. |
| CVE-2017-7528 | Medium | 2018-08-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Ansible Tower as shipped with Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 5 is vulnerable to CRLF Injection. It was found that X-Forwarded-For header allows internal servers to deploy other systems (using callback). |
| CVE-2017-7497 | Medium | 2018-07-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The dialog for creating cloud volumes (cinder provider) in CloudForms does not filter cloud tenants by user. An attacker with the ability to create storage volumes could use this to create storage volumes for any other tenant. |
| CVE-2017-2653 | Medium | 2018-07-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protection causing the routes to be used. This attack would require additional cross-site scripting or similar attacks in order to execute. |
| CVE-2017-2632 | Medium | 2018-07-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A logic error in valid_role() in CloudForms role validation before 5.7.1.3 could allow a tenant administrator to create groups with a higher privilege level than the tenant administrator should have. This would allow an attacker with tenant administration access to elevate privileges. |
| CVE-2017-15125 | Medium | 2018-07-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in CloudForms before 5.9.0.22 in the self-service UI snapshot feature where the name field is not properly sanitized for HTML and JavaScript input. An attacker could use this flaw to execute a stored XSS attack on an application administrator using CloudForms. Please note that CSP (Content Security Policy) prevents exploitation of this XSS however not all browsers support CSP. |
| CVE-2017-2664 | Medium | 2018-07-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1 lacks RBAC controls on certain methods in the rails application portion of CloudForms. An attacker with access could use a variety of methods within the rails application portion of CloudForms to escalate privileges. |
| CVE-2016-3702 | Medium | 2017-04-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Padding oracle flaw in CloudForms Management Engine (aka CFME) 5 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information. |
| CVE-2015-7502 | Medium | 2016-04-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat CloudForms 3.2 Management Engine (CFME) 5.4.4 and CloudForms 4.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.5.0 do not properly encrypt data in the backend PostgreSQL database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive data and consequently gain privileges by leveraging access to (1) database exports or (2) log files. |