Overview 16 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
16matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC6.2%
1EPSS ≥ 0.56.2%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
6.2%
Not applicable
15
93.8%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
16
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1
6.2%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
15
93.8%
split by
peak 7 / year
20132
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20141
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20161
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20171
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20187
Not applicable7
High7
not blocked7
No public exploit7
20191
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20203
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
High3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20132014201520162017201820192020
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-14296 | High | 2020-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 was vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw. With the access to add Ansible Tower provider, an attacker could scan and attack systems from the internal network which are not normally accessible. |
| CVE-2019-14894 | High | 2020-06-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the CloudForms management engine version 5.10 and CloudForms management version 5.11, which triggered remote code execution through NFS schedule backup. An attacker logged into the management console could use this flaw to execute arbitrary shell commands on the CloudForms server as root. |
| CVE-2012-6685 | High | 2020-02-19 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Nokogiri before 1.5.4 is vulnerable to XXE attacks |
| CVE-2014-0197 | High | 2019-12-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer header |
| CVE-2016-5402 | High | 2018-10-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A code injection flaw was found in the way capacity and utilization imported control files are processed. A remote, authenticated attacker with access to the capacity and utilization feature could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code as the user CFME runs as. |
| CVE-2016-7071 | High | 2018-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | It was found that the CloudForms before 5.6.2.2, and 5.7.0.7 did not properly apply permissions controls to VM IDs passed by users. A remote, authenticated attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary VMs on systems managed by CloudForms if they know the ID of the VM. |
| CVE-2017-2639 | High | 2018-07-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms. |
| CVE-2017-7530 | High | 2018-07-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1, it was found that privilege check is missing when invoking arbitrary methods via filtering on VMs that MiqExpression will execute that is triggerable by API users. An attacker could use this to execute actions they should not be allowed to (e.g. destroying VMs). |
| CVE-2018-10905 | High | 2018-07-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) is vulnerable to an improper security setting in the dRuby component of CloudForms. An attacker with access to an unprivileged local shell could use this flaw to execute commands as a high privileged user. |
| CVE-2013-2049 | High | 2018-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat CloudForms 2 Management Engine (CFME) allows remote attackers to conduct session tampering attacks by leveraging use of a static secret_token.rb secret. |
| CVE-2014-0087 | High | 2018-01-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The check_privileges method in vmdb/app/controllers/application_controller.rb in ManageIQ, as used in Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine (CFME), allows remote authenticated users to bypass authorization and gain privileges by leveraging improper RBAC checking, related to the rbac_user_edit action. |
| CVE-2016-4457 | High | 2017-06-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CloudForms Management Engine before 5.8 includes a default SSL/TLS certificate. |
| CVE-2016-7040 | High | 2016-10-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 4.1 does not properly handle regular expressions passed to the expression engine via the JSON API and the web-based UI, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary shell commands by leveraging the ability to view and filter collections. |
| CVE-2013-2050 | High | 2014-01-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in the miq_policy controller in Red Hat CloudForms 2.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.1 and ManageIQ Enterprise Virtualization Manager 5.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the profile[] parameter in an explorer action. |
| CVE-2013-2068 | High | 2013-09-28 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the AgentController in Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 2.0 allow remote attackers to create and overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the filename parameter to the (1) log, (2) upload, or (3) linuxpkgs method. |
| CVE-2013-4172 | High | 2013-08-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 5.1 allow remote administrators to execute arbitrary Ruby code via unspecified vectors. |