Overview 33 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
33matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
3public PoC9.1%
1EPSS ≥ 0.53.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
33
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
33
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
3
9.1%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
30
90.9%
split by
peak 4 / quarter
Q1 182
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
Q2 182
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 181
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 191
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 190
Q4 192
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q1 202
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only2
Q2 200
Q3 201
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 203
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
Q1 210
Q2 212
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 210
Q4 212
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q1 224
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
Q2 222
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 221
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 221
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 232
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q2 230
Q3 233
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
Q4 232
Not applicable2
High1
Low1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22Q4 22Q2 23Q4 23
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-25756 | High | 2023-11-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds read in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2023-22329 | Low | 2023-11-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2022-44611 | High | 2023-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2022-43505 | Medium | 2023-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient control flow management in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2022-27879 | Medium | 2023-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper buffer restrictions in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2022-38090 | Medium | 2023-02-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors when using Intel(R) Software Guard Extensions may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2022-30704 | High | 2023-02-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper initialization in the Intel(R) TXT SINIT ACM for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2022-21198 | High | 2022-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Time-of-check time-of-use race condition in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2022-21233 | Medium | 2022-08-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2022-21151 | Medium | 2022-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Processor optimization removal or modification of security-critical code for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2022-0004 | Medium | 2022-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Hardware debug modes and processor INIT setting that allow override of locks for some Intel(R) Processors in Intel(R) Boot Guard and Intel(R) TXT may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. |
| CVE-2022-0002 | Medium | 2022-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Non-transparent sharing of branch predictor within a context in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authorized user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2022-0001 | Medium | 2022-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Non-transparent sharing of branch predictor selectors between contexts in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authorized user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2021-33150 | Medium | 2022-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Hardware allows activation of test or debug logic at runtime for some Intel(R) Trace Hub instances which may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. |
| CVE-2021-33120 | Medium | 2022-02-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds read under complex microarchitectural condition in memory subsystem for some Intel Atom(R) Processors may allow authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure or cause denial of service via network access. |
| CVE-2021-0186 | Medium | 2021-11-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in the Intel(R) SGX SDK applications compiled for SGX2 enabled processors may allow a privileged user to potentially escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2021-0146 | Medium | 2021-11-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Hardware allows activation of test or debug logic at runtime for some Intel(R) processors which may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. |
| CVE-2020-24513 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Domain-bypass transient execution vulnerability in some Intel Atom(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-24489 | High | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incomplete cleanup in some Intel(R) VT-d products may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0599 | Medium | 2020-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in the PMC for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8695 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Observable discrepancy in the RAPL interface for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8694 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient access control in the Linux kernel driver for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0559 | High | 2020-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insecure inherited permissions in some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi products on Windows* 7 and 8.1 before version 21.40.5.1 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0551 | Medium | 2020-03-12 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Load value injection in some Intel(R) Processors utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access. The list of affected products is provided in intel-sa-00334: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00334.html |
| CVE-2019-14615 | Medium | 2020-01-17 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Insufficient control flow in certain data structures for some Intel(R) Processors with Intel(R) Processor Graphics may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2019-0155 | High | 2019-11-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient access control in a subsystem for Intel (R) processor graphics in 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Families; Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor J, N, Silver and Gold Series; Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor J, N, G3900 and G4900 Series; Intel(R) Atom(R) Processor A and E3900 Series; Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processor E3-1500 v5 and v6, E-2100 and E-2200 Processor Families; Intel(R) Graphics Driver for Windows before 26.20.100.6813 (DCH) or 26.20.100.6812 and before 21.20.x.5077 (aka15.45.5077), i915 Linux Driver for Intel(R) Processor Graphics before versions 5.4-rc7, 5.3.11, 4.19.84, 4.14.154, 4.9.201, 4.4.201 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2019-0154 | Medium | 2019-11-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient access control in subsystem for Intel (R) processor graphics in 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Families; Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor J, N, Silver and Gold Series; Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor J, N, G3900 and G4900 Series; Intel(R) Atom(R) Processor A and E3900 Series; Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processor E3-1500 v5 and v6 and E-2100 Processor Families may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2019-0120 | Medium | 2019-05-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient key protection vulnerability in silicon reference firmware for Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor J Series, Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor N Series, Intel(R) Celeron(R) J Series, Intel(R) Celeron(R) N Series, Intel(R) Atom(R) Processor A Series, Intel(R) Atom(R) Processor E3900 Series, Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor Silver Series may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2018-3693 | Medium | 2018-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a speculative buffer overflow and side-channel analysis. |
| CVE-2018-3640 | Medium | 2018-05-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and that perform speculative reads of system registers may allow unauthorized disclosure of system parameters to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Rogue System Register Read (RSRE), Variant 3a. |
| CVE-2017-5703 | Medium | 2018-04-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Configuration of SPI Flash in platforms based on multiple Intel platforms allow a local attacker to alter the behavior of the SPI flash potentially leading to a Denial of Service. |
| CVE-2018-9056 | Medium | 2018-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel attack on the directional branch predictor, as demonstrated by a pattern history table (PHT), aka BranchScope. |
| CVE-2017-5754 | Medium | 2018-01-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis of the data cache. |