WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product blockchain platform✕
Overview 8 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
8matches 2in Waratek scope25.0% 1protected12.5% 2exploited25.0% 1CISA KEV12.5% 2public PoC25.0% 2EPSS ≥ 0.525.0%
Protected by Waratek 1 12.5% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 1 12.5% Outside Waratek scope 3 37.5% Not applicable 3 37.5% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 8 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 1 12.5% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 7 87.5% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 2 25.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 6 75.0%
split by peak 2 / quarter
Not applicable: 3Outside Waratek scope: 3No exploit published: 1Protected by Waratek: 1 Medium: 8 not blocked: 7blocked by ARMR today: 1 No public exploit: 6Exploited: 2
Q2 171 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q3 171 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 180 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 190 Q3 191 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q4 190 Q1 200 Q2 202 Outside Waratek scope2 Medium2 not blocked2 Exploited2 Q3 201 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q4 201 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q1 210 Q2 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 No public exploit1
Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21
8 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-29425 Medium 2021-04-13 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value.
CVE-2020-27218 Medium 2020-11-28 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty version 9.4.0.RC0 to 9.4.34.v20201102, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.0.beta2, if GZIP request body inflation is enabled and requests from different clients are multiplexed onto a single connection, and if an attacker can send a request with a body that is received entirely but not consumed by the application, then a subsequent request on the same connection will see that body prepended to its body. The attacker will not see any data but may inject data into the body of the subsequent request.
CVE-2020-15719 Medium 2020-07-14 Not applicable No public exploit libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
CVE-2020-11023 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2020-11022 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2019-13057 Medium 2019-07-26 Not applicable No public exploit An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.)
CVE-2017-14159 Medium 2017-09-05 Not applicable No public exploit slapd in OpenLDAP 2.4.45 and earlier creates a PID file after dropping privileges to a non-root account, which might allow local users to kill arbitrary processes by leveraging access to this non-root account for PID file modification before a root script executes a "kill `cat /pathname`" command, as demonstrated by openldap-initscript.
CVE-2017-9287 Medium 2017-05-29 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit servers/slapd/back-mdb/search.c in OpenLDAP through 2.4.44 is prone to a double free vulnerability. A user with access to search the directory can crash slapd by issuing a search including the Paged Results control with a page size of 0.