Overview 9 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9matches
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
9
100.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
9
100.0%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q1 211
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 210
Q1 220
Q2 220
Q3 222
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 222
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 232
No exploit published2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 240
Q3 240
Q4 240
Q1 250
Q2 250
Q3 250
Q4 250
Q1 262
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q1 21Q3 21Q1 22Q3 22Q1 23Q3 23Q1 24Q3 24Q1 25Q3 25Q1 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-24807 | Medium | 2026-01-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in liuyueyi quick-media (plugins/svg-plugin/batik-codec-fix/src/main/java/org/apache/batik/ext/awt/image/codec/util modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files SeekableOutputStream.Java. This issue affects quick-media: before v1.0. |
| CVE-2026-24806 | Medium | 2026-01-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in liuyueyi quick-media (plugins/svg-plugin/batik-codec-fix/src/main/java/org/apache/batik/ext/awt/image/codec/png modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files PNGImageEncoder.Java. This issue affects quick-media: before v1.0. |
| CVE-2022-44730 | Medium | 2023-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. A malicious SVG can probe user profile / data and send it directly as parameter to a URL. |
| CVE-2022-44729 | High | 2023-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. On version 1.16, a malicious SVG could trigger loading external resources by default, causing resource consumption or in some cases even information disclosure. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.17 or later. |
| CVE-2022-42890 | High | 2022-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run Java code from untrusted SVG via JavaScript. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.16. |
| CVE-2022-41704 | High | 2022-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code from an SVG. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. It is recommended to update to version 1.16. |
| CVE-2022-38648 | Medium | 2022-09-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to fetch external resources. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-38398 | Medium | 2022-09-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2020-11987 | High | 2021-02-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. |