Overview 13 matches · 10 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
13matches
10in Waratek scope76.9%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC7.7%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
7.7%
No exploit published
9
69.2%
Outside Waratek scope
1
7.7%
Not applicable
2
15.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
13
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
7.7%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
12
92.3%
split by
peak 5 / year
20141
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20160
20171
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20180
20191
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20200
20211
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20225
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published4
High3
Medium2
not blocked5
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit4
20232
No exploit published2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20240
20250
20262
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
2014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-24807 | Medium | 2026-01-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in liuyueyi quick-media (plugins/svg-plugin/batik-codec-fix/src/main/java/org/apache/batik/ext/awt/image/codec/util modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files SeekableOutputStream.Java. This issue affects quick-media: before v1.0. |
| CVE-2026-24806 | Medium | 2026-01-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in liuyueyi quick-media (plugins/svg-plugin/batik-codec-fix/src/main/java/org/apache/batik/ext/awt/image/codec/png modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files PNGImageEncoder.Java. This issue affects quick-media: before v1.0. |
| CVE-2022-44730 | Medium | 2023-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. A malicious SVG can probe user profile / data and send it directly as parameter to a URL. |
| CVE-2022-44729 | High | 2023-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. On version 1.16, a malicious SVG could trigger loading external resources by default, causing resource consumption or in some cases even information disclosure. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.17 or later. |
| CVE-2022-42890 | High | 2022-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run Java code from untrusted SVG via JavaScript. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.16. |
| CVE-2022-41704 | High | 2022-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code from an SVG. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. It is recommended to update to version 1.16. |
| CVE-2022-40146 | High | 2022-09-22 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to access files using a Jar url. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-38648 | Medium | 2022-09-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to fetch external resources. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-38398 | Medium | 2022-09-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2020-11987 | High | 2021-02-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. |
| CVE-2019-13990 | Critical | 2019-07-26 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | initDocumentParser in xml/XMLSchedulingDataProcessor.java in Terracotta Quartz Scheduler through 2.3.0 allows XXE attacks via a job description. |
| CVE-2017-5662 | High | 2017-04-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. |
| CVE-2014-7016 | Medium | 2014-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Mahasna Batik (aka com.batik.mahasna) application 1.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. |