Medium Oracle Application Server CVEs
67 CVEs, 1 exploited, 9 protected by Waratek
Overview 67 matches · 9 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
9
13.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
1.5%
No exploit published
57
85.1%
blocked by ARMR today
9
13.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
58
86.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
1.5%
Working exploit published
2
3.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
1
1.5%
No public exploit
63
94.0%
split by
peak 15 / year
20028
No exploit published8
Medium8
not blocked8
Forecast only1
No public exploit7
20030
20043
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20050
20067
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published6
Medium7
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
No public exploit7
20077
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published6
Medium7
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
No public exploit7
20088
No exploit published8
Medium8
not blocked8
No public exploit8
200915
No exploit published15
Medium15
not blocked15
No public exploit15
20102
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20170
20184
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published3
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20194
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2
No public exploit4
20204
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2
No public exploit4
20214
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2
Exploited1
No public exploit3
20220
20230
20240
20250
20261
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
2002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-70732 | Medium | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Mobile Application Server product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: MWA Terminal Server). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Mobile Application Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Mobile Application Server accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2021-36374 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, or a derived formats, an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Commonly used derived formats from ZIP archives are for instance JAR files and many office files. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2021-36373 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2021-29425 | Medium | 2021-04-13 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value. |
| CVE-2020-17521 | Medium | 2020-12-07 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Groovy provides extension methods to aid with creating temporary directories. Prior to this fix, Groovy's implementation of those extension methods was using a now superseded Java JDK method call that is potentially not secure on some operating systems in some contexts. Users not using the extension methods mentioned in the advisory are not affected, but may wish to read the advisory for further details. Versions Affected: 2.0 to 2.4.20, 2.5.0 to 2.5.13, 3.0.0 to 3.0.6, and 4.0.0-alpha-1. Fixed in versions 2.4.21, 2.5.14, 3.0.7, 4.0.0-alpha-2. |
| CVE-2020-27218 | Medium | 2020-11-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty version 9.4.0.RC0 to 9.4.34.v20201102, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.0.beta2, if GZIP request body inflation is enabled and requests from different clients are multiplexed onto a single connection, and if an attacker can send a request with a body that is received entirely but not consumed by the application, then a subsequent request on the same connection will see that body prepended to its body. The attacker will not see any data but may inject data into the body of the subsequent request. |
| CVE-2020-5421 | Medium | 2020-09-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter. |
| CVE-2020-5397 | Medium | 2020-01-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack. |
| CVE-2019-10219 | Medium | 2019-11-08 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. |
| CVE-2019-12415 | Medium | 2019-10-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache POI up to 4.1.0, when using the tool XSSFExportToXml to convert user-provided Microsoft Excel documents, a specially crafted document can allow an attacker to read files from the local filesystem or from internal network resources via XML External Entity (XXE) Processing. |
| CVE-2019-3739 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys. |
| CVE-2019-3738 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to a Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key. |
| CVE-2018-11056 | Medium | 2018-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, prior to 4.1.6.1 (in 4.1.x), and RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition versions prior to 4.0.5.3 (in 4.0.x) contain an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion') vulnerability when parsing ASN.1 data. A remote attacker could use maliciously constructed ASN.1 data that would exhaust the stack, potentially causing a Denial Of Service. |
| CVE-2018-11039 | Medium | 2018-06-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework (versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.7, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.18, and older unsupported versions) allow web applications to change the HTTP request method to any HTTP method (including TRACE) using the HiddenHttpMethodFilter in Spring MVC. If an application has a pre-existing XSS vulnerability, a malicious user (or attacker) can use this filter to escalate to an XST (Cross Site Tracing) attack. |
| CVE-2018-1257 | Medium | 2018-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2018-1271 | Medium | 2018-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack. |
| CVE-2010-0070 | Medium | 2010-01-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Containers for J2EE component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.3.4 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0067 | Medium | 2010-01-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Containers for J2EE component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.3.4 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2009-3407 | Medium | 2009-10-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Portal component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.4.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0974 and CVE-2009-0983. |
| CVE-2009-1999 | Medium | 2009-10-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition component in unspecified Oracle Application Server versions allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2008-7236 | Medium | 2009-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle JDeveloper component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.2 and 10.1.3.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, aka AS05. |
| CVE-2008-7235 | Medium | 2009-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Forms component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.2 and E-Business Suite 12.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, aka AS04. |
| CVE-2008-7234 | Medium | 2009-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle BPEL Worklist Application component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.2 and 10.1.3.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, aka AS03. |
| CVE-2009-1017 | Medium | 2009-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the BI Publisher component in Oracle Application Server 5.6.2, 10.1.3.2.1, 10.1.3.3.3, and 10.1.3.4 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0994. |
| CVE-2009-0996 | Medium | 2009-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the BI Publisher component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.2.1, 10.1.3.3.3, and 10.1.3.4 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2009-0994 | Medium | 2009-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the BI Publisher component in Oracle Application Server 5.6.2, 10.1.3.2.1, 10.1.3.3.3, and 10.1.3.4 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-1017. |
| CVE-2009-0990 | Medium | 2009-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the BI Publisher component in Oracle Application Server 5.6.2, 10.1.3.2.1, and 10.1.3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0989. |
| CVE-2009-0989 | Medium | 2009-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the BI Publisher component in Oracle Application Server 5.6.2, 10.1.3.2.1, and 10.1.3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0990. |
| CVE-2009-0983 | Medium | 2009-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Portal component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.4.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0974 and CVE-2009-3407. |
| CVE-2009-0974 | Medium | 2009-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Portal component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.4.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0983 and CVE-2009-3407. |
| CVE-2008-5438 | Medium | 2009-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Portal component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.4.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2008-4017 | Medium | 2009-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the OC4J component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2008-4014 | Medium | 2009-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle BPEL Process Manager component in Oracle Application Server allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2008-3977 | Medium | 2008-10-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Portal component in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3 and 10.1.2.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3975. |
| CVE-2008-3975 | Medium | 2008-10-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Portal component in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3 and 10.1.2.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3977. |
| CVE-2008-2612 | Medium | 2008-07-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Hyperion BI Plus component in Oracle Application Server 8.3.2.4, 8.5.0.3, 9.2.0.3, 9.2.1.0, and 9.3.1.0 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors. |
| CVE-2008-2609 | Medium | 2008-07-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Portal component in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.3, and 10.1.4.2 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors. |
| CVE-2008-2596 | Medium | 2008-07-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Mobile Application Server component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.0.3 has unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors. |
| CVE-2008-2594 | Medium | 2008-07-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Portal component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.4.2 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2593. |
| CVE-2008-2593 | Medium | 2008-07-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Portal component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.4.2 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2594. |
| CVE-2008-2583 | Medium | 2008-07-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the sample Discussion Forum Portlet for the Oracle Portal component in Oracle Application Server, as available from OTN before 20080715, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors. |
| CVE-2007-2119 | Medium | 2007-04-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in boundary_rules.jsp in the Administration Front End for Oracle Enterprise (Ultra) Search, as used in Database Server 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.2, and in Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or web script via the EXPTYPE parameter, aka SES01. |
| CVE-2007-1609 | Medium | 2007-03-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in servlet/Spy in Dynamic Monitoring Services (DMS) in Oracle Application Server (OAS) 10g 10.1.2.0.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the table parameter. NOTE: This may be related to CVE-2002-0563. |
| CVE-2007-0289 | Medium | 2007-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2 have unknown impact and attack vectors related to Oracle Containers for J2EE, aka (1) OC4J01, (2) OC4J05, and (3) OC4J06. |
| CVE-2007-0285 | Medium | 2007-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2; Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2; and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10CU2 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to Oracle Reports Developer, aka REP01. |
| CVE-2007-0284 | Medium | 2007-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3 and 10.1.2.0.0, and Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2, have unknown impact and attack vectors related to Oracle Containers for J2EE, aka (1) OC4J03 and (2) OC4J04. |
| CVE-2007-0283 | Medium | 2007-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3 and Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to Oracle Containers for J2EE, aka OC4J02. |
| CVE-2007-0222 | Medium | 2007-01-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in the EmChartBean server side component for Oracle Application Server 10g allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unknown vectors, probably "\.." sequences in the beanId parameter. NOTE: this is likely a duplicate of another CVE that Oracle addressed in CPU Jan 2007, but due to lack of details by Oracle, it is unclear which BugID this issue is associated with, so the other CVE cannot be determined. Possibilities include EM02 (CVE-2007-0292) or EM05 (CVE-2007-0293). |
| CVE-2006-3714 | Medium | 2006-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 and 10.1.2.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS10. |
| CVE-2006-3713 | Medium | 2006-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS09. |
| CVE-2006-3712 | Medium | 2006-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS07. |
| CVE-2006-3711 | Medium | 2006-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3, 9.0.3.1, and 9.0.4.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS06. |
| CVE-2006-3709 | Medium | 2006-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3, 9.0.3.1, and 10.1.2.0.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS04. |
| CVE-2006-3706 | Medium | 2006-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS01. |
| CVE-2006-0275 | Medium | 2006-01-18 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# REP04. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that this issue is related to directory traversal that allows reading of portions of arbitrary XML files via the customize parameter. |
| CVE-2004-2244 | Medium | 2004-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The XML parser in Oracle 9i Application Server Release 2 9.0.3.0 and 9.0.3.1, 9.0.2.3 and earlier, and Release 1 1.0.2.2 and 1.0.2.2.2, and Database Server Release 2 9.2.0.1 and later, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a SOAP message containing a crafted DTD. |
| CVE-2004-1366 | Medium | 2004-08-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Oracle 10g Database Server stores the password for the SYSMAN account in cleartext in the world-readable emoms.properties file, which could allow local users to gain DBA privileges. |
| CVE-2004-2134 | Medium | 2004-01-28 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Oracle toplink mapping workBench uses a weak encryption algorithm for passwords, which allows local users to decrypt the passwords. |
| CVE-2002-2347 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Oracle Java Server Page (OJSP) demo files (1) hellouser.jsp, (2) welcomeuser.jsp and (3) usebean.jsp in Oracle 9i Application Server 9.0.2, 1.0.2.2, 1.0.2.1s and 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the text entry field. |
| CVE-2002-1858 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Oracle Oracle9i Application Server 1.0.2.2 and 9.0.2 through 9.0.2.0.1, when running on Windows, allows remote attackers to retrieve files in the WEB-INF directory, which contains Java class files and configuration information, via a request to the WEB-INF directory with a trailing dot ("WEB-INF."). |
| CVE-2002-1632 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Oracle 9i Application Server (9iAS) installs multiple sample pages that allow remote attackers to obtain environment variables and other sensitive information via (1) info.jsp, (2) printenv, (3) echo, or (4) echo2. |
| CVE-2002-0565 | Medium | 2002-07-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Oracle 9iAS 1.0.2.x compiles JSP files in the _pages directory with world-readable permissions under the web root, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information derived from the JSP code, including usernames and passwords, via a direct HTTP request to _pages. |
| CVE-2002-0563 | Medium | 2002-07-03 | No exploit published | Forecast only | The default configuration of Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2.x allows remote anonymous users to access sensitive services without authentication, including Dynamic Monitoring Services (1) dms0, (2) dms/DMSDump, (3) servlet/DMSDump, (4) servlet/Spy, (5) soap/servlet/Spy, and (6) dms/AggreSpy; and Oracle Java Process Manager (7) oprocmgr-status and (8) oprocmgr-service, which can be used to control Java processes. |
| CVE-2002-0562 | Medium | 2002-07-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default configuration of Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2.x running Oracle JSP or SQLJSP stores globals.jsa under the web root, which allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information including usernames and passwords via a direct HTTP request to globals.jsa. |
| CVE-2002-1637 | Medium | 2002-02-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple components in Oracle 9i Application Server (9iAS) are installed with over 160 default usernames and passwords, including (1) SYS, (2) SYSTEM, (3) AQJAVA, (4) OWA, (5) IMAGEUSER, (6) USER1, (7) USER2, (8) PLSQL, (9) DEMO, (10) FINANCE, and many others, which allows attackers to gain privileges. |
| CVE-2001-1372 | Medium | 2002-02-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to obtain the physical path of a file under the server root via a request for a non-existent .JSP file, which leaks the pathname in an error message. |