Overview 11 matches · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
9.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
10
90.9%
blocked by ARMR today
1
9.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
10
90.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1
9.1%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
10
90.9%
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-5575 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Common Applications Calendar component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.1 through 12.1.3 and 12.2.3 through 12.2.6 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to Resources Module. |
| CVE-2016-5571 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Applications DBA component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3 and 12.2.3 through 12.2.6 allows remote administrators to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to AD Utilities, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5567. |
| CVE-2016-5570 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Applications DBA component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.2.3 through 12.2.6 allows remote administrators to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to AD Utilities. |
| CVE-2016-5567 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Applications DBA component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3 and 12.2.3 through 12.2.6 allows remote administrators to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to AD Utilities, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5571. |
| CVE-2016-5517 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Applications DBA component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3 allows local users to affect confidentiality via vectors related to AD Utilities. |
| CVE-2016-0377 | Medium | 2016-10-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Administrative Console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.x before 7.0.0.43, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.13, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.10 mishandles CSRFtoken cookies, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-7065 | High | 2016-10-13 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | The JMX servlet in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 4 and 5 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object. |
| CVE-2016-5983 | High | 2016-10-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0 before 7.0.0.43, 8.0 before 8.0.0.13, 8.5 before 8.5.5.11, 9.0 before 9.0.0.2, and Liberty before 16.0.0.4 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted serialized object. |
| CVE-2016-7046 | Medium | 2016-10-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7, when operating as a reverse-proxy with default buffer sizes, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and disk consumption) via a long URL. |
| CVE-2016-5986 | High | 2016-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.x before 7.0.0.43, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.13, 8.5.x before 8.5.5.11, 9.0.x before 9.0.0.2, and Liberty before 16.0.0.3 mishandles responses, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-3042 | Medium | 2016-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Liberty before 16.0.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving OpenID Connect clients. |