WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Protection: None✕Product api gateway✕
Overview 14 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
14matches 3in Waratek scope21.4% 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 2public PoC14.3% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 3 21.4% Outside Waratek scope 6 42.9% Not applicable 5 35.7% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 1 7.1% High 3 21.4% Medium 10 71.4% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 14 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 1 7.1% Proof of concept only 3 21.4% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 10 71.4%
split by peak 4 / year
Not applicable: 5Outside Waratek scope: 6No exploit published: 3 Medium: 10High: 3Critical: 1 not blocked: 14 No public exploit: 10Proof of concept only: 3Working exploit published: 1
20151 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20161 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20171 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20184 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope3 High1 Medium3 not blocked4 Working exploit published1 No public exploit3 20192 Outside Waratek scope1 Not applicable1 Critical1 Medium1 not blocked2 No public exploit2 20202 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit1 20210 20220 20230 20242 Not applicable2 Medium2 not blocked2 Proof of concept only2 20250 20261 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
14 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2026-2606 Medium 2026-03-03 Not applicable No public exploit IBM webMethods API Gateway (on-prem) 10.11 through 10.11_Fix3210.15 to 10.15_Fix2711.1 to 11.1_Fix7 IBM webMethods API Management (on-prem) fails to properly validate user-supplied input passed to the url parameter on the /createapi endpoint. An attacker can modify this parameter to use a file:// URI schema instead of the expected https:// schema, enabling unauthorized arbitrary file read access on the underlying server file system.
CVE-2023-50093 Medium 2024-01-03 Not applicable Proof of concept only APIIDA API Gateway Manager for Broadcom Layer7 v2023.2.2 is vulnerable to Host Header Injection.
CVE-2023-50092 Medium 2024-01-03 Not applicable Proof of concept only APIIDA API Gateway Manager for Broadcom Layer7 v2023.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS).
CVE-2020-1971 Medium 2020-12-08 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w).
CVE-2020-11979 High 2020-10-01 No exploit published No public exploit As mitigation for CVE-2020-1945 Apache Ant 1.10.8 changed the permissions of temporary files it created so that only the current user was allowed to access them. Unfortunately the fixcrlf task deleted the temporary file and created a new one without said protection, effectively nullifying the effort. This would still allow an attacker to inject modified source files into the build process.
CVE-2019-15631 Critical 2019-12-02 Not applicable No public exploit Remote Code Execution vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.x and API Gateway 2.x released before October 31, 2019 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-1559 Medium 2019-02-27 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).
CVE-2018-5407 Medium 2018-11-15 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'.
CVE-2018-0734 Medium 2018-10-30 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p).
CVE-2018-0735 Medium 2018-10-29 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1).
CVE-2018-1000180 High 2018-06-05 No exploit published No public exploit Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later.
CVE-2017-3601 High 2017-04-24 No exploit published No public exploit Vulnerability in the Oracle API Gateway component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Oracle API Gateway). The supported version that is affected is 11.1.2.4.0. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle API Gateway. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle API Gateway accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle API Gateway accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
CVE-2016-3118 Medium 2016-04-06 Not applicable No public exploit CRLF injection vulnerability in CA API Gateway (formerly Layer7 API Gateway) 7.1 before 7.1.04, 8.0 through 8.3 before 8.3.01, and 8.4 before 8.4.01 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via unknown vectors.
CVE-2015-3195 Medium 2015-12-06 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application.