Overview 943 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 23 exploited · 7 CISA KEV · 74 public PoC · 16 EPSS ≥ 0.5
943matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
23exploited2.4%
7CISA KEV0.7%
74public PoC7.8%
16EPSS ≥ 0.51.7%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
943
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
943
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 208 / year
20001
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20010
20027
Not applicable7
Medium7
not blocked7
Working exploit published3
No public exploit4
20032
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20041
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
200513
Not applicable13
High6
Medium7
not blocked13
Working exploit published5
No public exploit8
200615
Not applicable15
High7
Medium4
Low4
not blocked15
Working exploit published8
No public exploit7
200711
Not applicable11
High6
Medium5
not blocked11
Working exploit published6
Forecast only1
No public exploit4
20085
Not applicable5
High5
not blocked5
Working exploit published5
20099
Not applicable9
High1
Medium8
not blocked9
Working exploit published1
No public exploit8
20103
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20112
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20127
Not applicable7
High2
Medium4
Low1
not blocked7
Working exploit published1
No public exploit6
20137
Not applicable7
Medium3
Low4
not blocked7
No public exploit7
201416
Not applicable16
High2
Medium13
Low1
not blocked16
Working exploit published1
No public exploit15
201510
Not applicable10
High4
Medium4
Low2
not blocked10
No public exploit10
201616
Not applicable16
Critical1
High10
Medium5
not blocked16
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
Forecast only1
No public exploit8
201734
Not applicable34
Critical3
High15
Medium15
Low1
not blocked34
Working exploit published3
No public exploit31
201850
Not applicable50
Critical9
High16
Medium25
not blocked50
No public exploit50
201962
Not applicable62
Critical13
High21
Medium27
Low1
not blocked62
Exploited4
Working exploit published4
No public exploit54
202083
Not applicable83
Critical15
High23
Medium45
not blocked83
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit80
202168
Not applicable68
Critical14
High25
Medium29
not blocked68
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit65
202268
Not applicable68
Critical17
High26
Medium25
not blocked68
Exploited4
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit58
2023126
Not applicable126
Critical20
High48
Medium55
Low3
not blocked126
Exploited8
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only24
No public exploit92
202468
Not applicable68
Critical14
High17
Medium34
Low3
not blocked68
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only15
No public exploit52
202551
Not applicable51
Critical8
High14
Medium27
Low2
not blocked51
Exploited2
Proof of concept only15
No public exploit34
2026208
Not applicable208
Critical39
High68
Medium83
Low18
not blocked208
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only22
Forecast only1
No public exploit182
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-17362 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to create, modify, or delete tenants due to missing authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17306 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17305 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17304 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper input validation. Locations supplied when service definitions are imported are not sufficiently validated, which could allow the server to retrieve content it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17303 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal network resources due to improper validation of a user-supplied URL. The address is not sufficiently restricted, which could allow the server to contact internal systems. |
| CVE-2026-17302 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to probe internal network services due to improper validation of a user-supplied URL. |
| CVE-2026-17301 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication due to improper verification of a cryptographic signature. |
| CVE-2026-17299 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform arbitrary file reads and server-side request forgery due to unrestricted resolution of external references. Externally referenced content in submitted definitions is not sufficiently restricted when processed, and the retrieved content could be returned to the attacker. |
| CVE-2026-17298 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17297 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform an account takeover due to an open redirect vulnerability. The redirect address used during sign-in is not sufficiently validated, which could allow authentication results to be sent to an attacker-controlled location. |
| CVE-2026-17296 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17295 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to path traversal. |
| CVE-2026-17294 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17293 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify user profile information due to broken object-level authorization. Access checks do not confirm that the user is permitted to change the targeted profile. |
| CVE-2026-17292 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to take over ownership of other organizations due to broken object-level authorization. Access checks on organization objects are incomplete, which could allow ownership of organizations the user does not control to be changed. |
| CVE-2026-17291 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform account takeover due to an open redirect vulnerability. The redirect address used during OAuth 2.0 sign-in is not sufficiently validated, which could allow authentication results to be sent to an attacker-controlled location. |
| CVE-2026-17290 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to create unauthorized user accounts due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. Identity information from a login provider is accepted without its signature being fully verified, so forged identity data could be used to create accounts. |
| CVE-2026-17289 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17288 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17287 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. User-supplied addresses are not sufficiently validated, so the server could be made to send requests to unintended destinations and return the results. |
| CVE-2026-17285 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of external references. When schemas are validated, references to external resources are not sufficiently restricted, which could allow the server to retrieve content it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17284 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized operations in other tenants' environments due to improper validation of client-supplied information. Tenant context is not sufficiently verified, which could allow actions on resources belonging to other tenants. |
| CVE-2026-17283 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to broken object-level authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17282 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to broken object-level authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17281 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17280 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthenticated brute-force attacks to obtain valid credentials due to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. |
| CVE-2026-17279 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption. Certain requests can cause internal processing to stall, which could make the service unavailable. |
| CVE-2026-17278 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive API catalog and runtime configuration data due to improper authentication. Information supplied by the client is not sufficiently verified, which could allow a caller to appear as a trusted party. |
| CVE-2026-17244 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized actions and obtain sensitive information due to missing authorization. Certain operations do not verify that the user is permitted to act on the targeted resource, which could allow other users' API keys to be deleted. |
| CVE-2026-17241 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17240 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. Authentication checks are not applied consistently, which could allow protected resources to be reached without valid credentials. |
| CVE-2026-17239 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-17238 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from other tenants due to path parameter injection. Values in the request path are not sufficiently validated, which could allow access to data belonging to other tenants. |
| CVE-2026-17237 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17236 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization. Authorization checks are not applied when certain organization URLs are resolved, which could allow access to information belonging to others. |
| CVE-2026-17233 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain information about internal network services due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. Addresses supplied by users are not sufficiently restricted, so the server could be made to contact internal systems. |
| CVE-2026-17232 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper neutralization of special elements in a request. Specially formed request parameters are not handled safely, which could allow protections to be circumvented. |
| CVE-2026-17231 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an observable response discrepancy. |
| CVE-2026-17230 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-17225 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions and access unauthorized analytics queries due to improper input validation. Request parameters are not validated sufficiently, which could allow restrictions on analytics data to be circumvented. |
| CVE-2026-17215 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to verbose error messages. Error responses contain more information about the system than necessary, which could help an attacker learn about the environment. |
| CVE-2026-17202 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to enumerate usernames due to observable differences in response behavior. |
| CVE-2026-17190 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript due to cross-site scripting. HTML content supplied by a provider is not sufficiently sanitized before it is displayed, which could allow script content to run in the user's browser. |
| CVE-2026-17188 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. When service definitions are imported, references to external resources are not sufficiently restricted, so the server could be made to request resources it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17150 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code and access sensitive information from other tenants due to insufficient input validation. Uploaded custom module content is not sufficiently validated before it is processed, which could allow code to run with access beyond the user's own tenant. |
| CVE-2026-17147 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code and perform unauthorized administrative actions due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-17140 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code. Input supplied by a user can influence code generated by the product, which could lead to code execution. |
| CVE-2026-17139 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to cross-site scripting. Certain URL fields are not sufficiently validated, so malicious script content could run in another user's browser session. |
| CVE-2026-17137 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper use of cryptography. The encryption applied to stored data is not implemented with sufficient strength, which weakens its protection. |
| CVE-2026-17134 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to SQL injection. |
| CVE-2026-17132 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| CVE-2026-17131 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. Restrictions on outbound requests can be bypassed, so the server could be made to contact unintended destinations and return the response. |
| CVE-2026-17129 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and cause a denial of service due to an insecure direct object reference. |
| CVE-2026-17128 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the insertion of sensitive information into log files. |
| CVE-2026-17117 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improperly controlled modification of object attributes. A user could set a field that should only be controlled by the system, which could lead to code execution. |
| CVE-2026-17114 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and cause a denial of service due to the generation of error messages containing sensitive information. |
| CVE-2026-17112 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information belonging to other tenants due to broken object-level authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17108 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17098 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to verbose error messages. |
| CVE-2026-17085 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper handling of case sensitivity. An access restriction is not applied consistently to all variations of the input, which could allow it to be circumvented and unauthorized emails to be sent. |
| CVE-2026-17067 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17066 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and modify or delete data belonging to other tenants due to missing authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17064 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an insecure direct object reference. |
| CVE-2026-17062 | Low | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify internal requests due to improper neutralization of argument delimiters. Special characters in user-supplied input are not handled safely, which could allow additional parameters to be added to a request made by the server. |
| CVE-2026-17049 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and modify arbitrary documents due to authorization bypass through user-controlled keys. |
| CVE-2026-16920 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a confused deputy vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-16918 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to access internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-16912 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-16884 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection. |
| CVE-2026-16880 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to path traversal. |
| CVE-2026-16854 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information belonging to other tenants due to an injection vulnerability. Input used to build a data query is not properly neutralized, which could allow the query to return data the user is not permitted to see. |
| CVE-2026-16720 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain valid access tokens for other users due to improper authentication. Authentication against a connected directory service is not sufficiently enforced, which could allow another user's identity to be assumed. |
| CVE-2026-16719 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to view arbitrary files on the system due to a path traversal vulnerability. A specially crafted URL request could allow directories outside the intended location to be accessed. |
| CVE-2026-16718 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of file paths. |
| CVE-2026-16717 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to broken object-level authorization. |
| CVE-2026-16716 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions to access and modify sensitive information due to improper restriction of security token assignment. |
| CVE-2026-16715 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from other tenants due to broken object-level authorization. |
| CVE-2026-16714 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to overwrite arbitrary files due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-16712 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from other tenants due to improper authorization. Identifiers supplied in requests are not sufficiently checked against the user's permissions, which could allow access to data belonging to other tenants. |
| CVE-2026-16711 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to inject platform credentials into outbound requests due to improper input validation. A validation check is not sufficiently strict, which could cause platform credentials to be included in outbound requests. |
| CVE-2026-16710 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-16709 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser due to cross-site scripting. User-supplied input is not properly neutralized when a web page is updated, so script content could run in another user's session. |
| CVE-2026-16679 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to view arbitrary files on the system due to a path traversal vulnerability. A specially crafted URL request could allow directories outside the intended location to be accessed. |
| CVE-2026-108178 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a token to be accepted that should be rejected due to an improperly implemented security check. Under certain conditions, token validation is incomplete, so a token may be accepted for a purpose it was not intended for. |
| CVE-2026-105459 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to an organization due to improper verification of a cryptographic signature. A token is accepted without its signature being fully verified, which could allow an attacker to join an organization without a valid invitation. |
| CVE-2026-105002 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow arbitrary code to be executed by the management service in certain non-default configurations due to improper control of generation of code. Customization content may be evaluated as code, which is only possible where the related feature is enabled and not properly restricted. |
| CVE-2026-92001 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper restriction of recursive entity references in DTDs ('XML entity expansion') vulnerability in Apache Sling XSS. This issue affects Apache Sling XSS: before 2.4.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.12, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-91999 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Apache Sling XSS. This issue affects Apache Sling XSS: before 2.4.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.12, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-91928 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Apache Sling XSS. This issue affects Apache Sling XSS: before 2.4.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.12, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-91852 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Apache Sling XSS. This issue affects Apache Sling XSS: before 2.4.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.12, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-73192 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') [CWE-79] vulnerability when using the XSSAPI.getValidHref() in Apache Sling XSS version 2.4.10 and prior may allow an attacker to perform a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in every feature using this method. In order to successfully attack an application, the attacker needs to be able to submit a value which is not correctly sanitized by that library. Upgrade to Apache Sling XSS >= 2.4.12 |
| CVE-2026-3416 | High | 2026-09-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The API Publisher component previously used a non-cryptographic pseudorandom number generator (PRNG) to create shared secrets for Webhook HMAC validation. This PRNG lacks sufficient entropy for security-sensitive operations, allowing a sophisticated attacker to predict future secrets. This enables malicious actors to forge event payloads with valid HMAC signatures, bypassing the API Gateway's authenticity verification. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to predict shared secrets used for Webhook HMAC validation and forge event payloads with valid signatures. This may enable bypassing API Gateway authenticity checks, leading to unauthorized event injection, data manipulation, or downstream system compromise. |
| CVE-2025-12737 | High | 2026-09-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The administrative operations within the Carbon Console do not adequately validate specific user-supplied input. This oversight allows a malicious actor with administrative privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code remotely. Successful exploitation enables a threat actor with administrative privileges and Carbon Console access to execute remote arbitrary code through specific administrative operations, leading to a complete compromise of the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-81158 | Medium | 2026-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Entity API allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Entity API versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.8.0. |
| CVE-2026-75020 | High | 2026-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection') vulnerability in Apache APISIX. A caller who holds valid credentials for one entry in the LDAP directory can authenticate through APISIX as a consumer mapped to a different entry, one the plugin's configured scope was meant to keep out of reach. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.11.0 through 3.17.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-75005 | High | 2026-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in Apache APISIX. A single small request can pin a gateway worker at 100% CPU for an extended period in graphql-limit-count routes. This issue affects Apache APISIX: 3.17.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-74848 | High | 2026-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache APISIX. An attacker could make other clients receive attacker-chosen or other users' responses on serverless-plugin routes. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.12.0 through 3.17.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-63041 | Medium | 2026-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in Apache APISIX. This vulnerability allows an attacker to escalate privilege or perform an authorization bypass by sending certain values that the attach-consumer-label plugin does not sanitise correctly. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.11.0 through 3.17.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-0637 | Medium | 2026-08-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a proxy server is configured with `customUrl.enabled`, the component accepts user-supplied input within forwarded HTTP headers without enforcing expected validation constraints. A malicious actor can manipulate these headers to influence the URL construction process, leading to an open redirect vulnerability. Additionally, unsanitized header values are written to application logs. An attacker can exploit this to force redirection to arbitrary malicious domains, potentially enabling phishing attacks. Furthermore, they can inject forged entries into application logs, impacting the reliability of security logs and potentially hindering incident investigation. |
| CVE-2025-13736 | Low | 2026-08-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When Multi-Attribute Login is enabled, the login interface fails to consistently mask the existence of user accounts. For valid users, the server resolves and displays their canonical username, while for non-existent users, it echoes the original input. This occurs regardless of the validate_username configuration. The discovery of valid usernames can increase the risk of brute force attacks, social engineering attacks, and targeted information leakage. Attackers can leverage this information to craft more effective phishing campaigns or social engineering tactics to compromise user accounts or extract sensitive data. |