Overview 4,175 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 30 exploited · 20 CISA KEV · 104 public PoC · 11 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4,175matches
3in Waratek scope0.1%
1protected0.0%
30exploited0.7%
20CISA KEV0.5%
104public PoC2.5%
11EPSS ≥ 0.50.3%
Protected by Waratek
1
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
2
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
4
0.1%
Not applicable
4,168
99.8%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4,174
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 543 / year
20081
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20093
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20101
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20113
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Exploited1
No public exploit2
201230
Not applicable30
High30
not blocked30
Working exploit published1
No public exploit29
201310
Not applicable10
High10
not blocked10
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit7
201414
Not applicable14
High14
not blocked14
Exploited2
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit8
201591
Not applicable91
High91
not blocked91
Exploited3
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only5
No public exploit74
2016329
Not applicable329
High329
not blocked329
Exploited2
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit316
2017543
Not applicable543
High543
not blocked543
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit533
2018453
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable451
High453
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked452
Working exploit published9
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit443
2019251
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable250
High251
not blocked251
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit243
2020331
Not applicable331
High331
not blocked331
Exploited2
Proof of concept only7
No public exploit322
2021252
No exploit published1
Not applicable251
High252
not blocked252
Exploited3
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit247
2022428
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable426
High428
not blocked428
Exploited2
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit421
2023439
Not applicable439
High439
not blocked439
Exploited3
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit432
2024337
Not applicable337
High337
not blocked337
Exploited4
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit327
2025282
Not applicable282
High282
not blocked282
Exploited2
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit276
2026377
No exploit published1
Not applicable376
High377
not blocked377
Exploited2
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit365
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-59045 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59044 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59043 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In arm_lpae_split_blk_unmap of io-pgtable-arm-common.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59042 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In __pkvm_pages_to_ppages of mmu.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59028 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In resolveAidConflictLocked of RegisteredAidCache.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59016 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In sendAnomalyProfile of ProfilingService.java, there is a possible path traversal issue due to path traversal. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59014 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59005 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In insertInternal of MmsProvider.java, there is a possible multiuser isolation issue due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59004 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59000 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58995 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getEntryFileName of ZipFileRO.cpp, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58994 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of NfcService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58989 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setOemUnlockAllowedByUser of OemLockService.java, there is a possible way to bypass FRP due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58986 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In notifyPictureProfileHandleSelection of MediaQualityService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58984 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use-after-free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58979 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In canPresent of PresentationController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58975 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58974 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58970 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In deliverResult of AppTimeTracker.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58966 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of hppsfilter.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a stack buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58965 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handleAudioEffectBroadcast of MusicFxHelper.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58964 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkDestination of SmsUsageMonitor.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58963 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58962 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In moveTaskToFrontLocked of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58961 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In moveTaskToFrontLocked of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58957 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In resolveToHeavyWeightSwitcherIfNeeded of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58956 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In modpowF4 of avb_rsa.c, there is a possible signature verification bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58949 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseMetaData of StagefrightMetadataRetriever.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to a stack buffer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58946 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In navigateUpTo of ActivityClientController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58944 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In moveTaskToFrontLocked of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible background application launch (bal) issue due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58943 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In run of AddAccountSettings.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58942 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In do_fault_around of memory.c, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58938 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseChunk of MPEG4Extractor.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58934 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In prepareWindowToDisplayDuringRelayout of WindowState.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58930 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unprivileged application can exploit a lack of package/signature validation in SystemUI's `RemoteQCController` when resolving a hardcoded `content://` URI. This allows the attacker to squat on a specific authority if the legitimate package is absent, inject spoofed UI elements into the trusted SystemUI Quick Controls panel, and gain a Background Activity Launch (BAL) grant from SystemUI when the user interacts with the spoofed element. |
| CVE-2026-58925 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The report details a heap Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability within the `android.hardware.automotive.evs-default` HAL service, stemming from unsynchronized access to an `std::unordered_map`. An unprivileged application with access to the EVS manager can trigger this UAF by making concurrent calls to `setExtendedInfo` and `getExtendedInfo`, potentially enabling code execution within the privileged HAL process. |
| CVE-2026-58924 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The vulnerability is a heap out-of-bounds read in the EVS HAL's `getStreamList()` method. An attacker can craft a `CameraDesc.metadata` byte array, which is parsed without validation, leading to an out-of-bounds read at an attacker-controlled offset within the HAL process's heap. The read data is then exfiltrated back to the attacker, potentially leaking sensitive information like pointers and buffer handles. |
| CVE-2026-58886 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In updateInputWindows of InputMonitor.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58885 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58884 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In startTetheredHotspotRequest of WifiServiceImpl.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58883 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58882 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In decodeWapPdu of WapPushOverSms.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an integer overflow. This could lead to a remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58879 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In descramble of multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper casting. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58873 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In addDragDropListener of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58871 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In set_type4_frame_classifier of sta_iface.cpp, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58867 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getMessenger of WifiP2pServiceImpl.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58866 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setAccessibilityWindowAttributes of AccessibilityWindowManager.java, there is a possible untrusted/misleading UI issue due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58857 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In decrypt of CryptoHalHidl.cpp, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58853 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of ipphelper.c, there is a possible stack bugger overflow due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58847 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In kvm_vfio_pviommu_attach of vfio.c, there is a possible double free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58845 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58844 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds read/write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58837 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58836 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handlePackagePostInstall of InstallPackageHelper.java, there is a possible Enhanced Confirmation Mode (ECM) bypass vulnerability that allows a sideloaded application to modify the package source during a self-update due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58829 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In fuse_backing_mmap of backing.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58828 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of base.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58827 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of dma-buf.c, there is a possible use after free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58826 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ksys_unshare of fork.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58825 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of fork.c, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58824 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In __pkvm_load_tracing of trace.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58814 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseContentType of PduParser.java, there is a possible denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55289 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions in multiple locations, there is a possible execution of sensitive USSD codes due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55288 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In validEfCfis of SIMRecords.java, there is a possible way to cause a denial of service due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55287 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onCreate of GrantCredentialsPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into granting account credentials due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55283 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55275 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55271 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In forwardToPreferredActionPickHandler of ContactsPickerActivity.kt, there is a possible intent redirection due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55263 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of AllowBindAppWidgetActivity.java, there is a possible misunderstanding of reject/consent actions due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55262 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setNotificationListenerAccessGrantedForUserInternal of NotificationManagerService.java, there is a possible policy desynchronization due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55261 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In nfa_t4tnfcee_store_rx_buf of nfa_nfcee_act.cc, there is a possible way to achieve code execution due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55257 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In UsbDialogHelper of UsbDialogHelper.java, there is a possible UI confusion due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49934 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of MmiUtils.java, there is a possible risk of USSD/MMI code execution due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49931 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onActivityResult in multiple locations, there is a possible contact leak from protected profile due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49923 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onResult of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible untrusted/misleading UI issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49922 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In queryRemoteConnectionServices of ConnectionServiceWrapper.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49906 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unprivileged application can bypass the `android.car.permission.CAR_DISPLAY_IN_CLUSTER` permission by registering an activity with the `android.car.cluster.NAVIGATION` category and requesting navigation app focus. The privileged `ClusterHomeSample` application, acting as a confused deputy, resolves and launches this arbitrary third-party activity on the safety-critical instrument cluster display without enforcing the necessary permission check, allowing for persistent display of potentially misleading or distracting content. |
| CVE-2026-45514 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of SaveUi.java, there is a possible bypass of package installation requirements due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28665 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onCreate of SettingsApplication.java, there is a possible cross-profile consent dialog label injection due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28597 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In writeGrantedUriPermissions of UriGrantsManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28588 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In shouldBlockDirectoryFromTree of ExternalStorageProvider.java, there is a possible way to access protected data due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0053 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible method for a primary user to disable secure nfc on other full users due to insufficient isolation between Android users. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-26433 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-22436 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into disclosing Autofill contents due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-111765 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | A2A Java SDK is the official Java SDK for the Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol. Starting in version 1.3.0.Final and prior to version 1.3.2.Final, the AndroidA2AHttpClient synchronous POST path overrides the disabled-redirect setting in AndroidA2AHttpClient.createConnection() with the PostBuilder default followRedirects value of true, leaving a residual of the earlier credential-redirect fix. JSONRPCTransport and RestTransport add interceptor-produced authentication headers and call synchronous post() without disabling redirects. AuthInterceptor permits X-API-Key, API-Key, X-Auth-Token, and X-Authentication headers; Android's repackaged OkHttp strips Authorization on cross-authority redirects but retains these nonstandard headers, disclosing a complete configured API key or token to another authority. The additional exposure applies when redirect or front-door behavior is compromised separately from the credential-handling component, or those components operate in different trust domains; a completely malicious initial origin already receives the credential on the first request. Autonomous clients require no human action, while user-invoked workflows can require interaction. Explicit followRedirects(false) prevents the redirected request. The demonstrated impact is credential disclosure, not subsequent credential use, integrity or availability impact, code execution, or host compromise. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2.Final. |
| CVE-2026-58880 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handle_app_val_response of btif_rc.cc, there is a possible way to achieve code execution due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58865 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of PduParser.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58859 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple places, there is a possible denial of service due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58854 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58841 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of VirtualAudioControllerTest.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58835 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In cfg2prop of btif_storage.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58815 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55286 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In stpropnci_process of stpropnci.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55280 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to uninitialized data. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55270 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In dialInternal in multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55269 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In FilterCapturedPacket of snoop_logger.cc, there is a possible memory safety issue due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55266 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In qsort of libufdt_sysdeps_vendor.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49937 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of MessageQueueBase.h, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49933 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handle_le_monitor_device_event of msft.cc, there is a possible control-flow hijack in the privileged bluetooth process due to an uninitialized pointer dereference. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49885 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In rw_t4t_update_file of rw_t4t.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49880 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of nfa_nfcee_act.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |