Overview 9,141 matches · 6 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 47 exploited · 35 CISA KEV · 149 public PoC · 14 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9,141matches
6in Waratek scope0.1%
0protected0.0%
47exploited0.5%
35CISA KEV0.4%
149public PoC1.6%
14EPSS ≥ 0.50.2%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
6
0.1%
Outside Waratek scope
7
0.1%
Not applicable
9,128
99.9%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9,141
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 1,583 / year
20082
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20098
Not applicable8
High3
Medium5
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20101
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
201112
Not applicable12
High3
Medium7
Low2
not blocked12
Exploited1
Working exploit published3
No public exploit8
201244
Not applicable44
High30
Medium14
not blocked44
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit42
201317
Not applicable17
High10
Medium5
Low2
not blocked17
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit14
201434
Not applicable34
High14
Medium17
Low3
not blocked34
Exploited3
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit26
2015125
Not applicable125
High91
Medium33
Low1
not blocked125
Exploited3
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only6
No public exploit107
2016526
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable525
Critical47
High329
Medium145
Low5
not blocked526
Exploited2
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only6
Forecast only1
No public exploit506
2017846
Not applicable846
Critical109
High543
Medium190
Low4
not blocked846
Exploited1
Working exploit published9
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit830
2018617
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable615
Critical73
High452
Medium88
Low4
not blocked617
Exploited1
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit603
2019494
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable493
Critical16
High251
Medium217
Low10
not blocked494
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit485
2020919
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable917
Critical163
High331
Medium394
Low31
not blocked919
Exploited2
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only11
No public exploit903
2021660
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable658
Critical28
High252
Medium356
Low24
not blocked660
Exploited11
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit647
20221,241
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1,237
Critical76
High428
Medium656
Low81
not blocked1,241
Exploited2
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit1,229
20231,583
Not applicable1,583
Critical53
High439
Medium1,066
Low25
not blocked1,583
Exploited5
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit1,568
2024739
Not applicable739
Critical42
High337
Medium346
Low14
not blocked739
Exploited6
Proof of concept only7
No public exploit726
2025568
Not applicable568
Critical25
High282
Medium254
Low7
not blocked568
Exploited5
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit553
2026705
No exploit published1
Not applicable704
Critical45
High377
Medium258
Low25
not blocked705
Exploited2
Proof of concept only12
No public exploit691
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-59048 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In rb_cpu_init of trace.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59047 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59046 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In __pkvm_guest_relinquish_to_host of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59045 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59044 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59043 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In arm_lpae_split_blk_unmap of io-pgtable-arm-common.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59042 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In __pkvm_pages_to_ppages of mmu.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59031 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In InputDispatcher::flushSensor of InputDispatcher.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59028 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In resolveAidConflictLocked of RegisteredAidCache.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59022 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59021 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59020 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In removeUserData of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible denial of service due to a race condition. This could lead to local denial of service with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59016 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In sendAnomalyProfile of ProfilingService.java, there is a possible path traversal issue due to path traversal. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59015 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59014 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59012 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkLastKnownCellIdAccessPermission of TelephonyPermissions.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59011 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59010 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In deserialize of legacy.rs, there is a possible denial of service due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59008 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setApplicationRestrictions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59007 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In decode_packed_entry_number of codebook.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59006 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getTouchOcclusionMode of WindowState.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59005 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In insertInternal of MmsProvider.java, there is a possible multiuser isolation issue due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59004 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59003 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getSubscriptionProperty of SubscriptionManagerService.java, there is a possible information disclosure due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59002 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handleMessage of UsbDeviceManager.java, there is a possible lock-screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59001 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkQueryPermission of TelephonyProvider.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-59000 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58997 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In validateImageInfo of Bitmap.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a precondition check failure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58995 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getEntryFileName of ZipFileRO.cpp, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58994 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of NfcService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58990 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In l2c_fcr_process_peer_cfg_req of l2c_fcr.cc, there is a possible memory safety issue due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58989 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setOemUnlockAllowedByUser of OemLockService.java, there is a possible way to bypass FRP due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58988 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In isValid of ShimConverter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58986 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In notifyPictureProfileHandleSelection of MediaQualityService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58985 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handleConnectInternal of RpcServerTrusty.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58984 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use-after-free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58979 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In canPresent of PresentationController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58978 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58977 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In is_valid_header of timed_cache_item.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58976 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getSelectionBySubIds of ProviderUtil.java, there is a possible cross-user data leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58975 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58974 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58971 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In _mupdf_get_hdr of wprint_mupdf.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58970 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In deliverResult of AppTimeTracker.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58969 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of MediaQualityService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58968 | Critical | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In oapvd_vlc_metadata of oapv_vlc.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a double free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58966 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of hppsfilter.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a stack buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58965 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handleAudioEffectBroadcast of MusicFxHelper.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58964 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkDestination of SmsUsageMonitor.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58963 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58962 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In moveTaskToFrontLocked of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58961 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In moveTaskToFrontLocked of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58957 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In resolveToHeavyWeightSwitcherIfNeeded of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58956 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In modpowF4 of avb_rsa.c, there is a possible signature verification bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58955 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In updateNotificationChannel of PreferencesHelper.java, there is a possible ui obfuscation issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58953 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In dec_vlc_read of oapv_vlc.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58951 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58949 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseMetaData of StagefrightMetadataRetriever.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to a stack buffer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58946 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In navigateUpTo of ActivityClientController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58945 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible side channel information leak due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to paired device information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58944 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In moveTaskToFrontLocked of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible background application launch (bal) issue due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58943 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In run of AddAccountSettings.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58942 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In do_fault_around of memory.c, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58938 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseChunk of MPEG4Extractor.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58937 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58936 | Critical | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In png_set_tRNS of pngset.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58934 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In prepareWindowToDisplayDuringRelayout of WindowState.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58933 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In process of C2SoftApvDec.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58930 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unprivileged application can exploit a lack of package/signature validation in SystemUI's `RemoteQCController` when resolving a hardcoded `content://` URI. This allows the attacker to squat on a specific authority if the legitimate package is absent, inject spoofed UI elements into the trusted SystemUI Quick Controls panel, and gain a Background Activity Launch (BAL) grant from SystemUI when the user interacts with the spoofed element. |
| CVE-2026-58927 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The vulnerability is a Use-After-Free (UAF) in the EVS AIDL HAL, arising from a data race on an unsynchronized `std::weak_ptr` within `EvsEnumerator::openCamera()`. Specifically, concurrent calls from a privileged UID (e.g., `AID_AUTOMOTIVE_EVS`) can cause a torn `weak_ptr` state, leading to a virtual call through a freed object's vtable at `cameraObj->getCameraInfo(&desc)`. This allows for potential arbitrary code execution within the `hal_evs_default` process. |
| CVE-2026-58926 | Low | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in the EVS HAL, allowing a privileged client to free a `buffer_handle_t` while the producer thread is still using it. This race condition, triggered via `doneWithFrame` and `setMaxFramesInFlight`, enables an attacker to manipulate freed heap memory, potentially leading to the leakage of file descriptors from the EVS HAL process. |
| CVE-2026-58925 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The report details a heap Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability within the `android.hardware.automotive.evs-default` HAL service, stemming from unsynchronized access to an `std::unordered_map`. An unprivileged application with access to the EVS manager can trigger this UAF by making concurrent calls to `setExtendedInfo` and `getExtendedInfo`, potentially enabling code execution within the privileged HAL process. |
| CVE-2026-58924 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The vulnerability is a heap out-of-bounds read in the EVS HAL's `getStreamList()` method. An attacker can craft a `CameraDesc.metadata` byte array, which is parsed without validation, leading to an out-of-bounds read at an attacker-controlled offset within the HAL process's heap. The read data is then exfiltrated back to the attacker, potentially leaking sensitive information like pointers and buffer handles. |
| CVE-2026-58915 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A physical occupant on an Android Automotive OS (AAOS) Multi-User Multi-Display (MUMD) passenger display can view sensitive Heads-Up Notification (HUN) content and execute actions for a secure passenger user (User N) without authenticating. This bypasses the PassengerKeyguard because the HUN system only checks the global keyguard state, which is tied to the driver's unlocked display, and the PassengerKeyguard implementation fails to suppress HUNs or intercept action PendingIntents. Consequently, private notification data is disclosed, and user-N actions are executed without credential verification. |
| CVE-2026-58886 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In updateInputWindows of InputMonitor.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58885 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58884 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In startTetheredHotspotRequest of WifiServiceImpl.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58883 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58882 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In decodeWapPdu of WapPushOverSms.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an integer overflow. This could lead to a remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58879 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In descramble of multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper casting. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58877 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkNearbyDevicesPermission of WifiP2pServiceImpl.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58876 | Critical | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58875 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58873 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In addDragDropListener of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58871 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In set_type4_frame_classifier of sta_iface.cpp, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58870 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onPersistentGroupsChanged of WifiP2pServiceImpl.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58868 | Critical | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onOutputReceived of FrameDecoder.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58867 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getMessenger of WifiP2pServiceImpl.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58866 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setAccessibilityWindowAttributes of AccessibilityWindowManager.java, there is a possible untrusted/misleading UI issue due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58857 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In decrypt of CryptoHalHidl.cpp, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58853 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of ipphelper.c, there is a possible stack bugger overflow due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58847 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In kvm_vfio_pviommu_attach of vfio.c, there is a possible double free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58845 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58844 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds read/write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58838 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of Helpers.java, there is a possible information disclosure due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58837 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58836 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handlePackagePostInstall of InstallPackageHelper.java, there is a possible Enhanced Confirmation Mode (ECM) bypass vulnerability that allows a sideloaded application to modify the package source during a self-update due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58829 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In fuse_backing_mmap of backing.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58828 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of base.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58827 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of dma-buf.c, there is a possible use after free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |