Overview 589 matches · 48 in Waratek scope · 18 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 23 public PoC · 8 EPSS ≥ 0.5
589matches
48in Waratek scope8.1%
18protected3.1%
4exploited0.7%
1CISA KEV0.2%
23public PoC3.9%
8EPSS ≥ 0.51.4%
Protected by Waratek
18
3.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
2
0.3%
No exploit published
28
4.8%
Outside Waratek scope
13
2.2%
Not applicable
528
89.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
18
3.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
571
96.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 96 / year
19981
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19994
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20000
20012
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20023
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20031
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20044
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable3
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20059
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable8
Medium9
not blocked9
Working exploit published4
No public exploit5
20067
Not applicable7
Medium7
not blocked7
No public exploit7
20074
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20089
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable8
Medium9
not blocked9
Working exploit published2
No public exploit7
20092
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
201013
Not applicable13
Medium13
not blocked13
Working exploit published1
No public exploit12
20112
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20128
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
No public exploit8
201312
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable10
Medium12
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked11
Working exploit published2
No public exploit10
201411
Not applicable11
Medium11
not blocked11
Working exploit published2
No public exploit9
201521
Not applicable21
Medium21
not blocked21
Exploited3
No public exploit18
20163
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20178
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
No public exploit8
201811
No exploit published1
Not applicable10
Medium11
not blocked11
No public exploit11
201996
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable92
Medium96
not blocked96
No public exploit96
202036
Protected by Waratek3
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable31
Medium36
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked33
Exploited1
No public exploit35
202139
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable38
Medium39
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked38
Forecast only1
No public exploit38
202266
Protected by Waratek10
No exploit published16
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable35
Medium66
blocked by ARMR today10
not blocked56
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only1
No public exploit62
202357
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable48
Medium57
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked55
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only1
No public exploit50
202449
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
Not applicable46
Medium49
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked48
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit48
202541
No exploit published1
Not applicable40
Medium41
not blocked41
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit36
202670
No exploit published1
Not applicable69
Medium70
not blocked70
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit65
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-116376 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to conduct a phishing attack due to an open redirect vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-110283 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of user-influenced resource identifiers. |
| CVE-2026-110282 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. |
| CVE-2026-110281 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 improperly validates TLS certificate validation, which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle technique. |
| CVE-2026-108910 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to missing required cryptographic step. |
| CVE-2026-108838 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption. |
| CVE-2026-108767 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to conduct HTTP response splitting due to improper neutralization of HTTP headers. |
| CVE-2026-108588 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a missing X-Content-Type-Options header allowing MIME type sniffing. |
| CVE-2026-108536 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames. |
| CVE-2026-105991 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a missing Content Security Policy header. |
| CVE-2026-105702 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of error messages containing internal implementation details. |
| CVE-2026-95630 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-0294 | Medium | 2026-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation (PE) vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Access Agent app on Windows and macOS devices enables a local user to execute code with elevated privileges. The Prisma Access Agent on Linux, iOS, Android, and ChromeOS is not affected. |
| CVE-2026-0293 | Medium | 2026-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Access Agent on Windows enables a local attacker with administrator privileges to bypass the anti-tamper protection, enabling unauthorized access to protected processes and files. The Prisma Access Agent on Linux, macOS, iOS, Android, and Chrome OS is not affected. |
| CVE-2026-48411 | Medium | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-60062 | Medium | 2026-07-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The NGINX Agent config_dirs directive allows a low-privileged attacker to gain limited read and write access to files outside of the designated secure directory. The config_dirs directive required for this issue can also be configured through NGINX Instance Manager. A successful exploit may allow an attacker to cross a security boundary. Impact: A remotely authenticated low-privileged attacker could gain limited read and write access outside of the list of directories specified in the NGINX Agent configuration. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-48371 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-48000 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Redirect (Open Redirect) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could construct a malicious URL that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a malicious link. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-47999 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-47998 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-47997 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-47996 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-0278 | Medium | 2026-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple protection mechanism failures in the Prisma Access Agent Data Loss Prevention (DLP) component for Windows allow a local user to bypass DLP policy enforcement controls. The Prisma Access Agent on macOS is not affected. |
| CVE-2026-0277 | Medium | 2026-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper certificate validation vulnerability in the Prisma® Access Agent for iOS enables an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack to intercept VPN traffic. The Prisma Access Agent on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and ChromeOS are not affected. |
| CVE-2026-54704 | Medium | 2026-07-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation provides OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation and instrumentation libraries for Java. In versions prior to 2.28.0, the JDBC auto-instrumentation may fail to sanitize passwords in SQL CONNECT statements when the password is double-quoted. As a result, clear-text database passwords can be added to trace span attributes and exported to observability backends. This issue has been fixed in version 2.28.0. |
| CVE-2026-57966 | Medium | 2026-06-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A path traversal vulnerability was found in spice-vdagent. This flaw allows a malicious or compromised SPICE host to write arbitrary files to any location on the guest operating system. This occurs because the filename provided by the SPICE host during file transfers is not properly sanitized before being used. An attacker could exploit this to write to sensitive locations with the privileges of the spice-vdagent process, typically the logged-in user. This issue requires the SPICE host to be untrusted or compromised for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57965 | Medium | 2026-06-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in spice-vdagent. A malicious or compromised SPICE host can trigger an integer overflow by sending a specially crafted message. This vulnerability can lead to a heap buffer overflow, causing the spice-vdagent daemon to crash and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the virtual machine. This issue requires the SPICE host to be untrusted or compromised for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0271 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation (PE) vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access Agent app on Linux devices enables a local user to execute code with elevated privileges. This does not impact Prisma Access Agent on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, or ChromeOS. |
| CVE-2026-0268 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security control bypass vulnerability in Prisma Access Agent for Linux allows a local attacker to route network traffic outside the VPN tunnel. This does not impact Prisma Access Agent on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, or ChromeOS. |
| CVE-2025-66592 | Medium | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An origin validation error vulnerability in Synology Active Backup for Business Agent before 3.1.0-4967 allows local users to write arbitrary files with restricted content and conduct denial-of-service during installation. |
| CVE-2025-13593 | Medium | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Origin validation error vulnerability in Synology ActiveProtect Agent before 1.1.0-0439 allows local users to write arbitrary files with restricted content and conduct denial-of-service during installation. |
| CVE-2026-0248 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper certificate validation vulnerability in the Prisma Access Agent® for Android and Chrome OS enables an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack to intercept VPN traffic. By presenting a certificate for any domain issued by a trusted Certificate Authority, the attacker can capture sensitive device information. The Prisma Access Agent on macOS, Windows, Linux and iOS are not affected. |
| CVE-2026-0247 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple authorization bypass vulnerabilities in the Endpoint DLP component of Prisma Access Agent® allow a local attacker to bypass authentication controls and execute privileged operations. |
| CVE-2026-0246 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability with a privilege management mechanism in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access Agent® enables a locally authenticated non-administrative user to escalate their privileges to root on macOS and Linux or NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on Windows. This allows the user to execute arbitrary code and read sensitive information otherwise accessible only to privileged accounts. The Prisma Access Agent on iOS, Android and Chrome OS are not affected. |
| CVE-2026-0245 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple information disclosure vulnerabilities in Prisma Access Agent® allow a local user to access sensitive configuration data and credentials. The Prisma Access Agent on Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and iOS are not affected. |
| CVE-2026-42830 | Medium | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Untrusted search path in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-34658 | Medium | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-34656 | Medium | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. |
| CVE-2026-34655 | Medium | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-34654 | Medium | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-1241 | Medium | 2026-04-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Encrypted values in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to version 7.10.0 and GoAnywhere Agents prior to version 2.2.0 utilize a static IV which allows admin users to brute-force decryption of data. |
| CVE-2026-40098 | Medium | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, the shared wishlist add-to-cart endpoint authorizes access with a public `sharing_code`, but loads the acted-on wishlist item by a separate global `wishlist_item_id` and never verifies that the item belongs to the shared wishlist referenced by that code. This lets an attacker use a valid shared wishlist code for wishlist A and a wishlist item ID belonging to victim wishlist B to import victim item B into the attacker's cart through the shared wishlist flow for wishlist A. Because the victim item's stored `buyRequest` is reused during cart import, the victim's private custom-option data is copied into the attacker's quote. If the product uses a file custom option, this can be elevated to cross-user file disclosure because the imported file metadata is preserved and the download endpoint is not ownership-bound. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-25525 | Medium | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, the Dataflow module in OpenMage LTS uses a weak blacklist filter (`str_replace('../', '', $input)`) to prevent path traversal attacks. This filter can be bypassed using patterns like `..././` or `....//`, which after the replacement still result in `../`. An authenticated administrator can exploit this to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-0232 | Medium | 2026-04-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A problem with a protection mechanism in the Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR agent on Windows allows a local Windows administrator to disable the agent. This issue may be leveraged by malware to perform malicious activity without detection. |
| CVE-2026-4482 | Medium | 2026-04-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The installer certificate files in the …/bootstrap/common/ssl folder do not seem to have restricted permissions on Windows systems (users have read and execute access). For the client.key file in particular, this could potentially lead to exploits, as this exposes agent identity material to any locally authenticated standard user. |
| CVE-2026-40152 | Medium | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, he list_files() tool in FileTools validates the directory parameter against workspace boundaries via _validate_path(), but passes the pattern parameter directly to Path.glob() without any validation. Since Python's Path.glob() supports .. path segments, an attacker can use relative path traversal in the glob pattern to enumerate arbitrary files outside the workspace, obtaining file metadata (existence, name, size, timestamps) for any path on the filesystem. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-5584 | Medium | 2026-04-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in Fosowl agenticSeek 0.1.0. Impacted is the function PyInterpreter.execute of the file sources/tools/PyInterpreter.py of the component query Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to code injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-4959 | Medium | 2026-03-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in OpenBMB XAgent 1.0.0. This impacts the function check_user of the file XAgentServer/application/websockets/share.py of the component ShareServer WebSocket Endpoint. Performing a manipulation of the argument interaction_id results in missing authentication. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-4269 | Medium | 2026-03-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A missing S3 ownership verification in the Bedrock AgentCore Starter Toolkit before version v0.1.13 may allow a remote actor to inject code during the build process, leading to code execution in the AgentCore Runtime. This issue only affects users of the Bedrock AgentCore Starter Toolkit before version v0.1.13 who build or have built the Toolkit after September 24, 2025. Any users on a version >=v0.1.13, and any users on previous versions who built the toolkit before September 24, 2025 are not affected. To remediate this issue, customers should upgrade to version v0.1.13. |
| CVE-2026-21360 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to access unauthorized files or directories outside the intended restricted path. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21359 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have limited impact to the integrity and availability of data. The exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21310 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass, with limited impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21297 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized access to a feature. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21296 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21294 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and bypass security controls. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21293 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and access unauthorized resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21292 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21291 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21286 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21285 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized access to a feature. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21282 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted input, causing limited impact to application availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-29791 | Medium | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agentgateway is an open source data plane for agentic AI connectivity within or across any agent framework or environment. Prior to version 0.12.0, when converting MCP tools/call request to OpenAPI request, input path, query, and header values are not sanitized. This issue has been patched in version 0.12.0. |
| CVE-2025-30413 | Medium | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Credentials are not deleted from Acronis Agent after plan revocation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 40497, Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41186. |
| CVE-2025-11790 | Medium | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Credentials are not deleted from Acronis Agent after plan revocation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41124. |
| CVE-2026-22760 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Device Management Agent (DDMA), versions prior to 26.02, contain an Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of Service. |
| CVE-2026-22285 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Device Management Agent (DDMA), versions prior to 26.02, contain a Plaintext Storage of Password vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized Access. |
| CVE-2026-2026 | Medium | 2026-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified where weak file permissions in the Nessus Agent directory on Windows hosts could allow unauthorized access, potentially permitting Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. |
| CVE-2026-2099 | Medium | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AgentFlow developed by Flowring has a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject persistent JavaScript codes that are executed in users' browsers upon page load. |
| CVE-2026-2098 | Medium | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AgentFlow developed by Flowring has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript codes in user's browser through phishing attacks. |
| CVE-2026-25523 | Medium | 2026-02-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Magento-lts is a long-term support alternative to Magento Community Edition (CE). Prior to version 20.16.1, the admin url can be discovered without prior knowledge of it's location by exploiting the X-Original-Url header on some configurations. This issue has been patched in version 20.16.1. |
| CVE-2025-64174 | Medium | 2025-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento-lts is a long-term support alternative to Magento Community Edition (CE). Versions 20.15.0 and below are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an admin with direct database access or the admin notification feed source to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable fields. Unescaped translation strings and URLs are printed into contexts inside app/code/core/Mage/Adminhtml/Block/Notification/Grid/Renderer/Actions.php. A malicious translation or polluted data can inject script. This issue is fixed in version 20.16.0. |
| CVE-2025-64322 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.3.0. |
| CVE-2025-64321 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.3.0. |
| CVE-2025-64320 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Code Injection.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2025-11844 | Medium | 2025-10-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Hugging Face Smolagents version 1.20.0 contains an XPath injection vulnerability in the search_item_ctrl_f function located in src/smolagents/vision_web_browser.py. The function constructs an XPath query by directly concatenating user-supplied input into the XPath expression without proper sanitization or escaping. This allows an attacker to inject malicious XPath syntax that can alter the intended query logic. The vulnerability enables attackers to bypass search filters, access unintended DOM elements, and disrupt web automation workflows. This can lead to information disclosure, manipulation of AI agent interactions, and compromise the reliability of automated web tasks. The issue is fixed in version 1.22.0. |
| CVE-2025-53950 | Medium | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Exposure of Private Personal Information ('Privacy Violation') vulnerability [CWE-359] in Fortinet FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin for MacOS and Windows 11.5.1 and 11.4.2 through 11.4.6 and 11.3.2 through 11.3.4 and 11.2.0 through 11.2.3 and 11.1.1. through 11.1.2 and 11.0.1 and 10.5.1 and 10.4.0, and 10.3.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to collect current user's email information. |
| CVE-2025-46752 | Medium | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A insertion of sensitive information into log file in Fortinet FortiDLP 12.0.0 through 12.0.5, 11.5.1, 11.4.6, 11.4.5 allows attacker to information disclosure via re-using the enrollment code. |
| CVE-2025-54267 | Medium | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access to elevated privileges that increase integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-54266 | Medium | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2025-54265 | Medium | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-59956 | Medium | 2025-09-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | AgentAPI is an HTTP API for Claude Code, Goose, Aider, Gemini, Amp, and Codex. Versions 0.3.3 and below are susceptible to a client-side DNS rebinding attack when hosted over plain HTTP on localhost. An attacker can gain access to the /messages endpoint served by the Agent API. This allows for the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive user data, specifically local message history, which can include secret keys, file system contents, and intellectual property the user was working on locally. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.0. |
| CVE-2025-55117 | Medium | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A stack-based buffer overflow can be remotely triggered when formatting an error message in the Control-M/Agent when SSL/TLS communication is configured. The issue occurs in the following cases: * Control-M/Agent 9.0.20: SSL/TLS configuration is set to the non-default setting "use_openssl=n"; * Control-M/Agent 9.0.21 and 9.0.22: Agent router configuration uses the non-default settings "JAVA_AR=N" and "use_openssl=n". |
| CVE-2025-55111 | Medium | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Certain files with overly permissive permissions were identified in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions as well as in newer versions which were upgraded from an affected version. These files contain keys and passwords relating to SSL files, keystore and policies. An attacker with local access to the system running the Agent can access these files. |
| CVE-2025-58125 | Medium | 2025-08-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin Freebox v6 agent allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic. |
| CVE-2025-49559 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to modify limited data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-49558 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the timing between the check of a resource's state and its use, allowing unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-49550 | Medium | 2025-06-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-6283 | Medium | 2025-06-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in xataio Xata Agent up to 0.3.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function GET of the file apps/dbagent/src/app/api/evals/route.ts. The manipulation of the argument passed leads to path traversal. Upgrading to version 0.3.1 is able to address this issue. The patch is named 03f27055e0cf5d4fa7e874d34ce8c74c7b9086cc. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. |
| CVE-2025-6166 | Medium | 2025-06-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in frdel Agent-Zero up to 0.8.4. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function image_get of the file /python/api/image_get.py. The manipulation of the argument path leads to path traversal. Upgrading to version 0.8.4.1 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 5db74202d632306a883ccce7339c5bdba0d16c5a. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. |
| CVE-2025-30642 | Medium | 2025-06-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A link following vulnerability in Trend Micro Deep Security 20.0 agents could allow a local attacker to create a denial of service (DoS) situation on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2025-27206 | Medium | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-20259 | Medium | 2025-06-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple vulnerabilities in the update process of Cisco ThousandEyes Endpoint Agent for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to delete arbitrary files on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to improper access controls on files that are in the local file system. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by using a symbolic link to perform an agent upgrade that redirects the delete operation of any protected file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files from the file system of the affected device. |
| CVE-2025-3547 | Medium | 2025-04-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability classified as critical was found in frdel Agent-Zero 0.8.1.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /get_work_dir_files. The manipulation of the argument path leads to path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-27191 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-27190 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-27188 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authorization vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2024-8556 | Medium | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in modelscope/agentscope, as of the latest commit 21161fe on the main branch. The vulnerability occurs in the view for inspecting detailed run information, where a user-controllable string (run ID) is appended and rendered as HTML. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the user's browser. |
| CVE-2025-21199 | Medium | 2025-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper privilege management in Azure Agent Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-0801 | Medium | 2025-02-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The RateMyAgent Official plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rma-settings-wizard'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2024-47265 | Medium | 2025-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in encrypted share umount functionality in Synology Active Backup for Business before 2.7.1-13234, 2.7.1-23234 and 2.7.1-3234 allows remote authenticated users to write specific files via unspecified vectors. |