Overview 634 matches · 22 in Waratek scope · 5 protected · 7 exploited · 5 CISA KEV · 36 public PoC · 11 EPSS ≥ 0.5
634matches
22in Waratek scope3.5%
5protected0.8%
7exploited1.1%
5CISA KEV0.8%
36public PoC5.7%
11EPSS ≥ 0.51.7%
Protected by Waratek
5
0.8%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
0.2%
No exploit published
16
2.5%
Outside Waratek scope
9
1.4%
Not applicable
603
95.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
5
0.8%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
629
99.2%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 87 / year
19982
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
19994
Not applicable4
High4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20002
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20014
Not applicable4
High4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20022
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20032
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20045
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable4
High5
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20057
Not applicable7
High7
not blocked7
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit4
20067
Not applicable7
High7
not blocked7
Working exploit published3
No public exploit4
200712
Not applicable12
High12
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
No public exploit10
20087
Not applicable7
High7
not blocked7
Working exploit published4
No public exploit3
20099
Not applicable9
High9
not blocked9
No public exploit9
201013
Not applicable13
High13
not blocked13
No public exploit13
20116
Not applicable6
High6
not blocked6
Working exploit published4
No public exploit2
20126
Not applicable6
High6
not blocked6
Working exploit published3
No public exploit3
20132
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20144
Not applicable4
High4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20153
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
201611
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable9
High11
not blocked11
Working exploit published1
No public exploit10
201711
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable10
High11
not blocked11
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit9
201821
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable20
High21
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked20
Exploited1
No public exploit20
201970
Not applicable70
High70
not blocked70
Working exploit published1
No public exploit69
202044
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable41
High44
not blocked44
Working exploit published1
No public exploit43
202148
No exploit published1
Not applicable47
High48
not blocked48
Exploited3
No public exploit45
202257
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published6
Not applicable49
High57
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked55
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit56
202373
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable67
High73
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked72
Exploited2
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit67
202462
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable58
High62
not blocked62
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit56
202553
Not applicable53
High53
not blocked53
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit47
202687
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published3
Not applicable83
High87
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked86
Proof of concept only14
No public exploit73
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-92922 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-92911 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-92910 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-92908 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-54640 | High | 2026-10-13 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | OpenRemote is an open-source internet-of-things platform. Prior to 1.24.2, the KNXProtocol.startAssetImport method in agent/src/main/java/org/openremote/agent/protocol/knx/KNXProtocol.java processes 0.xml from an authenticated user's uploaded ETS project ZIP with Saxon TransformerFactoryImpl and XMLInputFactory parsers that permit external entity resolution. This incomplete remediation of CVE-2026-40882 leaves the KNX handler unprotected while the parallel Velbus handler is hardened, allowing a regular realm user to read files accessible to the JVM process or cause server-side requests. This issue is fixed in version 1.24.2. |
| CVE-2026-50270 | High | 2026-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | dd-trace-java is a Datadog APM client for Java. Prior to 1.62.0, W3C baggage extraction does not enforce DD_TRACE_BAGGAGE_MAX_ITEMS, which defaults to 64, or DD_TRACE_BAGGAGE_MAX_BYTES, which defaults to 8192, although those limits apply during baggage injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send a baggage HTTP header containing many comma-separated key-value pairs or a single very large value. The extraction path allocates map entries while parsing the attacker-controlled header on every request, causing unbounded CPU and memory consumption in an HTTP service where the baggage propagation style is enabled, which is the default for most affected tracers. This can cause denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.62.0. |
| CVE-2026-77774 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-77111 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-77110 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this vulnerability to access unauthorized files or directories outside the intended restrictions, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-77109 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to restricted resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-77108 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-76202 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-78604 | High | 2026-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (CWE-732) in Elastic Agent can lead to local privilege escalation via Replace Binaries (CAPEC-642). On Windows systems where Elastic Agent is installed in unprivileged mode, resources used by the agent service are created with access controls broader than required. A local user could take advantage of this to cause the service to execute code of their choosing, ultimately obtaining SYSTEM-level privileges on the host. |
| CVE-2026-48416 | High | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-48415 | High | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-48414 | High | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-48413 | High | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-48412 | High | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to restricted resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-47299 | High | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-66421 | High | 2026-07-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenClaw Dashboard contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the administrator's browser session by injecting HTML markup into agent transcript messages processed through the sessions API. Attackers can craft a message containing inline event handler payloads such as an img tag with an onerror attribute within the 60-character rendering budget, which is stored in the session transcript and interpolated unsanitized into innerHTML on the default landing page, allowing theft of session tokens and unauthorized calls to authenticated administrative endpoints including agent instruction file modification. |
| CVE-2026-47995 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-47994 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-47992 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute malicious SQL commands, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-47988 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-47984 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-47632 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper certificate validation in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over an adjacent network. |
| CVE-2026-49042 | High | 2026-07-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.8.0 through 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 through 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.3, 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-54712 | High | 2026-07-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation provides OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation and instrumentation libraries for Java. In versions prior to 2.27.0, the RMI context propagation payload reader limits the number of context entries but does not limit the aggregate size of the strings read from the stream. An attacker who can reach an RMI endpoint on an instrumented JVM can send an oversized context propagation payload. This can cause excessive memory allocation while the JVM reads the payload, potentially leading to denial of service. The issue affects only deployments where RMI instrumentation is enabled and an RMI endpoint is network-reachable. This issue has been fixed in version 2.27.0. |
| CVE-2026-41121 | High | 2026-07-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Device Management Agent, versions prior to DDMA 26.05, contain an Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following’) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges. |
| CVE-2026-40381 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-34686 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-34653 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary file system read and write. An authenticated attacker with administrative privileges could exploit this vulnerability to read or write files outside the restricted directory. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-34652 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-34651 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-34650 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-34649 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-34648 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-34647 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-34646 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-34645 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-32204 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | External control of file name or path in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-44339 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonai version 4.6.37 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.37, praisonaiagents resolves unresolved tool names against module globals and __main__ after it fails to match the declared tool list and the registry. With the default agent configuration, _perm_allow is None, so undeclared non-dangerous tool names are not rejected by the permission gate. An attacker who can influence tool-call names can therefore invoke unintended application callables that were never declared as tools. This issue has been patched in praisonai version 4.6.37 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.37. |
| CVE-2026-44335 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.6.32, the URL checking logic in PraisonAI has a logical flaw that could be bypassed by attackers, leading to SSRF attacks. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.32. |
| CVE-2026-41496 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonai version 4.6.9 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.9, the fix for CVE-2026-40315 added input validation to SQLiteConversationStore only. Nine sibling backends — MySQL, PostgreSQL, async SQLite/MySQL/PostgreSQL, Turso, SingleStore, Supabase, SurrealDB — pass table_prefix straight into f-string SQL. Same root cause, same code pattern, same exploitation. 52 unvalidated injection points across the codebase. postgres.py additionally accepts an unvalidated schema parameter used directly in DDL. This issue has been patched in praisonai version 4.6.9 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.9. |
| CVE-2026-6788 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Using Malicious Files. |
| CVE-2026-6787 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Inclusion of Code in Existing Process. |
| CVE-2026-41288 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect permission assignment for a resource in the patch management component of the WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows an authenticated local user to elevate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. |
| CVE-2026-41287 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnerability to crash the agent service. |
| CVE-2026-41286 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnerability to crash the agent service. |
| CVE-2026-43003 | High | 2026-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in OpenStack ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0. Ironic Python Agent (IPA) sometimes executes grub-install from within a chroot of the deployed partition image, leading to code execution in the case of a malicious image. |
| CVE-2026-7461 | High | 2026-04-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of inputs used in an OS command in the FSx Windows File Server volume mounting component in Amazon ECS Agent on Windows before version 1.103.0 might allow a remote authenticated threat actor to execute shell commands with SYSTEM privileges on the underlying host via a specially crafted username field in an ECS task definition. This issue requires permissions to register ECS task definitions or write to the Secrets Manager or SSM Parameter Store credentials used by the FSx volume configuration. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.103.0. |
| CVE-2026-6389 | High | 2026-04-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Turbonomic prometurbo agent 8.16.0 through 8.17.6 IBM Turbonomic Application Resource Management grants excessive cluster‑wide permissions, including unrestricted read access to all secrets. An attacker that compromises the operator or its service account can exfiltrate sensitive credentials, escalate privileges, and potentially achieve full cluster compromise. |
| CVE-2026-33694 | High | 2026-04-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | This vulnerability allows an attacker to create a junction, enabling the deletion of arbitrary files with SYSTEM privileges. As a result, this condition potentially facilitates arbitrary code execution, whereby an attacker may exploit the vulnerability to execute malicious code with elevated SYSTEM privileges. |
| CVE-2026-40488 | High | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, the product custom option file upload in OpenMage LTS uses an incomplete blocklist (`forbidden_extensions = php,exe`) to prevent dangerous file uploads. This blocklist can be trivially bypassed by using alternative PHP-executable extensions such as `.phtml`, `.phar`, `.php3`, `.php4`, `.php5`, `.php7`, and `.pht`. Files are stored in the publicly accessible `media/custom_options/quote/` directory, which lacks server-side execution restrictions for some configurations, enabling Remote Code Execution if this directory is not explicitly denied script execution. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-25524 | High | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, PHP functions such as `getimagesize()`, `file_exists()`, and `is_readable()` can trigger deserialization when processing `phar://` stream wrapper paths. OpenMage LTS uses these functions with potentially controllable file paths during image validation and media handling. An attacker who can upload a malicious phar file (disguised as an image) and trigger one of these functions with a `phar://` path can achieve arbitrary code execution. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-6482 | High | 2026-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Rapid7 Insight Agent (versions > 4.1.0.2) is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation attack that allows users to gain SYSTEM level control of a Windows host. Upon startup the agent service attempts to load an OpenSSL configuration file from a non-existent directory that is writable by standard users. By planting a crafted openssl.cnf file an attacker can trick the high-privilege service into executing arbitrary commands. This effectively permits an unprivileged user to bypass security controls and achieve a full host compromise under the agent’s SYSTEM level access. |
| CVE-2026-30624 | High | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agent Zero 0.9.8 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in its External MCP Servers configuration feature. The application allows users to define MCP servers using a JSON configuration containing arbitrary command and args values. These values are executed by the application when the configuration is applied without sufficient validation or restriction. An attacker may supply a malicious MCP configuration to execute arbitrary operating system commands, potentially resulting in remote code execution with the privileges of the Agent Zero process. |
| CVE-2026-40287 | High | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Versions 4.5.138 and below are vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through automatic, unsanitized import of a tools.py file from the current working directory. Components including call.py (import_tools_from_file()), tool_resolver.py (_load_local_tools()), and CLI tool-loading paths blindly import ./tools.py at startup without any validation, sandboxing, or user confirmation. An attacker who can place a malicious tools.py in the directory where PraisonAI is launched (such as through a shared project, cloned repository, or writable workspace) achieves immediate arbitrary Python code execution in the host environment. This compromises the full PraisonAI process, the host system, and any connected data or credentials. This issue has been fixed in version 4.5.139. |
| CVE-2026-32192 | High | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Deserialization of untrusted data in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-32168 | High | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-40160 | High | 2026-04-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, web_crawl's httpx fallback path passes user-supplied URLs directly to httpx.AsyncClient.get() with follow_redirects=True and no host validation. An LLM agent tricked into crawling an internal URL can reach cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), internal services, and localhost. The response content is returned to the agent and may appear in output visible to the attacker. This fallback is the default crawl path on a fresh PraisonAI installation (no Tavily key, no Crawl4AI installed). This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40153 | High | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, the execute_command function in shell_tools.py calls os.path.expandvars() on every command argument at line 64, manually re-implementing shell-level environment variable expansion despite using shell=False (line 88) for security. This allows exfiltration of secrets stored in environment variables (database credentials, API keys, cloud access keys). The approval system displays the unexpanded $VAR references to human reviewers, creating a deceptive approval where the displayed command differs from what actually executes. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40150 | High | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, the web_crawl() function in praisonaiagents/tools/web_crawl_tools.py accepts arbitrary URLs from AI agents with zero validation. No scheme allowlisting, hostname/IP blocklisting, or private network checks are applied before fetching. This allows an attacker (or prompt injection in crawled content) to force the agent to fetch cloud metadata endpoints, internal services, or local files via file:// URLs. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40117 | High | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, read_skill_file() in skill_tools.py allows reading arbitrary files from the filesystem by accepting an unrestricted skill_path parameter. Unlike file_tools.read_file which enforces workspace boundary confinement, and unlike run_skill_script which requires critical-level approval, read_skill_file has neither protection. An agent influenced by prompt injection can exfiltrate sensitive files without triggering any approval prompt. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-4837 | High | 2026-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An eval() injection vulnerability in the Rapid7 Insight Agent beaconing logic for Linux versions could theoretically allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution as root via a crafted beacon response. Because the Agent uses mutual TLS (mTLS) to verify commands from the Rapid7 Platform, it is unlikely that the eval() function could be exploited remotely without prior, highly privileged access to the backend platform. |
| CVE-2026-34954 | High | 2026-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95. |
| CVE-2026-32173 | High | 2026-04-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper authentication in Azure SRE Agent allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| CVE-2026-34172 | High | 2026-03-31 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Giskard is an open-source Python library for testing and evaluating agentic systems. Prior to versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1, ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal. The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1. |
| CVE-2026-2123 | High | 2026-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security audit identified a privilege escalation vulnerability in Operations Agent(<=OA 12.29) on Windows. Under specific conditions Operations Agent may run executables from specific writeable locations.Thanks to Manuel Rickli & Philippe Leiser of Oneconsult AG for reporting this vulnerability |
| CVE-2026-21361 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vvulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21311 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21309 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21290 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21289 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21284 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-26117 | High | 2026-03-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Azure Windows Virtual Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-54659 | High | 2026-03-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.1.0, FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.0 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to read files accessible to the fortisoar user on a system where the agent is deployed, via sending a crafted request to the agent port. |
| CVE-2026-28727 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Local privilege escalation due to insecure Unix socket permissions. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (macOS) before build 41186, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (macOS) before build 41124, Acronis True Image (macOS) before build 42902. |
| CVE-2026-28713 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Default credentials set for local privileged user in Virtual Appliance. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (VMware) before build 36943, Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (VMware) before build 41186. |
| CVE-2025-11792 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Local privilege escalation due to DLL hijacking vulnerability. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Windows) before build 41124. |
| CVE-2025-11791 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to insufficient authorization checks. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41186, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41124. |
| CVE-2026-26949 | High | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Device Management Agent (DDMA), versions prior to 26.02, contain an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges. |
| CVE-2026-27961 | High | 2026-02-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agenta is an open-source LLMOps platform. A Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability exists in versions prior to 0.86.8 in Agenta's API server evaluator template rendering. Although the vulnerable code lives in the SDK package, it is executed server-side within the API process when running evaluators. This does not affect standalone SDK usage — it only impacts self-hosted or managed Agenta platform deployments. Version 0.86.8 contains a fix for the issue. |
| CVE-2026-2097 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agentflow developed by Flowring has an Arbitrary File Upload vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to upload and execute web shell backdoors, thereby enabling arbitrary code execution on the server. |
| CVE-2025-13818 | High | 2026-02-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Local privilege escalation vulnerability via insecure temporary batch file execution in ESET Management Agent |
| CVE-2020-36928 | High | 2026-01-16 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Brother BRAgent 1.38 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability in the WBA_Agent_Client service running with LocalSystem privileges. Attackers can exploit the unquoted path in C:\Program Files (x86)\Brother\BRAgent\ to inject and execute malicious code with elevated system permissions. |
| CVE-2026-21224 | High | 2026-01-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based buffer overflow in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-65176 | High | 2025-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Dynatrace OneAgent before 1.325.47. When attempting to access a remote network share from a machine where OneAgent is installed and receiving a "STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE" error, the agent will retrieve every user token on the machine and repeatedly attempt to access the network share while impersonating them. The exploitation of this vulnerability can allow an unprivileged attacker with access to the affected system to perform NTLM relay attacks. |
| CVE-2025-62550 | High | 2025-12-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2025-63408 | High | 2025-11-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Local Agent DVR versions thru 6.6.1.0 are vulnerable to directory traversal that allows an unauthenticated local attacker to gain access to sensitive information, cause a server-side forgery request (SSRF), or execute OS commands. |
| CVE-2025-59504 | High | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in Azure Monitor Agent allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-48982 | High | 2025-10-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | This vulnerability in Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows allows for Local Privilege Escalation if a system administrator is tricked into restoring a malicious file. |
| CVE-2025-54658 | High | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in Fortinet FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin for MacOS 11.5.1 and 11.4.2 through 11.4.6 and 11.3.2 through 11.3.4 and 11.2.0 through 11.2.3 and 11.1.1 through 11.1.2 and 11.0.1 and 10.5.1 and 10.4.0, and 10.3.1 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate their privilege to Root via sending a crafted request to a local listening port. |
| CVE-2025-53951 | High | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in Fortinet FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin for Windows 11.5.1 and 11.4.2 through 11.4.6 and 11.3.2 through 11.3.4 and 11.2.0 through 11.2.3 and 11.1.1 through 11.1.2 and 11.0.1 and 10.5.1 and 10.4.0, and 10.3.1 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate their privilege to LocalService via sending a crafted request to a local listening port. |
| CVE-2025-59494 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-59285 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Deserialization of untrusted data in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-58724 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-54264 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2025-54263 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and maintain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-47989 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |