Overview 59 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 32 exploited · 20 CISA KEV · 18 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
59
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
59
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
32
54.2%
Working exploit published
26
44.1%
Proof of concept only
1
1.7%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 9 / year
20001
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20011
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20022
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20031
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20040
20050
20061
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20072
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20082
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20094
Not applicable4
High3
Medium1
not blocked4
Working exploit published4
20100
20112
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20121
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20130
20144
Not applicable4
Critical2
High1
Medium1
not blocked4
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
20153
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published3
20161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20171
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20182
Not applicable2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20199
Not applicable9
Critical7
High2
not blocked9
Exploited9
20206
Not applicable6
High3
Medium3
not blocked6
Exploited5
Proof of concept only1
20211
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20220
20234
Not applicable4
Critical3
Medium1
not blocked4
Exploited4
20242
Not applicable2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Exploited2
20252
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited2
20267
Not applicable7
Critical5
High2
not blocked7
Exploited6
Working exploit published1
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-88773 | Critical | 2026-09-27 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response smuggling') vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1-37.279 and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 FIPS and before 13.1-64.23. |
| CVE-2026-88772 | Critical | 2026-09-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | Vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to Remote Code Execution or Denial of Service |
| CVE-2026-88771 | Critical | 2026-09-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper input validation vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands. |
| CVE-2026-19490 | Critical | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | Exploited | Vulnerability in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: from 14.1 through 73.32 and from 13.1 through 63.21; Gateway: from 14.1 through 73.32 and from 13.1 through 63.21. |
| CVE-2026-8452 | High | 2026-06-30 | Not applicable | Exploited | Memory overflow vulnerability NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior and Denial of Service if the appliance is configured as a Gateway (SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server |
| CVE-2026-8451 | High | 2026-06-30 | Not applicable | Exploited | Insufficient input validation in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway leading to memory overread if NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway is configured as a SAML IDP |
| CVE-2026-3055 | Critical | 2026-03-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | Insufficient input validation in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a SAML IDP leading to memory overread |
| CVE-2025-6543 | Critical | 2025-06-25 | Not applicable | Exploited | Memory overflow vulnerability leading to unintended control flow and Denial of Service in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) OR AAA virtual server |
| CVE-2025-5777 | Critical | 2025-06-17 | Not applicable | Exploited | Insufficient input validation leading to memory overread when the NetScaler is configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) OR AAA virtual server |
| CVE-2024-6235 | Critical | 2024-07-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Sensitive information disclosure in NetScaler Console |
| CVE-2023-6549 | High | 2024-01-17 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway allows Unauthenticated Denial of Service and Out-Of-Bounds Memory Read |
| CVE-2023-4966 | Critical | 2023-10-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Sensitive information disclosure in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server. |
| CVE-2023-3519 | Critical | 2023-07-19 | Not applicable | Exploited | Unauthenticated remote code execution |
| CVE-2023-24489 | Critical | 2023-07-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | A vulnerability has been discovered in the customer-managed ShareFile storage zones controller which, if exploited, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to remotely compromise the customer-managed ShareFile storage zones controller. |
| CVE-2023-24488 | Medium | 2023-07-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Cross site scripting vulnerability in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway in allows and attacker to perform cross site scripting |
| CVE-2021-22941 | Critical | 2021-09-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper Access Control in Citrix ShareFile storage zones controller before 5.11.20 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to remotely compromise the storage zones controller. |
| CVE-2020-8209 | High | 2020-08-17 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper access control in Citrix XenMobile Server 10.12 before RP2, Citrix XenMobile Server 10.11 before RP4, Citrix XenMobile Server 10.10 before RP6 and Citrix XenMobile Server before 10.9 RP5 and leads to the ability to read arbitrary files. |
| CVE-2020-8194 | Medium | 2020-07-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Reflected code injection in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway versions before 13.0-58.30, 12.1-57.18, 12.0-63.21, 11.1-64.14 and 10.5-70.18 and Citrix SDWAN WAN-OP versions before 11.1.1a, 11.0.3d and 10.2.7 allows the modification of a file download. |
| CVE-2020-8193 | Medium | 2020-07-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper access control in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway versions before 13.0-58.30, 12.1-57.18, 12.0-63.21, 11.1-64.14 and 10.5-70.18 and Citrix SDWAN WAN-OP versions before 11.1.1a, 11.0.3d and 10.2.7 allows unauthenticated access to certain URL endpoints. |
| CVE-2020-8191 | Medium | 2020-07-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper input validation in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway versions before 13.0-58.30, 12.1-57.18, 12.0-63.21, 11.1-64.14 and 10.5-70.18 and Citrix SDWAN WAN-OP versions before 11.1.1a, 11.0.3d and 10.2.7 allows reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS). |
| CVE-2020-8982 | High | 2020-05-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | An unauthenticated arbitrary file read issue exists in all versions of Citrix ShareFile StorageZones (aka storage zones) Controller, including the most recent 5.10.x releases as of May 2020. RCE and file access is granted to everything hosted by ShareFile, be it on-premise or inside Citrix Cloud itself (both are internet facing). NOTE: unlike most CVEs, exploitability depends on the product version that was in use when a particular setup step was performed, NOT the product version that is in use during a current assessment of a CVE consumer's product inventory. Specifically, the vulnerability can be exploited if a storage zone was created by one of these product versions: 5.9.0, 5.8.0, 5.7.0, 5.6.0, 5.5.0, or earlier. This CVE differs from CVE-2020-7473 and CVE-2020-8983. |
| CVE-2020-7473 | High | 2020-05-07 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | In certain situations, all versions of Citrix ShareFile StorageZones (aka storage zones) Controller, including the most recent 5.10.x releases as of May 2020, allow unauthenticated attackers to access the documents and folders of ShareFile users. NOTE: unlike most CVEs, exploitability depends on the product version that was in use when a particular setup step was performed, NOT the product version that is in use during a current assessment of a CVE consumer's product inventory. Specifically, the vulnerability can be exploited if a storage zone was created by one of these product versions: 5.9.0, 5.8.0, 5.7.0, 5.6.0, 5.5.0, or earlier. This CVE differs from CVE-2020-8982 and CVE-2020-8983 but has essentially the same risk. |
| CVE-2019-19781 | Critical | 2019-12-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | An issue was discovered in Citrix Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and Gateway 10.5, 11.1, 12.0, 12.1, and 13.0. They allow Directory Traversal. |
| CVE-2019-13608 | High | 2019-08-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix StoreFront Server before 1903, 7.15 LTSR before CU4 (3.12.4000), and 7.6 LTSR before CU8 (3.0.8000) allows XXE attacks. |
| CVE-2019-12991 | High | 2019-07-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.3 and NetScaler SD-WAN 10.0.x before 10.0.8 have Improper Input Validation (issue 5 of 6). |
| CVE-2019-12990 | Critical | 2019-07-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.3 and NetScaler SD-WAN 10.0.x before 10.0.8 allow Directory Traversal. |
| CVE-2019-12989 | Critical | 2019-07-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.3 and NetScaler SD-WAN 10.0.x before 10.0.8 allow SQL Injection. |
| CVE-2019-12988 | Critical | 2019-07-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.3 and NetScaler SD-WAN 10.0.x before 10.0.8 have Improper Input Validation (issue 4 of 6). |
| CVE-2019-12987 | Critical | 2019-07-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.3 and NetScaler SD-WAN 10.0.x before 10.0.8 have Improper Input Validation (issue 3 of 6). |
| CVE-2019-12986 | Critical | 2019-07-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.3 and NetScaler SD-WAN 10.0.x before 10.0.8 have Improper Input Validation (issue 2 of 6). |
| CVE-2019-12985 | Critical | 2019-07-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.3 and NetScaler SD-WAN 10.0.x before 10.0.8 have Improper Input Validation (issue 1 of 6). |
| CVE-2018-10653 | Critical | 2018-05-23 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | There is an XML External Entity (XXE) Processing Vulnerability in Citrix XenMobile Server 10.8 before RP2 and 10.7 before RP3. |
| CVE-2018-8897 | High | 2018-05-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A statement in the System Programming Guide of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (SDM) was mishandled in the development of some or all operating-system kernels, resulting in unexpected behavior for #DB exceptions that are deferred by MOV SS or POP SS, as demonstrated by (for example) privilege escalation in Windows, macOS, some Xen configurations, or FreeBSD, or a Linux kernel crash. The MOV to SS and POP SS instructions inhibit interrupts (including NMIs), data breakpoints, and single step trap exceptions until the instruction boundary following the next instruction (SDM Vol. 3A; section 6.8.3). (The inhibited data breakpoints are those on memory accessed by the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction itself.) Note that debug exceptions are not inhibited by the interrupt enable (EFLAGS.IF) system flag (SDM Vol. 3A; section 2.3). If the instruction following the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction is an instruction like SYSCALL, SYSENTER, INT 3, etc. that transfers control to the operating system at CPL < 3, the debug exception is delivered after the transfer to CPL < 3 is complete. OS kernels may not expect this order of events and may therefore experience unexpected behavior when it occurs. |
| CVE-2017-6316 | Critical | 2017-07-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN devices through v9.1.2.26.561201 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands as root via a CGISESSID cookie. On CloudBridge (the former name of NetScaler SD-WAN) devices, the cookie name was CAKEPHP rather than CGISESSID. |
| CVE-2016-9111 | Medium | 2016-11-07 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Incorrect access control mechanisms in Citrix Receiver Desktop Lock 4.5 allow an attacker to bypass the authentication requirement by leveraging physical access to a VDI for temporary disconnection of a LAN cable. NOTE: as of 20161208, the vendor could not reproduce the issue, stating "the researcher was unable to provide us with information that would allow us to confirm the behaviour and, despite extensive investigation on test deployments of supported products, we were unable to reproduce the behaviour as he described. The researcher has also, despite additional requests for information, ceased to respond to us." |
| CVE-2015-2841 | Medium | 2015-04-03 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall, as used in NetScaler 10.5, allows remote attackers to bypass intended firewall restrictions via a crafted Content-Type header, as demonstrated by the application/octet-stream and text/xml Content-Types. |
| CVE-2015-2838 | Medium | 2015-04-03 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nitro API in Citrix NetScaler before 10.5 build 52.3nc allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary commands as nsroot via shell metacharacters in the file_name JSON member in params/xen_hotfix/0 to nitro/v1/config/xen_hotfix. |
| CVE-2015-2682 | Medium | 2015-03-26 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Citrix Command Center before 5.1 Build 35.4 and 5.2 before Build 42.7 allows remote attackers to obtain credentials via a direct request to conf/securitydbData.xml. |
| CVE-2014-7140 | High | 2014-10-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the management interface in Citrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and NetScaler Gateway 10.x before 10.1-129.11 and 10.5 before 10.5-50.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2014-7169 | Critical | 2014-09-25 | Not applicable | Exploited | GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. |
| CVE-2014-6271 | Critical | 2014-09-24 | Not applicable | Exploited | GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. |
| CVE-2014-1664 | Medium | 2014-01-26 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The Citrix GoToMeeting application 5.0.799.1238 for Android logs HTTP requests containing sensitive information, which allows attackers to obtain user IDs, meeting details, and authentication tokens via an application that reads the system log file. |
| CVE-2012-0217 | High | 2012-06-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The x86-64 kernel system-call functionality in Xen 4.1.2 and earlier, as used in Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier and other products; Oracle Solaris 11 and earlier; illumos before r13724; Joyent SmartOS before 20120614T184600Z; FreeBSD before 9.0-RELEASE-p3; NetBSD 6.0 Beta and earlier; Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Windows 7 Gold and SP1; and possibly other operating systems, when running on an Intel processor, incorrectly uses the sysret path in cases where a certain address is not a canonical address, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application. NOTE: because this issue is due to incorrect use of the Intel specification, it should have been split into separate identifiers; however, there was some value in preserving the original mapping of the multi-codebase coordinated-disclosure effort to a single identifier. |
| CVE-2011-2882 | High | 2011-07-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in the NSEPA.NsepaCtrl.1 ActiveX control in nsepa.ocx in Citrix Access Gateway Enterprise Edition 8.1 before 8.1-67.7, 9.0 before 9.0-70.5, and 9.1 before 9.1-96.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP header data. |
| CVE-2010-4566 | High | 2011-01-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The web authentication form in the NT4 authentication component in Citrix Access Gateway Enterprise Edition 9.2-49.8 and earlier, and the NTLM authentication component in Access Gateway Standard and Advanced Editions before Access Gateway 5.0, allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the password field. |
| CVE-2009-3760 | High | 2009-10-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Static code injection vulnerability in config/writeconfig.php in the sample code in the XenServer Resource Kit in Citrix XenCenterWeb allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary PHP code into include/config.ini.php via the pool1 parameter. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2009-3759 | High | 2009-10-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in sample code in the XenServer Resource Kit in Citrix XenCenterWeb allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for (1) requests that change the password via the username parameter to config/changepw.php or (2) stop a virtual machine via the stop_vmname parameter to hardstopvm.php. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2009-3758 | High | 2009-10-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SQL injection vulnerability in login.php in sample code in the XenServer Resource Kit in Citrix XenCenterWeb allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the username parameter. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2009-3757 | Medium | 2009-10-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in sample code in the XenServer Resource Kit in Citrix XenCenterWeb allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) username parameter to config/edituser.php; (2) location, (3) sessionid, and (4) vmname parameters to console.php; (5) vmrefid and (6) vmname parameters to forcerestart.php; and (7) vmname and (8) vmrefid parameters to forcesd.php. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2008-5121 | High | 2008-11-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | dne2000.sys in Citrix Deterministic Network Enhancer (DNE) 2.21.7.233 through 3.21.7.17464, as used in (1) Cisco VPN Client, (2) Blue Coat WinProxy, and (3) SafeNet SoftRemote and HighAssurance Remote, allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted DNE_IOCTL DeviceIoControl request to the \\.\DNE device interface. |
| CVE-2008-4405 | High | 2008-10-03 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | xend in Xen 3.0.3 does not properly limit the contents of the /local/domain xenstore directory tree, and does not properly restrict a guest VM's write access within this tree, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service and possibly have unspecified other impact by writing to (1) console/tty, (2) console/limit, or (3) image/device-model-pid. NOTE: this issue was originally reported as an issue in libvirt 0.3.3 and xenstore, but CVE is considering the core issue to be related to Xen. |
| CVE-2007-6037 | Medium | 2007-11-20 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ws/generic_api_call.pl in Citrix NetScaler 8.0 build 47.8 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the standalone parameter and other unspecified parameters. |
| CVE-2007-0444 | High | 2007-01-24 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in the print provider library (cpprov.dll) in Citrix Presentation Server 4.0, MetaFrame Presentation Server 3.0, and MetaFrame XP 1.0 allows local users and remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long arguments to the (1) EnumPrintersW and (2) OpenPrinter functions. |
| CVE-2006-6334 | Medium | 2006-12-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in the SendChannelData function in wfica.ocx in Citrix Presentation Server Client before 9.230 for Windows allows remote malicious web sites to execute arbitrary code via a DataSize parameter that is less than the length of the Data buffer. |
| CVE-2003-1157 | Medium | 2003-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in login.asp in Citrix MetaFrame XP Server 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the NFuse_Message parameter. |
| CVE-2002-0504 | High | 2002-08-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Citrix NFuse 1.6 and earlier does not quote results from the getLastError method, which allows remote attackers to execute script in other clients via the NFuse_Application parameter to (1) launch.jsp or (2) launch.asp. |
| CVE-2002-0502 | Medium | 2002-08-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Citrix NFuse 1.6 may allow remote attackers to list applications without authentication by accessing the applist.asp page. |
| CVE-2001-0760 | Medium | 2001-10-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Citrix Nfuse 1.51 allows remote attackers to obtain the absolute path of the web root via a malformed request to launch.asp that does not provide the session field. |
| CVE-2000-0244 | High | 2000-03-29 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The Citrix ICA (Independent Computing Architecture) protocol uses weak encryption (XOR) for user authentication. |