Overview 17 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 7 exploited · 5 CISA KEV · 7 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
5.9%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
5.9%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
5.9%
Not applicable
14
82.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
5.9%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
16
94.1%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
7
41.2%
Working exploit published
6
35.3%
Proof of concept only
4
23.5%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 4 / year
20094
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published4
20100
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20171
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20181
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20190
20202
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20213
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable2
Critical1
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited2
Proof of concept only1
20221
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
20232
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable1
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Exploited2
20240
20252
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only2
20261
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8037 | Critical | 2026-06-04 | Not applicable | Exploited | OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress ADC Products allows an un-authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the LoadMaster appliance by exploiting unsanitized input in multiple command endpoints |
| CVE-2025-31644 | High | 2025-05-07 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | When running in Appliance mode, a command injection vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to execute arbitrary system commands. A successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-20029 | High | 2025-02-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Command injection vulnerability exists in iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) save command, which may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary system commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-46747 | Critical | 2023-10-26 | Not applicable | Exploited | Undisclosed requests may bypass configuration utility authentication, allowing an attacker with network access to the BIG-IP system through the management port and/or self IP addresses to execute arbitrary system commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2021-45468 | Critical | 2022-01-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) before 2021-12-23 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to use "Content-Encoding: gzip" to evade WAF security controls and send malicious HTTP POST requests to web servers behind the WAF. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2002-20001 | High | 2021-11-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE. |
| CVE-2021-22986 | Critical | 2021-03-31 | Not applicable | Exploited | On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3 amd BIG-IQ 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.3 and 7.0.0.x before 7.0.0.2, the iControl REST interface has an unauthenticated remote command execution vulnerability. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2020-5902 | Critical | 2020-07-01 | Not applicable | Exploited | In BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.5, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.1, the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the Configuration utility, has a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in undisclosed pages. |
| CVE-2014-2595 | Critical | 2020-02-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Barracuda Web Application Firewall (WAF) 7.8.1.013 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging a permanent authentication token obtained from a query string. |
| CVE-2018-3639 | Medium | 2018-05-22 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. |
| CVE-2017-14706 | Critical | 2017-09-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | DenyAll WAF before 6.4.1 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain authentication information by making a typeOf=debug request to /webservices/download/index.php, and then reading the iToken field in the reply. This affects DenyAll i-Suite LTS 5.5.0 through 5.5.12, i-Suite 5.6, Web Application Firewall 5.7, and Web Application Firewall 6.x before 6.4.1, with On Premises or AWS/Azure cloud deployments. |
| CVE-2009-3457 | Medium | 2009-09-29 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cisco ACE XML Gateway (AXG) and ACE Web Application Firewall (WAF) before 6.1 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an HTTP request that lacks a handler, as demonstrated by (1) an OPTIONS request or (2) a crafted GET request, leading to a Message-handling Errors message containing a certain client intranet IP address, aka Bug ID CSCtb82159. |
| CVE-2009-1593 | Medium | 2009-05-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Armorlogic Profense Web Application Firewall before 2.2.22, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4, does not properly implement the "negative model," which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a modified end tag of a SCRIPT element. |
| CVE-2009-0468 | Medium | 2009-02-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ajax.html in Profense Web Application Firewall 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shutdown the server, (2) send ping packets, (3) enable network services, (4) configure a proxy server, and (5) modify other settings via parameters in the query string. |
| CVE-2009-0467 | Medium | 2009-02-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in proxy.html in Profense Web Application Firewall 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the proxy parameter in a deny_log manage action. |