Overview 9 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 6 exploited · 5 CISA KEV · 7 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
11.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
5
55.6%
Not applicable
3
33.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
11.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
88.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
6
66.7%
Working exploit published
3
33.3%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q1 161
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 160
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 180
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 191
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 191
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q3 191
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q4 192
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Critical1
Medium1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Q1 201
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q2 200
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 210
Q2 210
Q3 211
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q4 211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2021-40438 | Critical | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. |
| CVE-2014-4650 | Critical | 2020-02-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The CGIHTTPServer module in Python 2.7.5 and 3.3.4 does not properly handle URLs in which URL encoding is used for path separators, which allows remote attackers to read script source code or conduct directory traversal attacks and execute unintended code via a crafted character sequence, as demonstrated by a %2f separator. |
| CVE-2013-5123 | Medium | 2019-11-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The mirroring support (-M, --use-mirrors) in Python Pip before 1.5 uses insecure DNS querying and authenticity checks which allows attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks. |
| CVE-2019-11043 | Critical | 2019-10-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it is possible to cause FPM module to write past allocated buffers into the space reserved for FCGI protocol data, thus opening the possibility of remote code execution. |
| CVE-2019-10092 | Medium | 2019-09-26 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed. |
| CVE-2019-0211 | High | 2019-04-08 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected. |
| CVE-2019-5418 | High | 2019-03-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | There is a File Content Disclosure vulnerability in Action View <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 and v3 where specially crafted accept headers can cause contents of arbitrary files on the target system's filesystem to be exposed. |
| CVE-2016-0752 | High | 2016-02-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Directory traversal vulnerability in Action View in Ruby on Rails before 3.2.22.1, 4.0.x and 4.1.x before 4.1.14.1, 4.2.x before 4.2.5.1, and 5.x before 5.0.0.beta1.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by leveraging an application's unrestricted use of the render method and providing a .. (dot dot) in a pathname. |