WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product retail predictive application server✕Has a public PoC✕
Overview 6 matches · 4 in Waratek scope · 4 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
6matches 4in Waratek scope66.7% 4protected66.7% 1exploited16.7% 0CISA KEV0.0% 4EPSS ≥ 0.566.7%
Protected by Waratek 4 66.7% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 2 33.3% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 2 33.3% High 2 33.3% Medium 2 33.3% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 4 66.7% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 2 33.3% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 1 16.7% Working exploit published 2 33.3% Proof of concept only 3 50.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 2 / quarter
Outside Waratek scope: 2Protected by Waratek: 4 Medium: 2High: 2Critical: 2 not blocked: 2blocked by ARMR today: 4 Proof of concept only: 3Working exploit published: 2Exploited: 1
Q2 171 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 170 Q4 171 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 Q1 180 Q2 182 Protected by Waratek2 Critical1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 Working exploit published1 Proof of concept only1 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 190 Q3 190 Q4 190 Q1 201 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 Q2 200 Q3 200 Q4 200 Q1 210 Q2 210 Q3 210 Q4 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21
6 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2020-5398 High 2020-01-17 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.
CVE-2018-1271 Medium 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2018-1270 Critical 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.
CVE-2016-8610 High 2017-11-13 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.
CVE-2017-5645 Critical 2017-04-17 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.