Overview 7 matches · 2 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 6 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
2
28.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
5
71.4%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
28.6%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
71.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
57.1%
Working exploit published
2
28.6%
Proof of concept only
1
14.3%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / year
20131
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Proof of concept only1
20140
20150
20161
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20170
20180
20193
Mitigation candidate3
High3
not blocked3
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
20200
20211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20220
20231
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2019-1003002 | High | 2019-01-22 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Declarative Plugin 1.3.3 and earlier in pipeline-model-definition/src/main/groovy/org/jenkinsci/plugins/pipeline/modeldefinition/parser/Converter.groovy that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to provide a pipeline script to an HTTP endpoint that can result in arbitrary code execution on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-1003001 | High | 2019-01-22 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.61 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsFlowDefinition.java, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsGroovyShellFactory.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to provide a pipeline script to an HTTP endpoint that can result in arbitrary code execution on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-1003000 | High | 2019-01-22 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Script Security Plugin 1.49 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/GroovySandbox.java that allows attackers with the ability to provide sandboxed scripts to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2016-0792 | High | 2016-04-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple unspecified API endpoints in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via serialized data in an XML file, related to XStream and groovy.util.Expando. |
| CVE-2013-2186 | High | 2013-10-28 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | The DiskFileItem class in Apache Commons FileUpload, as used in Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1; JBoss Portal 4.3 CP07, 5.2.2, and 6.0.0; and Red Hat JBoss Web Server 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance. |