WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Product integration✕Has a public PoC✕
Overview 10 matches · 7 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 9 EPSS ≥ 0.5
10matches 7exploited70.0% 4CISA KEV40.0% 9EPSS ≥ 0.590.0%
Protected by Waratek 10 100.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0%
Critical 7 70.0% High 1 10.0% Medium 2 20.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 10 100.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 0 0.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 7 70.0% Working exploit published 2 20.0% Proof of concept only 1 10.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 4 / quarter
Protected by Waratek: 10 Medium: 2High: 1Critical: 7 blocked by ARMR today: 10 Proof of concept only: 1Working exploit published: 2Exploited: 7
Q2 171 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 170 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 182 Protected by Waratek2 Critical1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 Working exploit published1 Proof of concept only1 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 190 Q3 190 Q4 190 Q1 200 Q2 200 Q3 201 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 Q4 201 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 Q1 210 Q2 210 Q3 210 Q4 214 Protected by Waratek4 Critical2 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today4 Exploited4 Q1 220 Q2 221 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22
10 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2022-22965 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-45046 Critical 2021-12-14 Protected by Waratek Exploited It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default.
CVE-2021-4104 High 2021-12-14 Protected by Waratek Exploited JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2021-44228 Critical 2021-12-10 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.
CVE-2020-17530 Critical 2020-12-11 Protected by Waratek Exploited Forced OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. Affected software : Apache Struts 2.0.0 - Struts 2.5.25.
CVE-2019-0230 Critical 2020-09-14 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution.
CVE-2018-1271 Medium 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2018-1270 Critical 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.
CVE-2017-5645 Critical 2017-04-17 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.