Overview 23 matches · 8 in Waratek scope · 5 protected · 6 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 8 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
7
30.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
4.3%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
15
65.2%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
5
21.7%
partly blocked
2
8.7%
not blocked
16
69.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
6
26.1%
Working exploit published
16
69.6%
Proof of concept only
1
4.3%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / year
19991
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20000
20011
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20022
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20030
20041
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20052
Not applicable2
Medium1
Low1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20060
20072
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20081
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20090
20100
20112
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20121
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20130
20140
20152
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
Critical1
Low1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20161
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
partly blocked1
Exploited1
20173
Protected by Waratek3
Critical2
High1
blocked by ARMR today2
partly blocked1
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
20182
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
20190
20200
20211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20220
20231
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
1999200120032005200720092011201320152017201920212023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2018-10906 | High | 2018-07-24 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | In fuse before versions 2.9.8 and 3.x before 3.2.5, fusermount is vulnerable to a restriction bypass when SELinux is active. This allows non-root users to mount a FUSE file system with the 'allow_other' mount option regardless of whether 'user_allow_other' is set in the fuse configuration. An attacker may use this flaw to mount a FUSE file system, accessible by other users, and trick them into accessing files on that file system, possibly causing Denial of Service or other unspecified effects. |
| CVE-2018-1270 | Critical | 2018-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. |
| CVE-2015-7501 | Critical | 2017-11-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. |
| CVE-2017-12617 | High | 2017-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2016-4437 | Critical | 2016-06-07 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Shiro before 1.2.5, when a cipher key has not been configured for the "remember me" feature, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or bypass intended access restrictions via an unspecified request parameter. |
| CVE-2015-3202 | Low | 2015-07-02 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | fusermount in FUSE before 2.9.3-15 does not properly clear the environment before invoking (1) mount or (2) umount as root, which allows local users to write to arbitrary files via a crafted LIBMOUNT_MTAB environment variable that is used by mount's debugging feature. |
| CVE-2015-1427 | Critical | 2015-02-17 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Groovy scripting engine in Elasticsearch before 1.3.8 and 1.4.x before 1.4.3 allows remote attackers to bypass the sandbox protection mechanism and execute arbitrary shell commands via a crafted script. |
| CVE-2012-5295 | Medium | 2012-10-04 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in login.cfm in FuseTalk Forums 3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the windowed parameter. |
| CVE-2010-5033 | High | 2011-11-02 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SQL injection vulnerability in ProductList.cfm in Fusebox 5.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the CatDisplay parameter. |
| CVE-2010-3879 | Medium | 2011-01-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | FUSE, possibly 2.8.5 and earlier, allows local users to create mtab entries with arbitrary pathnames, and consequently unmount any filesystem, via a symlink attack on the parent directory of the mountpoint of a FUSE filesystem, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0789. |
| CVE-2008-2284 | High | 2008-05-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in fusebox5.php in Fusebox 5.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the FUSEBOX_APPLICATION_PATH parameter. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| CVE-2007-3339 | Medium | 2007-06-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in forum/include/error/autherror.cfm in FuseTalk Basic, Standard, Enterprise, and ColdFusion allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) FTVAR_LINKP and (2) FTVAR_URLP parameters to (a) forum/include/error/autherror.cfm, and the (3) FTVAR_SCRIPTRUN parameter to (b) forum/include/common/comfinish.cfm and (c) blog/include/common/comfinish.cfm. |
| CVE-2007-3301 | High | 2007-06-20 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SQL injection vulnerability in forum/include/error/autherror.cfm in FuseTalk allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the errorcode parameter. NOTE: a patch may have been released privately between April and June 2007. NOTE: this issue may overlap CVE-2007-3273. |
| CVE-2005-2480 | Medium | 2005-08-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ColdFusion Fusebox 4.1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the fuseaction parameter, which is not quoted in an error page, as demonstrated using index.cfm. |
| CVE-2005-1858 | Low | 2005-06-03 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | FUSE 2.x before 2.3.0 does not properly clear previously used memory from unfilled pages when the filesystem returns a short byte count to a read request, which may allow local users to obtain sensitive information. |
| CVE-2004-1995 | Medium | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FuseTalk 2.0 allows remote attackers to create arbitrary accounts via a link to adduser.cfm. |
| CVE-2002-0504 | High | 2002-08-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Citrix NFuse 1.6 and earlier does not quote results from the getLastError method, which allows remote attackers to execute script in other clients via the NFuse_Application parameter to (1) launch.jsp or (2) launch.asp. |
| CVE-2002-0502 | Medium | 2002-08-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Citrix NFuse 1.6 may allow remote attackers to list applications without authentication by accessing the applist.asp page. |
| CVE-2001-0760 | Medium | 2001-10-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Citrix Nfuse 1.51 allows remote attackers to obtain the absolute path of the web root via a malformed request to launch.asp that does not provide the session field. |
| CVE-1999-0759 | High | 1999-09-13 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in FuseMAIL POP service via long USER and PASS commands. |