Overview 5 matches · 3 protected · 4 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
3
60.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
2
40.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
60.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2
40.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
80.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
20.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / month
Oct 211
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Nov 210
Dec 211
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Jan 220
Feb 220
Mar 221
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Apr 222
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
Oct 21Nov 21Dec 21Jan 22Feb 22Mar 22Apr 22
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2021-2471 | Medium | 2021-10-20 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | Vulnerability in the MySQL Connectors product of Oracle MySQL (component: Connector/J). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.26 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Connectors. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all MySQL Connectors accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Connectors. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H). |