Overview 6 matches · 4 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 4 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
3
50.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
16.7%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
2
33.3%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
50.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
3
50.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
66.7%
Working exploit published
1
16.7%
Proof of concept only
1
16.7%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q4 181
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q1 190
Q2 190
Q3 190
Q4 190
Q1 200
Q2 200
Q3 200
Q4 201
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 210
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 211
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q1 221
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 222
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2020-1971 | Medium | 2020-12-08 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w). |
| CVE-2018-15686 | High | 2018-10-26 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | A vulnerability in unit_deserialize of systemd allows an attacker to supply arbitrary state across systemd re-execution via NotifyAccess. This can be used to improperly influence systemd execution and possibly lead to root privilege escalation. Affected releases are systemd versions up to and including 239. |