Overview 43 matches · 21 in Waratek scope · 10 protected · 11 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 12 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
10
23.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
11
25.6%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
2.3%
Not applicable
21
48.8%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
10
23.3%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
33
76.7%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
11
25.6%
Working exploit published
16
37.2%
Proof of concept only
16
37.2%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 9 / year
19982
Not applicable2
High1
Low1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
19991
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20002
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20011
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20021
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20030
20040
20050
20060
20072
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20081
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20091
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20100
20110
20120
20130
20140
20151
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20161
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20171
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20181
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Proof of concept only1
20196
Protected by Waratek4
Not applicable2
Critical1
High3
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only5
20207
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate5
Not applicable1
Critical3
High4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only3
20219
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate5
Not applicable1
High8
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked6
Exploited4
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only3
20224
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable2
Critical2
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked3
Exploited2
Proof of concept only2
20230
20242
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
High2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only2
200020032006200920122015201820212024
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-50868 | High | 2024-02-14 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations. |
| CVE-2023-50387 | High | 2024-02-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Certain DNSSEC aspects of the DNS protocol (in RFC 4033, 4034, 4035, 6840, and related RFCs) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via one or more DNSSEC responses, aka the "KeyTrap" issue. One of the concerns is that, when there is a zone with many DNSKEY and RRSIG records, the protocol specification implies that an algorithm must evaluate all combinations of DNSKEY and RRSIG records. |
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-1011 | High | 2022-03-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A use-after-free flaw was found in the Linux kernel’s FUSE filesystem in the way a user triggers write(). This flaw allows a local user to gain unauthorized access to data from the FUSE filesystem, resulting in privilege escalation. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2022-25636 | High | 2022-02-24 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | net/netfilter/nf_dup_netdev.c in the Linux kernel 5.4 through 5.6.10 allows local users to gain privileges because of a heap out-of-bounds write. This is related to nf_tables_offload. |
| CVE-2021-39152 | High | 2021-08-23 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. |
| CVE-2021-39146 | High | 2021-08-23 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39144 | High | 2021-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39141 | High | 2021-08-23 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-34429 | Medium | 2021-07-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | For Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.37-9.4.42, 10.0.1-10.0.5 & 11.0.1-11.0.5, URIs can be crafted using some encoded characters to access the content of the WEB-INF directory and/or bypass some security constraints. This is a variation of the vulnerability reported in CVE-2021-28164/GHSA-v7ff-8wcx-gmc5. |
| CVE-2021-23337 | High | 2021-02-15 | Not applicable | Exploited | Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. |
| CVE-2020-36179 | High | 2021-01-07 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to oadd.org.apache.commons.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS. |
| CVE-2020-36188 | High | 2021-01-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.JNDIConnectionSource. |
| CVE-2020-36184 | High | 2021-01-06 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource. |
| CVE-2020-35728 | High | 2020-12-27 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.oracle.wls.shaded.org.apache.xalan.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool (aka embedded Xalan in org.glassfish.web/javax.servlet.jsp.jstl). |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2020-8617 | High | 2020-05-19 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results. |
| CVE-2020-10673 | High | 2020-03-18 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.caucho.config.types.ResourceRef (aka caucho-quercus). |
| CVE-2020-9548 | Critical | 2020-03-02 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to br.com.anteros.dbcp.AnterosDBCPConfig (aka anteros-core). |
| CVE-2020-9547 | Critical | 2020-03-02 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.ibatis.sqlmap.engine.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionConfig (aka ibatis-sqlmap). |
| CVE-2020-8840 | Critical | 2020-02-10 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10.2 lacks certain xbean-reflect/JNDI blocking, as demonstrated by org.apache.xbean.propertyeditor.JndiConverter. |
| CVE-2019-6467 | High | 2019-10-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A programming error in the nxdomain-redirect feature can cause an assertion failure in query.c if the alternate namespace used by nxdomain-redirect is a descendant of a zone that is served locally. The most likely scenario where this might occur is if the server, in addition to performing NXDOMAIN redirection for recursive clients, is also serving a local copy of the root zone or using mirroring to provide the root zone, although other configurations are also possible. Versions affected: BIND 9.12.0-> 9.12.4, 9.14.0. Also affects all releases in the 9.13 development branch. |
| CVE-2019-14540 | Critical | 2019-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig. |
| CVE-2019-14439 | High | 2019-07-30 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.9.2. This occurs when Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the logback jar in the classpath. |
| CVE-2019-12384 | Medium | 2019-06-24 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.9.1 might allow attackers to have a variety of impacts by leveraging failure to block the logback-core class from polymorphic deserialization. Depending on the classpath content, remote code execution may be possible. |
| CVE-2019-12814 | Medium | 2019-06-19 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x through 2.9.9. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has JDOM 1.x or 2.x jar in the classpath, an attacker can send a specifically crafted JSON message that allows them to read arbitrary local files on the server. |
| CVE-2017-3141 | High | 2019-01-16 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The BIND installer on Windows uses an unquoted service path which can enable a local user to achieve privilege escalation if the host file system permissions allow this. Affects BIND 9.2.6-P2->9.2.9, 9.3.2-P1->9.3.6, 9.4.0->9.8.8, 9.9.0->9.9.10, 9.10.0->9.10.5, 9.11.0->9.11.1, 9.9.3-S1->9.9.10-S1, 9.10.5-S1. |
| CVE-2017-7525 | Critical | 2018-02-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind, versions before 2.6.7.1, 2.7.9.1 and 2.8.9, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. |
| CVE-2017-8779 | High | 2017-05-04 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | rpcbind through 0.2.4, LIBTIRPC through 1.0.1 and 1.0.2-rc through 1.0.2-rc3, and NTIRPC through 1.4.3 do not consider the maximum RPC data size during memory allocation for XDR strings, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption with no subsequent free) via a crafted UDP packet to port 111, aka rpcbomb. |
| CVE-2016-2776 | High | 2016-09-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted query. |
| CVE-2015-5477 | High | 2015-07-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion failure and daemon exit) via TKEY queries. |
| CVE-2009-0696 | Medium | 2009-07-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | The dns_db_findrdataset function in db.c in named in ISC BIND 9.4 before 9.4.3-P3, 9.5 before 9.5.1-P3, and 9.6 before 9.6.1-P1, when configured as a master server, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via an ANY record in the prerequisite section of a crafted dynamic update message. |
| CVE-2008-1447 | Medium | 2008-07-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The DNS protocol, as implemented in (1) BIND 8 and 9 before 9.5.0-P1, 9.4.2-P1, and 9.3.5-P1; (2) Microsoft DNS in Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2; and other implementations allow remote attackers to spoof DNS traffic via a birthday attack that uses in-bailiwick referrals to conduct cache poisoning against recursive resolvers, related to insufficient randomness of DNS transaction IDs and source ports, aka "DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability" or "the Kaminsky bug." |
| CVE-2007-2930 | Medium | 2007-09-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The (1) NSID_SHUFFLE_ONLY and (2) NSID_USE_POOL PRNG algorithms in ISC BIND 8 before 8.4.7-P1 generate predictable DNS query identifiers when sending outgoing queries such as NOTIFY messages when answering questions as a resolver, which allows remote attackers to poison DNS caches via unknown vectors. NOTE: this issue is different from CVE-2007-2926. |
| CVE-2007-2926 | Medium | 2007-07-24 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | ISC BIND 9 through 9.5.0a5 uses a weak random number generator during generation of DNS query ids when answering resolver questions or sending NOTIFY messages to slave name servers, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the next query id and perform DNS cache poisoning. |
| CVE-2002-1220 | Medium | 2002-11-29 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | BIND 8.3.x through 8.3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (termination due to assertion failure) via a request for a subdomain that does not exist, with an OPT resource record with a large UDP payload size. |
| CVE-2001-0010 | High | 2001-02-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in transaction signature (TSIG) handling code in BIND 8 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges. |
| CVE-2000-0887 | Medium | 2000-12-19 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | named in BIND 8.2 through 8.2.2-P6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by making a compressed zone transfer (ZXFR) request and performing a name service query on an authoritative record that is not cached, aka the "zxfr bug." |
| CVE-2000-1029 | High | 2000-12-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in host command allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands via a long response to an AXFR query. |
| CVE-1999-0848 | Medium | 1999-11-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Denial of service in BIND named via consuming more than "fdmax" file descriptors. |
| CVE-1999-1499 | Low | 1998-04-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | named in ISC BIND 4.9 and 8.1 allows local users to destroy files via a symlink attack on (1) named_dump.db when root kills the process with a SIGINT, or (2) named.stats when SIGIOT is used. |
| CVE-1999-0009 | High | 1998-04-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Inverse query buffer overflow in BIND 4.9 and BIND 8 Releases. |