Overview 202 matches · 18 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 3 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
202matches
18in Waratek scope8.9%
3protected1.5%
3exploited1.5%
2CISA KEV1.0%
3public PoC1.5%
3EPSS ≥ 0.51.5%
Protected by Waratek
3
1.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
0.5%
No exploit published
14
6.9%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
184
91.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
1.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
199
98.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
3
1.5%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
5
2.5%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
194
96.0%
split by
peak 51 / year
20127
No exploit published1
Not applicable6
High3
Medium4
not blocked7
No public exploit7
20130
20141
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20160
20175
Not applicable5
Critical1
High3
Medium1
not blocked5
No public exploit5
201827
Not applicable27
High13
Medium13
Low1
not blocked27
No public exploit27
201914
Not applicable14
Critical4
High8
Medium2
not blocked14
No public exploit14
20208
No exploit published1
Not applicable7
Critical1
High3
Medium3
Low1
not blocked8
No public exploit8
202121
Not applicable21
Critical6
High14
Medium1
not blocked21
No public exploit21
202220
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published4
Not applicable15
Critical2
High12
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked19
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit18
202318
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published5
Not applicable12
Critical1
High8
Medium9
not blocked18
Exploited1
No public exploit17
202418
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Not applicable15
Critical2
High7
Medium9
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked16
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit16
202512
No exploit published2
Not applicable10
High3
Medium8
Low1
not blocked12
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit11
202651
Not applicable51
Critical3
High30
Medium18
not blocked51
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit49
20122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2012-4249 | High | 2012-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Amazon Lab126 com.lab126.system sendEvent implementation on the Kindle Touch before 5.1.2 allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a string, as demonstrated by using lipc-set-prop to set an LIPC property, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4248. |
| CVE-2012-4248 | High | 2012-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Amazon Kindle Touch before 5.1.2 does not properly restrict access to the libkindleplugin.so NPAPI plugin interface, which might allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via vectors involving the (1) dev.log, (2) lipc.set, (3) lipc.get, or (4) todo.scheduleItems method, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4249. |