Overview 80,844 matches · 3,064 in Waratek scope · 221 protected · 862 exploited · 252 CISA KEV · 20,362 public PoC · 1,532 EPSS ≥ 0.5
80,844matches
3,064in Waratek scope3.8%
221protected0.3%
862exploited1.1%
252CISA KEV0.3%
20,362public PoC25.2%
1,532EPSS ≥ 0.51.9%
Protected by Waratek
222
0.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
157
0.2%
No exploit published
2,685
3.3%
Outside Waratek scope
1,526
1.9%
Not applicable
75,367
93.2%
Withdrawn CVE
887
1.1%
Critical
1,165
1.4%
High
32,796
40.6%
Medium
40,518
50.1%
Low
5,478
6.8%
None
0
0.0%
Unknown
887
1.1%
split by
peak 8,008 / year
19882
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
19893
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
199011
Not applicable11
High8
Medium2
Low1
not blocked11
Working exploit published1
No public exploit10
199115
Not applicable15
High11
Medium4
not blocked15
Working exploit published2
No public exploit13
199214
Not applicable13
Withdrawn CVE1
High12
Low1
Unknown1
not blocked14
No public exploit14
199313
Not applicable13
High8
Medium3
Low2
not blocked13
No public exploit13
199426
Not applicable25
Withdrawn CVE1
High14
Medium10
Low1
Unknown1
not blocked26
Working exploit published6
No public exploit20
199525
Not applicable25
Critical1
High17
Medium6
Low1
not blocked25
Working exploit published5
No public exploit20
199675
No exploit published1
Not applicable73
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical1
High43
Medium21
Low9
Unknown1
not blocked75
Working exploit published18
Forecast only1
No public exploit56
1997253
Not applicable252
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical1
High143
Medium89
Low19
Unknown1
not blocked253
Exploited2
Working exploit published73
Forecast only2
No public exploit176
1998247
Not applicable246
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical1
High137
Medium85
Low23
Unknown1
not blocked247
Exploited1
Working exploit published50
No public exploit196
1999923
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable891
Withdrawn CVE29
Critical3
High423
Medium357
Low111
Unknown29
not blocked923
Exploited2
Working exploit published282
No public exploit639
20001,020
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1,005
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical2
High454
Medium467
Low96
Unknown1
not blocked1,020
Exploited5
Working exploit published427
Forecast only1
No public exploit587
20011,679
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope14
Not applicable1,649
Withdrawn CVE3
Critical12
High776
Medium706
Low182
Unknown3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1,678
Exploited14
Working exploit published480
Forecast only2
No public exploit1,183
20022,170
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
Outside Waratek scope12
Not applicable2,107
Withdrawn CVE14
Critical10
High1,023
Medium980
Low143
Unknown14
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked2,167
Exploited12
Working exploit published545
Forecast only9
No public exploit1,604
20031,548
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable1,482
Withdrawn CVE21
Critical9
High674
Medium747
Low97
Unknown21
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1,546
Exploited10
Working exploit published499
Forecast only1
No public exploit1,038
20042,479
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable2,416
Withdrawn CVE28
Critical10
High973
Medium1,265
Low203
Unknown28
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2,477
Exploited21
Working exploit published755
Forecast only1
No public exploit1,702
20055,010
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Outside Waratek scope17
Not applicable4,833
Withdrawn CVE78
Critical13
High2,048
Medium2,430
Low441
Unknown78
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked5,007
Exploited22
Working exploit published1,341
Forecast only11
No public exploit3,636
20066,659
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
Outside Waratek scope67
Not applicable6,408
Withdrawn CVE51
Critical12
High2,763
Medium3,324
Low509
Unknown51
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked6,651
Exploited37
Working exploit published2,440
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only6
No public exploit4,175
20076,596
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
Outside Waratek scope83
Not applicable6,283
Withdrawn CVE80
Critical21
High3,162
Medium3,101
Low232
Unknown80
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked6,590
Exploited47
Working exploit published2,495
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only5
No public exploit4,044
20085,664
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
Outside Waratek scope74
Not applicable5,422
Withdrawn CVE32
Critical19
High2,846
Medium2,582
Low185
Unknown32
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked5,657
Exploited42
Working exploit published2,518
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only9
No public exploit3,091
20095,778
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
Outside Waratek scope62
Not applicable5,467
Withdrawn CVE46
Critical15
High2,734
Medium2,786
Low197
Unknown46
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked5,769
Exploited73
Working exploit published2,591
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only3
No public exploit3,109
20104,667
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
Outside Waratek scope86
Not applicable4,370
Withdrawn CVE28
Critical28
High2,093
Medium2,241
Low277
Unknown28
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked4,658
Exploited73
Working exploit published1,313
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only9
No public exploit3,271
20114,172
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
Outside Waratek scope116
Not applicable3,841
Withdrawn CVE22
Critical5
High1,784
Medium2,101
Low260
Unknown22
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked4,166
Exploited50
Working exploit published691
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only4
No public exploit3,422
20125,351
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published278
Outside Waratek scope94
Not applicable4,883
Withdrawn CVE63
Critical21
High1,724
Medium3,035
Low508
Unknown63
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked5,340
not established2
Exploited59
Working exploit published831
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only46
No public exploit4,408
20135,324
Protected by Waratek26
Mitigation candidate18
No exploit published305
Outside Waratek scope300
Not applicable4,538
Withdrawn CVE137
Critical23
High1,735
Medium2,914
Low515
Unknown137
blocked by ARMR today26
not blocked5,297
not established1
Exploited97
Working exploit published520
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only21
No public exploit4,683
20148,008
Protected by Waratek41
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
Outside Waratek scope253
Not applicable7,340
Withdrawn CVE80
Critical20
High1,938
Medium5,314
Low656
Unknown80
blocked by ARMR today41
not blocked7,967
Exploited97
Working exploit published795
Proof of concept only13
Forecast only16
No public exploit7,087
20156,595
Protected by Waratek32
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Outside Waratek scope202
Not applicable5,969
Withdrawn CVE101
Critical51
High2,354
Medium3,501
Low588
Unknown101
blocked by ARMR today32
not blocked6,563
Exploited95
Working exploit published647
Proof of concept only16
Forecast only19
No public exploit5,818
20166,517
Protected by Waratek58
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published465
Outside Waratek scope129
Not applicable5,785
Withdrawn CVE68
Critical887
High2,895
Medium2,446
Low221
Unknown68
blocked by ARMR today57
partly blocked1
not blocked6,458
not established1
Exploited103
Working exploit published429
Proof of concept only27
Forecast only32
No public exploit5,926
1989199219951998200120042007201020132016
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-8824 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where improper access controls allow a regular user to write a part of the registry intended for privileged users only, leading to escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8823 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler for DxgDdiEscape where the size of an input buffer is not validated leading to a denial of service or possible escalation of privileges |
| CVE-2016-8822 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape ID 0x600000E, 0x600000F, and 0x6000010 where a value passed from a user to the driver is used without validation as the index to an internal array, leading to denial of service or potential escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8821 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler for DxgDdiEscape where improper access controls may allow a user to access arbitrary physical memory, leading to an escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8820 | Medium | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where a check on a function return value is missing, potentially allowing an uninitialized value to be used as the source of a strcpy() call, leading to denial of service or information disclosure. |
| CVE-2016-8819 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgkDdiEscape where a handle to a kernel object may be returned to the user, leading to possible denial of service or escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8818 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where a pointer passed from a user to the driver is used without validation, leading to denial of service or potential escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8817 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where a value passed from a user to the driver is used without validation as the size input to memcpy(), causing a buffer overflow, leading to denial of service or potential escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8816 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where a value passed from a user to the driver is used without validation as the index to an array, leading to denial of service or potential escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8815 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where a value passed from a user to the driver is used without validation as the index to an array, leading to denial of service or potential escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8814 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where multiple pointers are used without checking for NULL, leading to denial of service or potential escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-8813 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of NVIDIA Windows GPU Display Driver contain a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer (nvlddmkm.sys) handler for DxgDdiEscape where multiple pointers are used without checking for NULL, leading to denial of service or potential escalation of privileges. |
| CVE-2016-6657 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An open redirect vulnerability has been detected with some Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime components. Users of affected versions should apply the following mitigation: Upgrade PCF Elastic Runtime 1.8.x versions to 1.8.12 or later. Upgrade PCF Ops Manager 1.7.x versions to 1.7.18 or later and 1.8.x versions to 1.8.10 or later. |
| CVE-2016-6656 | High | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Pivotal Greenplum before 4.3.10.0. Creation of external tables using GPHDFS protocol has a vulnerability whereby arbitrary commands can be injected into the system. In order to exploit this vulnerability the user must have superuser 'gpadmin' access to the system or have been granted GPHDFS protocol permissions in order to create a GPHDFS external table. |
| CVE-2016-3129 | Medium | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A remote shell execution vulnerability in the BlackBerry Good Enterprise Mobility Server (GEMS) implementation of the Apache Karaf command shell in GEMS versions 2.1.5.3 to 2.2.22.25 allows remote attackers to obtain local administrator rights on the GEMS server via commands executed on the Karaf command shell. |
| CVE-2013-1430 | Critical | 2016-12-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in xrdp before 0.9.1. When successfully logging in using RDP into an xrdp session, the file ~/.vnc/sesman_${username}_passwd is created. Its content is the equivalent of the user's cleartext password, DES encrypted with a known key. |
| CVE-2016-9566 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | base/logging.c in Nagios Core before 4.2.4 allows local users with access to an account in the nagios group to gain root privileges via a symlink attack on the log file. NOTE: this can be leveraged by remote attackers using CVE-2016-9565. |
| CVE-2016-9565 | Critical | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | MagpieRSS, as used in the front-end component in Nagios Core before 4.2.2 might allow remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by spoofing a crafted response from the Nagios RSS feed server. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2008-4796. |
| CVE-2016-8708 | Unknown | 2016-12-15 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-8823. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-8823. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-8823 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2016-7892 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Exploited | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the TextField class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7891 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe RoboHelp version 2015.0.3 and earlier, RoboHelp 11 and earlier have an input validation issue that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2016-7890 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have security bypass vulnerability in the implementation of the same origin policy. |
| CVE-2016-7889 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Digital Editions versions 4.5.2 and earlier has an issue with parsing crafted XML entries that could lead to information disclosure. |
| CVE-2016-7888 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Digital Editions versions 4.5.2 and earlier has an important vulnerability that could lead to memory address leak. |
| CVE-2016-7887 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe ColdFusion Builder versions 2016 update 2 and earlier, 3.0.3 and earlier have an important vulnerability that could lead to information disclosure. |
| CVE-2016-7886 | Critical | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe InDesign version 11.4.1 and earlier, Adobe InDesign Server 11.0.0 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7885 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and earlier have a vulnerability that could be used in Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. |
| CVE-2016-7884 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.1 and earlier have an input validation issue in the DAM create assets that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2016-7883 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager version 6.2 has an input validation issue in create Launch wizard that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2016-7882 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and earlier have an input validation issue in the WCMDebug filter that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2016-7881 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the MovieClip class when handling conversion to an object. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7880 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability when setting the length property of an array object. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7879 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the NetConnection class when handling an attached script object. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7878 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the PSDK's MediaPlayer class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7877 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the Action Message Format serialization (AFM0). Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7876 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the Clipboard class related to data handling functionality. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7875 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable integer overflow vulnerability in the BitmapData class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7874 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the NetConnection class when handling the proxy types. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7873 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the PSDK class related to ad policy functionality method. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7872 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the MovieClip class related to objects at multiple presentation levels. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7871 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the Worker class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7870 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable buffer overflow / underflow vulnerability in the RegExp class for specific search strategies. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7869 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable buffer overflow / underflow vulnerability in the RegExp class related to backtrack search functionality. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7868 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable buffer overflow / underflow vulnerability in the RegExp class related to alternation functionality. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7867 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.207 and earlier, 11.2.202.644 and earlier have an exploitable buffer overflow / underflow vulnerability in the RegExp class related to bookmarking in searches. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7866 | Critical | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Adobe Animate versions 15.2.1.95 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-7856 | Critical | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe DNG Converter versions 9.7 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2016-6934 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager Forms versions 6.2 and earlier, LiveCycle 11.0.1, LiveCycle 10.0.4 have an input validation issue in the PMAdmin module that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2016-6933 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager Forms versions 6.2 and earlier, LiveCycle 11.0.1, LiveCycle 10.0.4 have an input validation issue in the AACComponent that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2016-6854 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX Guard before 2.4.2-rev5. Script code which got injected to a mail with inline PGP signature gets executed when verifying the signature. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-6853 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX Guard before 2.4.2-rev5. Script code and references to external websites can be injected to the names of PGP public keys. When requesting that key later on using a specific URL, such script code might get executed. In case of injecting external websites, users might get lured into a phishing scheme. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-6852 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. Users can provide local file paths to the RSS reader; the response and error code give hints about whether the provided file exists or not. Attackers may discover specific system files or library versions on the middleware server to prepare further attacks. |
| CVE-2016-6851 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX Guard before 2.4.2-rev5. Script code can be provided as parameter to the OX Guard guest reader web application. This allows cross-site scripting attacks against arbitrary users since no prior authentication is needed. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.) in case the user has an active session on the same domain already. |
| CVE-2016-6850 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. SVG files can be used as profile pictures. In case their XML structure contains iframes and script code, that code may get executed when calling the related picture URL or viewing the related person's image within a browser. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-6848 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. API requests can be used to inject, generate and download executable files to the client ("Reflected File Download"). Malicious platform specific (e.g. Microsoft Windows) batch file can be created via a trusted domain without authentication that, if executed by the user, may lead to local code execution. |
| CVE-2016-6847 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. SVG files can be used as mp3 album covers. In case their XML structure contains script code, that code may get executed when calling the related cover URL. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-6845 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. Script code within hyperlinks at HTML E-Mails is not getting correctly sanitized when using base64 encoded "data" resources. This allows an attacker to provide hyperlinks that may execute script code instead of directing to a proper location. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-6844 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. Script code within SVG files is maintained when opening such files "in browser" based on our Mail or Drive app. In case of "a" tags, this may include link targets with base64 encoded "data" references. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-6843 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. Script code can be injected to contact names. When adding those contacts to a group, the script code gets executed in the context of the user which creates or changes the group by using autocomplete. In most cases this is a user with elevated permissions. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-6842 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev8. Setting the user's name to JS code makes that code execute when selecting that user's "Templates" folder from OX Documents settings. This requires the folder to be shared to the victim. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-5740 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.2-rev5. JavaScript code can be used as part of ical attachments within scheduling E-Mails. This content, for example an appointment's location, will be presented to the user at the E-Mail App, depending on the invitation workflow. This code gets executed within the context of the user's current session. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). |
| CVE-2016-5124 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev14. Adding images from external sources to HTML editors by drag&drop can potentially lead to script code execution in the context of the active user. To exploit this, a user needs to be tricked to use an image from a specially crafted website and add it to HTML editor areas of OX App Suite, for example E-Mail Compose or OX Text. This specific attack circumvents typical XSS filters and detection mechanisms since the code is not loaded from an external service but injected locally. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). To exploit this vulnerability, a attacker needs to convince a user to follow specific steps (social-engineering). |
| CVE-2016-4048 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev11. Custom messages can be shown at the login screen to notify external users about issues with sharing links. This mechanism can be abused to inject arbitrary text messages. Users may get tricked to follow instructions injected by third parties as part of social engineering attacks. |
| CVE-2016-4047 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev8. References to external Open XML document type definitions (.dtd resources) can be placed within .docx and .xslx files. Those resources were requested when parsing certain parts of the generated document. As a result an attacker can track access to a manipulated document. Usage of a document may get tracked and information about internal infrastructure may get exposed. |
| CVE-2016-4046 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev11. The API to configure external mail accounts can be abused to map and access network components within the trust boundary of the operator. Users can inject arbitrary hosts and ports to API calls. Depending on the response type, content and latency, information about existence of hosts and services can be gathered. Attackers can get internal configuration information about the infrastructure of an operator to prepare subsequent attacks. |
| CVE-2016-4045 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev11. Script code can be embedded to RSS feeds using a URL notation. In case a user clicks the corresponding link at the RSS reader of App Suite, code gets executed at the context of the user. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). The attacker needs to reside within the same context to make this attack work. |
| CVE-2016-4028 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX Guard before 2.4.0-rev8. OX Guard uses an authentication token to identify and transfer guest users' credentials. The OX Guard API acts as a padding oracle by responding with different error codes depending on whether the provided token matches the encryption padding. In combination with AES-CBC, this allows attackers to guess the correct padding. Attackers may run brute-forcing attacks on the content of the guest authentication token and discover user credentials. For a practical attack vector, the guest users needs to have logged in, the content of the guest user's "OxReaderID" cookie and the value of the "auth" parameter needs to be known to the attacker. |
| CVE-2016-4027 | Low | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev10. App Suite frontend offers to control whether a user wants to store cookies that exceed the session duration. This functionality is useful when logging in from clients with reduced privileges or shared environments. However the setting was incorrectly recognized and cookies were stored regardless of this setting when the login was performed using a non-interactive login method. In case the setting was enforced by middleware configuration or the user went through the interactive login page, the workflow was correct. Cookies with authentication information may become available to other users on shared environments. In case the user did not properly log out from the session, third parties with access to the same client can access a user's account. |
| CVE-2016-4026 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev11. The content sanitizer component has an issue with filtering malicious content in case invalid HTML code is provided. In such cases the filter will output a unsanitized representation of the content. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). Attackers can use this issue for filter evasion to inject script code later on. |
| CVE-2016-3174 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX AppSuite before 7.8.0-rev27. The "defer" servlet offers to redirect a client to a specified URL. Since some checks were missing, arbitrary URLs could be provided as redirection target. Users can be tricked to follow a link to a trustworthy domain but end up at an unexpected service later on. This vulnerability can be used to prepare and enhance phishing attacks. |
| CVE-2016-3173 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX AppSuite before 7.8.0-rev27. The aria-label parameter of tiles at the Portal can be used to inject script code. Those labels use the name of the file (e.g. an image) which gets displayed at the portal application. Using script code at the file name leads to script execution. Malicious script code can be executed within a user's context. This can lead to session hijacking or triggering unwanted actions via the web interface (sending mail, deleting data etc.). Users actively need to add a file to the portal to enable this attack. In case of shared files however, a internal attacker may modify a previously embedded file to carry a malicious file name. Furthermore this vulnerability can be used to persistently execute code that got injected by a temporary script execution vulnerability. |
| CVE-2016-2840 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange Server 6 / OX AppSuite before 7.8.0-rev26. The "session" parameter for file-download requests can be used to inject script code that gets reflected through the subsequent status page. Malicious script code can be executed within a trusted domain's context. While no OX App Suite specific data can be manipulated, the vulnerability can be exploited without being authenticated and therefore used for social engineering attacks, stealing cookies or redirecting from trustworthy to malicious hosts. |
| CVE-2015-8542 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange Guard before 2.2.0-rev8. The "getprivkeybyid" API call is used to download a PGP Private Key for a specific user after providing authentication credentials. Clients provide the "id" and "cid" parameter to specify the current user by its user- and context-ID. The "auth" parameter contains a hashed password string which gets created by the client by asking the user to enter his or her OX Guard password. This parameter is used as single point of authentication when accessing PGP Private Keys. In case a user has set the same password as another user, it is possible to download another user's PGP Private Key by iterating the "id" and "cid" parameters. This kind of attack would also be able by brute-forcing login credentials, but since the "id" and "cid" parameters are sequential they are much easier to predict than a user's login name. At the same time, there are some obvious insecure standard passwords that are widely used. A attacker could send the hashed representation of typically weak passwords and randomly fetch Private Key of matching accounts. The attack can be executed by both internal users and "guests" which use the external mail reader. |
| CVE-2015-6574 | High | 2016-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The SNAP Lite component in certain SISCO MMS-EASE and AX-S4 ICCP products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted packet. |
| CVE-2015-3271 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tika server (aka tika-server) in Apache Tika 1.9 might allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the HTTP fileUrl header. |
| CVE-2016-9215 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to log in to the device with the privileges of the root user. More Information: CSCva38434. Known Affected Releases: 6.1.1.BASE. |
| CVE-2016-9214 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) contains a vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against the user of the web interface of the affected system. More Information: CSCvb86332 CSCvb86760. Known Affected Releases: 2.0(101.130). |
| CVE-2016-9212 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Decrypt for End-User Notification configuration parameter of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Web Security Appliances could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to connect to a secure website over Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS), even if the WSA is configured to block connections to the website. Affected Products: This vulnerability affects Cisco Web Security Appliances if the HTTPS decryption options are enabled and configured for the device to block connections to certain websites. More Information: CSCvb49012. Known Affected Releases: 9.0.1-162 9.1.1-074. |
| CVE-2016-9211 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in TCP port management in Cisco ONS 15454 Series Multiservice Provisioning Platforms could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the controller card to unexpectedly reload. More Information: CSCuw26032. Known Affected Releases: 10.51. |
| CVE-2016-9210 | High | 2016-12-14 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Cisco Unified Reporting upload tool accessed via the Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to modify arbitrary files on the file system. More Information: CSCvb61698. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1.11007.2). Known Fixed Releases: 12.0(0.98000.168) 12.0(0.98000.178) 12.0(0.98000.399) 12.0(0.98000.510) 12.0(0.98000.536) 12.0(0.98500.7). |
| CVE-2016-9209 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in TCP processing in Cisco FirePOWER system software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to download files that would normally be blocked. Affected Products: The following Cisco products are vulnerable: Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 5500-X Series with FirePOWER Services, Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks - 7000 Series Appliances, Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks - 8000 Series Appliances, FirePOWER 7000 Series Appliances, FirePOWER 8000 Series Appliances, FirePOWER Threat Defense for Integrated Services Routers (ISRs), Next Generation Intrusion Prevention System (NGIPS) for Blue Coat X-Series, Sourcefire 3D System Appliances, Virtual Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention System (NGIPSv) for VMware. More Information: CSCvb20102. Known Affected Releases: 2.9.7.10. |
| CVE-2016-9208 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the File Management Utility, the Download File form, and the Serviceability application of Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to access files in arbitrary locations on the file system of an affected device. More Information: CSCva98951 CSCva98954 CSCvb57494. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(2.10000.5). Known Fixed Releases: 12.0(0.98000.14) 12.0(0.98000.16). |
| CVE-2016-9207 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the HTTP traffic server component of Cisco Expressway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to initiate TCP connections to arbitrary hosts. This does not allow for full traffic proxy through the Expressway. Affected Products: This vulnerability affects Cisco Expressway Series Software and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS). More Information: CSCvc10834. Known Affected Releases: X8.7.2 X8.8.3. Known Fixed Releases: X8.9. |
| CVE-2016-9206 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the ccmadmin page of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. More Information: CSCvb64641. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1.10000.6) 11.5(1.11007.2). Known Fixed Releases: 11.5(1.12900.7) 11.5(1.12900.8) 12.0(0.98000.155) 12.0(0.98000.178) 12.0(0.98000.366) 12.0(0.98000.468) 12.0(0.98000.536) 12.0(0.98500.6). |
| CVE-2016-9205 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the HTTP 2.0 request handling code of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Event Management Service daemon (emsd) to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. More Information: CSCvb14425. Known Affected Releases: 6.1.1.BASE. Known Fixed Releases: 6.1.2.6i.MGBL 6.1.22.9i.MGBL 6.2.1.14i.MGBL. |
| CVE-2016-9204 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Cisco Intercloud Fabric (ICF) Director could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to connect to internal services with an internal account. Affected Products: Cisco Nexus 1000V InterCloud is affected. More Information: CSCus99379. Known Affected Releases: 2.2(1). |
| CVE-2016-9203 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) feature of Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the ipsecmgr process. More Information: CSCvb38398. Known Affected Releases: 20.2.3 20.2.3.65026. Known Fixed Releases: 21.1.M0.65431 21.1.PP0.65733 21.1.R0.65467 21.1.R0.65496 21.1.VC0.65434 21.1.VC0.65489 21.2.A0.65437. |
| CVE-2016-9202 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the affected interface on an affected device. More Information: CSCvb37346. Known Affected Releases: 9.1.1-036 9.7.1-066. |
| CVE-2016-9201 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Zone-Based Firewall feature of Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to pass traffic that should otherwise have been dropped based on the configuration. More Information: CSCuz21015. Known Affected Releases: 15.3(3)M3. Known Fixed Releases: 15.6(2)T0.1 15.6(2.0.1a)T0 15.6(2.19)T 15.6(3)M. |
| CVE-2016-9200 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web framework code of Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against the user of the web interface. More Information: CSCut43268. Known Affected Releases: 10.5(1) 10.6. |
| CVE-2016-9199 | Medium | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Cisco application-hosting framework (CAF) of Cisco IOx could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files on a targeted system. Affected Products: This vulnerability affects specific releases of the Cisco IOx subsystem of Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software. More Information: CSCvb23331. Known Affected Releases: 15.2(6.0.57i)E CAF-1.1.0.0. |
| CVE-2016-9198 | High | 2016-12-14 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Active Directory integration component of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a denial of service (DoS) attack. More Information: CSCuw15041. Known Affected Releases: 1.2(1.199). |
| CVE-2016-9193 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the malicious file detection and blocking features of Cisco Firepower Management Center and Cisco FireSIGHT System Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass malware detection mechanisms on an affected system. Affected Products: Cisco Firepower Management Center and FireSIGHT System Software are affected when they are configured to use a file policy that has the Block Malware action. More Information: CSCvb27494. Known Affected Releases: 6.0.1.1 6.1.0. |
| CVE-2016-9192 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install and execute an arbitrary executable file with privileges equivalent to the Microsoft Windows operating system SYSTEM account. More Information: CSCvb68043. Known Affected Releases: 4.3(2039) 4.3(748). Known Fixed Releases: 4.3(4019) 4.4(225). |
| CVE-2016-9035 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An exploitable buffer overflow exists in the Joyent SmartOS 20161110T013148Z Hyprlofs file system. The vulnerability is present in the Ioctl system call with the command HYPRLOFS_ADD_ENTRIES when dealing with native file systems. An attacker can craft an input that can cause a buffer overflow in the path variable leading to an out of bounds memory access and could result in potential privilege escalation. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2016-9033. |
| CVE-2016-9034 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An exploitable buffer overflow exists in the Joyent SmartOS 20161110T013148Z Hyprlofs file system. The vulnerability is present in the Ioctl system call with the command HYPRLOFS_ADD_ENTRIES when dealing with 32-bit file systems. An attacker can craft an input that can cause a buffer overflow in the nm variable leading to an out of bounds memory access and could result in potential privilege escalation. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2016-9032. |
| CVE-2016-9033 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An exploitable buffer overflow exists in the Joyent SmartOS 20161110T013148Z Hyprlofs file system. The vulnerability is present in the Ioctl system call with the command HYPRLOFS_ADD_ENTRIES when dealing with native file systems. An attacker can craft an input that can cause a buffer overflow in the path variable leading to an out of bounds memory access and could result in potential privilege escalation. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2016-9035. |
| CVE-2016-9032 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An exploitable buffer overflow exists in the Joyent SmartOS 20161110T013148Z Hyprlofs file system. The vulnerability is present in the Ioctl system call with the command HYPRLOFS_ADD_ENTRIES when dealing with native file systems. An attacker can craft an input that can cause a buffer overflow in the nm variable leading to an out of bounds memory access and could result in potential privilege escalation. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2016-9034. |
| CVE-2016-9031 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An exploitable integer overflow exists in the Joyent SmartOS 20161110T013148Z Hyprlofs file system. The vulnerability is present in the Ioctl system call with the command HYPRLOFS_ADD_ENTRIES when dealing with 32-bit file systems. An attacker can craft an input that can cause a kernel panic and potentially be leveraged into a full privilege escalation vulnerability. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2016-8733. |
| CVE-2016-8733 | High | 2016-12-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An exploitable integer overflow exists in the Joyent SmartOS 20161110T013148Z Hyprlofs file system. The vulnerability is present in the Ioctl system call with the command HYPRLOFS_ADD_ENTRIES when dealing with native file systems. An attacker can craft an input that can cause a kernel panic and potentially be leveraged into a full privilege escalation vulnerability. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2016-9031. |