Overview 423,923 matches · 15,311 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 5,737 exploited · 1,698 CISA KEV · 30,931 public PoC · 4,205 EPSS ≥ 0.5
423,923matches
15,311in Waratek scope3.6%
0protected0.0%
5,737exploited1.4%
1,698CISA KEV0.4%
30,931public PoC7.3%
4,205EPSS ≥ 0.51.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
7
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
400
0.1%
No exploit published
14,904
3.5%
Outside Waratek scope
4,846
1.1%
Not applicable
384,594
90.7%
Withdrawn CVE
19,172
4.5%
Critical
43,476
10.3%
High
164,842
38.9%
Medium
174,375
41.1%
Low
17,867
4.2%
None
79
0.0%
Unknown
23,284
5.5%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
423,923
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 100,140 / year
19882
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
19893
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
199011
Not applicable11
High8
Medium2
Low1
not blocked11
Working exploit published1
No public exploit10
199115
Not applicable15
High11
Medium4
not blocked15
Working exploit published2
No public exploit13
199214
Not applicable13
Withdrawn CVE1
High12
Low1
Unknown1
not blocked14
No public exploit14
199313
Not applicable13
High8
Medium3
Low2
not blocked13
No public exploit13
199426
Not applicable25
Withdrawn CVE1
High14
Medium10
Low1
Unknown1
not blocked26
Working exploit published6
No public exploit20
199525
Not applicable25
Critical1
High17
Medium6
Low1
not blocked25
Working exploit published5
No public exploit20
199675
No exploit published1
Not applicable73
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical1
High43
Medium21
Low9
Unknown1
not blocked75
Working exploit published18
Forecast only1
No public exploit56
1997253
Not applicable252
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical1
High143
Medium89
Low19
Unknown1
not blocked253
Exploited2
Working exploit published73
Forecast only2
No public exploit176
1998247
Not applicable246
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical1
High137
Medium85
Low23
Unknown1
not blocked247
Exploited1
Working exploit published50
No public exploit196
1999923
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable891
Withdrawn CVE29
Critical3
High423
Medium357
Low111
Unknown29
not blocked923
Exploited2
Working exploit published282
No public exploit639
20001,020
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1,005
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical2
High454
Medium467
Low96
Unknown1
not blocked1,020
Exploited5
Working exploit published427
Forecast only1
No public exploit587
20011,678
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope14
Not applicable1,649
Withdrawn CVE3
Critical12
High775
Medium706
Low182
Unknown3
not blocked1,678
Exploited14
Working exploit published480
Forecast only2
No public exploit1,182
20022,167
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
Outside Waratek scope12
Not applicable2,107
Withdrawn CVE14
Critical10
High1,022
Medium978
Low143
Unknown14
not blocked2,167
Exploited12
Working exploit published545
Forecast only9
No public exploit1,601
20031,546
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable1,482
Withdrawn CVE21
Critical9
High674
Medium745
Low97
Unknown21
not blocked1,546
Exploited10
Working exploit published498
Forecast only1
No public exploit1,037
20042,477
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable2,416
Withdrawn CVE28
Critical10
High972
Medium1,264
Low203
Unknown28
not blocked2,477
Exploited21
Working exploit published755
Forecast only1
No public exploit1,700
20055,007
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Outside Waratek scope17
Not applicable4,833
Withdrawn CVE78
Critical13
High2,048
Medium2,427
Low441
Unknown78
not blocked5,007
Exploited22
Working exploit published1,340
Forecast only11
No public exploit3,634
20066,651
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
Outside Waratek scope67
Not applicable6,408
Withdrawn CVE51
Critical12
High2,759
Medium3,320
Low509
Unknown51
not blocked6,651
Exploited36
Working exploit published2,439
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only6
No public exploit4,169
20076,590
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
Outside Waratek scope83
Not applicable6,283
Withdrawn CVE80
Critical21
High3,159
Medium3,099
Low231
Unknown80
not blocked6,590
Exploited47
Working exploit published2,494
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only5
No public exploit4,039
20085,657
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
Outside Waratek scope74
Not applicable5,422
Withdrawn CVE32
Critical19
High2,843
Medium2,578
Low185
Unknown32
not blocked5,657
Exploited40
Working exploit published2,515
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only9
No public exploit3,089
20095,769
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
Outside Waratek scope62
Not applicable5,467
Withdrawn CVE46
Critical15
High2,731
Medium2,781
Low196
Unknown46
not blocked5,769
Exploited73
Working exploit published2,587
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only3
No public exploit3,104
20104,658
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
Outside Waratek scope86
Not applicable4,370
Withdrawn CVE28
Critical27
High2,091
Medium2,235
Low277
Unknown28
not blocked4,658
Exploited71
Working exploit published1,310
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only9
No public exploit3,267
20114,166
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
Outside Waratek scope116
Not applicable3,841
Withdrawn CVE22
Critical5
High1,783
Medium2,097
Low259
Unknown22
not blocked4,166
Exploited50
Working exploit published689
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only4
No public exploit3,419
20125,340
Mitigation candidate22
No exploit published278
Outside Waratek scope94
Not applicable4,883
Withdrawn CVE63
Critical18
High1,722
Medium3,029
Low508
Unknown63
not blocked5,340
Exploited54
Working exploit published831
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only46
No public exploit4,402
20135,297
Mitigation candidate17
No exploit published305
Outside Waratek scope300
Not applicable4,538
Withdrawn CVE137
Critical22
High1,723
Medium2,901
Low514
Unknown137
not blocked5,297
Exploited90
Working exploit published517
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only21
No public exploit4,667
20147,967
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
Outside Waratek scope253
Not applicable7,340
Withdrawn CVE80
Critical20
High1,929
Medium5,282
Low656
Unknown80
not blocked7,967
Exploited95
Working exploit published791
Proof of concept only12
Forecast only14
No public exploit7,055
20156,563
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Outside Waratek scope202
Not applicable5,969
Withdrawn CVE101
Critical48
High2,346
Medium3,481
Low587
Unknown101
not blocked6,563
Exploited92
Working exploit published643
Proof of concept only16
Forecast only19
No public exploit5,793
20166,458
Mitigation candidate11
No exploit published465
Outside Waratek scope129
Not applicable5,785
Withdrawn CVE68
Critical873
High2,876
Medium2,420
Low221
Unknown68
not blocked6,458
Exploited95
Working exploit published422
Proof of concept only26
Forecast only28
No public exploit5,887
201718,009
Mitigation candidate14
No exploit published682
Outside Waratek scope245
Not applicable13,597
Withdrawn CVE3,471
Critical2,077
High6,567
Medium5,663
Low231
Unknown3,471
not blocked18,009
Exploited198
Working exploit published1,249
Proof of concept only51
Forecast only23
No public exploit16,488
201817,978
Mitigation candidate16
No exploit published697
Outside Waratek scope338
Not applicable15,283
Withdrawn CVE1,644
Critical2,565
High7,501
Medium6,112
Low156
Unknown1,644
not blocked17,978
Exploited224
Working exploit published1,066
Proof of concept only81
Forecast only32
No public exploit16,575
201918,815
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate23
No exploit published756
Outside Waratek scope514
Not applicable15,888
Withdrawn CVE1,633
Critical2,617
High7,190
Medium7,082
Low293
Unknown1,633
not blocked18,815
Exploited314
Working exploit published779
Proof of concept only116
Forecast only51
No public exploit17,555
202019,068
Mitigation candidate34
No exploit published898
Outside Waratek scope503
Not applicable16,733
Withdrawn CVE900
Critical2,738
High7,718
Medium7,324
Low388
Unknown900
not blocked19,068
Exploited324
Working exploit published598
Proof of concept only150
Forecast only66
No public exploit17,930
202121,826
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published649
Outside Waratek scope491
Not applicable18,860
Withdrawn CVE1,801
Critical2,805
High8,723
Medium8,108
Low389
Unknown1,801
not blocked21,826
Exploited473
Working exploit published442
Proof of concept only210
Forecast only165
No public exploit20,536
202226,218
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate21
No exploit published895
Outside Waratek scope401
Not applicable23,542
Withdrawn CVE1,358
Critical4,368
High10,261
Medium9,850
Low379
Unknown1,360
not blocked26,218
Exploited462
Working exploit published562
Proof of concept only2,747
Forecast only92
No public exploit22,355
202330,786
Mitigation candidate38
No exploit published876
Outside Waratek scope263
Not applicable27,476
Withdrawn CVE2,133
Critical4,974
High11,566
Medium11,795
Low317
Unknown2,134
not blocked30,786
Exploited552
Working exploit published555
Proof of concept only5,561
Forecast only111
No public exploit24,007
202440,598
Mitigation candidate29
No exploit published617
Outside Waratek scope237
Not applicable38,964
Withdrawn CVE751
Critical4,839
High15,285
Medium18,979
Low736
None1
Unknown758
not blocked40,598
Exploited730
Working exploit published403
Proof of concept only7,450
Forecast only84
No public exploit31,931
202549,867
Rule in development4
Mitigation candidate23
No exploit published723
Outside Waratek scope151
Not applicable47,144
Withdrawn CVE1,822
Critical4,454
High16,643
Medium23,006
Low3,035
None10
Unknown2,719
not blocked49,867
Exploited711
Working exploit published590
Proof of concept only10,971
Forecast only16
No public exploit37,579
2026100,140
Mitigation candidate25
No exploit published5,426
Outside Waratek scope177
Not applicable91,740
Withdrawn CVE2,772
Critical10,896
High40,661
Medium36,068
Low6,470
None68
Unknown5,977
not blocked100,140
Exploited917
Working exploit published449
Proof of concept only19,292
Forecast only5
No public exploit79,477
1990199419982002200620102014201820222026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-129103 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cudy TR3000 before 2.5.42 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to execute commands as root by injecting newlines into reboot_time. Attackers can submit a reboot_time value followed by a newline and crontab line, which /etc/init.d/autoreboot writes to the root crontab for crond to run. |
| CVE-2026-129102 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cudy TR3000 before 2.5.42 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to execute commands as root by injecting newlines into the IPsec keyexchange field of the vpn.set_conf RPC method. Attackers can append a second leftupdown directive to ipsec.conf, which StrongSwan's updown plugin runs as root when an attacker-controlled peer establishes the CHILD_SA. |
| CVE-2026-129101 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cudy TR3000 before 2.5.42 contains a mass assignment vulnerability in the vpn.set_conf App RPC method that allows authenticated administrators to inject arbitrary OpenVPN server options. Attackers can set enabled=1 and a malicious up option in the openvpns object, which the openvpn-hotplug wrapper executes via /bin/sh as root. |
| CVE-2026-129100 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cudy TR3000 before 2.5.42 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to execute commands as root by uploading crafted OpenVPN private or tls-auth keys. Attackers can close the inline key block with </key>, inject directives such as tls-verify that bypass the .ovpn denylist, and have OpenVPN execute the hook as root. |
| CVE-2026-129099 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cudy TR3000 before 2.5.42 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to run root commands by importing a malicious OpenVPN client configuration. Attackers can include tls-verify or ipchange directives, which the incomplete denylist does not filter, to execute commands as root when the router connects to an attacker-controlled VPN endpoint. |
| CVE-2026-129094 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | @utcp/http before 1.1.14 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote manuals to reach loopback services by bypassing the remote-loopback check with a {host} placeholder. Attackers can supply host arguments like 127.0.0.1 or register tools via Streamable HTTP and SSE discovery to access internal services on the agent machine. |
| CVE-2026-129092 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CCC Attestation SIG attested-tls-poc through commit 731ca82 contains a time-of-check time-of-use vulnerability because Evidence is appraised only once during the TLS handshake, without post-handshake re-attestation. Attackers with local access to the attesting endpoint can alter workload code, data, configuration, or attached devices like GPUs while peers keep trusting the original Evidence. |
| CVE-2026-128991 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | xschem 2.9.9 through 3.4.7 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in read_xschem_file() in src/save.c that mishandles embedded-symbol records lacking a preceding instance. Attackers can supply a crafted schematic beginning with a "[" record, causing xschem to read and dereference memory below the instance array and crash. |
| CVE-2026-128990 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | xschem 2.9.9 through 3.4.7 contains a heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in read_dataset() in src/rawtovcd.c due to an unchecked variable index. Attackers can supply a crafted ngspice .raw file that, when converted with rawtovcd, writes file-controlled heap pointers at chosen signed offsets, corrupting heap memory. |
| CVE-2026-128987 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in dbus. A local attacker can exploit this vulnerability by connecting to an affected service, requesting a response, and stopping socket reads while keeping the connection open. Because the socket transport handles broken pipe write errors as retryable, the application enters a continuous retry loop. This can lead to excessive CPU consumption, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) for the target process. |
| CVE-2026-128986 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.3, ABAC-enabled deployments match `ROUTE` access rules against the fully decoded request path, while the router routes on the raw, still encoded path. An encoded slash (`%2F`) inside a path value is a segment separator for the access check but part of the value for the router, so a request can match a narrow `ROUTE` rule while the handler returns a different, larger resource. An authenticated caller whose rules grant READ only on parts of a resource can therefore read the whole resource. In the DPP API, a rule such as `/v1/dpps/*/elements/*`, meant to grant only passport elements, also grants the complete passport whose identifier contains `/elements/`. In the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment, a rule such as `/submodels/*/submodel-elements/*/attachment`, meant to grant only file attachments, also grants the complete element whose stored idShort contains `%2F`. The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.4. |
| CVE-2026-128970 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Psono Server Community Edition versions 1.12.6 through 7.5.0 and Psono Server Enterprise Edition before 7.5.1 do not require accepted group membership when authorizing deletion of group share-rights. The DELETE /share/right/ endpoint checks for a membership matching the target group, the authenticated user, and share_admin=True, but omits accepted=True. An authenticated remote attacker who has been invited to a group with share-admin privileges, and who knows a group share-right UUID, can therefore delete that group's share-right record without accepting the invitation or after declining it. Pending invitations have accepted=None, while declined invitations retain accepted=False and the share_admin flag. Deletion revokes the group's access to the affected share and its contained secrets for all accepted group members, without deleting the underlying data or disclosing secret contents. The issue was fixed in version 7.5.1 of both editions, released on 2026-10-13. |
| CVE-2026-128910 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use of hard-coded credentials (CWE-798) on the 1300 communications board in DJI AeroScope Mobile (TP703) firmware 03.00.00.26, with 1300 communications board firmware 02.00.07.12 through 02.00.08.40, allows an attacker with physical access to the board's serial console to log in as root. The same password hash is present on every unit and uses DES crypt, so the password can be recovered offline from the distributed firmware. No network login service accepts this password by default. Confirmed on a physical device. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. DJI has discontinued AeroScope Mobile and no fixed firmware is available. |
| CVE-2026-128909 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper verification of cryptographic signature (CWE-347) in the firmware update handler of the management service (uavmonitor_usbv1) of the 1300 communications board in DJI AeroScope Mobile (TP703) firmware 03.00.00.26, with 1300 communications board firmware 02.00.07.12 through 02.00.08.40, allows an unauthenticated attacker on the local network to install modified firmware, which gives persistent code execution as root. The device accepts any image that matches an MD5 checksum supplied in the same request and does not verify a signature. Exploitation requires network access to TCP port 16000 on the board and that the unit is not connected to another controlling host. Reproduced by running the unmodified device binaries in emulation; not tested on a physical device. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. DJI has discontinued AeroScope Mobile and no fixed firmware is available. |
| CVE-2026-128908 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OS command injection (CWE-78) in the network-configuration handling of the management service (uavmonitor_usbv1) of the 1300 communications board in DJI AeroScope Mobile (TP703) firmware 03.00.00.26, with 1300 communications board firmware 02.00.07.12 through 02.00.08.40, allows an unauthenticated attacker on the local network to execute arbitrary commands as root. Configuration values that can be written without authentication over the management interface are inserted unquoted into shell commands. Exploitation requires network access to TCP port 16000 on the board and that the unit is not connected to another controlling host. The injected command persists across reboots. Confirmed on a physical device. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. DJI has discontinued AeroScope Mobile and no fixed firmware is available. |
| CVE-2026-128907 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing authentication for a critical function (CWE-306) in the management service (uavmonitor_usbv1) of the 1300 communications board in DJI AeroScope Mobile (TP703) firmware 03.00.00.26, with 1300 communications board firmware 02.00.07.12 through 02.00.08.40, allows an unauthenticated attacker on the local network to read device information, such as the serial number, MAC address, IP address and radio configuration, and to change configuration settings. The service accepts commands in DJI's proprietary DUML protocol without any authentication. Exploitation requires network access to TCP port 16000 on the board and that the unit is not connected to another controlling host. The same commands are also accepted over the USB operator port. Confirmed on a physical device. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. DJI has discontinued AeroScope Mobile and no fixed firmware is available. |
| CVE-2026-128886 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in dbus when configured with the nonce-tcp transport. An unauthenticated attacker able to connect to an exposed listener can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by opening a connection and withholding the expected authentication token. Because the server processes this verification without enforcing a timeout, the stalled connection blocks the accept process and prevents legitimate clients from establishing new connections. |
| CVE-2026-128885 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in D-Bus. In configurations where the daemon falls back to using the Unix select() mechanism for event monitoring, it does not verify whether file descriptor numbers exceed allocated limits. A local attacker can exploit this flaw by opening a large number of concurrent connections to trigger an out-of-bounds write on the stack. This can cause the daemon to crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). |
| CVE-2026-128834 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing Authorization vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Spectra ultimate-addons-for-gutenberg allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Spectra: from n/a through 2.20.5. |
| CVE-2026-128824 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. The v1 registry API error handler reflects the attacker-supplied image_id path segment in a response served as text/html, allowing a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. By tricking a user into visiting a specially crafted URL, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser within the Quay origin, potentially compromising the user's session. |
| CVE-2026-128790 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment do not apply an access rule's `FILTERLIST` fragment filters to single Submodel reads. `GET /submodels` removes the fields that a rule's `FILTERLIST` hides, but `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}` and `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$metadata` return them unfiltered. An authenticated caller with READ access to a Submodel can therefore read fields that the access rules hide from them, for example `supplementalSemanticIds` keys that name the other parties allowed to read the Submodel. If versioning is enabled (`history.mode` set to `api` or `audit`), `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$history` and `GET /shells/{aasIdentifier}/$history` in the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment return the complete stored version without applying the rule's formula or fragment filters. A caller whose rules grant READ on these routes can read fields that the access rules hide, and Submodels and Asset Administration Shells that the direct read does not return to them at all. The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3. |
| CVE-2026-128637 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The MISP Modules website component contains an open redirect vulnerability in its login endpoint. The /login route accepted a user-supplied next query parameter and passed it directly to Flask's redirect() function without validating the destination. An attacker could craft a URL such as https://victim-host/login?next=https://attacker.example/phish and deliver it to a user (e.g., via email or a lookalike page). After the user successfully authenticated, the application issued a 302 redirect to the attacker-controlled external URL. This enables phishing attacks where a user, believing they are still on the legitimate MISP Modules site, may enter additional credentials or sensitive information on the attacker's page. It can also be used to obscure the true destination of a link, bypassing user trust in the legitimate domain. The vulnerability requires the victim to interact with the crafted URL and complete a login, but no prior authentication or special configuration is needed on the attacker's side. The affected component is the website sub-project of misp-modules, specifically the account blueprint in website/app/account/account.py. No version boundaries are specified in the patch metadata. |
| CVE-2026-128424 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Kroxylicious. The ACL authorizer's rules-file parser unquotes `matching /…/` regular-expression literals using the string unquoting rules, which strips every backslash escape. As a result, an allow rule such as `matching /orders\.v1/` is compiled as the regex `orders.v1`, which also matches unintended names such as `ordersXv1`, and character classes such as `\d` and `\w` lose their special meaning. Allow rules written with regex escapes can therefore apply to more resources than the author intended. Depending on the ACL configuration, this may allow an authenticated Kafka client to access a resource (such as read or write a topic) that should have been denied. |
| CVE-2026-128348 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a formula injection vulnerability in the totals row formula getter in lib/doc/table.js that fails to escape [, ], # and ' characters in structured reference column names. Attackers can supply column names containing ] via untrusted input like imported CSV headers to inject formulas such as HYPERLINK that exfiltrate cell values when users open and click the generated workbook. |
| CVE-2026-128347 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the streaming WorkbookWriter that allows attackers to read local files by supplying crafted image filenames to addImage. Attackers can inject ../ path segments into user-controlled image paths, causing addMedia to embed any file readable by the Node.js process under xl/media in the generated workbook. |
| CVE-2026-128346 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a resource leak vulnerability in the streaming WorkbookReader.parse that leaves temporary files and open descriptors when sheet parsing fails or iteration stops early. Attackers can repeatedly upload malformed multi-sheet workbooks with worksheets placed before xl/sharedStrings.xml to fill the temporary directory and exhaust file descriptors. |
| CVE-2026-128345 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in slideFormula in lib/utils/shared-formula.js when translating shared formulas to child cells. Attackers can supply a crafted spreadsheet with very long master formulas, such as runs of hyphens, causing quadratic regex backtracking that blocks the Node.js event loop. |
| CVE-2026-128344 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying a workbook with an unbounded image anchor column in the drawing part. Attackers can set an anchor column such as 300000000 in xl/drawings/drawing1.xml so reading getImages() anchor positions makes Worksheet.getColumn allocate millions of Column objects and abort with a heap out-of-memory error. |
| CVE-2026-128343 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | exceljs through 4.4.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to block the event loop by supplying unbounded row r attributes parsed in row-xform.js. Attackers can craft an XLSX file with a row numbered far beyond Excel's limit, making getSheetValues(), workbook writes and CSV export consume time proportional to that number. |
| CVE-2026-128342 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to block the event loop by supplying an unbounded sheetId in xl/workbook.xml. Attackers can provide a workbook with a huge sheetId, making the sparse worksheet array walk stall worksheets, getWorksheet and writeBuffer for seconds. |
| CVE-2026-128341 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in data-validations-xform.js that allows attackers to exhaust CPU and memory by supplying unbounded sqref ranges. Attackers can provide a small crafted workbook with a sqref of A1:XFD1048576 to make xlsx.load() iterate billions of addresses, blocking the event loop and crashing the process with an uncatchable out-of-memory error. |
| CVE-2026-128340 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying a workbook with an oversized defined-name range. DefinedNames.addEx expands ranges such as S!$A$1:$XFD$1048576 from xl/workbook.xml cell by cell, causing an uncatchable fatal heap out-of-memory error during xlsx.load(). |
| CVE-2026-128339 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in Worksheet._parseMergeCells that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying unbounded mergeCell ranges. Attackers can craft a small workbook with a mergeCell ref like A1:XFD1048576, causing xlsx.load() to create billions of Row and Cell objects and abort the process. |
| CVE-2026-128338 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | exceljs through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying a worksheet col element with an unbounded max attribute. Attackers can craft a small workbook with a huge max value, causing xlsx.load() to allocate hundreds of millions of Column objects and abort the process with an uncatchable heap out-of-memory error. |
| CVE-2026-128337 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in mergeConditionalFormattings that allows attackers to modify Object.prototype by supplying an x14:cfRule id of __proto__. Attackers can craft an xlsx file that, when loaded with xlsx.load(), sets properties such as type, direction, border and cfvo on every object in the process until it restarts. |
| CVE-2026-128336 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability that allows attackers to add numeric keys to Object.prototype through a crafted defined name referencing a __proto__ sheet. Attackers can supply an xlsx whose xl/workbook.xml definedName range targets __proto__, causing CellMatrix to write empty arrays onto Object.prototype process-wide when workbook.xlsx.load() runs. |
| CVE-2026-128335 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Contao 4.6.0 before 5.3.54, 5.4.0-RC1 before 5.7.17, and 6.0.0-RC1 before 6.0.6 fails to invalidate existing user sessions when two-factor authentication is enabled or disabled. Because Contao\User::isEqualTo() and serialized session data omit two-factor state, attackers already holding a session keep it after the owner changes 2FA settings. |
| CVE-2026-128334 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | listmonk 6.2.0 before 7.0.0-beta.2 contains a missing authentication vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to submit Azure Event Grid bounce webhooks when no shared secret is configured. Attackers can POST forged EmailDeliveryReportReceived events with Bounced status to /webhooks/service/azure to blocklist, unsubscribe, or delete arbitrary subscribers. |
| CVE-2026-128333 | Critical | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | listmonk 6.0.0 before 7.0.0-beta.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in doResetPassword that skips TOTP verification after a password reset. Attackers who can complete a reset, such as by reading the victim's reset email, obtain fully authenticated sessions including Super Admin without the TOTP code. |
| CVE-2026-128332 | Critical | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Listmonk 6.0.0 before 7.0.0-beta.2 contains a 2FA bypass vulnerability that allows attackers with a valid password to brute-force TOTP codes because the attempt counter resets on every new password login. Attackers can repeatedly submit credentials to POST /admin/login to obtain fresh tokens, each allowing 15 more guesses, gaining sessions for 2FA-protected accounts including Super Admin. |
| CVE-2026-128331 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Miniflux before 2.3.5 contains an unverified password change vulnerability that allows holders of a signed-in session to change the account password without supplying the current password. Attackers with a stolen session cookie or unattended device can submit new password fields via updateSettings to lock out the owner and take over the account. |
| CVE-2026-128330 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Miniflux before 2.3.5 contains an insufficient session expiration vulnerability that allows attackers to retain account access because password changes do not revoke existing web sessions. Attackers holding a leaked password or copied session cookie keep access for up to 30 days, reading integration credentials, creating API keys, or registering passkeys. |
| CVE-2026-128329 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dokploy 0.28.0 before 0.31.1 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows authenticated organization members to read arbitrary files by supplying ../ sequences in the filePath of patch.readRepoFile. Attackers with service read permission can read /etc/shadow, SSH private keys, and secret environment files on the Dokploy host or managed remote servers. |
| CVE-2026-128328 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Dokploy 0.28.0 before 0.31.1 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows authenticated organization members to list tracked files of any git repository by supplying an arbitrary repoPath to patch.readRepoDirectories. Attackers with read access to one service can enumerate file and directory names of other tenants' application and compose source trees on the host or managed servers. |
| CVE-2026-128321 | Unknown | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tight JPEG decoding in TightVNC and UltraVNC viewers contains a heap-based buffer overflow because an attacker-controlled framebuffer rectangle width is not validated against a fixed-size decoding buffer. A malicious VNC server can cause an out-of-bounds heap write when a user connects, resulting in application crash and potentially other memory-corruption impacts. |
| CVE-2026-128242 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | actix-http before 3.20.1 and actix-web before 4.18.2 contain an unbounded decompression vulnerability in encoding::Decoder that lets remote attackers exhaust memory and CPU via compressed bodies. Attackers can send small highly compressed gzip, deflate, Brotli or zstd request bodies to Json, Form, Bytes or String extractors, or serve them to awc clients, causing denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-128241 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The xmlwf tool in libexpat through 2.10.0 contains a symlink following vulnerability because -d output mode opens files with fopen("wb"), which follows symbolic links. Local attackers with write access to the output directory can plant a symlink at the expected output name to truncate or overwrite files writable by the xmlwf user. |
| CVE-2026-128240 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | GPAC through 26.07.0 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in gf_sg_proto_del() in src/scenegraph/vrml_proto.c because gf_sg_reset() frees unregistered prototypes still referenced by scene commands. Attackers can supply a crafted XMT/BT scene declaring prototypes via commands, processed by MP4Box -chap, to trigger freed memory access and crash the process. |
| CVE-2026-128239 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | GPAC through 26.07.0 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the MPEG-4 Form spatial-constraint handlers in src/compositor/mpeg4_form.c that lets attackers crash the process via unchecked group lookups. Attackers can supply a crafted XMT scene whose Form constraints reference a non-existent group, crashing tools like MP4Box during chapter import for denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-128238 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Scapy before 2.8.0 contains an uncontrolled recursion vulnerability in the BER/ASN.1 decoder in scapy/asn1/ber.py that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to crash parsing applications. Attackers can send a single 833-byte packet with 250 nested ASN.1 SEQUENCE structures to trigger an unhandled RecursionError, terminating TLS, SNMP, X.509, or LDAP parsers even with safe=True. |
| CVE-2026-128237 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Scapy before 2.8.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in BER_num_dec() and BERcodec_OID.do_dec() that allows remote attackers to exhaust CPU by supplying oversized OID arcs. Attackers can send ASN.1/BER data with many base-128 continuation bytes to cause quadratic CPU consumption or an uncaught ValueError crash on Python 3.11+. |
| CVE-2026-128134 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Prior to 3.10.4, nltk.parse.dependencygraph.dot2img resolves the Graphviz dot executable through PATH but invokes the resulting absolute executable without routing through spawn_trusted, so resolve_trusted_executable ownership and writability validation and safe_env loader environment scrubbing do not run. A local low-privileged attacker who can write to a directory on a POSIX victim's PATH can plant or replace dot, and code executes as the victim when dot2img is called directly or DependencyGraph.repr_svg renders a graph. The current-working-directory-only bare-name vector is blocked and is not this vulnerability; this issue is the residual writable absolute PATH element bypass after CVE-2026-78680. This issue is fixed in version 3.10.4. |
| CVE-2026-128133 | Unknown | 2026-11-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: This CVE is a duplicate of another CVE. |
| CVE-2026-128132 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, the WebSocket reader continues parsing frames already received after the receive queue pauses the transport, and empty messages are not counted toward the queue size. With permessage-deflate, one read of compressed frames can add many megabytes of decompressed messages to the receive queue. A remote peer can send many small or compressed messages faster than the application consumes them and cause excessive memory use in a server or client. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128131 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, aiohttp decompresses each member of a payload containing many concatenated gzip, deflate, or zstd streams by passing the entire remaining input to a new decompressor, causing quadratic CPU use. Empty members produce no output, so client_max_size and output backpressure do not limit the work. A remote attacker can block a server event loop with a crafted compressed request body or WebSocket message, and a malicious server can similarly block a client. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128130 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, when the pipelined request queue is full, the pure-Python parser stores the unparsed remainder internally and also returns the same data to its caller. After a handler declines an upgrade request, the caller feeds the remainder back to the parser, causing the buffer to grow with each handled request and dispatching already-handled requests to the application again. The issue affects deployments using AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS or otherwise running without the standard C-extension wheel, and can cause excessive memory use and repeated request processing. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128129 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, aiohttp buffers all additional connection data received while a request marked for upgrade, such as a WebSocket handshake, is being handled, without a size limit or flow control. A remote attacker can stream data behind an upgrade request to a handler that does not immediately accept or reject the upgrade and cause unbounded memory consumption. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128128 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, the C WebSocket reader adds a declared frame length to the size of an already buffered partial message using signed 64-bit arithmetic. A length near two to the power of 63 can overflow, allowing the max_msg_size check to pass. A remote peer can send a small non-final fragment followed by an oversized message and cause unbounded memory consumption. The Python WebSocket reader is unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128127 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, BodyPartReader.read_chunk() processing a multipart part with Content-Transfer-Encoding set to base64 keeps reading until the chunk length is a multiple of four without enforcing a byte limit. A short Content-Length or a long run of whitespace can cause one call to read the remaining body into memory before the size check or spin on the event loop. A remote attacker can send such a multipart request to a handler that reads multipart data and bypass client_max_size. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128126 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, Request.post() does not limit the number of fields in a URL-encoded form body, and inserting many repeated keys into MultiDict takes quadratic time on the event loop. A remote attacker can send a form POST within client_max_size to a handler that calls Request.post() and block the event loop. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128125 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, Set-Cookie parsing treats unrecognized name=value attributes as additional cookies, while CookieJar does not limit the number of cookies stored or sent. A malicious server can make an aiohttp client accumulate a very large cookie set, consume memory and CPU repeatedly across redirects, and construct an excessively large Cookie header for later requests to the same domain. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128124 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, Application.add_domain() converts every asterisk wildcard in a domain mask into a greedy regular-expression fragment, so a mask containing two or more wildcards can take polynomial time to reject a long Host header that does not match. A remote attacker can repeatedly send such headers to a server configured with a multi-wildcard domain mask and stall the event loop. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. |
| CVE-2026-128123 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. From version 5.5.7 until versions 5.5.8 and 6.0.1, , @sveltejs/adapter-node can attempt to add a header to an immutable request in a context that causes the server to crash, denying service to any other requests routed to that server. This issue is fixed in 5.5.8 and 6.0.1. |
| CVE-2026-128122 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. From version 4.7.0 until versions 7.2.10 and 8.0.2, @sveltejs/adapter-cloudflare allowed an attacker-influenced link crawled during prerendering to place whitespace, control characters, wildcards, or placeholders into a prerendered redirect path. The adapter wrote those paths into the Cloudflare _redirects output without output-context validation, allowing a path to create unintended routing rules that could redirect or expose requests beyond the intended prerendered route. This issue is fixed in 7.2.10 and 8.0.2. |
| CVE-2026-128121 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. Prior to @sveltejs/adapter-vercel 6.3.5 and 7.0.2 and @sveltejs/adapter-static 3.0.11 and 4.0.1, an attacker-influenced link crawled during prerendering could be emitted into the generated Vercel routing configuration without escaping regular-expression metacharacters. The configuration could consequently interpret the path as regular-expression syntax, match unintended application paths, and expose content or behavior outside the intended path. This issue is fixed in @sveltejs/adapter-vercel 6.3.5 and 7.0.2 and @sveltejs/adapter-static 3.0.11 and 4.0.1. |
| CVE-2026-128120 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. From version 2.42.0 until 3.1.1, applications using the experimental remote functions flag and a remote form function could perform quadratic synchronous work while parsing a specially crafted request with many form entries. The parsing work could block the event loop for an extended period and deny service. This issue is fixed in 3.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-128119 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. From version 2.60.1 until 3.1.1, applications using the experimental remote functions flag could assign the same generated identifier to separate non-exported query.batch functions. When those private functions shared a request batch, arguments intended for one function could be passed to another function, causing unexpected cross-function processing and possible disclosure of function arguments. This issue is fixed in 3.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-128118 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. From version 3.0.0 until 3.1.1, the build-time server-only module guard did not treat src/params.js as a client entry point even though parameter matchers can run in the browser. Server-only modules imported through src/params.js could consequently enter the client bundle, where statically replaced private environment values or other server secrets could be exposed. This issue is fixed in 3.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-128117 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. Prior to versions 2.70.4 and 3.1.1, the reroute hook could rewrite an invalid percent-encoded pathname into a valid route and reach a comparison that decoded the original malformed pathname outside the guarded decoding operation. The resulting unhandled URIError could crash an adapter-node server and deny service to other requests. This issue is fixed in 2.70.4 and 3.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-128116 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte. Prior to versions 2.70.4 and 3.1.1, apps configured with router.resolution: 'server' could treat a pathname beginning with // as a protocol-relative module specifier during client-side navigation. A socially engineered link could therefore make server-side route resolution import and execute JavaScript from another origin in the user's browser. This issue is fixed in 2.70.4 and 3.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-128100 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vault Community Edition and Vault Enterprise did not apply explicit ACL policy deny rules to letter case variants of user and group names in auth methods that treat these names as case-insensitive. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to modify a protected user or group, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-128100) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.2.2 and Vault Enterprise 2.2.2, 1.21.14, and 1.19.25. |
| CVE-2026-128091 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When MCUboot is built with the TinyCrypt crypto backend (MCUBOOT_USE_TINYCRYPT), bootutil_aes_ctr_drop() in boot/bootutil/include/bootutil/crypto/aes_ctr_tinycrypt.h was an empty stub. The AES-CTR context for this backend is the fully expanded AES-128 key schedule (struct tc_aes_key_sched_struct). Generic code relies on this hook to release and clear key state, so with TinyCrypt nothing was cleared. The mbedTLS and PSA backends do free or destroy their key state here. As a result, boot_state_clear(), which boot_go() calls before handing off to the application, left the image's AES content-encryption key schedule in the static boot_data state. This is the case after an encrypted upgrade in single-image builds, where boot_enc_zeroize() is not called. boot_decrypt_key() likewise left the ECIES-derived key-encryption key schedule on the stack. The affected build uses MCUBOOT_ENC_IMAGES with TinyCrypt, which is the default ECDSA and Ed25519 backend in the Zephyr port. The first AES-128 round key equals the cipher key, so anyone who can read the leftover bootloader RAM after boot can recover the image content key and decrypt that encrypted image. That includes a physical attacker with debug or RAM access, or code later running on the device. This weakens image-encryption key confidentiality (and so the confidentiality of the encrypted image's plaintext). The device's long-term private decryption key is not exposed, and image authenticity is not affected. The fix wipes the context with bootutil_wipe_memory(). |
| CVE-2026-128089 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | dnspython is a DNS toolkit for Python. Prior to version 2.9.2, the from_text() parser for WKS records does not require the service number to be between 0 and 65535 before using it as a bitmap offset. An attacker-controlled zone file can supply a larger number, causing the service bitmap to grow to an extremely large size through inefficient repeated extension, consuming excessive memory and CPU and potentially terminating the process. Applications are affected only when they parse zone-file text whose record type and rdata are attacker controlled. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.2. |
| CVE-2026-128088 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | russh is a Rust SSH client and server library that includes an SSH agent protocol implementation. Prior to version 0.65.1, try_sign() captures an Arc<PrivateKey> before awaiting Agent::confirm() and does not revalidate the shared lock state or key presence after the await. This is a distinct residual defect in the remediation for CVE-2026-116794. A peer, including a remote SSH server using agent forwarding, can begin a confirmation-constrained signature request while the agent is unlocked and receive the signature after another connection locks the agent if the stale confirmation returns true. New post-lock requests are rejected and private key material is not disclosed, but the pending operation bypasses the current lock state. This issue is fixed in version 0.65.1. |
| CVE-2026-128087 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | russh is a Rust SSH client and server library that includes an SSH agent protocol implementation. From version 0.55.0 until version 0.65.1, the initial key exchange invokes client::Handler::kex_done() with the raw shared secret before check_server_key() accepts the server host key or certificate. A malicious SSH server can therefore trigger application-defined secondary-channel initialization or early data handling even when the server identity is subsequently rejected. Ordinary clients that keep the callback's no-op default or independently defer callback-derived actions until trust is confirmed are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.65.1. |
| CVE-2026-128086 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenTelemetry-Go is the Go implementation of OpenTelemetry. From version 1.0.0-RC1 until version 1.47.0, baggage.Parse and propagation.Baggage.Extract eagerly materialize every W3C baggage property through parseMember, grow property slices, serialize members, and copy properties into internal/baggage.Item. A valid densely populated baggage header can therefore cause allocation traffic and retained memory disproportionate to its bounded input size. Remote impact requires baggage extraction to be enabled, attacker-controlled input to reach it, and extraction to run before authentication or on a public route; the evidence establishes increased allocation and garbage-collection pressure but not reliable process termination. This issue is fixed in version 1.47.0. |
| CVE-2026-128085 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenTelemetry-Go is the Go implementation of OpenTelemetry. From SDK version 1.33.0, SDK log version 0.9.0, and trace version 1.35.0 until version 1.47.0, the AttributeValueLengthLimit and WithAttributeValueLengthLimit truncation paths in sdk/internal/attrnorm, sdk/log/internal/attrnorm, and trace/auto.go do not count valid U+FFFD replacement characters. This is a distinct incomplete-fix defect in the replacement truncation code introduced by the remediation for CVE-2026-81869. Values composed of or dominated by those characters can therefore exceed the configured character and memory bound in span, log-record, and auto-instrumentation trace attributes. Attacker-controlled telemetry attributes can increase retained memory and pipeline pressure, while confidentiality and integrity are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.47.0. |
| CVE-2026-128084 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | sqlite3 provides Ruby bindings for the SQLite3 embedded database. Prior to 2.10.2, sqlite3-ruby casts Ruby string lengths to int before passing SQL through Database#prepare, bound String or Blob values through Statement#bind_param, and String or Blob results from Ruby-defined SQL functions and aggregates through Database#create_function and Database#create_aggregate. On 64-bit platforms, a string of 4 GiB (2^32 bytes) or larger can wrap the length so SQLite processes only a prefix. A truncated SQL string can drop trailing clauses such as a WHERE condition, while a truncated bound value matters only when the application validated the full value before binding it. Exploitation requires the application and server to accept and retain the unusually large attacker-controlled string. If a dropped SQL clause contained a bind placeholder, binding raises SQLite3::RangeException instead of running the query. This issue is fixed in version 2.10.2. |
| CVE-2026-128083 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Laravel is a web application framework. Prior to 12.71.0 and 13.40.0, Laravel's Concurrency::run process driver can treat a forged internal result message in child standard output as framework output. An application route must invoke Concurrency::run, and a task must write attacker-controlled bytes at the start of the child's standard output that form a complete JSON document followed by gzip magic bytes. Under those application-specific conditions, an attacker can forge the internal result message and achieve remote code execution. The affected behavior is not exposed by default and requires application code that routes untrusted input into task output. This issue is fixed in versions 12.71.0 and 13.40.0. |
| CVE-2026-128082 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | AutoMapper is a convention-based object-object mapper in .NET. Prior to 15.1.4 and from 16.0.0 until 16.3.0, AutoMapper increments type depth only after creating the destination, so recursive mapping performed through constructor parameters occurs before MaxDepth is counted. Destinations built through positional records or other constructors, and recursive ConstructUsing mappings that call context.Mapper, can therefore bypass explicit MaxDepth values and the default limit of 64. Deep attacker-influenced input can throw an uncatchable StackOverflowException and terminate the process. This issue is fixed in versions 15.1.4 and 16.3.0. |
| CVE-2026-128081 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AutoMapper is a convention-based object-object mapper in .NET. Prior to 15.1.4 and from 16.0.0 until 16.3.0, AutoMapper can recurse without an effective MaxDepth limit when mapping polymorphic graphs through Include or IncludeBase, runtime-typed object or interface members, nested Dictionary<string, object> or ExpandoObject sources, or recursive ConvertUsing type converters. Deep attacker-influenced graphs on these paths can throw an uncatchable StackOverflowException and terminate the process. This issue is fixed in versions 15.1.4 and 16.3.0. |
| CVE-2026-128080 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenTelemetry JavaScript is the OpenTelemetry JavaScript client. From 0.204.0 until 0.222.0, @opentelemetry/instrumentation-http writes the raw query string from incoming HTTP requests to the url.query server-span attribute without applying the redactedQueryParams protection used for outgoing spans. Services receiving signed URLs or other credentials in query parameters can therefore export still-valid secrets to tracing backends, where observability infrastructure and users with span-read access may read them. The redactedQueryParams option does not protect incoming spans in affected versions. This issue is fixed in version 0.222.0. |
| CVE-2026-128079 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | envd provides reproducible development environments for humans and agents. In versions starting with 0.3.38 and before 1.3.6, insufficient containment of host-side requirements-file reads in install.python_packages(requirements=...) could allow access to files outside the build context. An attacker able to influence build input could cause file contents interpreted as dependency entries to appear in debug logs or build-step metadata, subject to the envd process’s permissions. Exploitation in version 1.3.5 additionally requires concurrent modification of relevant filesystem paths. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.6. |
| CVE-2026-128078 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 9.5.0 until 10.0.27 and 11.0.9, authenticated users could access ITIL followups, tasks, or solutions generated from templates without a read-permission check on the parent ticket, problem, or change. Depending on the template configuration, this could reveal information from parent items the user could not otherwise read. This issue is fixed in versions 10.0.27 and 11.0.9. |
| CVE-2026-128077 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From 4.6.0 until 4.6.4, Nuxt parses a request path beginning with // as a URL host before rendering a page, while Nitro server/middleware and routeRules continue to evaluate the original path. An unauthenticated request such as //x/admin can therefore resolve to the /admin page without route-scoped serverHandlers, server/middleware path checks, redirects, or security headers configured for /admin. API handlers in server/api and server/routes, appMiddleware, page middleware are unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128076 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From 3.21.6 to before 4.0.0 and from 4.4.6 until 4.6.4, the /__nuxt_island path hash uses ohash serialization that does not escape quotes in string values or delimiters in object keys, allowing different island-prop tuples to produce the same path. For prerendering, substituted content is written into the generated page only if the crawler reaches a colliding URL before rendering the page with the legitimate props. Separately, a CDN or reverse proxy that keys island responses by path alone can be primed with the colliding response. If the substituted prop reaches v-html, innerHTML, or another unsafe HTML sink, the response can execute script in the application origin; otherwise the impact is content substitution. Applications that do not use server components or NuxtIsland, islands without attacker-influenced string props, and responses not cached by path alone are unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128075 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From 3.0.0 until 4.6.4, Nuxt wraps non-HTTP errors thrown during server rendering with createError and incorrectly treats the result as an error deliberately exposed by the application. In production, the error page payload (__NUXT_DATA__) and JSON error response can therefore disclose the original message and data, including an upstream $fetch URL, query-string secrets, response bodies, database hosts, or similar sensitive details, regardless of what a custom error.vue renders. Errors deliberately created with createError or showError, errors returned by useFetch or useAsyncData, and server/api routes are not affected because their client-visible behavior is intentional or follows a different path. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128074 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From 4.6.0 until 4.6.4, _payload.json URL generation and the experimental early-404 path use a trailing-slash regular expression whose work grows quadratically with a long run of slash characters. An unauthenticated request can synchronously occupy the Node.js event loop and delay other requests when server-side rendering uses isr, swr, or cache route rules, or when experimental.early404 is enabled. Applications without those route rules and without experimental.early404, fully prerendered applications, and client-only applications are unaffected; the impact is limited to availability. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128072 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From @nuxt/webpack-builder 3.0.0 and @nuxt/rspack-builder 3.12.2 until 4.6.4, the development middleware trusts Origin, Referer, or Sec-Fetch-Site when the Host header names the same attacker-controlled hostname. After DNS rebinding changes that hostname to a loopback address, a malicious page opened by a developer can read /_nuxt/*.js client chunks and inline source maps, exposing compiled application source, local filesystem paths, and developer-controlled values embedded in the client bundle. The attacker must know or guess the development-server port and induce the developer to open the malicious page; Chrome 142 and later and other Chromium-based browsers that enforce Local Network Access restrictions prompt before a public page can reach the loopback address. The default Vite builder and production builds are unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128071 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. Nuxt from 3.0.0 until 4.6.4, @nuxt/nitro-server from 3.20.0 until 4.6.4, and @nuxt/vite-server from 4.6.0 until 4.6.4, routeRules matching leaves an encoded slash (%2F) in the request path while a catch-all page such as app/pages/[...slug].vue or a custom multi-segment page route decodes it into a route parameter. The getRouteRules result is therefore incomplete, and an unauthenticated request can render the page without the redirect, headers, proxy, SSR, noScripts, appMiddleware, or appLayout rules configured for the decoded path. Protected content is resolved only when the page interprets the decoded parameter accordingly: a custom multi-segment parameter can contain the decoded path, while a repeatable catch-all must join the slash-containing array element; route.path remains encoded and does not resolve that resource. Static pages, single-segment parameters, server/api handlers, and server/routes handlers are not affected because they do not have the same encoded-path mismatch. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128070 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From 3.5.0 until 4.6.4, Nuxt can choose a parent directory as the default workspaceDir in either of two cases: a stray parent lockfile when the project is outside a Git repository and has no workspace file above it, or a parent pnpm or Deno settings file that does not declare packages or a workspace, including when the project is inside a Git repository. When the development server is reachable from an untrusted network, Vite permits /_nuxt/@fs/ requests beneath that widened directory, allowing unauthenticated clients to read files such as credentials and SSH keys. The issue affects the development server only; production builds and projects whose parent directories contain no qualifying files are unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.4. |
| CVE-2026-128069 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | rails-html-sanitizer is responsible for sanitizing HTML fragments in Rails applications. Before 1.7.2, the HTML4 and HTML5 variants of Rails::HTML::SafeListSanitizer reuse one Rails::HTML::PermitScrubber across calls and mutate its tags and attributes without synchronization. In a multithreaded process, concurrent sanitize calls using different tags: or attributes: options can interleave and cause one call to use the other call's allowlist. If a permissive call admits a script element or event-handler attribute, output expected to be sanitized under a stricter policy can retain it and cause cross-site scripting when rendered. Applications that are single-threaded, use one identical allowlist everywhere, or provide a separate scrubber: are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.2. |
| CVE-2026-128068 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | rails-html-sanitizer is responsible for sanitizing HTML fragments in Rails applications. From 1.0.3 through 1.7.1, Rails::HTML::PermitScrubber checks SVG href and xlink:href local references with a pattern whose line-start anchor and whitespace class cause an all-whitespace value to be rescanned from each line start. An attacker who supplies HTML can cause quadratic CPU consumption when an application customizes its allowed tags to include an SVG reference element such as use and permits href or xlink:href. The default allowed tag configuration is not affected. CRuby 3.2 and later uses linear-time regular expression matching for this pattern, while CRuby 3.1 and earlier and JRuby are affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.2. |
| CVE-2026-128067 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Pillow is a Python imaging library. From 2.3.0 through 12.3.0, Pillow applications that save compressed TIFF images through libtiff can pass attacker-controlled image geometry tags to the encoder while allocating its row buffer from the actual image dimensions. The affected TiffImagePlugin._save path allows ImageWidth, ImageLength, or SamplesPerPixel from exif=, tiffinfo=, or a source TIFF IFD to make libtiff consume a larger scanline than the buffer supplied by ImagingLibTiffEncode. This can read heap memory into the generated TIFF or crash the process. When TIFF Predictor 2 is enabled, libtiff can rewrite the oversized scanline in place and corrupt memory beyond the buffer. A carried-over PlanarConfiguration value of 2 instead makes libtiff use a shorter scanline and can produce an undecodable output file, but is not established to cause the out-of-bounds access. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-128066 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Pillow is a Python imaging library. From 1.0 through 12.3.0, ImageFileDirectory_v2.load() in src/PIL/TiffImagePlugin.py retains a separate bytes object for each out-of-line IFD tag value without limiting the total data read or preventing distinct tags from referencing the same file region. A small crafted TIFF or EXIF-bearing JPEG, PNG, WebP, or MPO can therefore cause memory use quadratic in the input size. TIFF and some JPEG paths trigger parsing during Image.open(), while other formats are exposed when EXIF is requested, including through getexif() or ImageOps.exif_transpose(). The declared pixel dimensions do not bound this metadata allocation, so decompression-bomb checks do not prevent process memory exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-128065 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | @grpc/grpc-js implements the core functionality of gRPC purely in JavaScript, without a C++ addon. From 1.14.0 through 1.14.1, XdsServer in @grpc/grpc-js-xds can acknowledge Route and VirtualHost resources while failing to apply their RBACPerRoute override configurations. The override parser is not registered under the override message type, override maps are stored under a type URL instead of the configured HTTP filter name, and VirtualHost override maps are not read. When experimental RBAC is enabled and a trusted xDS control plane supplies a broad top-level ALLOW policy with a stricter matching override, affected servers evaluate RPCs under the broad policy and can accept requests that should be denied. This issue is fixed in version 1.14.2. |
| CVE-2026-128053 | Low | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenMage magento-lts before 20.18.2 and 21.0.0-beta1 before 21.0.0-beta3 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in its error pages, which print SCRIPT_NAME-derived URLs built by errors/processor.php without escaping. Unauthenticated attackers can craft links that trigger uncaught exceptions on servers deriving SCRIPT_NAME from the request path, executing script in the storefront origin within victims' browsers. |
| CVE-2026-128052 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenMage magento-lts before 20.19.0 and 21.0.0-beta1 before 21.0.0-beta3 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the template filter's {{layout}} directive, which renders arbitrary layout handles without enforcing the admin/block whitelist that the {{block}} directive applies. Administrators with rights to edit email, CMS, widget or newsletter content can embed {{layout}} with arbitrary handles to render disallowed blocks and disclose limited information. |
| CVE-2026-128051 | Medium | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenMage magento-lts before 20.18.2 and 21.0.0-beta1 before 21.0.0-beta3 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because storefront MSRP/MAP popup and Qty Increments notice templates output product names without proper escaping. Attackers with admin product-edit rights can store a malicious product name that executes script when shoppers view product, category, or wishlist pages. |
| CVE-2026-128049 | Critical | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenMage Magento LTS before 20.18.2 and 21.0.0-beta1 before 21.0.0-beta3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the admin and storefront OAuth confirm and confirmSimple actions, which accept GET requests without form-key validation. Attackers holding OAuth consumer credentials can lure a logged-in administrator or customer to a crafted confirm URL that authorizes the attacker's request token, then exchange it at /oauth/token for a persistent REST API access token bound to the victim. |