WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Product security✕
Overview 216 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
216matches 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 216 100.0%
Critical 32 14.8% High 89 41.2% Medium 86 39.8% Low 9 4.2% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 216 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 7 3.2% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 209 96.8%
split by peak 73 / year
No exploit published: 216 Low: 9Medium: 86High: 89Critical: 32 not blocked: 216 No public exploit: 209Proof of concept only: 7
20101 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20110 20122 No exploit published2 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 20131 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20143 No exploit published3 Medium3 not blocked3 No public exploit3 20152 No exploit published2 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 20162 No exploit published2 High2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 201710 No exploit published10 Critical1 High6 Medium2 Low1 not blocked10 No public exploit10 201811 No exploit published11 Critical1 High6 Medium4 not blocked11 No public exploit11 201917 No exploit published17 Critical1 High8 Medium7 Low1 not blocked17 No public exploit17 202010 No exploit published10 Critical1 High5 Medium4 not blocked10 No public exploit10 20216 No exploit published6 High3 Medium3 not blocked6 No public exploit6 202223 No exploit published23 Critical6 High9 Medium8 not blocked23 Proof of concept only2 No public exploit21 202315 No exploit published15 Critical3 High2 Medium10 not blocked15 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit14 202420 No exploit published20 Critical2 High8 Medium5 Low5 not blocked20 No public exploit20 202520 No exploit published20 Critical3 High7 Medium10 not blocked20 Proof of concept only3 No public exploit17 202673 No exploit published73 Critical14 High33 Medium24 Low2 not blocked73 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit72
201020122014201620182020202220242026
216 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed. ‹ prev page 3 of 3 next ›
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2014-3527 Critical 2017-05-25 No exploit published No public exploit When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.
CVE-2014-0097 High 2017-05-25 No exploit published No public exploit The ActiveDirectoryLdapAuthenticator in Spring Security 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 and 3.1.0 to 3.1.5 does not check the password length. If the directory allows anonymous binds then it may incorrectly authenticate a user who supplies an empty password.
CVE-2017-3470 Medium 2017-04-24 No exploit published No public exploit Vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Security Gateway component of Oracle Communications Applications (subcomponent: Network). The supported version that is affected is 3.0.0. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via ICMP Ping to compromise Oracle Communications Security Gateway. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Communications Security Gateway. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).
CVE-2016-3102 High 2017-02-09 No exploit published No public exploit The Script Security plugin before 1.18.1 in Jenkins might allow remote attackers to bypass a Groovy sandbox protection mechanism via a plugin that performs (1) direct field access or (2) get/set array operations.
CVE-2016-9879 High 2017-01-06 No exploit published No public exploit An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security before 3.2.10, 4.1.x before 4.1.4, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1. Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed. Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath(), and getPathInfo(). Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified. Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected. Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected.
CVE-2016-8281 High 2016-10-25 No exploit published No public exploit Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 12.1.3.0.0, 12.2.1.0.0, and 12.2.1.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5536.
CVE-2016-5536 High 2016-10-25 No exploit published No public exploit Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 12.1.3.0.0, 12.2.1.0.0, and 12.2.1.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-8281.
CVE-2015-5253 Medium 2015-11-18 No exploit published No public exploit The SAML Web SSO module in Apache CXF before 2.7.18, 3.0.x before 3.0.7, and 3.1.x before 3.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to bypass authentication via a crafted SAML response with a valid signed assertion, related to a "wrapping attack."
CVE-2014-8152 Medium 2015-01-21 No exploit published No public exploit Apache Santuario XML Security for Java 2.0.x before 2.0.3 allows remote attackers to bypass the streaming XML signature protection mechanism via a crafted XML document.
CVE-2014-3623 Medium 2014-10-30 No exploit published No public exploit Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does not properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2014-0034 Medium 2014-07-07 No exploit published No public exploit The SecurityTokenService (STS) in Apache CXF before 2.6.12 and 2.7.x before 2.7.9 does not properly validate SAML tokens when caching is enabled, which allows remote attackers to gain access via an invalid SAML token.
CVE-2013-4517 Medium 2014-01-11 No exploit published No public exploit Apache Santuario XML Security for Java before 1.5.6, when applying Transforms, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via crafted Document Type Definitions (DTDs), related to signatures.
CVE-2013-5960 Medium 2013-09-30 No exploit published No public exploit The authenticated-encryption feature in the symmetric-encryption implementation in the OWASP Enterprise Security API (ESAPI) for Java 2.x before 2.1.0.1 does not properly resist tampering with serialized ciphertext, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended cryptographic protection mechanisms via an attack against the intended cipher mode in a non-default configuration, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5679.
CVE-2012-5055 Medium 2012-12-05 No exploit published No public exploit DaoAuthenticationProvider in VMware SpringSource Spring Security before 2.0.8, 3.0.x before 3.0.8, and 3.1.x before 3.1.3 does not check the password if the user is not found, which makes the response delay shorter and might allow remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via a series of login requests.
CVE-2011-2731 Medium 2012-12-05 No exploit published No public exploit Race condition in the RunAsManager mechanism in VMware SpringSource Spring Security before 2.0.7 and 3.0.x before 3.0.6 stores the Authentication object in the shared security context, which allows attackers to gain privileges via a crafted thread.
CVE-2010-3700 Medium 2010-10-29 No exploit published No public exploit VMware SpringSource Spring Security 2.x before 2.0.6 and 3.x before 3.0.4, and Acegi Security 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 and 7.0, allows remote attackers to bypass security constraints via a path parameter.
‹ prev page 3 of 3 next ›