Overview 4,615 matches · 267 in Waratek scope · 37 protected · 86 exploited · 56 CISA KEV · 300 public PoC · 117 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4,615matches
267in Waratek scope5.8%
37protected0.8%
86exploited1.9%
56CISA KEV1.2%
300public PoC6.5%
117EPSS ≥ 0.52.5%
Protected by Waratek
37
0.8%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
14
0.3%
No exploit published
216
4.7%
Outside Waratek scope
223
4.8%
Not applicable
4,125
89.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
37
0.8%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4,578
99.2%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 444 / year
19992
Not applicable2
High1
Low1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200011
Not applicable11
High4
Medium6
Low1
not blocked11
Working exploit published2
No public exploit9
20013
Not applicable3
High2
Low1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
200212
Not applicable12
High5
Medium6
Low1
not blocked12
Working exploit published1
No public exploit11
20036
Not applicable6
High3
Medium3
not blocked6
Working exploit published3
No public exploit3
200430
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable29
High11
Medium16
Low3
not blocked30
Working exploit published7
No public exploit23
200546
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable44
High22
Medium19
Low5
not blocked46
Working exploit published6
No public exploit40
200656
Not applicable56
High17
Medium38
Low1
not blocked56
Working exploit published19
No public exploit37
200794
Not applicable94
Critical2
High49
Medium37
Low6
not blocked94
Working exploit published16
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit76
200857
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable56
Critical1
High40
Medium16
not blocked57
Working exploit published9
No public exploit48
200980
Not applicable80
High42
Medium36
Low2
not blocked80
Exploited2
Working exploit published20
Forecast only1
No public exploit57
201035
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable33
High18
Medium15
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked34
Working exploit published6
No public exploit29
201148
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable47
High35
Medium12
Low1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked47
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit44
2012130
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Not applicable127
Critical1
High30
Medium92
Low7
not blocked130
Working exploit published11
Forecast only11
No public exploit108
2013101
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Not applicable98
High33
Medium56
Low12
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked99
Working exploit published3
No public exploit98
2014171
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable166
Critical2
High46
Medium112
Low11
not blocked171
Exploited5
Working exploit published10
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit155
2015128
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable123
Critical1
High44
Medium76
Low7
not blocked128
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit116
2016160
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable154
Critical9
High82
Medium62
Low7
not blocked160
Exploited4
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit143
2017303
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable289
Critical28
High135
Medium130
Low10
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked302
Exploited2
Working exploit published34
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit265
2018329
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable304
Critical22
High157
Medium144
Low6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked328
Exploited7
Working exploit published17
Forecast only1
No public exploit304
2019388
Protected by Waratek5
Mitigation candidate5
No exploit published17
Outside Waratek scope19
Not applicable342
Critical39
High170
Medium173
Low6
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked383
Exploited4
Working exploit published7
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only3
No public exploit372
2020444
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope41
Not applicable393
Critical35
High187
Medium207
Low15
not blocked444
Exploited9
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only7
No public exploit422
2021442
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope31
Not applicable395
Critical33
High189
Medium208
Low12
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked434
Exploited16
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only4
No public exploit413
2022401
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published23
Outside Waratek scope20
Not applicable351
Critical68
High174
Medium150
Low9
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked397
Exploited8
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only53
No public exploit335
2023327
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published15
Outside Waratek scope22
Not applicable279
Critical29
High160
Medium127
Low11
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked318
Exploited10
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only30
Forecast only3
No public exploit280
2024334
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published20
Outside Waratek scope27
Not applicable284
Critical45
High139
Medium132
Low18
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked331
Exploited7
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only49
No public exploit273
2025210
No exploit published20
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable184
Critical26
High96
Medium81
Low7
not blocked210
Exploited5
Proof of concept only37
No public exploit168
2026267
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published73
Outside Waratek scope29
Not applicable163
Critical36
High134
Medium87
Low10
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked265
Exploited7
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only20
No public exploit237
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-2475 | Medium | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, caused by an open redirect vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially crafted request to redirect a victim to arbitrary Web sites. |
| CVE-2026-1491 | Medium | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy. |
| CVE-2026-1345 | High | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands as lower user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-3470 | Low | 2026-03-31 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in the SonicWall Email Security appliance due to improper input sanitization that may lead to data corruption, allowing a remote authenticated attacker as admin user could exploit this issue by providing crafted input that corrupts application database. |
| CVE-2026-3469 | Low | 2026-03-31 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability exists due to improper input validation in the SonicWall Email Security appliance, allowing a remote authenticated attacker as admin user to cause the application to become unresponsive. |
| CVE-2026-3468 | Medium | 2026-03-31 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the SonicWall Email Security appliance due to improper neutralization of user-supplied input during web page generation, allowing a remote authenticated attacker as admin user to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code. |
| CVE-2026-33545 | Medium | 2026-03-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | MobSF is a mobile application security testing tool used. Prior to version 4.4.6, MobSF's `read_sqlite()` function in `mobsf/MobSF/utils.py` (lines 542-566) uses Python string formatting (`%`) to construct SQL queries with table names read from a SQLite database's `sqlite_master` table. When a security analyst uses MobSF to analyze a malicious mobile application containing a crafted SQLite database, attacker-controlled table names are interpolated directly into SQL queries without parameterization or escaping. This allows an attacker to cause denial of service and achieve SQL injection. Version 4.4.6 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-20012 | High | 2026-03-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) feature of Cisco IOS Software, Cisco IOS XE Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software, and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit of Cisco IOS Software and IOS XE Software could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. A successful exploit of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Secure FTD Software could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, resulting in system instability, such as the inability to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition. |
| CVE-2026-22732 | Critical | 2026-03-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When applications specify HTTP response headers for servlet applications using Spring Security, there is the possibility that the HTTP Headers will not be written. This issue affects Spring Security Servlet applications using lazy (default) writing of HTTP Headers: : from 5.7.0 through 5.7.21, from 5.8.0 through 5.8.23, from 6.3.0 through 6.3.14, from 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, from 6.5.0 through 6.5.8, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.3. |
| CVE-2026-1276 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2025-36051 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 stores potentially sensitive information in configuration files that could be read by a local user. |
| CVE-2025-15051 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality. |
| CVE-2025-13995 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 could allow an attacker with access to one tenant to access hostname data from another tenant's account. |
| CVE-2026-4312 | Critical | 2026-03-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | GCB/FCB Audit Software developed by DrangSoft has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to directly access certain APIs to create a new administrative account. |
| CVE-2026-32600 | High | 2026-03-16 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | xml-security is a library that implements XML signatures and encryption. Prior to versions 2.3.1 and 1.13.9, XML nodes encrypted with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm lack validation of the authentication tag length. An attacker can use this to brute-force an authentication tag, recover the GHASH key, and decrypt the encrypted nodes. It also allows to forge arbitrary ciphertexts without knowing the encryption key. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.1 and 1.13.9. |
| CVE-2025-2274 | Medium | 2026-03-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in Forcepoint Web Security (On-Prem) on Windows allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Web Security through 8.5.6. |
| CVE-2026-27661 | Medium | 2026-03-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.9.0). The affected application leaks confidential information in metadata, and files such as information on contributors and email address, on `SSM Server`. |
| CVE-2026-29063 | High | 2026-03-06 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Immutable.js provides many Persistent Immutable data structures. Prior to versions 3.8.3, 4.3.7, and 5.1.5, Prototype Pollution is possible in immutable via the mergeDeep(), mergeDeepWith(), merge(), Map.toJS(), and Map.toObject() APIs. This issue has been patched in versions 3.8.3, 4.3.7, and 5.1.5. |
| CVE-2026-27750 | High | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Avira Internet Security contains a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability in the Optimizer component. A privileged service running as SYSTEM identifies directories for cleanup during a scan phase and subsequently deletes them during a separate cleanup phase without revalidating the target path. A local attacker can replace a previously scanned directory with a junction or reparse point before deletion occurs, causing the privileged process to delete an unintended system location. This may result in deletion of protected files or directories and can lead to local privilege escalation, denial of service, or system integrity compromise depending on the affected target. |
| CVE-2026-27749 | High | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Avira Internet Security contains a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the System Speedup component. The Avira.SystemSpeedup.RealTimeOptimizer.exe process, which runs with SYSTEM privileges, deserializes data from a file located in C:\\ProgramData using .NET BinaryFormatter without implementing input validation or deserialization safeguards. Because the file can be created or modified by a local user in default configurations, an attacker can supply a crafted serialized payload that is deserialized by the privileged process, resulting in arbitrary code execution as SYSTEM. |
| CVE-2026-27748 | High | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Avira Internet Security contains an improper link resolution vulnerability in the Software Updater component. During the update process, a privileged service running as SYSTEM deletes a file under C:\\ProgramData without validating whether the path resolves through a symbolic link or reparse point. A local attacker can create a malicious link to redirect the delete operation to an arbitrary file, resulting in deletion of attacker-chosen files with SYSTEM privileges. This may lead to local privilege escalation, denial of service, or system integrity compromise depending on the targeted file and operating system configuration. |
| CVE-2026-20106 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN, HTTP management and MUS functionality, of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exhaust device memory resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition requiring a manual reboot. This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to stop responding, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20105 | High | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN functionality of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to exhaust device memory resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces. This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20103 | High | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN functionality of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exhaust device memory resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition to new Remote Access SSL VPN connections. This does not affect the management interface, though it may become temporarily unresponsive. This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device web interface to stop responding, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20102 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the SAML 2.0 single sign-on (SSO) feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against the SAML feature and access sensitive, browser-based information. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of multiple HTTP parameters. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to access a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct a reflected XSS attack through an affected device. |
| CVE-2026-20101 | High | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the SAML 2.0 single sign-on (SSO) feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. This vulnerability is due to insufficient error checking when processing SAML messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted SAML messages to the SAML service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20100 | High | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the LUA interperter of the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces. This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation in the LUA interprerter. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20082 | High | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the handling of the embryonic connection limits in Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause incoming TCP SYN packets to be dropped incorrectly. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of new, incoming TCP connections that are destined to management or data interfaces when the device is under a TCP SYN flood attack. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted stream of traffic to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to prevent all incoming TCP connections to the device from being established, including remote management access, Remote Access VPN (RAVPN) connections, and all network protocols that are TCP-based. This results in a denial of service (DoS) condition for affected features. |
| CVE-2026-20073 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to send traffic that should be denied through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper error handling when an affected device that is joining a cluster runs out of memory while replicating access control rules. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic that should be blocked through the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass access controls and reach devices in protected networks. |
| CVE-2026-20070 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the VPN web services component of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a browser that is accessing an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input in HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a link to a malicious website that is designed to submit malicious input to the affected application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary HTML or script code in the browser in the context of the VPN web server. |
| CVE-2026-20069 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the VPN web services component of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct browser-based attacks against users of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to visit a website that is designed to pass malicious HTTP requests to a device that is running Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software or Cisco Secure FTD Software and has web services endpoints supporting VPN features enabled. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to reflect malicious input from the affected device to the browser that is in use and conduct browser-based attacks, including cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. The attacker is not able to directly impact the affected device. |
| CVE-2026-20049 | High | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the processing of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM)-encrypted Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) IPsec traffic of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to the allocation of an insufficiently sized block of memory. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted GCM-encrypted IPsec traffic to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an unexpected reload of the device, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials to establish a VPN connection with the affected device. |
| CVE-2026-20039 | High | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the VPN web server of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to ineffective memory management of the VPN web server. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a large number of crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20025 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF link-state update (LSU) packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF LSU packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20024 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key. This vulnerability is due to heap corruption in OSPF when parsing packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the OSPF service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20023 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to corrupt memory on an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to memory corruption when parsing OSPF protocol packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause memory corruption causing the affected device to reboot, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20022 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition when OSPF canonicalization debug is enabled by using the command debug ip ospf canon. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF LSU packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted unauthenticated OSPF packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write to memory outside of the packet data, causing the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20021 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to exhaust memory on an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improperly validating input by the OSPF protocol when parsing packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by by sending crafted OSPF packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust memory on the affected device, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20020 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. If OSPF authentication is enabled, the attacker must know the secret key to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF update packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF update packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to create a buffer overflow, causing the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-20016 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Cisco FXOS Software CLI feature for Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with root-level privileges. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of user-supplied command arguments. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted input for specific CLI commands. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute commands on the underlying operating system with root-level privileges. |
| CVE-2026-20015 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the IKEv2 feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device that may impact the availability of services to devices elsewhere in the network. This vulnerability is due to a memory leak when parsing IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust resources, causing a DoS condition that will eventually require the device to be manually reloaded. |
| CVE-2026-20014 | High | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the IKEv2 feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with valid VPN user credentials to cause a DoS condition on an affected device that may also impact the availability of services to devices elsewhere in the network. This vulnerability is due to the improper processing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted, authenticated IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust memory, causing the device to reload. |
| CVE-2026-20013 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the IKEv2 feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device that may also impact the availability of services to devices elsewhere in the network. This vulnerability is due to memory exhaustion caused by not freeing memory during IKEv2 packet processing. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust resources, causing a DoS condition that will eventually require the device to manually reload. |
| CVE-2026-20009 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the implementation of the proprietary SSH stack with SSH key-based authentication in Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to log in to a Cisco Secure Firewall ASA device and execute commands as a specific user. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user input during the SSH authentication phase. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted input during SSH authentication to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to log in to the device as a specific user without the private SSH key of that user. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must possess a valid username and the associated public key. The private key is not required. Notes: Exploitation of this vulnerability does not provide the attacker with root access. The authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) configuration command auto-enable is not affected by this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-20008 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in a small subset of CLI commands that are used on Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to craft Lua code that could be used on the underlying operating system as root. This vulnerability exists because user-provided input is not properly sanitized. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting valid Lua code and submitting it as a malicious parameter for a CLI command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject Lua code, which could lead to arbitrary code execution as the root user. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have valid Administrator credentials. |
| CVE-2025-70821 | Critical | 2026-03-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | renren-secuity before v5.5.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the BaseServiceImpl.java component |
| CVE-2025-14963 | Medium | 2026-02-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability identified in the HX Agent driver file fekern.sys allowed a threat actor with local user access the ability to gain elevated system privileges. Utilization of a Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD) was leveraged to gain access to the critical Windows process memory lsass.exe (Local Security Authority Subsystem Service). The fekern.sys is a driver file associated with the HX Agent (used in all existing HX Agent versions). The vulnerable driver installed in a product or a system running a fully functional HX Agent is, itself, not exploitable as the product’s tamper protection restricts the ability to communicate with the driver to only the Agent’s processes. |
| CVE-2026-2698 | Medium | 2026-02-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated user could access areas outside of their authorized scope. |
| CVE-2026-2697 | Low | 2026-02-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Indirect Object Reference (IDOR) in Security Center allows an authenticated remote attacker to escalate privileges via the 'owner' parameter. |
| CVE-2025-36376 | High | 2026-02-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security QRadar EDR 3.12 through 3.12.23 does not invalidate session after a session expiration which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. |
| CVE-2026-24326 | Medium | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Due to a missing authorization check in the Disconnected Operations of the SAP S/4HANA Defense & Security, an attacker with user privileges could call remote-enabled function modules to do direct update on standard SAP database table . This results in low impact on integrity, with no impact on confidentiality or availability of the application. |
| CVE-2026-23906 | Critical | 2026-02-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Affected Products and Versions * Apache Druid * Affected Versions: 0.17.0 through 35.x (all versions prior to 36.0.0) * Prerequisites: * druid-basic-security extension enabled * LDAP authenticator configured * Underlying LDAP server permits anonymous bind Vulnerability Description An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Apache Druid when using the druid-basic-security extension with LDAP authentication. If the underlying LDAP server is configured to allow anonymous binds, an attacker can bypass authentication by providing an existing username with an empty password. This allows unauthorized access to otherwise restricted Druid resources without valid credentials. The vulnerability stems from improper validation of LDAP authentication responses when anonymous binds are permitted, effectively treating anonymous bind success as valid user authentication. Impact A remote, unauthenticated attacker can: * Gain unauthorized access to the Apache Druid cluster * Access sensitive data stored in Druid datasources * Execute queries and potentially manipulate data * Access administrative interfaces if the bypassed account has elevated privileges * Completely compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the Druid deployment Mitigation Immediate Mitigation (No Druid Upgrade Required): * Disable anonymous bind on your LDAP server. This prevents the vulnerability from being exploitable and is the recommended immediate action. Resolution * Upgrade Apache Druid to version 36.0.0 or later, which includes fixes to properly reject anonymous LDAP bind attempts. |
| CVE-2026-22548 | High | 2026-02-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests along with conditions beyond the attacker's control can cause the bd process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-20732 | Low | 2026-02-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in an undisclosed BIG-IP Configuration utility page that may allow an attacker to spoof error messages. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-69875 | High | 2026-02-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability exists in Quick Heal Total Security 23.0.0 in the quarantine management component where insufficient validation of restore paths and improper permission handling allow a low-privileged local user to restore quarantined files into protected system directories. This behavior can be abused by a local attacker to place files in high-privilege locations, potentially leading to privilege escalation. |
| CVE-2026-1616 | High | 2026-01-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The $uri$args concatenation in nginx configuration file present in Open Security Issue Management (OSIM) prior v2025.9.0 allows path traversal attacks via query parameters. |
| CVE-2026-24490 | High | 2026-01-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | MobSF is a mobile application security testing tool used. Prior to version 4.4.5, a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in MobSF's Android manifest analysis allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a victim's browser session by uploading a malicious APK. The `android:host` attribute from `<data android:scheme="android_secret_code">` elements is rendered in HTML reports without sanitization, enabling session hijacking and account takeover. Version 4.4.5 fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-1414 | Low | 2026-01-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was determined in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System up to 3.0.12. This impacts the function getInformation of the file /equipment/get_Information of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument fortEquipmentIp can lead to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. |
| CVE-2026-1413 | Low | 2026-01-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System up to 3.0.12. This affects the function portValidate of the file /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument port results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. |
| CVE-2026-1412 | Medium | 2026-01-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System up to 3.0.12. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /fort/audit/get_clip_img of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument frame/dirno leads to command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2026-1325 | Medium | 2026-01-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A security flaw has been discovered in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System up to 3.0.12. This affects the function edit_pwd_mall of the file /fort/login/edit_pwd_mall. The manipulation of the argument flag results in weak password recovery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-1324 | High | 2026-01-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was identified in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.12. Affected by this issue is the function SessionController of the file /isomp-protocol/protocol/session of the component SSH Protocol Handler. The manipulation of the argument keypassword leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2025-22234 | Medium | 2026-01-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The fix applied in CVE-2025-22228 inadvertently broke the timing attack mitigation implemented in DaoAuthenticationProvider. This can allow attackers to infer valid usernames or other authentication behavior via response-time differences under certain configurations. |
| CVE-2025-15503 | Medium | 2026-01-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | A security flaw has been discovered in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.8. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /fort/trust/version/common/common.jsp. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in unrestricted upload. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2025-15502 | Medium | 2026-01-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was identified in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.8. The affected element is the function SessionController of the file /isomp-protocol/protocol/session. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2025-15501 | High | 2026-01-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was determined in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.8. Impacted is the function WriterHandle.getCmd of the file /isomp-protocol/protocol/getCmd. This manipulation of the argument sessionPath causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-21876 | Critical | 2026-01-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The OWASP core rule set (CRS) is a set of generic attack detection rules for use with compatible web application firewalls. Prior to versions 4.22.0 and 3.3.8, the current rule 922110 has a bug when processing multipart requests with multiple parts. When the first rule in a chain iterates over a collection (like `MULTIPART_PART_HEADERS`), the capture variables (`TX:0`, `TX:1`) get overwritten with each iteration. Only the last captured value is available to the chained rule, which means malicious charsets in earlier parts can be missed if a later part has a legitimate charset. Versions 4.22.0 and 3.3.8 patch the issue. |
| CVE-2025-67826 | High | 2025-12-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in K7 Ultimate Security 17.0.2045. A Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) vulnerability in the K7 Ultimate Security antivirus can be exploited by a local unprivileged user on default installations of the product. Insecure access to a named pipe allows unprivileged users to edit any registry key, leading to a full compromise as SYSTEM. |
| CVE-2023-53973 | High | 2025-12-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Zillya Total Security 3.0.2367.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows low-privileged users to copy files to unauthorized system locations using the quarantine module. Attackers can leverage symbolic link techniques to restore quarantined files to restricted directories, potentially enabling system-level access through techniques like DLL hijacking. |
| CVE-2025-68384 | Medium | 2025-12-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) causing a persistent denial of service (OOM crash) via submission of oversized user settings data. |
| CVE-2025-37731 | High | 2025-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper Authentication in Elasticsearch PKI realm can lead to user impersonation via specially crafted client certificates. A malicious actor would need to have such a crafted client certificate signed by a legitimate, trusted Certificate Authority. |
| CVE-2025-67511 | Critical | 2025-12-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Cybersecurity AI (CAI) is an open-source framework for building and deploying AI-powered offensive and defensive automation. Versions 0.5.9 and below are vulnerable to Command Injection through the run_ssh_command_with_credentials() function, which is available to AI agents. Only password and command inputs are escaped in run_ssh_command_with_credentials to prevent shell injection; while username, host and port values are injectable. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication. |
| CVE-2025-7073 | High | 2025-12-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A local privilege escalation vulnerability in Bitdefender Total Security versions prior to 27.0.47.241 allows low-privileged attackers to elevate privileges. The issue arises from bdservicehost.exe deleting files from a user-writable directory (C:\ProgramData\Atc\Feedback) without proper symbolic link validation, enabling arbitrary file deletion. This issue is chained with a file copy operation during network events and a filter driver bypass via DLL injection to achieve arbitrary file copy and code execution as elevated user. |
| CVE-2025-40831 | High | 2025-12-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.10.0). The affected application lacks input validation of date parameter in report generation functionality. This could allow an authenticated, lowly privileged attacker to cause denial of service condition of the report functionality. |
| CVE-2025-40830 | High | 2025-12-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.10.0). The affected application does not have proper authorization checks for the file_transfer feature in ssmctl-client command. This could allow an authenticated, lowly privileged local attacker to read or write to any file on server or sensor. |
| CVE-2025-13428 | High | 2025-12-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in the SecOps SOAR server. The custom integrations feature allowed an authenticated user with an "IDE role" to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the server. The flaw stemmed from weak validation of uploaded Python package code. An attacker could upload a package containing a malicious setup.py file, which would execute on the server during the installation process, leading to potential server compromise. No customer action is required. All customers have been automatically upgraded to the fixed version: 6.3.64 or higher. |
| CVE-2024-56464 | Low | 2025-12-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 - 7.5.0 UP14 IF01 is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability involving exposure of directory information. IBM has addressed this vulnerability in the latest update. |
| CVE-2025-40605 | Medium | 2025-11-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A Path Traversal vulnerability has been identified in the Email Security appliance allows an attacker to manipulate file system paths by injecting crafted directory-traversal sequences (such as ../) and may access files and directories outside the intended restricted path. |
| CVE-2025-40604 | Critical | 2025-11-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Download of Code Without Integrity Check Vulnerability in the SonicWall Email Security appliance loads root filesystem images without verifying signatures, allowing attackers with VMDK or datastore access to modify system files and gain persistent arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2025-33119 | Medium | 2025-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 through 7.5.0 UP14 stores user credentials in configuration files in source control which can be read by an authenticated user. |
| CVE-2025-5317 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper access restriction to a folder in Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools for Mac (BEST) before 7.20.52.200087 allows local users with administrative privileges to bypass the configured uninstall password protection. An unauthorized user with sudo privileges can manually remove the application directory (/Applications/Endpoint Security for Mac.app/) and the related directories within /Library/Bitdefender/AVP without needing the uninstall password. |
| CVE-2024-57695 | High | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue in Agnitum Outpost Security Suite 7.5.3 (3942.608.1810) and 7.6 (3984.693.1842) allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the lock function. The manufacturer fixed the vulnerability in version 8.0 (4164.652.1856) from December 17, 2012. |
| CVE-2025-12916 | Low | 2025-11-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was determined in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System 3.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /fort/portal_login of the component Frontend. This manipulation of the argument loginUrl causes command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 3.0.11 and 3.0.12 is recommended to address this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. |
| CVE-2025-62262 | Medium | 2025-10-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Information exposure through log file vulnerability in LDAP import feature in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.97, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows local users to view user email address in the log files. |
| CVE-2025-36170 | Medium | 2025-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 through 7.5.0 Update Pack 13 Independent Fix 02 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2025-36138 | Medium | 2025-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 through 7.5.0 Update Pack 13 Independent Fix 02 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2025-36007 | High | 2025-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 through 7.5.0 Update Pack 13 Independent Fix 02 is vulnerable to privilege escalation due to improper privilege assignment to an update script. |
| CVE-2025-62256 | Medium | 2025-10-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.109, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.7, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not properly restrict access to OpenAPI in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to access the OpenAPI YAML file via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2025-61990 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When using a multi-bladed platform with more than one blade, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-61958 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in the iHealth command that may allow an authenticated attacker with at least a resource administrator role to bypass tmsh restrictions and gain access to a bash shell. For BIG-IP systems running in Appliance mode, a successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-61951 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. This issue may occur when a Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) 1.2 virtual server is enabled with a Server SSL profile that is configured with a certificate, key, and the SSL Sign Hash set to ANY, and the backend server is enabled with DTLS 1.2 and client authentication. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-61938 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured with a URL greater than 1024 characters in length for the Data Guard Protection Enforcement setting, either manually or through the automatic Policy Builder, the bd process can terminate repeatedly. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-61935 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a BIG IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the bd process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-59781 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When DNS cache is configured on a BIG-IP or BIG-IP Next CNF virtual server, undisclosed DNS queries can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-59483 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A validation vulnerability exists in an undisclosed URL in the Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-59481 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow an authenticated attacker with at least resource administrator role to execute arbitrary system commands with higher privileges. A successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-59269 | High | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-59268 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On the BIG-IP system, undisclosed endpoints that contain static non-sensitive information are accessible to an unauthenticated remote attacker through the Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-58474 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP Advanced WAF is configured on a virtual server with Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection or when an NGINX server is configured with App Protect Bot Defense, undisclosed requests can disrupt new client requests. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-58424 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP systems, undisclosed traffic can cause data corruption and unauthorized data modification in protocols which do not have message integrity protection. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |