Overview 3,654 matches · 1,118 in Waratek scope · 140 protected · 107 exploited · 48 CISA KEV · 199 public PoC · 130 EPSS ≥ 0.5
3,654matches
1,118in Waratek scope30.6%
140protected3.8%
107exploited2.9%
48CISA KEV1.3%
199public PoC5.4%
130EPSS ≥ 0.53.6%
Protected by Waratek
141
3.9%
Rule in development
1
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
59
1.6%
No exploit published
917
25.1%
Outside Waratek scope
103
2.8%
Not applicable
2,433
66.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
140
3.8%
partly blocked
1
0.0%
not blocked
3,513
96.1%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 546 / year
20001
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20010
20020
20032
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20042
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20052
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20066
Not applicable6
High2
Medium4
not blocked6
No public exploit6
200717
No exploit published1
Not applicable16
High2
Medium15
not blocked17
Working exploit published2
No public exploit15
20088
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable6
High2
Medium5
Low1
not blocked8
Working exploit published2
No public exploit6
200917
No exploit published4
Not applicable13
High12
Medium4
Low1
not blocked17
Exploited2
Working exploit published4
No public exploit11
201015
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable5
High7
Medium5
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked13
Exploited4
Working exploit published2
No public exploit9
20117
No exploit published2
Not applicable5
High3
Medium4
not blocked7
Working exploit published1
No public exploit6
201230
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published8
Not applicable20
High16
Medium11
Low3
not blocked30
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
No public exploit26
201356
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published25
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable27
High15
Medium34
Low7
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked54
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit51
201450
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published16
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable27
High12
Medium30
Low8
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked46
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
No public exploit46
201542
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published12
Not applicable27
Critical1
High4
Medium29
Low8
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked40
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit39
201641
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable25
Critical6
High22
Medium13
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked37
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit38
2017121
Protected by Waratek7
No exploit published16
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable94
Critical17
High30
Medium67
Low7
blocked by ARMR today6
partly blocked1
not blocked114
Exploited5
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit109
2018168
Protected by Waratek26
No exploit published29
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable106
Critical25
High69
Medium71
Low3
blocked by ARMR today26
not blocked142
Exploited4
Working exploit published7
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only2
No public exploit152
2019243
Protected by Waratek29
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published46
Outside Waratek scope19
Not applicable146
Critical44
High96
Medium98
Low5
blocked by ARMR today29
not blocked214
Exploited10
Working exploit published9
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only6
No public exploit214
2020303
Protected by Waratek12
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published87
Outside Waratek scope20
Not applicable178
Critical55
High114
Medium129
Low5
blocked by ARMR today12
not blocked291
Exploited7
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only11
Forecast only2
No public exploit279
2021279
Protected by Waratek15
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published57
Outside Waratek scope18
Not applicable185
Critical32
High142
Medium105
blocked by ARMR today15
not blocked264
Exploited11
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only7
No public exploit246
2022299
Protected by Waratek11
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published88
Outside Waratek scope11
Not applicable186
Critical32
High142
Medium121
Low4
blocked by ARMR today11
not blocked288
Exploited4
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only39
Forecast only5
No public exploit245
2023510
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate18
No exploit published132
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable351
Critical123
High246
Medium137
Low4
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked503
Exploited9
Working exploit published15
Proof of concept only79
Forecast only8
No public exploit399
2024450
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published78
Not applicable363
Critical63
High247
Medium138
Low2
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked447
Exploited7
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only34
Forecast only3
No public exploit402
2025546
Protected by Waratek13
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate11
No exploit published168
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable346
Critical30
High223
Medium256
Low37
blocked by ARMR today13
not blocked533
Exploited25
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only67
Forecast only1
No public exploit448
2026439
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published132
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable294
Critical70
High206
Medium152
Low11
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked435
Exploited11
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only31
No public exploit394
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-46852 | Critical | 2026-06-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform product of Oracle Enterprise Manager (component: Metadata Plugin). Supported versions that are affected are 13.5 and 24.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-46832 | Critical | 2026-06-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform product of Oracle Enterprise Manager (component: Discovery Framework). Supported versions that are affected are 13.5 and 24.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-50632 | High | 2026-06-12 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A further incomplete fix for a previous advisory CVE-2026-44417 (Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE) for Apache CXF has been identified, which can allow code execution capabilities, if untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-49875 | Critical | 2026-06-12 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache CXF's EndpointReferenceUtils and W3CMultiSchemaFactory classes construct a SAXParserFactory without the necessary JAXP hardening configurations, enabling out-of-band (OOB) external entity resolution. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue. |
| CVE-2026-44495 | High | 2026-06-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2. |
| CVE-2026-46625 | High | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | JavaScript Cookie is a JavaScript API for handling cookies, client-side. Prior to version 3.0.7, js-cookie's internal assign() helper copies properties with for...in + plain assignment. When the source object is produced by JSON.parse, the JSON object's "__proto__" member is an own enumerable property, so the for…in enumerates it and the target[key] = source[key] write triggers the Object.prototype.__proto__ setter on the fresh target ({}). The result is a per-instance prototype hijack: Object.prototype itself is untouched, but the merged attributes object now inherits attacker-controlled keys. Because the consuming set() function then enumerates the merged object with another for...in, every key the attacker placed on the polluted prototype lands in the resulting Set-Cookie string as an attribute pair. The attacker can set domain=, secure=, samesite=, expires=, and path= on cookies whose attributes the developer thought were locked down. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.7. |
| CVE-2026-41731 | High | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JsonKafkaHeaderMapper and the deprecated DefaultKafkaHeaderMapper matched type headers against trusted packages using a prefix check, meaning that trusting any package implicitly trusted all of its subpackages. Combined with Jackson's default bean deserialization, a producer could supply crafted header values that caused the consumer to deserialize arbitrary JDK types. Affected versions: Spring for Apache Kafka 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.3.0 through 3.3.15; 3.2.0 through 3.2.13; 2.9.0 through 2.9.13; 2.8.0 through 2.8.11. |
| CVE-2026-20259 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2604.0, 10.3.2512.12, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, 10.0.2503.14, and 9.3.2411.131, a user who holds a Splunk role that contains the high-privilege capability `edit_saved_search_owner` could reassign saved search ownership to users outside their authorized scope. The ownership reassignment endpoint lacks access control. |
| CVE-2026-20258 | High | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.11, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could store a malicious script in a classic dashboard HTML panel, causing unauthorized JavaScript code to execute in the browser of another user. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The low-privileged user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. |
| CVE-2026-20257 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could craft a classic dashboard that exfiltrates sensitive data from the browser of a higher-privileged user who views it. The exfiltration is possible because classic dashboard panels do not fully validate style attribute values, which can allow for requests to reach external domains outside the configured Trusted Domains List. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The low-privileged user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. |
| CVE-2026-20256 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the 'admin' or 'power' Splunk roles could cause data exfiltration through classic dashboards by redirecting a victim to an external site using a protocol-relative URL in a drill-down link.<br><br>The vulnerability exists because the URL classifier in classic dashboards only recognizes `http://` and `https://` schemes when checking for external URLs. Protocol-relative URLs such as `//attacker.com` bypass this check entirely, and Splunk Web does not show the external-navigation warning dialog to the victim. |
| CVE-2026-20255 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could craft a malicious classic dashboard that exfiltrates sensitive data to an external server. The vulnerability exists because URL validation on the external content dialog is incomplete, which can allow for requests to untrusted domains when a user interacts with a crafted dashboard. |
| CVE-2026-20254 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the 'admin' or 'power' Splunk roles could craft a malicious classic dashboard that exfiltrates sensitive data to an external server when a higher-privileged user views it, bypassing the external content restriction through a Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) injection.<br><br>The Trusted Domains security check does not fully validate inline style attribute values, which can allow for outbound requests to untrusted domains and credential exfiltration when a victim views a crafted dashboard. |
| CVE-2026-20252 | High | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2604.3, 10.3.2512.12, 10.2.2510.14, 10.1.2507.22, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could send server-side requests to arbitrary internal destinations through the Dashboard Studio PDF export feature. The vulnerability exists because the trusted-domain validation uses a prefix match that can be bypassed with attacker-controlled subdomains (for example, docs.splunk.com.evil.com), and because the PDF export service follows HTTP redirects automatically without re-validating each redirect target against the allowlist. |
| CVE-2026-20251 | High | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.12, 10.2.2510.14, 10.1.2507.22, and 9.3.2411.132, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.6, 3.9.20, and 3.8.67, a low-privileged user that does not hold the 'admin' or 'power' Splunk roles could perform a Remote Code Execution (RCE) through the Splunk Secure Gateway app.<br><br>The Remote Code Execution is possible because of unsafe deserialization of App Key Value Store (KV Store) data through the ‘jsonpickle’ Python library, which reconstructs arbitrary Python objects from specially crafted JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) without adequate validation. |
| CVE-2026-41724 | High | 2026-06-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | VMware Cloud Foundation Operations contains multiple stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.A malicious actor with privileges to create policies, views or text-widgets may be able to inject scripts to perform administrative actions in VMware Cloud Foundation Operations. |
| CVE-2026-41723 | High | 2026-06-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | VMware Cloud Foundation Operations contains multiple stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.A malicious actor with privileges to create policies, views or text-widgets may be able to inject scripts to perform administrative actions in VMware Cloud Foundation Operations. |
| CVE-2026-41722 | High | 2026-06-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | VMware Cloud Foundation Operations contains multiple stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.A malicious actor with privileges to create policies, views or text-widgets may be able to inject scripts to perform administrative actions in VMware Cloud Foundation Operations. |
| CVE-2026-1784 | High | 2026-06-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Route OpenShift resource allows to define routes to make pods reachable at a subdomain through HAProxy. It was found that the checks performed on the spec.path YAML stanza in a Route document was insufficient and could allow a controlled injection of the HAProxy configuration. |
| CVE-2026-25277 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while using Strongbox due to buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-25276 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while using Strongbox due to missing bounds check. |
| CVE-2026-25260 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when accessing shared buffers without validation of concurrent user-mode input modifications. |
| CVE-2026-25259 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing multiple IOCTL command for escape operations. |
| CVE-2026-24092 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing fastboot commands to set display mode. |
| CVE-2026-24091 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing fastboot commands with improperly formatted input. |
| CVE-2026-24090 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cryptographic issue while processing partition table entries allows unauthorized modification of boot flow. |
| CVE-2026-24089 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing fastboot commands with invalid input. |
| CVE-2026-24088 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cryptographic Issue while processing a specific partition which allows unauthorized write access to load a customized bootloader. |
| CVE-2026-24087 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing fastboot OEM commands. |
| CVE-2026-24085 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing display command line information due to improper initialization of a variable. |
| CVE-2026-10533 | Medium | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in OpenShift Container Platform. Completed pods with restartPolicy: Never do not count toward ResourceQuota pod limits, and Kubernetes events are not quota-scoped. A non-privileged user who can create pods in a namespace can exploit this to generate a large volume of events that accumulate in etcd, causing API server performance degradation across the cluster. |
| CVE-2025-59613 | Medium | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when output buffer size is smaller than input buffer size during data copying operation. |
| CVE-2025-59612 | Medium | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption in windows drivers while sending incorrect trusted application request |
| CVE-2025-59611 | Medium | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption in diagnostic services due to absence of input validation |
| CVE-2025-59610 | Medium | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing IOCTL requests with mismatched API versions due to concurrent modification of user-space buffer. |
| CVE-2025-59609 | Medium | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Information Disclosure when processing advertisement frames with malformed MBSSID elements of insufficient length. |
| CVE-2025-59606 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when writing to invalid memory locations occurs due to heap memory exhaustion during secure data initialization. |
| CVE-2025-59605 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing device identifier strings that exceed the expected maximum length. |
| CVE-2025-59604 | High | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when running a memory copy operation due to invalid writes caused by a null pointer. |
| CVE-2025-59601 | Medium | 2026-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Information Disclosure when resetting device to factory default settings through powerline interface allows unauthorized access to device configuration. |
| CVE-2026-46579 | High | 2026-05-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the OpenShift Router. When a Route has `insecureEdgeTerminationPolicy` set to Allow, the HTTP frontend does not remove `X-SSL-Client-*` headers from incoming requests. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to send plain HTTP requests with crafted `X-SSL-Client-*` headers. As a result, backends relying on these headers for mutual TLS (Transport Layer Security) authentication can be bypassed, enabling the attacker to impersonate client certificate identities. |
| CVE-2026-42965 | High | 2026-05-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the OpenShift Router. A user with EndpointSlice write access can exploit this vulnerability by creating a Service backed by an FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name) EndpointSlice that resolves to a cloud metadata endpoint. This allows the router to proxy requests to the cloud metadata endpoint, leading to the disclosure of instance credentials and other sensitive metadata. This bypasses previous security measures for validating IP addresses. |
| CVE-2026-4408 | Critical | 2026-05-28 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in Samba. A remote attacker can exploit a misconfiguration in Samba file servers and classic domain controllers that use the "check password script" feature. If this script is configured with the %u substitution character, the client-controlled username is passed without proper escaping of shell meta-characters. This vulnerability allows an attacker to achieve remote command execution on the affected system. This issue primarily affects non-standard configurations where the "check password script" is used with %u and the samba-dcerpcd service is started as a system service. |
| CVE-2026-3012 | High | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Samba’s certificate auto-enrollment Group Policy handling. When certificate auto-enrollment is enabled, Samba may retrieve a CA certificate over an unencrypted HTTP connection and install it into the local trust store without proper verification. An attacker with the ability to intercept or redirect network traffic could exploit this behavior to supply a malicious certificate authority certificate, potentially allowing interception or spoofing of trusted communications. |
| CVE-2026-2340 | Medium | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Samba’s vfs_worm module. The module is intended to provide write-once, read-many (WORM) protections by preventing modification of files after a configurable grace period. Due to insufficient validation during rename operations, an authenticated user with write access to a share could overwrite a protected file by renaming a newly created file over the existing WORM-protected file. |
| CVE-2026-1933 | High | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Samba’s handling of NTFS-style reparse points on shares configured with read only = yes. Due to missing SMB-layer access checks, authenticated users with underlying filesystem write permissions may create or delete reparse point metadata through SMB operations even on read-only exports. This could allow modification of SMB-visible file behavior, including converting files into symbolic links or other reparse point types. |
| CVE-2026-48864 | High | 2026-05-26 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libsolv. This heap buffer overflow occurs during the decompression of attacker-controlled compressed data within `.solv` files due to insufficient input validation. An attacker can provide a specially crafted `.solv` file, which, when processed by a vulnerable application, can lead to out-of-bounds memory access. This could result in information disclosure, alteration of program execution, or a denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-48710 | Medium | 2026-05-26 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values. |
| CVE-2026-4480 | Critical | 2026-05-26 | Not applicable | Exploited | A flaw was found in the Samba printing subsystem. Samba passes the client-controlled job description string to the command configured with the "print command" setting via the "%J" substitution character without escaping shell meta characters. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted print job description that contains unescaped shell characters. This could lead to remote code execution on the affected system. |
| CVE-2025-36148 | Medium | 2026-05-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4.0 through 3.2.4.15 IBM Financial Transaction Manager SWIFT is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2026-46300 | High | 2026-05-23 | Not applicable | Exploited | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: skbuff: preserve shared-frag marker during coalescing skb_try_coalesce() can attach paged frags from @from to @to. If @from has SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG set, the resulting @to skb can contain the same externally-owned or page-cache-backed frags, but the shared-frag marker is currently lost. That breaks the invariant relied on by later in-place writers. In particular, ESP input checks skb_has_shared_frag() before deciding whether an uncloned nonlinear skb can skip skb_cow_data(). If TCP receive coalescing has moved shared frags into an unmarked skb, ESP can see skb_has_shared_frag() as false and decrypt in place over page-cache backed frags. Propagate SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG when skb_try_coalesce() transfers paged frags. The tailroom copy path does not need the marker because it copies bytes into @to's linear data rather than transferring frag descriptors. |
| CVE-2026-9149 | Medium | 2026-05-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in libsolv. This heap buffer overflow vulnerability occurs when a victim processes a specially crafted `.solv` file containing negative size values in the `repo_add_solv` function. This leads to an undersized memory allocation and a subsequent out-of-bounds write. An attacker could exploit this to cause a denial of service (DoS). |
| CVE-2026-9150 | Medium | 2026-05-20 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libsolv. This stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability occurs in libsolv's Debian metadata parser when processing specially crafted Debian repository metadata. An attacker could exploit this by providing malicious SHA384 or SHA512 checksum tags, leading to memory corruption and a denial of service (DoS) in the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-45498 | High | 2026-05-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| CVE-2026-33137 | Critical | 2026-05-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform. In versions starting with 15.10.6 and prior to 18.1.0-rc-1, 17.10.3, 17.4.9, and 16.10.17, the POST /wikis/{wikiName} API executes a XAR import without performing any authentication or authorization checks, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to create or update documents in the target wiki. This vulnerability has been patched in XWiki 16.10.17, 17.4.9, 17.10.3, 18.0.1 and 18.1.0-rc-1. |
| CVE-2026-20240 | Medium | 2026-05-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.2, 10.0.5, 9.4.11, and 9.3.12, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2603.1, 10.3.2512.9, 10.2.2510.11, 10.1.2507.21, 10.0.2503.13, and 9.3.2411.129, a low-privileged user that does not hold the ‘admin’ or ‘power’ Splunk roles could cause a Denial of Service by exploiting the `coldToFrozen.sh` script in the `splunk_archiver` app to rename critical Splunk directories, making the instance non-functional.<br><br>The Denial of Service is possible because of missing input validation in the `coldToFrozen.sh` script, which accepts arbitrary file paths and renames them without restricting operations to safe directories. |
| CVE-2026-20239 | High | 2026-05-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.2 and 10.0.5, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.8, 10.2.2510.11, 10.1.2507.21, and 10.0.2503.13, a user with a role that has access to the `_internal` index could view session cookies and response bodies that contain sensitive data. |
| CVE-2026-42009 | High | 2026-05-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit an issue in the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) packet reordering logic. The comparator function, responsible for ordering DTLS packets by sequence numbers, did not correctly handle packets with duplicate sequence numbers. This could lead to unstable packet ordering or undefined behavior, resulting in a denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-21730 | Medium | 2026-05-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Verba is affected by a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability within its login logging mechanism. When an unauthenticated remote attacker attempts to log in using an incorrect username and password combination, the supplied username value is recorded in the application logs. Due to lack of input sanitization, an attacker can inject a malicious XSS payload into the username field. This payload will be executed in the context of the administrator’s browser when the admin accesses the web application's log viewer. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond to our messages. This issue was fixed in version 10.0.6 |
| CVE-2025-32425 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AutoGPT is a platform that allows users to create, deploy, and manage continuous artificial intelligence agents that automate complex workflows. In AutoGPT, the execution process is recorded to the console (stdout/stderr), and deployed in container mode, which is automatically captured by Docker and stored as "container logs". However, prior to 0.6.32, there is no limit on the log size when the container is deployed. When the number of user accesses is too large, the log on the server disk will be too large, causing disk resource exhaustion and eventually causing DoS. autogpt-platform-beta-v0.6.32 fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-45321 | Critical | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | Exploited | On 2026-05-11, between approximately 19:20 and 19:26 UTC, 84 malicious versions across 42 @tanstack/* packages were published to the npm registry. The publishes were authenticated via the legitimate GitHub Actions OIDC trusted-publisher binding for TanStack/router, but the publish workflow itself was not modified. The attacker chained three known vulnerability classes — a pull_request_target "Pwn Request" misconfiguration, GitHub Actions cache poisoning across the fork↔base trust boundary, and runtime memory extraction of the OIDC token from the Actions runner process — to publish credential-stealing malware under a trusted identity. Each affected package received exactly two malicious versions, published a few minutes apart. |
| CVE-2026-32658 | High | 2026-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Automation Platform versions prior to 2.0.0.0, contains a missing authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-42010 | Critical | 2026-05-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in gnutls. Servers configured with RSA-PSK (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman – Pre-Shared Key) wrongfully matched usernames containing a NUL character with truncated usernames. A remote attacker could exploit this by sending a specially crafted username, leading to an authentication bypass. This vulnerability allows an attacker to gain unauthorized access by circumventing the authentication process. |
| CVE-2026-24082 | High | 2026-05-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when copying data from a freed source while executing performance counter deselect operation. |
| CVE-2025-47407 | High | 2026-05-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while creating a process on the digital signal processor due to allocation failure at the kernel level. |
| CVE-2025-47406 | Medium | 2026-05-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Information Disclosure while processing IOCTL handler callbacks without verifying buffer size. |
| CVE-2026-3833 | High | 2026-04-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because gnutls performs case-sensitive comparisons of `nameConstraints` labels, specifically for `dNSName` (DNS) or `rfc822Name` (email) constraints within `excludedSubtrees` or `permittedSubtrees`. A remote attacker can exploit this by crafting a leaf certificate with casing differences in the Subject Alternative Name (SAN), leading to a policy bypass where a certificate that should be rejected is instead accepted. This could result in unauthorized access or information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-3832 | Low | 2026-04-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by presenting a specially crafted Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) response during a TLS handshake. Due to a logic error in how gnutls processes multi-record OCSP responses, a client with OCSP verification enabled may incorrectly accept a revoked server certificate, potentially leading to a compromise of trust. |
| CVE-2026-33845 | Critical | 2026-04-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw in GnuTLS DTLS handshake parsing allows malformed fragments with zero length and non-zero offset, leading to an integer underflow during reassembly and resulting in an out-of-bounds read. This issue is remotely exploitable and may cause information disclosure or denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-7309 | Medium | 2026-04-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the OpenShift Container Platform build system. A user with the `edit` ClusterRole can inject arbitrary environment variables, such as `LD_PRELOAD` or `http_proxy`, into `docker-build` containers through the `buildconfigs/instantiate` API. This incomplete fix for a previous vulnerability allows for information disclosure, specifically impacting the confidentiality of build traffic. |
| CVE-2026-40022 | High | 2026-04-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When authentication is enabled on the Apache Camel embedded HTTP server or embedded management server (camel-platform-http-main) and a non-root context path such as /api or /admin is configured via camel.server.path or camel.management.path, the BasicAuthenticationConfigurer and JWTAuthenticationConfigurer classes derive the authentication path from properties.getPath() when camel.server.authenticationPath / camel.management.authenticationPath is not explicitly set. Combined with the Vert.x sub-router mounting model - the sub-router is mounted at _path_* and the authentication handler is registered inside the sub-router at the resolved path - this causes the authentication handler to match only the exact configured context path, not its subpaths. Unauthenticated requests to subpaths such as /api/_route_ or /admin/observe/info therefore reach protected business routes and management endpoints without being challenged for credentials. The /observe/info endpoint can disclose runtime metadata such as the user, working directory, home directory, process ID, JVM and operating system information. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.14.1 before 4.14.6, from 4.18.0 before 4.18.2. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.6. If users are on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream, they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.2. |
| CVE-2026-6732 | High | 2026-04-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libxml2. This vulnerability occurs when the library processes a specially crafted XML Schema Definition (XSD) validated document that includes an internal entity reference. An attacker could exploit this by providing a malicious document, leading to a type confusion error that causes the application to crash. This results in a denial of service (DoS), making the affected system or application unavailable. |
| CVE-2026-6846 | High | 2026-04-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in binutils. A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists when processing a specially crafted XCOFF (Extended Common Object File Format) object file during linking. A local attacker could trick a user into processing this malicious file, which could lead to arbitrary code execution, allowing the attacker to run unauthorized commands, or cause a denial of service, making the system unavailable. |
| CVE-2026-6845 | Medium | 2026-04-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in binutils, specifically within the `readelf` utility. This vulnerability allows a local attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by tricking a user into processing a specially crafted Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) file. The exploitation of this flaw can lead to the system becoming unresponsive due to excessive resource consumption or a program crash. |
| CVE-2026-6844 | Medium | 2026-04-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the `readelf` utility of the binutils package. A local attacker could exploit two Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities by providing a specially crafted Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) file. One vulnerability, a resource exhaustion (CWE-400), can lead to an out-of-memory condition. The other, a null pointer dereference (CWE-476), can cause a segmentation fault. Both issues can result in the `readelf` utility becoming unresponsive or crashing, leading to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-6843 | Medium | 2026-04-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in nano. A local user could exploit a format string vulnerability in the `statusline()` function. By creating a directory with a name containing `printf` specifiers, the application attempts to display this name, leading to a segmentation fault (SEGV). This results in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the `nano` application. |
| CVE-2026-31431 | High | 2026-04-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly. |
| CVE-2026-34279 | Critical | 2026-04-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform product of Oracle Enterprise Manager (component: Event Management). Supported versions that are affected are 13.5 and 24.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-6245 | Medium | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the System Security Services Daemon (SSSD). The pam_passkey_child_read_data() function within the PAM passkey responder fails to properly handle raw bytes received from a pipe. Because the data is treated as a NUL-terminated C string without explicit termination, it results in an out-of-bounds read when processed by functions like snprintf(). A local attacker could potentially trigger this vulnerability by initiating a crafted passkey authentication request, causing the SSSD PAM responder to crash, resulting in a local Denial of Service (DoS). |
| CVE-2026-40105 | Medium | 2026-04-15 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. Versions 10.4-rc-1, through 16.10.15, 17.0.0-rc-1, through 17.4.7 and 17.5.0-rc-1 through 17.10.0 contain a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) in the comparison view between revisions of a page allows executing JavaScript code in the user's browser. If the current user is an admin, this can not only affect the current user but also the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the whole XWiki instance. If developers are unable to update immediately, they can apply the patch manually to templates/changesdoc.vm in the deployed WAR. |
| CVE-2026-40104 | Medium | 2026-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. Versions 1.8-rc-1, 17.0.0-rc-1 and 17.5.0-rc-1 and prior include a resource exhaustion vulnerability in REST API endpoints such as /xwiki/rest/wikis/xwiki/spaces/AnnotationCode/pages/AnnotationConfig/objects/AnnotationCode.AnnotationConfig/0/properties, which list all available pages as part of the metadata for database list properties without applying query limits. On large wikis, this can exhaust available server resources. This issue has been patched in versions 16.10.16, 17.4.8 and 17.10.1. |
| CVE-2026-20204 | High | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.1, 10.0.5, 9.4.10, and 9.3.11, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2603.0, 10.3.2512.5, 10.2.2510.9, 10.1.2507.19, 10.0.2503.13, and 9.3.2411.127, a low-privileged user that does not hold the `admin` or `power` Splunk roles could potentially perform a Remote Code Execution (RCE) by uploading a malicious file to the `$SPLUNK_HOME/var/run/splunk/apptemp` directory due to improper handling and insufficient isolation of temporary files within the `apptemp` directory. |
| CVE-2026-20203 | Medium | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.2, 10.0.5, 9.4.10, and 9.3.11, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2603.0, 10.3.2512.6, 10.2.2510.10, 10.1.2507.19, 10.0.2503.13, and 9.3.2411.127, a low-privileged user that does not hold the `admin` or `power` Splunk roles, has write permission on the app, and does not hold the high-privilege capability `accelerate_datamodel`, could turn on or off Data Model Acceleration due to improper access control. |
| CVE-2026-20202 | Medium | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.2, 10.0.5, 9.4.10, and 9.3.11, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2603.0, 10.3.2512.6, 10.2.2510.10, 10.1.2507.20, 10.0.2503.13, and 9.3.2411.127, a user who holds a role that contains the high-privilege capability `edit_user`could create a specially crafted username that includes a null byte or a non-UTF-8 percent-encoded byte due to improper input validation.<br><br>This could lead to inconsistent conversion of usernames into a proper format for storage and account management inconsistencies, such as being unable to edit or delete affected users. |
| CVE-2026-1711 | Medium | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Pega Platform versions 8.1.0 through 25.1.1 are affected by a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in a user interface component. Requires a high privileged user with a developer role. |
| CVE-2026-1564 | Medium | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Pega Platform versions 8.1.0 through 25.1.1 are affected by an HTML Injection vulnerability in a user interface component. Requires a high privileged user with a developer role. |
| CVE-2026-33825 | High | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | Insufficient granularity of access control in Microsoft Defender allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-6179 | Medium | 2026-04-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stored Cross Site Scripting in NightWolf Penetration Testing Platform allows attack trigger and run malicious script in user's browser |
| CVE-2026-39979 | Medium | 2026-04-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | jq is a command-line JSON processor. In commits before 2f09060afab23fe9390cce7cb860b10416e1bf5f, the jv_parse_sized() API in libjq accepts a counted buffer with an explicit length parameter, but its error-handling path formats the input buffer using %s in jv_string_fmt(), which reads until a NUL terminator is found rather than respecting the caller-supplied length. This means that when malformed JSON is passed in a non-NUL-terminated buffer, the error construction logic performs an out-of-bounds read past the end of the buffer. The vulnerability is reachable by any libjq consumer calling jv_parse_sized() with untrusted input, and depending on memory layout, can result in memory disclosure or process termination. The issue has been patched in commit 2f09060afab23fe9390cce7cb860b10416e1bf5f. |
| CVE-2026-4878 | High | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libcap. A local unprivileged user can exploit a Time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the `cap_set_file()` function. This allows an attacker with write access to a parent directory to redirect file capability updates to an attacker-controlled file. By doing so, capabilities can be injected into or stripped from unintended executables, leading to privilege escalation. |
| CVE-2026-33229 | High | 2026-04-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. Prior to 17.4.8 and 17.10.1, an improperly protected scripting API allows any user with script right to bypass the sandboxing of the Velocity scripting API and execute, e.g., arbitrary Python scripts, allowing full access to the XWiki instance and thereby compromising the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the whole instance. Note that script right already constitutes a high level of access that we don't recommend giving to untrusted users. This vulnerability is fixed in 17.4.8 and 17.10.1. |
| CVE-2025-57847 | Medium | 2026-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain Ansible Automation Platform images. This issue arises from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during the build process. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This vulnerability allows an attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, gaining full root privileges within the container. |
| CVE-2026-5745 | Medium | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libarchive. A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the ACL parsing logic, specifically within the archive_acl_from_text_nl() function. When processing a malformed ACL string (such as a bare "d" or "default" tag without subsequent fields), the function fails to perform adequate validation before advancing the pointer. An attacker can exploit this by providing a maliciously crafted archive, causing an application utilizing the libarchive API (such as bsdtar) to crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). |
| CVE-2026-5384 | Medium | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue that could allow a credential to be updated and used for a task from outside of the authorized organization scope has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N (5.8 Medium). This issue was fixed in version 4.0.26021.0 of the runZero Platform. |
| CVE-2026-5383 | Medium | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue that could allow access to Explorer groups from outside of the authorized organization scope has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L (4.4 Medium). This issue was fixed in version 4.0.260208.0 of the runZero Explorer. |
| CVE-2026-5382 | Low | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue that could expose records outside of the authorized organization scope through the MCP endpoints has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N (3.0 Low). This issue was fixed in version 4.0.260206.0 of the runZero Platform. |
| CVE-2026-5381 | Low | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue that could expose task information outside of the authorized organization scope has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N (2.2 Low). This issue was fixed in version 4.0.260205.0 of the runZero Platform. |
| CVE-2026-5380 | Medium | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue that could allow an authorized user to view the clear-text secrets for a subset of credential types and fields has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (5.3 Medium). This issue was fixed in version 4.0.260204.2 of the runZero Platform. |
| CVE-2026-5379 | Low | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue that allowed MCP agents to access certificate information from outside of their authorized organization scope has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N (3.0 Low). This issue was fixed in version 4.0.260203.0 of the runZero Platform. |
| CVE-2026-5378 | Medium | 2026-04-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue that allowed administrators to create and update users outside of their authorized organization scope has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N (5.8 Medium). This issue was fixed in version 4.0.260203.0 of the runZero Platform. |