Overview 9,143 matches · 8 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 47 exploited · 35 CISA KEV · 149 public PoC · 14 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9,143matches
8in Waratek scope0.1%
2protected0.0%
47exploited0.5%
35CISA KEV0.4%
149public PoC1.6%
14EPSS ≥ 0.50.2%
Protected by Waratek
2
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
6
0.1%
Outside Waratek scope
7
0.1%
Not applicable
9,128
99.8%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9,141
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 1,583 / year
20082
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20098
Not applicable8
High3
Medium5
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20101
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
201112
Not applicable12
High3
Medium7
Low2
not blocked12
Exploited1
Working exploit published3
No public exploit8
201244
Not applicable44
High30
Medium14
not blocked44
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit42
201317
Not applicable17
High10
Medium5
Low2
not blocked17
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit14
201434
Not applicable34
High14
Medium17
Low3
not blocked34
Exploited3
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit26
2015125
Not applicable125
High91
Medium33
Low1
not blocked125
Exploited3
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only6
No public exploit107
2016526
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable525
Critical47
High329
Medium145
Low5
not blocked526
Exploited2
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only6
Forecast only1
No public exploit506
2017847
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable846
Critical109
High543
Medium190
Low5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked846
Exploited1
Working exploit published9
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit831
2018618
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable615
Critical73
High453
Medium88
Low4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked617
Exploited1
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit604
2019494
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable493
Critical16
High251
Medium217
Low10
not blocked494
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit485
2020919
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable917
Critical163
High331
Medium394
Low31
not blocked919
Exploited2
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only11
No public exploit903
2021660
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable658
Critical28
High252
Medium356
Low24
not blocked660
Exploited11
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit647
20221,241
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1,237
Critical76
High428
Medium656
Low81
not blocked1,241
Exploited2
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit1,229
20231,583
Not applicable1,583
Critical53
High439
Medium1,066
Low25
not blocked1,583
Exploited5
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit1,568
2024739
Not applicable739
Critical42
High337
Medium346
Low14
not blocked739
Exploited6
Proof of concept only7
No public exploit726
2025568
Not applicable568
Critical25
High282
Medium254
Low7
not blocked568
Exploited5
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit553
2026705
No exploit published1
Not applicable704
Critical45
High377
Medium258
Low25
not blocked705
Exploited2
Proof of concept only12
No public exploit691
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-56997 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Av1DecodeFrameTag of vp9hwd_headers.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56992 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple files, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56989 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56988 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of bluetooth_cco.cc, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56986 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56985 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple files, there is a possible way to obtain signatures due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56982 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In VPU, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56979 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56978 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In get_global_config_item_addr of gc.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56975 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cellular Modem, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56974 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Start of AudioRtpPayloadEncoderNode.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56973 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56972 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56970 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56967 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cellular Modem, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56964 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56960 | Critical | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56958 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gf_algo_get_cached_dump_data of gf_algo.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56950 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In validate_ns_buf of mbu_class.rs, there is a possible information disclosure due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56945 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In VPU, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56942 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ReadTileInfo of vp9hwd_headers.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56941 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of fpc_tee_hal.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56932 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Trusted Execution Environment, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56923 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handle_unmap_req of tipc_virtio_dev.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56922 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In CPM, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56920 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In s_decode_vui_param of fw_hevc_dec_header.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56915 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In bigo_worker_thread of bigo.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56914 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56907 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In VPU, there is a possible shared memory overwrite due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56892 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ReadDataElement of common.c, there is a possible information disclosure due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56889 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56888 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56882 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cellular Modem, there is a possible information disclosure due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56881 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In enable_segment of remap.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56879 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gmc_mb_msg_handler of gmc_mba.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55366 | Critical | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible authentication bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55365 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of remap.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55359 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55351 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In VPU, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55343 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In decodeAmr of ImsMediaAudioPlayer.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55332 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55331 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55323 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gf_base_update_finger_base of gf_base.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55318 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55317 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In printf of printf.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55306 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cellular Modem, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55304 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In addr_remap_address_map of remap.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55302 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55301 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Wave6VpuDecFlush of wave6.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0200 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cellular Modem, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0199 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gf_ta_test_set_config of gf_ta_test.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0197 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In VPU, there is a possible information dislclosure due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0194 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0192 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Bootloader, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0189 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ac_init_policy of init.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0187 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gsa_sw_pk_hash_compare of image-auth-srv.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0186 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ac_init_one_sswrp of init.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0183 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In CPM, there is a possible information disclosure due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0179 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Bootloader, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0177 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In do_sss_aes_gcm_256_op of crypto-aes.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0171 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0170 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Vp9DecodeFrameTag of vp9hwd_headers.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0159 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cellular Modem, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-21112 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in Samsung Tips prior to Android 17 allows local attackers to launch arbitrary activity with Samsung Tips privilege. User interaction is required for triggering this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-21104 | High | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in KnoxVault trustlet prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local privileged attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2026-21103 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Path traversal in GalaxyDiagnostics prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows physical attackers to access files with system privilege. |
| CVE-2026-21102 | Critical | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use after free in DualDAR prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local privileged attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privilege. |
| CVE-2026-21101 | High | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in DualDAR driver prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local privileged attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code with root privilege. |
| CVE-2026-21100 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in SystemUI prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to launch arbitrary activity. |
| CVE-2026-21099 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in SettingsProvider prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information. |
| CVE-2026-21098 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Link to Windows prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to establish a connection with the PC without proper user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21097 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper authentication in ActivityTaskManagerService prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local privileged attackers to launch arbitrary activity. |
| CVE-2026-21096 | Critical | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in JPEG decoder of libimagecodec.quram.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2026-21095 | Critical | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in DNG decoder of libimagecodec.quram.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2026-21094 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in wpa_supplicant prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows adjacent attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. |
| CVE-2026-21093 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based buffer overflow in PROCA trustlet prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local privileged attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. |
| CVE-2026-21092 | High | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Path traversal in ImsService prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows remote attackers to create image files with system server privilege. |
| CVE-2026-21091 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in libcodec2secevrcdec.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. |
| CVE-2026-21090 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in libsaviextractor.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. |
| CVE-2026-21089 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in removing style tag in libsubextractor.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. |
| CVE-2026-21088 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in loading a subtitle frame in libsubextractor.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. |
| CVE-2026-21087 | High | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in libmdnie.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code with system server privilege. |
| CVE-2026-21086 | Medium | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper authorization in ProxyHandler prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access proxy configuration. |
| CVE-2026-21085 | High | 2026-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in Keymaster trustlet prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local privileged attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. |
| CVE-2026-58941 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of iommu.c, there is a possible out of bounds read/write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58874 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of SmsController.java, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58848 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of alloc.c, there is a possible unauthorized read/write access due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58846 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In kvm_iommu_map_sg of iommu.c, there is a possible use after free due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58839 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In forEachLine of MountRegistry.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58823 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In stpropnci_process_std of stpropnci_std.cc, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58822 | Critical | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of ftsmooth.c, there is a possible memory safety issue due to improper casting. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58820 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges required. |
| CVE-2026-55294 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ihevcd_get_tu_data_size of ihevcd_utils.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55290 | Low | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setTo of ResourceTypes.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds heap read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55285 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In openLogicalChannel of multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55277 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkUiccListenConfigNeeded of RoutingManager.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55273 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In AppendCommentLine of AnnotationProcessor.cpp, there is a possible supply chain risk due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55256 | Medium | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parsePartHeaders of multiple files, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49932 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseParts of PduParser.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49927 | High | 2026-09-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |