Overview 1,483 matches · 99 in Waratek scope · 44 protected · 26 exploited · 18 CISA KEV · 77 public PoC · 32 EPSS ≥ 0.5
1,483matches
99in Waratek scope6.7%
44protected3.0%
26exploited1.8%
18CISA KEV1.2%
77public PoC5.2%
32EPSS ≥ 0.52.2%
Protected by Waratek
44
3.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
3
0.2%
No exploit published
52
3.5%
Outside Waratek scope
39
2.6%
Not applicable
1,345
90.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
44
3.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
1,439
97.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 196 / year
19983
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
19998
Not applicable8
High4
Medium4
not blocked8
Working exploit published2
No public exploit6
20002
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20016
Not applicable6
High4
Medium2
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20025
Not applicable5
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20033
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20049
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable7
High5
Medium4
not blocked9
Working exploit published2
No public exploit7
200518
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable17
High7
Medium9
Low2
not blocked18
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
No public exploit11
200616
Not applicable16
High7
Medium7
Low2
not blocked16
Working exploit published3
No public exploit13
200717
Not applicable17
High12
Medium4
Low1
not blocked17
Working exploit published3
No public exploit14
200817
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable16
High7
Medium9
Low1
not blocked17
Working exploit published6
No public exploit11
200911
Not applicable11
High9
Medium2
not blocked11
Working exploit published1
No public exploit10
201026
Not applicable26
High13
Medium13
not blocked26
Working exploit published1
No public exploit25
20119
Not applicable9
High6
Medium2
Low1
not blocked9
Working exploit published4
No public exploit5
201215
Not applicable15
High6
Medium8
Low1
not blocked15
Working exploit published3
No public exploit12
201317
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable15
High2
Medium12
Low3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked16
Working exploit published2
No public exploit15
201416
Not applicable16
High4
Medium11
Low1
not blocked16
Working exploit published3
No public exploit13
201526
Not applicable26
Critical1
High3
Medium21
Low1
not blocked26
Exploited4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit21
201619
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable17
Critical5
High11
Medium3
not blocked19
Working exploit published2
No public exploit17
201727
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable26
Critical7
High11
Medium8
Low1
not blocked27
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit23
201835
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable33
Critical3
High21
Medium11
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked34
Exploited1
No public exploit34
2019182
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable176
Critical15
High70
Medium96
Low1
not blocked182
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit179
2020113
Protected by Waratek10
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable96
Critical21
High44
Medium36
Low12
blocked by ARMR today10
not blocked103
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit111
2021118
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Not applicable115
Critical29
High48
Medium39
Low2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked116
Exploited7
Forecast only1
No public exploit110
2022158
Protected by Waratek18
No exploit published22
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable110
Critical24
High57
Medium66
Low11
blocked by ARMR today18
not blocked140
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only6
Forecast only1
No public exploit148
2023153
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope9
Not applicable130
Critical14
High73
Medium57
Low9
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked146
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only10
Forecast only1
No public exploit139
2024142
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable122
Critical12
High62
Medium49
Low19
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked140
Exploited1
Proof of concept only9
No public exploit132
2025116
No exploit published2
Not applicable114
Critical13
High53
Medium41
Low9
not blocked116
Exploited2
Proof of concept only17
No public exploit97
2026196
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published5
Not applicable188
Critical30
High87
Medium70
Low9
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked193
Exploited4
Proof of concept only30
Forecast only1
No public exploit161
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-59504 | High | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in Azure Monitor Agent allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-64174 | Medium | 2025-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento-lts is a long-term support alternative to Magento Community Edition (CE). Versions 20.15.0 and below are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an admin with direct database access or the admin notification feed source to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable fields. Unescaped translation strings and URLs are printed into contexts inside app/code/core/Mage/Adminhtml/Block/Notification/Grid/Renderer/Actions.php. A malicious translation or polluted data can inject script. This issue is fixed in version 20.16.0. |
| CVE-2025-64322 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.3.0. |
| CVE-2025-64321 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.3.0. |
| CVE-2025-64320 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Code Injection.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2025-48982 | High | 2025-10-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | This vulnerability in Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows allows for Local Privilege Escalation if a system administrator is tricked into restoring a malicious file. |
| CVE-2025-11844 | Medium | 2025-10-22 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Hugging Face Smolagents version 1.20.0 contains an XPath injection vulnerability in the search_item_ctrl_f function located in src/smolagents/vision_web_browser.py. The function constructs an XPath query by directly concatenating user-supplied input into the XPath expression without proper sanitization or escaping. This allows an attacker to inject malicious XPath syntax that can alter the intended query logic. The vulnerability enables attackers to bypass search filters, access unintended DOM elements, and disrupt web automation workflows. This can lead to information disclosure, manipulation of AI agent interactions, and compromise the reliability of automated web tasks. The issue is fixed in version 1.22.0. |
| CVE-2025-54658 | High | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in Fortinet FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin for MacOS 11.5.1 and 11.4.2 through 11.4.6 and 11.3.2 through 11.3.4 and 11.2.0 through 11.2.3 and 11.1.1 through 11.1.2 and 11.0.1 and 10.5.1 and 10.4.0, and 10.3.1 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate their privilege to Root via sending a crafted request to a local listening port. |
| CVE-2025-53951 | High | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in Fortinet FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin for Windows 11.5.1 and 11.4.2 through 11.4.6 and 11.3.2 through 11.3.4 and 11.2.0 through 11.2.3 and 11.1.1 through 11.1.2 and 11.0.1 and 10.5.1 and 10.4.0, and 10.3.1 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate their privilege to LocalService via sending a crafted request to a local listening port. |
| CVE-2025-53950 | Medium | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Exposure of Private Personal Information ('Privacy Violation') vulnerability [CWE-359] in Fortinet FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin for MacOS and Windows 11.5.1 and 11.4.2 through 11.4.6 and 11.3.2 through 11.3.4 and 11.2.0 through 11.2.3 and 11.1.1. through 11.1.2 and 11.0.1 and 10.5.1 and 10.4.0, and 10.3.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to collect current user's email information. |
| CVE-2025-46752 | Medium | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A insertion of sensitive information into log file in Fortinet FortiDLP 12.0.0 through 12.0.5, 11.5.1, 11.4.6, 11.4.5 allows attacker to information disclosure via re-using the enrollment code. |
| CVE-2025-59494 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-59285 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Deserialization of untrusted data in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-58724 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-54267 | Medium | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access to elevated privileges that increase integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-54266 | Medium | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2025-54265 | Medium | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-54264 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2025-54263 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and maintain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-47989 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-59956 | Medium | 2025-09-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | AgentAPI is an HTTP API for Claude Code, Goose, Aider, Gemini, Amp, and Codex. Versions 0.3.3 and below are susceptible to a client-side DNS rebinding attack when hosted over plain HTTP on localhost. An attacker can gain access to the /messages endpoint served by the Agent API. This allows for the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive user data, specifically local message history, which can include secret keys, file system contents, and intellectual property the user was working on locally. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.0. |
| CVE-2025-55117 | Medium | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A stack-based buffer overflow can be remotely triggered when formatting an error message in the Control-M/Agent when SSL/TLS communication is configured. The issue occurs in the following cases: * Control-M/Agent 9.0.20: SSL/TLS configuration is set to the non-default setting "use_openssl=n"; * Control-M/Agent 9.0.21 and 9.0.22: Agent router configuration uses the non-default settings "JAVA_AR=N" and "use_openssl=n". |
| CVE-2025-55116 | Critical | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow in the Control-M/Agent can lead to a local privilege escalation when an attacker has access to the system running the Agent. This vulnerability impacts the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions. |
| CVE-2025-55115 | Critical | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A path traversal in the Control-M/Agent can lead to a local privilege escalation when an attacker has access to the system running the Agent. This vulnerability impacts the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions. This vulnerability was fixed in 9.0.20.100 and above. |
| CVE-2025-55113 | Critical | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | If the Access Control List is enforced by the Control-M/Agent and the C router is in use (default in Out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions; non-default but configurable using the JAVA_AR setting in newer versions), the verification stops at the first NULL byte encountered in the email address referenced in the client certificate. An attacker could bypass configured ACLs by using a specially crafted certificate. |
| CVE-2025-55112 | High | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 (and potentially earlier unsupported versions) that are configured to use the non-default Blowfish cryptography algorithm use a hardcoded key. An attacker with access to network traffic and to this key could decrypt network traffic between the Control-M/Agent and Server. |
| CVE-2025-55111 | Medium | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Certain files with overly permissive permissions were identified in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions as well as in newer versions which were upgraded from an affected version. These files contain keys and passwords relating to SSL files, keystore and policies. An attacker with local access to the system running the Agent can access these files. |
| CVE-2025-55109 | Critical | 2025-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions when using an empty or default kdb keystore or a default PKCS#12 keystore. A remote attacker with access to a signed third-party or demo certificate for client authentication can bypass the need for a certificate signed by the certificate authority of the organization during authentication on the Control-M/Agent. The Control-M/Agent contains hardcoded certificates which are only trusted as fallback if an empty kdb keystore is used; they are never trusted if a PKCS#12 keystore is used. All of these certificates are now expired. In addition, the Control-M/Agent default kdb and PKCS#12 keystores contain trusted third-party certificates (external recognized CAs and default self-signed demo certificates) which are trusted for client authentication. |
| CVE-2025-55316 | High | 2025-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | External control of file name or path in Azure Arc allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-54236 | Critical | 2025-09-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-49692 | High | 2025-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in Azure Windows Virtual Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-58125 | Medium | 2025-08-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin Freebox v6 agent allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic. |
| CVE-2025-55524 | High | 2025-08-21 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Insecure permissions in Agent-Zero v0.8.* allow attackers to arbitrarily reset the system via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2025-55523 | Low | 2025-08-21 | Not applicable | Exploited | An issue in the component /api/download_work_dir_file.py of Agent-Zero v0.8.* allows attackers to execute a directory traversal. |
| CVE-2025-49559 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to modify limited data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-49558 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the timing between the check of a resource's state and its use, allowing unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-49557 | High | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be exploited by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2025-49556 | High | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, and scope is unchanged. |
| CVE-2025-49555 | High | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A high-privileged attacker could trick a victim into executing unintended actions on a web application where the victim is authenticated, potentially allowing unauthorized access or modification of sensitive data. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a malicious website or click on a crafted link. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2025-49554 | High | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted input, causing the application to crash or become unresponsive. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-5120 | Critical | 2025-07-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A sandbox escape vulnerability was identified in huggingface/smolagents version 1.14.0, allowing attackers to bypass the restricted execution environment and achieve remote code execution (RCE). The vulnerability stems from the local_python_executor.py module, which inadequately restricts Python code execution despite employing static and dynamic checks. Attackers can exploit whitelisted modules and functions to execute arbitrary code, compromising the host system. This flaw undermines the core security boundary intended to isolate untrusted code, posing risks such as unauthorized code execution, data leakage, and potential integration-level compromise. The issue is resolved in version 1.17.0. |
| CVE-2025-47988 | High | 2025-07-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Azure Monitor Agent allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over an adjacent network. |
| CVE-2025-49550 | Medium | 2025-06-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-49549 | Low | 2025-06-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-6283 | Medium | 2025-06-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in xataio Xata Agent up to 0.3.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function GET of the file apps/dbagent/src/app/api/evals/route.ts. The manipulation of the argument passed leads to path traversal. Upgrading to version 0.3.1 is able to address this issue. The patch is named 03f27055e0cf5d4fa7e874d34ce8c74c7b9086cc. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. |
| CVE-2025-6282 | Low | 2025-06-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in xlang-ai OpenAgents up to ff2e46440699af1324eb25655b622c4a131265bb and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function create_upload_file of the file backend/api/file.py. The manipulation leads to path traversal. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically with the label "not planned" by a bot. |
| CVE-2025-6281 | Low | 2025-06-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in OpenBMB XAgent up to 1.0.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /conv/community. The manipulation leads to path traversal. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-6166 | Medium | 2025-06-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in frdel Agent-Zero up to 0.8.4. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function image_get of the file /python/api/image_get.py. The manipulation of the argument path leads to path traversal. Upgrading to version 0.8.4.1 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 5db74202d632306a883ccce7339c5bdba0d16c5a. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. |
| CVE-2025-30642 | Medium | 2025-06-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A link following vulnerability in Trend Micro Deep Security 20.0 agents could allow a local attacker to create a denial of service (DoS) situation on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2025-30641 | High | 2025-06-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A link following vulnerability in the anti-malware solution portion of Trend Micro Deep Security 20.0 agents could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2025-30640 | High | 2025-06-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A link following vulnerability in Trend Micro Deep Security 20.0 agents could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2025-36632 | High | 2025-06-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Tenable Agent versions prior to 10.8.5 on a Windows host, it was found that a non-administrative user could execute code with SYSTEM privilege. |
| CVE-2025-36633 | High | 2025-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Tenable Agent versions prior to 10.8.5 on a Windows host, it was found that a non-administrative user could arbitrarily delete local system files with SYSTEM privilege, potentially leading to local privilege escalation. |
| CVE-2025-36631 | High | 2025-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Tenable Agent versions prior to 10.8.5 on a Windows host, it was found that a non-administrative user could overwrite arbitrary local system files with log content at SYSTEM privilege. |
| CVE-2025-47110 | High | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed to that of other high-privileged accounts, leading to a high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| CVE-2025-43586 | High | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized elevated access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-43585 | High | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access leading to a limited impact to confidentiality and a high impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-27206 | Medium | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-5480 | High | 2025-06-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Action1 Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Action1. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of OpenSSL. The product loads an OpenSSL configuration file from an unsecured location. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-26767. |
| CVE-2025-20259 | Medium | 2025-06-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple vulnerabilities in the update process of Cisco ThousandEyes Endpoint Agent for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to delete arbitrary files on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to improper access controls on files that are in the local file system. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by using a symbolic link to perform an agent upgrade that redirects the delete operation of any protected file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files from the file system of the affected device. |
| CVE-2025-3709 | Critical | 2025-05-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agentflow from Flowring Technology has an Account Lockout Bypass vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit this vulnerability to perform password brute force attack. |
| CVE-2024-52976 | High | 2025-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Inclusion of functionality from an untrusted control sphere in Elastic Agent subprocess, osqueryd, allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code via parameter injection. An attacker requires local access and the ability to modify osqueryd configurations. |
| CVE-2023-46669 | High | 2025-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Exposure of sensitive information to local unauthorized actors in Elastic Agent and Elastic Security Endpoint can lead to loss of confidentiality and impersonation of Endpoint to the Elastic Stack. This issue was identified by Elastic engineers and Elastic has no indication that it is known or has been exploited by malicious actors. |
| CVE-2025-29984 | High | 2025-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Trusted Device, versions prior to 7.0.3.0, contain an Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2025-29983 | High | 2025-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Trusted Device, versions prior to 7.0.3.0, contain an Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2025-3547 | Medium | 2025-04-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability classified as critical was found in frdel Agent-Zero 0.8.1.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /get_work_dir_files. The manipulation of the argument path leads to path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2024-13861 | High | 2025-04-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A code injection vulnerability in the Debian package component of Taegis Endpoint Agent (Linux) versions older than 1.3.10 allows local users arbitrary code execution as root. Redhat-based systems using RPM packages are not affected. |
| CVE-2025-32754 | Critical | 2025-04-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In jenkins/ssh-agent Docker images 6.11.1 and earlier, SSH host keys are generated on image creation for images based on Debian, causing all containers based on images of the same version use the same SSH host keys, allowing attackers able to insert themselves into the network path between the SSH client (typically the Jenkins controller) and SSH build agent to impersonate the latter. |
| CVE-2025-27192 | Low | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Insufficiently Protected Credentials vulnerability that could lead to a security feature bypass. A high privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to protected resources by obtaining sensitive credential information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-27191 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-27190 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-27188 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authorization vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2024-8556 | Medium | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in modelscope/agentscope, as of the latest commit 21161fe on the main branch. The vulnerability occurs in the view for inspecting detailed run information, where a user-controllable string (run ID) is appended and rendered as HTML. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the user's browser. |
| CVE-2024-8551 | Critical | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A path traversal vulnerability exists in the save-workflow and load-workflow functionality of modelscope/agentscope versions prior to the fix. This vulnerability allows an attacker to read and write arbitrary JSON files on the filesystem, potentially leading to the exposure or modification of sensitive information such as configuration files, API keys, and hardcoded passwords. |
| CVE-2024-8537 | Critical | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A path traversal vulnerability exists in the modelscope/agentscope application, affecting all versions. The vulnerability is present in the /delete-workflow endpoint, allowing an attacker to delete arbitrary files from the filesystem. This issue arises due to improper input validation, enabling the attacker to manipulate file paths and delete sensitive files outside of the intended directory. |
| CVE-2024-8524 | High | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A directory traversal vulnerability exists in modelscope/agentscope version 0.0.4. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to read any local JSON file by sending a crafted POST request to the /read-examples endpoint. |
| CVE-2024-8501 | High | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | An arbitrary file download vulnerability exists in the rpc_agent_client component of modelscope/agentscope version v0.0.4. This vulnerability allows any user to download any file from the rpc_agent's host by exploiting the download_file method. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information, including configuration files, credentials, and potentially system files, which may facilitate further exploitation such as privilege escalation or lateral movement within the network. |
| CVE-2024-8487 | Critical | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) vulnerability exists in modelscope/agentscope version v0.0.4. The CORS configuration on the agentscope server does not properly restrict access to only trusted origins, allowing any external domain to make requests to the API. This can lead to unauthorized data access, information disclosure, and potential further exploitation, thereby compromising the integrity and confidentiality of the system. |
| CVE-2024-8438 | High | 2025-03-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A path traversal vulnerability exists in modelscope/agentscope version v.0.0.4. The API endpoint `/api/file` does not properly sanitize the `path` parameter, allowing an attacker to read arbitrary files on the server. |
| CVE-2025-21199 | Medium | 2025-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper privilege management in Azure Agent Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-0801 | Medium | 2025-02-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The RateMyAgent Official plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rma-settings-wizard'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2024-12284 | High | 2025-02-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Authenticated privilege escalation in NetScaler Console and NetScaler Agent allows. |
| CVE-2024-47266 | Low | 2025-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in share file list functionality in Synology Active Backup for Business before 2.7.1-13234, 2.7.1-23234 and 2.7.1-3234 allows remote authenticated users with administrator privileges to read specific files containing non-sensitive information via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2024-47265 | Medium | 2025-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in encrypted share umount functionality in Synology Active Backup for Business before 2.7.1-13234, 2.7.1-23234 and 2.7.1-3234 allows remote authenticated users to write specific files via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2024-47264 | Medium | 2025-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in agent-related functionality in Synology Active Backup for Business before 2.7.1-13234, 2.7.1-23234 and 2.7.1-3234 allows remote authenticated users with administrator privileges to delete arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2025-24438 | High | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high. |
| CVE-2025-24437 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11, 2.4.8-beta1 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to view or modify select information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24436 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11, 2.4.8-beta1 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to view select information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24435 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access to modify limited fields. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24434 | Critical | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high. |
| CVE-2025-24432 | Low | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could exploit this race condition to alter a condition after it has been checked but before it is used, potentially bypassing rate limiting mechanisms. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24430 | Low | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could exploit this race condition to alter a condition after it has been checked but before it is used, potentially bypassing rate limiting mechanisms. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24429 | Low | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass allowing read only access. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24428 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2025-24427 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24425 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a Business Logic Error vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to circumvent intended security mechanisms by manipulating the logic of the application's operations causing limited data modification. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2025-24421 | Medium | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read select data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction |
| CVE-2025-24417 | High | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high. |
| CVE-2025-24416 | High | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high. |
| CVE-2025-24415 | High | 2025-02-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high. |